CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00975676SOFT-ESTUpdated Oct 25, 2021Results posted

Study of Estrogen Levels in Premenopausal Women Who Have Undergone Surgery for Breast Cancer and Are Receiving Triptorelin and Tamoxifen Citrate or Exemestane on Clinical Trial IBCSG 24-02

An interventional study of gas chromatography / tandem mass spectometry in Breast Cancer, sponsored by ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation. Completed at 24 sites in 8 countries. Open to female participants aged 0 Years to 120 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-25.

Sponsored by ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
123
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
0 Years to 120 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Studying samples of blood from patients with breast cancer in the laboratory may help doctors learn how well triptorelin given together with tamoxifen citrate or exemestane works in lowering estrogen levels.

PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying estrogen levels in premenopausal women who have undergone surgery for breast cancer and are receiving triptorelin and tamoxifen citrate or exemestane on clinical trial IBCSG-2402.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Describe estrogen levels (estradiol [E2], estrone [E1], and estrone sulphate [E1S]) at different time points during the first 4 years of treatment with triptorelin in combination with either tamoxifen citrate or exemestane on clinical trial IBCSG-2402 in premenopausal women with resected breast cancer.
  • Assess whether there is a suboptimally estrogen-suppressed subgroup of patients who receive exemestane.

Secondary

  • Compare estrogen levels (E2, E1, E1S) at different time points during treatment with triptorelin in combination with either tamoxifen citrate or exemestane.
  • Examine potential predictive factors of ineffective estrogen suppression (e.g., age, chemotherapy [yes/no], type of chemotherapy received, smoking history, BMI, and evidence of menses at study entry).
  • Investigate the predictive value of optimal estrogen suppression during the first 6 and 12 months of treatment with regard to long-term estrogen suppression (4-year period).
  • Compare disease-free survival of suboptimally estrogen-suppressed patients treated with exemestane with that of patients with optimal suppression (exploratory analysis).
  • Examine related endocrine function (FSH and LH) to further elucidate causes of suboptimal estrogen suppression.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.

Blood samples are collected at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months for measurement of estrogen levels (estradiol [E2], estrone [E1], and estrone sulphate [E1S]) by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and measurement of endocrine function (FSH and LH).

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
  • progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer
  • stage IA breast cancer
  • stage IB breast cancer
  • stage II breast cancer
  • stage IIIA breast cancer
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,543 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 123 is above the median of 72 across 9,302 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation is the lead sponsor of 50 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Years to 120 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed resected breast cancer
  • Concurrent enrollment on clinical trial IBCSG-2402 (SOFT trial) required

    • Randomized to receive triptorelin in combination with either tamoxifen citrate or exemestane
  • Hormone receptor status:

    • Estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive tumor

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Premenopausal

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
123 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Triptorelin plus tamoxifen

    Determination of estrogen levels in blood samples from patients being treated with triptorelin plus tamoxifen for 5 years.

    Other: gas chromatography / tandem mass spectometry

  • Experimental
    Triptorelin plus exemestane

    Determination of estrogen levels in blood samples from patients being treated with triptorelin plus exemestane for 5 years.

    Other: gas chromatography / tandem mass spectometry

Interventions

  • Othergas chromatography / tandem mass spectometry

    Determination of estrogen levels through gas chromatography.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Estrogen Levels (Estradiol [E2], Estrone [E1], and Estrone Sulphate [E1S]) at Different Time Points During the First 4 Years of Treatment With Triptorelin (Trip) in Combination With Either Tamoxifen (T) or Exemestane (E), IBCSG 24-02 SOFT-EST Substudy

    Estrogen levels (estradiol \[E2\], estrone \[E1\], and estrone sulphate \[E1S\]) were measured at the following time points for the SOFT-EST: 0 (baseline), 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months after randomization. Some of these samples were not used, including un-scheduled sample, post surgery or vaginal bleeding, samples taken post early discontinuation (ED) or discontinuation of GnRH injections.

    Time frame: 0 (baseline), 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months after randomization

  2. Number of Patients Who Receive Exemestane Experiencing Suboptimal Estrogen Suppression

    Suboptimal estrogen suppression (SES), estradiol (E2) levels greater than 2.72 pg/mL in at least 2 post-baseline samples.

    Time frame: 0 (baseline), 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of Estrogen Levels at Different Time Points During Treatment

    Percent (%) change of estrogen levels estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), and estrone sulphate (E1S) at each timepoint from baseline: e.g. {E2(t)-E2(0)} / E2(0)\*100, where t= 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months from randomization

    Time frame: baseline (0 months), 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months from randomization

  2. Number of Participants With Potential Predictive Factors of Ineffective Estrogen Suppression

    Potential predictive factors of ineffective estrogen suppression (SES) (with E2 \> 2.72 pg/mL, or any vaginal bleeding \> 3 months after triptorelin start or pregnancy) such as: age, evidence of menses at entry, BMI, chemotherapy (yes/no), and, type of chemotherapy received

    Time frame: Four years after randomization

  3. Baseline Estrogen Levels (E2, E1, E1S) With Suboptimal Estrogen Suppression (SES) in the Exemestane + Triptorelin Arm

    The secondary analysis explored baseline estrogen levels (E2, E1, E1S) with suboptimal estrogen suppression (SES) where estrogen (E2) \> 2.72 pg/mL in the exemestane + triptorelin arm.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Baseline Endocrine Function Levels (FSH, LH) With Suboptimal Estrogen Suppression (SES) in the Exemestane + Triptorelin Arm

    The secondary analysis explored endocrine functions (FSH, LH) with suboptimal estrogen suppression (SES) where estrogen (E2) \> 2.72 pg/mL in the exemestane + triptorelin arm.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Endocrine Functions (FSH and LH) Status According to Treatment Assignments

    Endocrine function (FSH, LH) status according to treatment assignments at 12 months using 12 month data alone or 12 month data plus earlier data (when 12 month not available)

    Time frame: Less than 12 months, at 12 months

07

Results

Posted Oct 25, 2021

Participant flow

The SOFT-EST substudy was activated on 25 Nov 2008. Participating Centers were expected to enroll all or most patients who planned to use triptorelin as method of OFS, if randomized to receive OFS, into this substudy. The accrual goal for the substudy was 120 patients (30 T+OFS; 90 E+OFS). Enrollment of 30 patients randomly assigned to T+OFS was reached by 31 Dec 2009; enrollment of patients randomly assigned to E+OFS continued until SOFT and SOFT-EST enrollment closed on 31 Jan 2011.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTriptorelin Plus TamoxifenTriptorelin Plus Exemestane
Started3291
Completed2683
Not completed68
Withdrew: Baseline samples only, no sample analyzed or only single sample available68

Outcome measures

PrimaryEstrogen Levels (Estradiol [E2], Estrone [E1], and Estrone Sulphate [E1S]) at Different Time Points During the First 4 Years of Treatment With Triptorelin (Trip) in Combination With Either Tamoxifen (T) or Exemestane (E), IBCSG 24-02 SOFT-EST Substudy

Estrogen levels (estradiol \[E2\], estrone \[E1\], and estrone sulphate \[E1S\]) were measured at the following time points for the SOFT-EST: 0 (baseline), 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months after randomization. Some of these samples were not used, including un-scheduled sample, post surgery or vaginal bleeding, samples taken post early discontinuation (ED) or discontinuation of GnRH injections.

Time frame:
0 (baseline), 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months after randomization
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Estrogen Levels (Estradiol [E2], Estrone [E1], and Estrone Sulphate [E1S]) at Different Time Points During the First 4 Years of Treatment With Triptorelin (Trip) in Combination With Either Tamoxifen (T) or Exemestane (E), IBCSG 24-02 SOFT-EST Substudy
pg/mLTriptorelin Plus TamoxifenTriptorelin Plus Exemestane
Estradiol (E2) levels at baseline (0 months)109.81 ± 119.15196.55 ± 151.235
Estradiol (E2) levels at 3 months4.876 ± 7.1233.973 ± 8.439
Estradiol (E2) levels at 6 months3.761 ± 2.023.672 ± 8.006
Estradiol (E2) levels at 12 months4.013 ± 2.7652.486 ± 5
Estradiol (E2) levels at 18 months7.306 ± 16.3252.527 ± 6.204
Estradiol (E2) levels at 24 months4.453 ± 3.3472.52 ± 6.566
Estradiol (E2) levels at 36 months3.704 ± 2.1381.654 ± 2.764
Estradiol (E2) levels at 48 months5.914 ± 8.9599.073 ± 57.307
Estrone (E1) levels at baseline (0 months)60.27 ± 52.465.42 ± 78.12
Estrone (E1) levels at 3 months17.8 ± 6.732.93 ± 3.33
Estrone (E1) levels at 6 months18.66 ± 7.542.73 ± 3.12
Estrone (E1) levels at 12 months19.05 ± 8.43.71 ± 6.35
Estrone (E1) levels at 18 months18.64 ± 9.358.47 ± 33.42
Estrone (E1) levels at 24 months18.96 ± 7.634.69 ± 9.16
Estrone (E1) levels at 36 months19.49 ± 7.324.93 ± 9.16
Estrone (E1) levels at 48 months19.14 ± 7.248.53 ± 35.07
Estrone sulfate (E1S) levels at baseline (0 months)1437 ± 1825.061371 ± 1763.84
Estrone sulfate (E1S) levels at 3 months281.4 ± 183.4456.02 ± 133.71
Estrone sulfate (E1S) levels at 6 months259 ± 167.2354.7 ± 97.66
Estrone sulfate (E1S) levels at 12 months278.5 ± 236.3847.31 ± 130.45
Estrone sulfate (E1S) levels at 18 months281.8 ± 160.663.52 ± 175.19
Estrone sulfate (E1S) levels at 24 months242.6 ± 96.7573.56 ± 258.29
Estrone sulfate (E1S) levels at 36 months249.4 ± 113.2753.27 ± 151.03
Estrone sulfate (E1S) levels at 48 months231.1 ± 93.46112 ± 556.81
PrimaryNumber of Patients Who Receive Exemestane Experiencing Suboptimal Estrogen Suppression

Suboptimal estrogen suppression (SES), estradiol (E2) levels greater than 2.72 pg/mL in at least 2 post-baseline samples.

Time frame:
0 (baseline), 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months after randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients Who Receive Exemestane Experiencing Suboptimal Estrogen Suppression
ParticipantsTriptorelin Plus Exemestane
Patients with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL at baseline (0 months)74
Patients with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL at 3 months17
Patients with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL at 6 months16
Patients with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL at 12 months12
Patients with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL at 18 months12
Patients with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL at 24 months8
Patients with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL at 36 months8
Patients with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL at 48 months3
SecondaryComparison of Estrogen Levels at Different Time Points During Treatment

Percent (%) change of estrogen levels estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), and estrone sulphate (E1S) at each timepoint from baseline: e.g. {E2(t)-E2(0)} / E2(0)\*100, where t= 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months from randomization

Time frame:
baseline (0 months), 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months from randomization
Reported as:
Mean · percent change of estrogen levels
Comparison of Estrogen Levels at Different Time Points During Treatment
percent change of estrogen levelsTriptorelin Plus TamoxifenTriptorelin Plus Exemestane
Percent change from baseline of estradiol (E2) at 0 months (baseline)0 ± 00 ± 0
Percent change from baseline of estradiol (E2) at 3 months-70 ± 40-76 ± 75
Percent change from baseline of estradiol (E2) at 6 months-69 ± 44-82 ± 62
Percent change from baseline of estradiol (E2) at 12 months-57 ± 61-83 ± 47
Percent change from baseline of estradiol (E2) at 18 months-61 ± 50-85 ± 37
Percent change from baseline of estradiol (E2) at 24 months-63 ± 48-79 ± 61
Percent change from baseline of estradiol (E2) at 36 months-56 ± 44-86 ± 33
Percent change from baseline of estradiol (E2) at 48 months-65 ± 41-79 ± 87
Percent change from baseline of estrone (E1) at 0 months (baseline)0 ± 00 ± 0
Percent change from baseline of estrone (E1) at 3 months-48 ± 41-90 ± 18
Percent change from baseline of estrone (E1) at 6 months-43 ± 50-90 ± 19
Percent change from baseline of estrone (E1) at 12 months-38 ± 55-81 ± 61
Percent change from baseline of estrone (E1) at 18 months-44 ± 37-75 ± 86
Percent change from baseline of estrone (E1) at 24 months-40 ± 43-84 ± 33
Percent change from baseline of estrone (E1) at 36 months-29 ± 39-82 ± 35
Percent change from baseline of estrone (E1) at 48 months-41 ± 33-70 ± 133
Percent change from baseline of estrone sulfate (E1S) at 0 months (baseline)0 ± 00 ± 0
Percent change from baseline of estrone sulfate (E1S) at 3 months-43 ± 73-90 ± 27
Percent change from baseline of estrone sulfate (E1S) at 6 months-50 ± 59-87 ± 35
Percent change from baseline of estrone sulfate (E1S) at 12 months-35 ± 82-92 ± 17
Percent change from baseline of estrone sulfate (E1S) at 18 months-35 ± 68-92 ± 16
Percent change from baseline of estrone sulfate (E1S) at 24 months-27 ± 87-88 ± 33
Percent change from baseline of estrone sulfate (E1S) at 36 months-26 ± 63-70 ± 173
Percent change from baseline of estrone sulfate (E1S) at 48 months-36 ± 66-87 ± 53
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Potential Predictive Factors of Ineffective Estrogen Suppression

Potential predictive factors of ineffective estrogen suppression (SES) (with E2 \> 2.72 pg/mL, or any vaginal bleeding \> 3 months after triptorelin start or pregnancy) such as: age, evidence of menses at entry, BMI, chemotherapy (yes/no), and, type of chemotherapy received

Time frame:
Four years after randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Potential Predictive Factors of Ineffective Estrogen Suppression
ParticipantsTriptorelin Plus Exemestane With Suboptimal Estrogen Suppression (E2>2.72 pg/mL)Triptorelin Plus Exemestane Without Suboptimal Estrogen Suppression (E2>2.72 pg/mL)
Age at randomization (years), <3535
Age at randomization (years), >=351857
Menstrual status, normal1324
Menstrual status, irregular311
Menstrual status, persistent amenorrhea527
BMI (kg/m2), normal (<25)936
BMI (kg/m2), over weight (25-<30)816
BMI (kg/m2), obese (>=30)39
Prior chemo, no1225
Prior chemo, yes937
Prior chemo regimen, no chemo1225
Prior chemo regimen, anthracycline-based37
Prior chemo regimen, taxane-based02
Prior chemo regimen, anthracycline+taxane628
SecondaryBaseline Estrogen Levels (E2, E1, E1S) With Suboptimal Estrogen Suppression (SES) in the Exemestane + Triptorelin Arm

The secondary analysis explored baseline estrogen levels (E2, E1, E1S) with suboptimal estrogen suppression (SES) where estrogen (E2) \> 2.72 pg/mL in the exemestane + triptorelin arm.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Median · pg/mL
Baseline Estrogen Levels (E2, E1, E1S) With Suboptimal Estrogen Suppression (SES) in the Exemestane + Triptorelin Arm
pg/mLTriptorelin Plus Exemestane With Suboptimal Estrogen Suppression (SES) With E2>2.72 pg/mLTriptorelin Plus Exemestane Without Suboptimal Estrogen Suppression (SES) With E2>2.72 pg/mL
Baseline estradiol (E2)80 (60 to 121)39 (6 to 83)
Baseline estrone (E1)50 (26 to 59)41 (23 to 71)
Baseline estrone sulphate (E1S)928 (572 to 1168)715 (302 to 1330)
SecondaryBaseline Endocrine Function Levels (FSH, LH) With Suboptimal Estrogen Suppression (SES) in the Exemestane + Triptorelin Arm

The secondary analysis explored endocrine functions (FSH, LH) with suboptimal estrogen suppression (SES) where estrogen (E2) \> 2.72 pg/mL in the exemestane + triptorelin arm.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Median · IU/L
Baseline Endocrine Function Levels (FSH, LH) With Suboptimal Estrogen Suppression (SES) in the Exemestane + Triptorelin Arm
IU/LTriptorelin Plus Exemestane With Suboptimal Estrogen Suppression (SES) With E2>2.72 pg/mLTriptorelin Plus Exemestane Without Suboptimal Estrogen Suppression (SES) With E2>2.72 pg/mL
Baseline follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)6 (5 to 8)32 (10 to 58)
Baseline luteinizing hormone (LH)6 (4 to 8)21 (7 to 32)
SecondaryEndocrine Functions (FSH and LH) Status According to Treatment Assignments

Endocrine function (FSH, LH) status according to treatment assignments at 12 months using 12 month data alone or 12 month data plus earlier data (when 12 month not available)

Time frame:
Less than 12 months, at 12 months
Reported as:
Median · IU/L
Endocrine Functions (FSH and LH) Status According to Treatment Assignments
IU/LTriptorelin Plus TamoxifenTriptorelin Plus Exemestane
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) at 12 months2.0 (1.5 to 2.6)7.0 (5.2 to 8.8)
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) at <=12 months2.2 (1.6 to 3.1)6.5 (4.8 to 8.7)
Luteinizing hormone (LH) at 12 months0.2 (0.1 to 0.4)0.1 (0.1 to 0.1)
Luteinizing hormone (LH) at <=12 months0.2 (0.1 to 0.4)0.1 (0.1 to 0.2)

Adverse events

Collected over Four years after randomization.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Triptorelin Plus Tamoxifen———
Triptorelin Plus Exemestane———

Baseline characteristics

Intent to treat (ITT) population: all patients receiving triptorelin plus either tamoxifen (T+Trip) or exemestane (E+Trip) with the exception of patients who withdrew consent and/or never started triptorelin. Analysis cohort (N=109): all patients from ITT population, who had two sample data were included, given the primary aims of this analysis is for the long term (4 years) data, patients with only baseline data were excluded. Fourteen patients were excluded.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Triptorelin Plus TamoxifenTriptorelin Plus ExemestaneTotal
<35088
35-3951015
40-4472633
45-49143953
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Triptorelin Plus TamoxifenTriptorelin Plus ExemestaneTotal
Female2683109
Male000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Triptorelin Plus TamoxifenTriptorelin Plus ExemestaneTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White2581106
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported123
Estradiol (E2), pg/mL
Estradiol (E2), pg/mL(pg/mL)Triptorelin Plus TamoxifenTriptorelin Plus ExemestaneTotal
Mean109.81 ± 119.8196.55 ± 151.2399.78 ± 143.68
Estrone (E1), pg/mL
Estrone (E1), pg/mL(pg/mL)Triptorelin Plus TamoxifenTriptorelin Plus ExemestaneTotal
Mean60.27 ± 52.4065.42 ± 78.1264.17 ± 72.52
Estrone sulfate (E1S), pg/mL
Estrone sulfate (E1S), pg/mL(pg/mL)Triptorelin Plus TamoxifenTriptorelin Plus ExemestaneTotal
Mean1437.02 ± 1825.061371.21 ± 1763.841387.20 ± 1770.42
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), LU/L
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), LU/L(LU/L)Triptorelin Plus TamoxifenTriptorelin Plus ExemestaneTotal
Mean25.14 ± 29.0530.30 ± 27.3729.05 ± 27.73
Luteinizing hormone (LH), LU/L
Luteinizing hormone (LH), LU/L(LU/L)Triptorelin Plus TamoxifenTriptorelin Plus ExemestaneTotal
Mean16.77 ± 16.2918.97 ± 16.1218.44 ± 16.11
08

Study locations

24 sites
  • Centre Rene Huguenin
    Saint-Cloud, France
  • National Institute of Oncology
    Budapest, Hungary
  • Salvatore Maugeri Foundation
    Pavia, Italy
  • Clinica Oncologica, Policlinico Univeritario
    Udine, Italy
  • INEN (Instituto de Enfermedades Neoplasicas)
    Lima, Peru
  • Centro de Lisboa
    Lisboa, Portugal
  • Vall d'Hebron University Hospital
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Hospital Dr Negrin
    Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
  • H.U. Arnau de Vilanova
    Lleida, Spain
  • Centro Oncologico Md Anderson
    Madrid, Spain
  • Hospital Ramon Y Cajal
    Madrid, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
    Madrid, Spain
  • Hospital Son Dureta
    Palma, Spain
  • Hospital Son Llatzer
    Palma, Spain
  • Hospital Sant Joan de Reus
    Reus, Spain
  • Hospital Sant Pau i Santa Tecla
    Tarragona, Spain
  • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
    Valencia, Spain
  • Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia
    Valencia, Spain
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg
    Göteborg, Sweden
  • Kantonsspital Graubünden
    Chur, Switzerland
  • Multidisciplinary Oncology Centre, CHUV
    Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Spital Thun
    Thun, Switzerland
  • Brust-Zentrum
    Zürich, Switzerland
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 25, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00975676
Lead sponsor
ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 11, 2009
Start date
Nov 25, 2008
Primary completion
Dec 2016
Completion
Dec 2016
Results posted
Oct 25, 2021
Last update
Oct 25, 2021

Study contacts

Prudence Francis, MD
study chair · Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion