CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00967902REMEDEEUpdated Mar 29, 2016

Safety and Effectiveness Study of Combo Bio-engineered Sirolimus Eluting Stent

A Phase 2 interventional study of coronary stenting in Coronary Artery Lesions, sponsored by OrbusNeich. Completed at 1 site in Australia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-29.

Sponsored by OrbusNeich · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Combo Bio-engineered Sirolimus Eluting Stent (Combo Stent) compared to the Taxus® Liberté® Stent in the treatment of coronary artery lesions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Lesions

Keywords

  • intracoronary stent
  • drug eluting stent
  • sirolimus
  • endothelial progenitor cells
03

In context

Lead sponsor

OrbusNeich is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

General Inclusion Criteria

  • The patient must be ≥18 and ≤ 80 years of age;
  • Symptomatic ischemic heart disease (CCS class 1-4, Braunwald Class IB, IC, IIB, IIC, IIIB, IIIC, and/or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia);
  • Acceptable candidate for CABG;
  • The Patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations;
  • The Patient or legally authorized representative has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has been provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate Medical Ethics Committee (MEC), Institutional Review Board (IRB), or Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC).

Angiographic Inclusion Criteria:

  • Single de novo or non-stented restenotic lesion in the target vessel;
  • Patients with two-vessel coronary disease, may have undergone successful treatment (\<20% diameter stenosis by visual estimate) of the non-target vessel with approved devices up to and including the index procedure but must be prior to the index target vessel treatment. Any non-target vessel or lesion intended to be treated during the index procedure, cannot be an unprotected left main, ostial lesion, chronic total occlusion (CTO), heavily calcified, bifurcation, vein grafts, have angiographic evidence of thrombus, be anything requiring atherectomy, thrombectomy, or pre-treatment with anything other than balloon angioplasty;
  • Target lesion located in a native coronary artery;
  • Target lesion (maximum length is 20 mm by visual estimate) covered by a single stent maximum 23 mm length for Combo Stent, and 24 mm in length for TAXUS® Liberté® (stent coverage including at least 3 mm of healthy vessel is recommended). The lesion length should be measured after pre-dilation procedure;
  • Reference vessel diameter must be ≥2.5 to ≤ 3.5 mm by visual estimate. The vessel diameter should be measured after pre-dilation procedure and after intra-coronary nitroglycerin if spasm is suspected;
  • Target lesion ≥50% and \<100% stenosed by visual estimate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

General Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or nursing patients and those who plan pregnancy in the period up to 1 year following index procedure. Female patients of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test done within 7 days prior to the index procedure per site standard test;
  • Patient has had a known diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) within 72 hours preceding the index procedure (elevated troponin or CK-MB ≥2 times upper limit of normal) or >72 hours preceding the index procedure and CK and CK-MB have not returned to within normal limits at the time of procedure;
  • The patient is currently experiencing clinical symptoms consistent with new onset AMI, such as nitrate unresponsive prolonged chest pain;
  • Impaired renal function (serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL or 177 μmol/l) or on dialysis;
  • Platelet count \<100,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3 or a WBC \<3,000 cells/mm3;
  • Patient has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or patients in whom anti-platelet and/or anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated;
  • Patient requires low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) treatment post-procedure or has received a dose of LMWH ≤8 hours prior to index procedure;
  • Patient has received any organ transplant or is on a waiting list for any organ transplant;
  • Patient has other medical illness (e.g., cancer, known malignancy, or congestive heart failure) or known history of substance abuse (alcohol, cocaine, heroin etc.) that may cause non-compliance with the protocol, confound the data interpretation or is associated with a limited life expectancy (i.e., less than 1 year);
  • Patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin/bivalirudin, clopidogrel/ticlopidine, prasugrel, stainless steel alloy, sirolimus, paclitaxel and/or contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre-medicated;
  • Patient has previously received murine therapeutic antibodies and exhibited sensitization through the production of Human Anti-Murine Antibodies (HAMA);
  • Patient presents with cardiogenic shock;
  • Patient has current unstable cardiac arrhythmias that create hemodynamic instability;
  • Patient has extensive peripheral vascular disease that precludes safe 6 French sheath insertion;
  • Any significant medical condition which in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with the patient's optimal participation in the study;
  • Currently participating in another investigational drug or device study or patient in inclusion in another investigational drug or device study during follow-up;

Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unprotected left main coronary artery disease with ≥50% stenosis;
  • Ostial target lesion(s);
  • Totally occluded target vessel (TIMI flow 0);
  • Calcified target lesion(s) which cannot be successfully predilated;
  • Target lesion has excessive tortuosity unsuitable for stent delivery and deployment;
  • Angiographic evidence of thrombus in the target lesion(s);
  • Target lesion involving bifurcation with a side branch ≥2.0 mm in diameter (either stenosis of both main vessel and major side branch or stenosis of just major side branch) that would require intervention of diseased side branch;
  • A significant (>50%) stenosis proximal or distal to the target lesion that cannot be covered by same single stent;
  • Diffuse distal disease to target lesion with impaired runoff;
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤30% (LVEF must be obtained within 6 months prior to the index procedure);
  • Pre-treatment with devices other than balloon angioplasty;
  • Prior stent within 10 mm of target lesion;
  • Intervention (PCI or bypass) of another lesion performed within 6 months before or planned within 30 days following the index procedure.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
180 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Combo

    The Combo Stent is composed of the OrbusNeich R stent™, with an abluminal coating of a bioabsorbable polymer matrix formulated with sirolimus for sustained release, and an anti-CD34 antibody cell capture coating on the luminal surface.

    Device: coronary stenting

  • Active comparator
    Taxus® Liberté® Stent

    Commercially available product

    Device: coronary stenting

Interventions

  • Devicecoronary stenting

    Balloon dilatation of obstructive coronary artery disease with deployment of a metallic stent to scaffold the dilated lesion; stent incorporating sustained release of anti-proliferative agent to control neointimal proliferation and reocclusion; test device incorporates affinity surface for circulating EPCs

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. In-stent late lumen loss of the Combo Stent compared to the TAXUS® Liberté® DES

    Time frame: 9 months post-procedure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. All-cause and cardiac mortality

    Time frame: 30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 year

  2. Myocardial infarction: Q-wave and non Q-wave, cumulative and individual

    Time frame: 30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  3. Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) defined as a composite of death, MI (Q-wave or non Q-wave), emergent CABG, or target lesion revascularization by repeat PTCA or CABG

    Time frame: Hospital discharge, 30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure

  4. Vascular complications from index procedure

    Time frame: Up to hospital discharge

  5. Rate of stent thrombosis, per ARC definition of definite and probable stent thrombosis further categorized as early, late or very late

    Time frame: 30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure

  6. Change in human anti-murine antibody (HAMA) plasma levels

    Time frame: 30 day and 9 month follow-up compared to baseline

  7. Device success, defined as attainment of <50% residual stenosis of the target lesion using the Combo Stent

    Time frame: Index procedure

  8. Lesion success defined as attainment of < 50% residual stenosis using any percutaneous method

    Time frame: Index procedure

  9. Procedure success defined as lesion success without the occurrence of in-hospital MACE

    Time frame: Up to hospital discharge

  10. Clinically (ischemia)-driven target lesion revascularization

    Time frame: 30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years

  11. Clinically (ischemia)-driven target vessel revascularization

    Time frame: 30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years

  12. In-stent and in-segment angiographic binary restenosis

    Time frame: 9 months

  13. In-stent and in-segment minimum lumen diameter (MLD)

    Time frame: 9 months

  14. In-stent, proximal and distal late lumen loss

    Time frame: 9 months

  15. Neointimal hyperplasia volume and % in-stent volume obstruction as measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for patients receiving angiographic/IVUS follow-up

    Time frame: 9 months

  16. Target lesion failure (TLF) (defined as death, MI and ischemic target lesion revascularization (TLR))

    Time frame: 30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • John Hunter Hospital
    Newcastle, New South Wales 2300, Australia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Haude M, Lee SW, Worthley SG, Silber S, Verheye S, Erbs S, Rosli MA, Botelho R, Meredith I, Sim KH, Stella PR, Tan HC, Whitbourn R, Thambar S, Abizaid A, Koh TH, Den Heijer P, Parise H, Cristea E, Maehara A, Mehran R. The REMEDEE trial: a randomized comparison of a combination sirolimus-eluting endothelial progenitor cell capture stent with a paclitaxel-eluting stent. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr;6(4):334-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.018. Epub 2013 Mar 20. PubMed 23523459 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 29, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00967902
Lead sponsor
OrbusNeich
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 28, 2009
Start date
Nov 2009
Primary completion
Jul 2011
Completion
Sep 2015
Last update
Mar 29, 2016

Study contacts

Ian T Meredith, MBBS, PhD
principal investigator · Monash University
Stephan Windecker, MD
principal investigator · University of Bern
Alexandre Abizaid, MD
principal investigator · Inst Dante Pazzanese of Cardiology
Roxana Mehran, MD
study director · CardioVascular Research Foundation
Alexandra Lansky, MD
study director · CardioVascular Research Foundation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion