CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00975156Updated Feb 25, 2013Results posted

Improving Ambulation Post Stroke With Robotic Training

An interventional study of Physical Therapy and Lokomat in Stroke, sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-02-25.

Sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to look at a new rehabilitation technique for individuals who have suffered a stroke and have difficulties walking. This study is designed to compare robot-assisted (Lokomat) rehabilitation therapy with standard physical therapy in order to improve walking post-stroke. This research project will be conducted as a pilot randomized controlled trial that compares the effectiveness of Lokomat versus conventional physical therapy in improving the ambulation and gait of chronic stroke patients. The project will provide important pilot data that could indicate whether or not the effectiveness of Lokomat training is superior to that of standard physical therapy and if a definitive and larger clinical trial is warranted.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston is the lead sponsor of 880 studies on the registry; 209 are open to participants now.

Of its 170 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by cerebral computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan
  • Age>18
  • At least 3 months post stroke at time of enrollment into study
  • Ability to walk at least 10 feet with maximum 1 person assist, but not to walk in the community independently
  • Residual paresis in the lower extremity as defined by the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale lower extremity motor score 2-4
  • Ability to perform Lokomat ambulation training with assistance of 1 therapist
  • Ability to follow a three-step command
  • Physician approval for patient participation
  • Ability to give informed consent
  • Completed their rehabilitation services, i.e., receiving no concurrent physical, occupational, or speech therapies

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious cardiac condition
  • Uncontrolled blood pressure, defined as > 200 or diastolic > 100 at rest
  • Hx of serious chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or oxygen dependence
  • Sever weight bearing pain
  • Lower extremity amputation
  • Claudication while walking
  • Life expectancy \< 1 year
  • History of deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE) within 6 months
  • Severe orthopedic problem
  • Any medical or psychiatric condition that the investigators believe would make the patient unable to participate in this study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lokomat Intervention

    Lokomat gait training (five days a week for eight weeks for a total of 40 sessions).

    Device: Lokomat

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care

    Conventional physical therapy focusing on gait training for five days a week for eight weeks for a total of 40 sessions.

    Other: Physical Therapy

Interventions

  • OtherPhysical Therapy

    Conventional physical therapy

  • DeviceLokomat

    Robotic-assisted walking device

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 10-meter Walking Test (10mWT)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 Week Post-Intervention (study mean of 5.05 days since last therapy session), 3-Month Post-Intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. 6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-Week Post-Intervention (study mean of 5.05 days since last therapy session), 3-Month Post-Intervention

07

Results

Posted Sep 13, 2012
Limitations and caveats
Limitations include: small sample (n=21 enrolled, n=20 completed) and significant (p=0.025) difference between groups in time since stroke (Lokomat group, time since stroke mean=1353.60 days; Conventional group, time since stroke mean=525.00 days).

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLokomat InterventionStandard of Care
Started1110
Completed119
Not completed01
Withdrew: Protocol violation01

Outcome measures

Primary10-meter Walking Test (10mWT)
Time frame:
Baseline, 1 Week Post-Intervention (study mean of 5.05 days since last therapy session), 3-Month Post-Intervention
Reported as:
Mean · meters per second (m/s)
10-meter Walking Test (10mWT)
meters per second (m/s)Lokomat Intervention 10-meter Walking Test (10mWT) OutcomeStandard of Care 10mWT OutcomeAll Participants 10mWT Outcome
Baseline0.20 ± 0.100.18 ± 0.120.19 ± 0.11
Post-Intervention (mean=5.05 days post-therapy)0.20 ± 0.100.27 ± 0.270.23 ± 0.19
Three-Month Follow-up0.21 ± 0.100.28 ± 0.290.24 ± 0.20
Secondary6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD)
Time frame:
Baseline, 1-Week Post-Intervention (study mean of 5.05 days since last therapy session), 3-Month Post-Intervention
Reported as:
Mean · meters (m)
6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD)
meters (m)Lokomat Intervention 6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD) OutcomeStandard of Care 6MWD OutcomeAll Participants 6MWD Outcome
Baseline53.94 ± 30.5348.77 ± 21.0451.61 ± 26.16
Post-Intervention (mean=5.05 days post-therapy)57.02 ± 25.5070.26 ± 60.4062.98 ± 43.86
Three-Month Follow-up57.82 ± 25.9976.89 ± 62.2966.40 ± 45.65

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Lokomat Intervention—2/11 (18.2%)5/11 (45.5%)
Standard of Care—2/9 (22.2%)3/9 (33.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLokomat InterventionStandard of Care
Hypotensive episodeCardiac disorders0/111/9
Chest painCardiac disorders0/111/9
Skin breakdownSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/110/9
StrokeVascular disorders1/110/9
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLokomat InterventionStandard of Care
Minor skin breakdownSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders5/113/9

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Lokomat InterventionStandard of CareTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years459
>=65 years7512
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Lokomat InterventionStandard of CareTotal
Mean66.91 ± 8.5064.33 ± 10.9165.75 ± 9.48
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Lokomat InterventionStandard of CareTotal
Female448
Male7613
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Lokomat InterventionStandard of CareTotal
United States111021
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Memorial Hermann
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 25, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00975156
Lead sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Responsible party
Elizabeth Noser (Clinical Assistant Professor - Neurology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 11, 2009
Start date
May 2008
Primary completion
Jul 2011
Completion
Oct 2011
Results posted
Sep 13, 2012
Last update
Feb 25, 2013

Study contacts

Elizabeth Noser, MD
principal investigator · The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion