CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00966524Updated Jun 11, 2010

Learning and Retention of Tracheal Intubation by Medical Students: Comparison of Standard Intubation Teaching Against Video-guided Intubation Teaching.

An interventional study of Endotracheal intubation in Endotracheal Intubation, sponsored by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM). Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-06-11.

Sponsored by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Purpose: This study is designed to assess the impact of teaching tracheal intubation using video-guided feedback on the ability to perform and maintain this clinical skill by medical students.

Hypothesis: We hypothesise that, for novices, video-guided feedback provided during tracheal intubation will improve learning and retention of this clinical skill compared to standard teaching using direct visualization feedback.

Read the detailed description

Introduction:

Competency in laryngoscopic tracheal intubation is a key skill to be developed during the training of medical students. Teaching this technical skill remains a challenge due to the fact that the laryngeal view is limited to one person at a time. Therefore, the feedback given during the procedure by the instructor to the student becomes limited, delayed and thus less efficient. This lack of efficiency could explain the poor success rates of tracheal intubations performed by medical students during the initial learning phase. Over the last ten years, new intubation devices incorporating optic fibers have been commercialized. These new technologies combined to video systems are now increasingly used for teaching purposes. Recent literature tends to show that this new approach could ease the learning process and increase the medical student's satisfaction towards the teaching of tracheal intubation.

Maintaining this knowledge and clinical skill can also be challenging especially for physicians who are not exposed to the intubation technique on a regular basis. Since tracheal intubation is a potentially lifesaving procedure, retention of this competency is crucial.

This study is designed to assess the impact of teaching tracheal intubation using video-guided feedback and the short and mid-term retention of the competency in a population of pregraduate medical students (clinical years 3 and 4).

Methods:

-Initial phase:

Medical students enrolled in this study will initially receive standardised training using a short video explaining the tracheal intubation technique. Then, they will be asked to intubate on mannequins for a short period of time (15 minutes).

A total of 18 medical students will be randomly assigned to the following groups:

  • Group V: to perform video-guided intubations on six patients under the supervision of an anaesthesiologist.
  • Group S: to perform tracheal intubation on six patients under the supervision of an anaesthesiologist using standard teaching technique (direct visualization).

Patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia including neuromuscular blockade as part of their anaesthetic management will be considered for this study. Standard monitoring for general anaesthesia will be used. Immediately after induction of general anaesthesia, the anaesthesiologist will confirm the patient's intubation grade. Patients having an intubation grade higher than 2 on the Cormack-Lehane scale, will be excluded.

-Short-term phase (within a week from the initial phase):

Novices will be asked to perform ten tracheal intubations under the supervision of an anaesthesiologist but without any specific feedback.

-Mid-term phase (6 weeks after the initial/short-term phase):

Novices will be asked to perform ten tracheal intubations six weeks after the initial/short term phase under the supervision of an anaesthesiologist without any specific feedback. If the medical student fails to intubate the patient, the anaesthesiologist will perform the technique.

Images from all intubations will be captured on videotape for subsequent review. These images will be used to detect mucosa lacerations, oesophageal intubation, number of attempts and total time required to perform tracheal intubation.

Lastly, a questionnaire will be completed by all medical students to assess their satisfaction towards the teaching technique and their ability to perform tracheal intubation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endotracheal Intubation

Keywords

  • Endotracheal intubation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) is the lead sponsor of 370 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Limited experience with tracheal intubation (less than 5 intubations under supervision)
  • Pre-graduate medical students in their 2 clinical yea
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
18 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Video

    Teaching tracheal intubation to medical students using video-guided feedback during the procedure.

    Procedure: Endotracheal intubation

  • Active comparator
    Standard

    Teaching tracheal intubation to medical students using direct visualization feedback during the procedure.

    Procedure: Endotracheal intubation

Interventions

  • ProcedureEndotracheal intubation

    Pregraduates medical students will be randomized to perform endotracheal intubation with video-guided feedback (experimental arm) or endotracheal intubation using direct visualization feedback (standard technique).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ease to intubate (time and number of attempts required to perform intubation) and retention of the competency (short and mid-term)

    Time frame: Within a week and at 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Medical students' satisfaction towards the teaching technique and their ability to perform tracheal intubation.

    Time frame: At 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (Hôpital Notre-Dame)
    Montreal, Quebec H2L 4M1, Canada
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00966524
Lead sponsor
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
First posted
Aug 27, 2009
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Apr 2010
Completion
Jun 2010
Last update
Jun 11, 2010

Study contacts

François Girard, MD
principal investigator · Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion