CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT00966121Updated Aug 23, 2017

Endoscopic Band Ligation (EBL) Versus Endoscopic Band Ligation and Propranolol for the Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding

A Phase 4 interventional study of endoscopic band ligation and EBL+Propranolol in Cirrhosis and Variceal Bleeding, sponsored by Korea University. Status unknown at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-23.

Sponsored by Korea University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Both propranolol and endoscopic band ligation (EBL) are effective for prevention of variceal rebleeding. Recently several studies compared the efficacy of EBL alone and with a combination of propranolol and EBL. However, the results of recent studies showed discrepancy. This study is performed to compare the efficacy and safety of EBL alone and EBL combined with propranolol in patients without previous history of endoscopic variceal treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cirrhosis
  • Variceal Bleeding

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cirrhosis
  • Esophagus Disorders
  • Varicose Veins
03

In context

Fibrosis

3,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Fibrosis; 465 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 180 is above the median of 50 across 2,130 interventional studies indexed under Fibrosis.

Browse Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Korea University is the lead sponsor of 64 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • liver cirrhosis
  • age between 18 and 70 years
  • Successful control of esophageal variceal bleeding within 6 weeks before enrollment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Gastric variceal bleeding
  • Patients with systolic blood pressure \<100 mmHg or basal heart rate \<60/min
  • Portal vein thrombosis
  • Prominent hepatic encephalopathy
  • Coexisting untreated malignancy
  • Severe cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease, renal failure
  • Previous history of endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical treatment for varices or ascites
  • Contraindication to beta-blocker
  • Pregnancy
  • Refusal to give consent to participate in the trial
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
180 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Endoscopic band ligation

    Perform endoscopic band ligation (EBL) until esophageal varices are eradicated, and then follow-up endoscopy with 3-6 months interval

    Procedure: endoscopic band ligation

  • Active comparator
    EBL+Propranolol

    Perform EBL same as EBL group. In addition, take propranolol to reduce 25% in HR or HR ≤55/min

    Procedure: EBL+Propranolol

Interventions

  • Procedureendoscopic band ligation

    * Perform EBL within 7 days after randomization * Apply 1-2 band/column/session to varices in the distal 5-7cm of the esophagus till they are eradicated (Disappearance or too small to apply band) with interval of 4weeks (at 4,8,12 weeks after initial treatment). * Acid suppression using proton pump inhibitor until eradicated. * After eradication, then follow-up endoscopy according to a preset schedule (at 1, 2, 3 months after initial treatment, then every 3-6 months until 36 months).

  • ProcedureEBL+Propranolol

    * Start with 20 mg b.i.d * Adjust by 20-40 mg/d reaching reduction by 25% in HR or HR ≤55/min * After reaching target HR, then FU according to a preset schedule (at 1, 2, 3 months after initial treatment, then every 3 months until 36 months)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rebleeding from esophageal varices

    Rebleeding from esophageal varices

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding; significant esophageal variceal bleeding; mortality;adverse events

    Upper gastrointestinal bleeding; significant esophageal variceal bleeding; mortality;adverse events

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Korea University Anam Hospital
    Seoul, 136-705, Korea, Republic of
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 23, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00966121
Lead sponsor
Korea University
Responsible party
Soon Ho Um (Professor, Korea University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 26, 2009
Start date
Aug 2008
Primary completion
Jul 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 23, 2017

Study contacts

Soon Ho Um, Prof
Contact
umsh@korea.ac.kr
82-2-920-5019
Yeon Seok Seo, MD
Contact
drseo@korea.ac.kr
82-2-920-6608

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion