ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00975143Updated Jul 4, 2014Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of CIP-Isotretinoin in Patients With Severe Recalcitrant Nodular Acne

A Phase 3 interventional study of CIP-Isotretinoin and Isotretinoin in Severe Nodular Acne, sponsored by Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Completed at 49 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 54 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-07-04.

Sponsored by Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
925
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 54 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of CIP-Isotretinoin and a marketed (generic) formulation of isotretinoin when both are administered twice daily with meals.

02

Conditions studied

  • Severe Nodular Acne

Keywords

  • isotretinoin
  • dermatology
  • skin
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 54 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Severe recalcitrant nodular acne, which in the opinion of the investigator is compatible with isotretinoin treatment.
  • Ten (10) or more nodular lesions (facial and/or truncal).
  • Treatment-naïve patients without any prior exposure to systemic isotretinoin or other retinoids.
  • Age between 12 and 54 years.
  • Weight between 40 and 110 kg.
  • Negative serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) pregnancy test consistent with a non-pregnant state (females only).
  • No significant disease or finding in a physical examination.
  • No clinically significant abnormal laboratory value.
  • No clinically significant abnormal vital sign measurement.
  • Patients presenting with stable and controlled diabetes mellitus (Types I and II) may be included in the study. However, patients should not have had a hospitalization for any diabetes related complications in the last 12 months, and must be on stable medication for the preceding 6 months. To be included in the study, the patients should have -A1c values ≤ 6.5% at screening and in the test done 3 - 4 months previously.
  • Patients with previously diagnosed Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) may be included in the study if in the opinion of the investigator they do not have any other clinically significant abnormality (e.g. metabolic syndrome or elevated lipids).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients will be excluded from the study if they:

    • Are pregnant;
    • Are at high risk for becoming pregnant or likely to become pregnant during treatment;
    • Will be breast-feeding or considering breast feeding during the course of the study.
  • Known history or presence of any unstable medical condition(s) which in the opinion of the investigator could pose a risk for the safety of the patient including any previous history of gastrointestinal disease.
  • Patients with any skin disease or other condition that might interfere with the evaluation of recalcitrant nodular acne.
  • Patients will be interviewed using the SCID-CT current and lifetime modules for Major Depression, Mania, and Psychosis. Patients with a lifetime history of psychosis will be excluded. Patients with a history of major depressive, manic, hypomanic or mixed episodes will not be excluded unless they have had an episode during the preceding year.
  • Patients with any past or current psychotic symptoms.
  • Patients reporting any suicidal behaviour (including attempts, interrupted attempts, aborted attempts, or other preparatory behaviours), within the past year, or serious suicidal ideation in the past year, will be excluded from study participation.
  • A lifetime history of wishing to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts or active suicidal ideation without intent to act will not result in exclusion.
  • Known history or suspected carcinoma.
  • Known history of liver or kidney disorders (hepatic and renal insufficiency).
  • Known history or current pseudotumor cerebri (benign intracranial hypertension).
  • Patients with HLA-B27 related disease, rheumatoid arthritis, rickets or other vitamin D depletion disease or phosphate metabolic disease, severe scoliosis > 15 Cobb angle, history of back surgery/injuries, ongoing use of anticonvulsants known to affect bone metabolism and other genetic or acquired rheumatologic and joint diseases.
  • All pediatric patients with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels \< 20 ng/mL.
  • Patients with hearing disorders who in the opinion of the investigator would not be able to participate in audiometric testing for the study.
  • or idiosyncratic reaction to isotretinoin, Vitamin A and/or any other drug substances with similar activity.
  • Allergy to soy beans, soy bean oil or any other ingredients in the study medications.
  • On a special diet within four weeks prior to drug administration (e.g., liquid, protein, raw food diet).
  • Difficulty consuming two (2) meals a day to sustain weight and health.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
925 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CIP-Isotretinoin

    Drug: CIP-Isotretinoin

  • Active comparator
    Isotretinoin

    Drug: Isotretinoin

Interventions

  • DrugCIP-Isotretinoin

    0.5 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks, and 1 mg/kg/day for 16 weeks, taken orally, twice daily.

  • 0.5 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks, and 1 mg/kg/day for 16 weeks, taken orally, twice daily.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Co-primary Outcome 1: Change From Baseline in Total Nodular Lesion Count (Facial and Truncal)

    The change from Baseline to Week 20 in the total number of nodular lesions was calculated as the Week 20 lesion count minus Baseline lesion count and compared using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA), controlling for Baseline total nodular lesion count, gender and analysis site. The 95% CI of the adjusted least square mean difference (CIP-ISOTRETINOIN minus Isotretinoin) was also calculated using the ANCOVA model. Pre-defined criterion for non-inferiority: upper bound of the 95% CI for the treatment difference \< 4.

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  2. Co-Primary Outcome 2: Proportion of Patients Who Achieve at Least a 90% Reduction in Total Number of Nodular Lesions (Facial and Truncal).

    The percentage of patients in each group who achieved ≥90% reduction in the total nodular lesion count from Baseline to Week 20 was calculated along with its 95% CI (normal approximation). A 95% 2-sided CI on the difference between treatments (CIP-ISOTRETINOIN minus Isotretinoin) was also computed. Pre-defined criterion for non-inferiority: lower bound of the 95% CI for the treatment difference \> -10.

    Time frame: 20 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients Who Are Rated as Clear/Almost Clear on the Six-point Physicians' Global Assessment Scale (PGSA).

    PGSA categories: 1 (Almost clear); 2 (Mild); 3 (Moderate); 4 (Severe); 5 (Very severe). A grade of either 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) on the 6-point PGSA scale within the Week 20 analysis window was considered a success.

    Time frame: 20 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jul 4, 2014
Limitations and caveats
Generic isotretinoin control because Accutane® was discontinued in the US. 201 PPP exclusions (CIP-Isotretinoin 101, Isotretinoin 100) due to discontinuation \< Week 20 (61+51), non-compliance with treatment (76+75) or other requirements (≥1 reason).

Participant flow

The study was performed at 49 investigational centers in the United States and Canada. Of the 1265 patients screened for the study, a total of 925 were randomized to CIP-Isotretinoin (N=464) or generic Isotretinoin (N=461) between October 2009 and October 2010. Randomization was stratified by gender and study site.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCIP-IsotretinoinIsotretinoin
Started464461
Completed treatment (week 20)403410
Completed394401
Not completed7060
Withdrew: Adverse event1915
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1515
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2016
Withdrew: Non-compliance58
Withdrew: Physician decision12
Withdrew: Details not available104

Outcome measures

PrimaryCo-primary Outcome 1: Change From Baseline in Total Nodular Lesion Count (Facial and Truncal)

The change from Baseline to Week 20 in the total number of nodular lesions was calculated as the Week 20 lesion count minus Baseline lesion count and compared using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA), controlling for Baseline total nodular lesion count, gender and analysis site. The 95% CI of the adjusted least square mean difference (CIP-ISOTRETINOIN minus Isotretinoin) was also calculated using the ANCOVA model. Pre-defined criterion for non-inferiority: upper bound of the 95% CI for the treatment difference \< 4.

Time frame:
20 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Lesions
Co-primary Outcome 1: Change From Baseline in Total Nodular Lesion Count (Facial and Truncal)
LesionsCIP-IsotretinoinIsotretinoin
Co-primary Outcome 1: Change From Baseline in Total Nodular Lesion Count (Facial and Truncal)-17.01 ± 14.26-16.52 ± 10.57
Statistical analysis
  • CIP-Isotretinoin vs Isotretinoin · ANCOVA · p = 0.5077 (P values are from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlling for Baseline total nodular lesion count, gender and analysis site.) · Ls mean difference: 0.1382 · 95% CI -0.2712 to 0.5475The 95% CI of the adjusted least square mean difference (CIP-ISOTRETINOIN minus Isotretinoin) was calculated using the ANCOVA model.
SecondaryProportion of Patients Who Are Rated as Clear/Almost Clear on the Six-point Physicians' Global Assessment Scale (PGSA).

PGSA categories: 1 (Almost clear); 2 (Mild); 3 (Moderate); 4 (Severe); 5 (Very severe). A grade of either 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) on the 6-point PGSA scale within the Week 20 analysis window was considered a success.

Time frame:
20 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Proportion of Patients Who Are Rated as Clear/Almost Clear on the Six-point Physicians' Global Assessment Scale (PGSA).
percentage of participantsCIP-IsotretinoinIsotretinoin
Proportion of Patients Who Are Rated as Clear/Almost Clear on the Six-point Physicians' Global Assessment Scale (PGSA).85.9 (82.3 to 89.6)89.4 (86.2 to 92.6)
Statistical analysis
  • CIP-Isotretinoin vs Isotretinoin · Normal approximation · p = >0.05 · Proportion difference: -3.48 · 95% CI -8.4 to 1.495% CI on difference in proportions (CIP-Isotretinoin minus Isotretinoin) was estimated using normal approximation.
PrimaryCo-Primary Outcome 2: Proportion of Patients Who Achieve at Least a 90% Reduction in Total Number of Nodular Lesions (Facial and Truncal).

The percentage of patients in each group who achieved ≥90% reduction in the total nodular lesion count from Baseline to Week 20 was calculated along with its 95% CI (normal approximation). A 95% 2-sided CI on the difference between treatments (CIP-ISOTRETINOIN minus Isotretinoin) was also computed. Pre-defined criterion for non-inferiority: lower bound of the 95% CI for the treatment difference \> -10.

Time frame:
20 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Co-Primary Outcome 2: Proportion of Patients Who Achieve at Least a 90% Reduction in Total Number of Nodular Lesions (Facial and Truncal).
percentage of participantsCIP-IsotretinoinIsotretinoin
Co-Primary Outcome 2: Proportion of Patients Who Achieve at Least a 90% Reduction in Total Number of Nodular Lesions (Facial and Truncal).78.8 (74.6 to 83.0)80.9 (76.8 to 84.9)
Statistical analysis
  • CIP-Isotretinoin vs Isotretinoin · Normal approximation · p = >0.05 · Proportion difference: -2.10 · 95% CI -7.94 to 3.74

Adverse events

Collected over AEs and SAEs were collected from the beginning of double-blind treatment until 30 days after the last study treatment (Week 24). AEs occurring before starting study treatment but after signing the informed consent form were recorded under Medical History.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
CIP-Isotretinoin—7/464 (1.5%)428/464 (92.2%)
Isotretinoin—5/460 (1.1%)413/460 (89.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventCIP-IsotretinoinIsotretinoin
Chest painGeneral disorders0/4641/460
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders0/4641/460
VaricellaInfections and infestations0/4641/460
PregnancyPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions1/4641/460
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/4641/460
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders1/4640/460
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders1/4640/460
OrchitisInfections and infestations1/4640/460
Ligament ruptureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/4640/460
MigraineNervous system disorders1/4640/460
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent other events
EventCIP-IsotretinoinIsotretinoin
Lip dryGastrointestinal disorders209/464210/460
Dry skinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders205/464206/460
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders96/46489/460
Dry eyeEye disorders87/46478/460
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders64/46460/460
EpistaxisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders54/46442/460
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations36/46448/460
HeadacheNervous system disorders37/46436/460
Chapped lipsGastrointestinal disorders34/46432/460
DermatitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders28/46423/460

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)CIP-IsotretinoinIsotretinoinTotal
<=18 years205192397
Between 18 and 65 years259269528
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CIP-IsotretinoinIsotretinoinTotal
Mean20.8 ± 7.520.7 ± 6.820.8 ± 7.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CIP-IsotretinoinIsotretinoinTotal
Female187178365
Male277283560
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)CIP-IsotretinoinIsotretinoinTotal
Hispanic or Latino5963122
Not Hispanic or Latino405398803
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)CIP-IsotretinoinIsotretinoinTotal
United States380373753
Canada8488172
Nodular Lesion Count
Nodular Lesion Count(Lesions)CIP-IsotretinoinIsotretinoinTotal
Mean18.4 ± 14.717.7 ± 10.818.0 ± 12.9
Inflammatory Lesion Count
Inflammatory Lesion Count(Lesions)CIP-IsotretinoinIsotretinoinTotal
Mean37.8 ± 31.338.4 ± 34.538.1 ± 33.0
Physician's Global Severity Assessment (PGSA)
Physician's Global Severity Assessment (PGSA)(participants)CIP-IsotretinoinIsotretinoinTotal
1 (Almost clear)325
2 (Mild)111021
3 (Moderate)4960109
4 (Severe)329322651
5 (Very Severe)6463127
Not assessed8412
08

Study locations

49 sites
  • Total Skin & Beauty Dermatology Center
    Birmingham, Alabama 35205, United States
  • Burke Pharmaceutical Research
    Hot Springs, Arkansas 71913, United States
  • Center for Dermatology Clinical Research
    Fremont, California 94538, United States
  • Dermatology Research Associates
    Los Angeles, California 90045, United States
  • Dermatology Specialists
    Oceanside, California 92056, United States
  • Skin Surgery Medical Group, Inc.
    San Diego, California 92117, United States
  • Horizons Clinical Research Center
    Denver, Colorado 80220, United States
  • North Florida Dermatology Associates, PA
    Jacksonville, Florida 32204, United States
  • Ameriderm Research
    Jacksonville, Florida 32216, United States
  • Park Avenue Dermatology
    Orange Park, Florida 32073, United States
  • Ameriderm Research
    Ormond Beach, Florida 32174, United States
  • Peachtree Dermatology Associates, PC
    Atlanta, Georgia 30327, United States
  • MedaPhase Inc.
    Newnan, Georgia 30263, United States
  • Northwest Clinical Trials
    Boise, Idaho 83704, United States
  • Northwest Clinical Trials
    Nampa, Idaho 83687, United States
  • Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46256, United States
  • The Indiana Clinical Trials Center, PC
    Plainfield, Indiana 46168, United States
  • The South Bend Clinic, LLP
    South Bend, Indiana 46617, United States
  • Dermatology and Skin Cancer Specialists / Pediaresearch, LLC
    Owensboro, Kentucky 42303, United States
  • ActivMed Practices & Research
    Haverhill, Massachusetts 01830, United States
  • Great Lakes Research Group
    Bay City, Michigan 48706, United States
  • Hamzavi Dermatology
    Fort Gratiot, Michigan 48059, United States
  • Minnesota Clinical Study Center
    Fridley, Minnesota 55432, United States
  • Skin Specialists, PC
    Omaha, Nebraska 68144, United States
  • Comprehensive Clinical Research
    Berlin, New Jersey 08009, United States
  • Haber Dermatology, Clinical Research Center
    South Euclid, Ohio 44118, United States
  • Oregon Dermatology and Research Center
    Portland, Oregon 97210, United States
  • Paddington Testing Company Inc.
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, United States
  • Radiant Research, Inc.
    Greer, South Carolina 29651, United States
  • Dermatology Associates of Knoxville
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37934, United States
  • Tennessee Clinical Research Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37215, United States
  • Arlington Center for Dermatology
    Arlington, Texas 76011, United States
  • Suzanne Bruce and Associates - The Center for Skin Research
    Houston, Texas 77056, United States
  • Progressive Clinical Research
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Stephen Miller, MD, PA Dermatology
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Dermatology Research Center
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84117, United States
  • Premier Clinical Research
    Spokane, Washington 99204, United States
  • Derm Research @ 888 Inc.
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 3Y1, Canada
  • Dermadvances Research
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3C 1R4, Canada
  • Durondel C.P. Inc
    Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 8X3, Canada
  • Newlab Clinical Research Inc.
    St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador A1C 2H5, Canada
  • UltraNova Skincare
    Barrie, Ontario L4M 6L2, Canada
  • Dermatrials Research
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 1V6, Canada
  • The Guenther Dermatology Research Centre
    London, Ontario N6A 3H7, Canada
  • Lynderm Research Inc.
    Markham, Ontario L3P 1A8, Canada
  • North Bay Dermatology Centre
    North Bay, Ontario P1B 3Z7, Canada
  • Institute of Cosmetic and Laser Surgery
    Oakville, Ontario L6J 7W5, Canada
  • K. Papp Clinical Research
    Waterloo, Ontario N2J 1C4, Canada
  • Windsor Clinical Research
    Windsor, Ontario N8W 5L7, Canada
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 4, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00975143
Lead sponsor
Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 11, 2009
Start date
Sep 2009
Primary completion
May 2011
Completion
May 2011
Results posted
Jul 4, 2014
Last update
Jul 4, 2014

Study contacts

James J. Leyden, MD
study chair · University of Pennsylvania
Guy Webster, MD
study chair · Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University
Jason A. Gross, PharmD
study director · Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion