CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00963989STARTUpdated Nov 23, 2021Results posted

Imaging Guided Patient Selection for Interventional Revascularization Therapy

An interventional study of Penumbra System in Acute Ischemic Stroke, sponsored by Penumbra Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-23.

Sponsored by Penumbra Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
146
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this clinical evaluation is to determine the safety and effectiveness of the Penumbra System in a stroke cohort who presents within 8 hours from symptom and with a known core infarct volume at admission. The secondary objective is to determine if there is a correlation between infarct volume and functional outcome in treated patients at 90 days post-procedure.

Read the detailed description

Study Title: The START Trial: Clinical Outcome in Acute Stroke Treatment after Imaging Guided Patient Selection for Interventional Revascularization Therapy

Study Objective: The objective of this clinical evaluation is to determine the safety and effectiveness of the Penumbra System in a stroke cohort who presents within 8 hours from symptom onset and with a known core infarct volume at admission. The data will also be used to determine if there is a correlation between infarct volume and functional outcome at 90 days post-procedure. Safety is defined by the procedural serious adverse events, and effectiveness is defined by the rate of revascularization (TIMI 2-3/TICI 2a-3) and good functional outcome. Good functional outcome is defined by a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 2 or less at 90 days post-procedure. Core infarct volume at admission will be assessed by computed tomography perfusion (CTP), computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance DWI scans. The core infarct volumes will be sub-grouped by \<50cc, 50-100cc and >100cc to determine the correlation with patient functional outcome.

Study Design: A prospective, single arm, multi-center trial. Up to 200 patients at up to 45 centers will be enrolled in the study. It is anticipated that up to 150 evaluable patients will be needed for analysis.

Patient Population: Patients presenting with symptoms of acute ischemic stroke within 8 hours from symptom onset and with a known imaging-defined infarct volume will be enrolled for interventional treatment by the Penumbra System to achieve revascularization of the target vessel territory.

Indication: The Penumbra System is intended for use in the revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (within the internal carotid, middle cerebral - M1 and M2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of symptom onset.

Sample Size Justification: Up to 200 subjects will be enrolled in order to obtain up to 150 evaluable patients. Assuming a post-procedure angiographic success (TIMI 2-3/TICI 2a-3) rate of 80% (120/150), the expected two-sided exact binomial 95% confidence interval is (72.7%, 86.1%). Assuming a 90-day mRS success (mRS 0-2) rate of 30%, the expected two-sided exact binomial 95% confidence interval is (22.8%, 38.0%). Additionally, the study results will be used for sample size estimates for a potential future randomized, concurrent controlled trial.

Core Laboratory and Clinical Event Committee An independent Core Lab will review and score all imaging scans for infarct volume, TIMI, TICI and ICH. A Clinical Event Committee will adjudicate all Serious Adverse Events for severity and causality (disease-, procedure-, drug-, or device-relatedness.

Study Rationale: Use of interventional revascularization techniques offer several potential clinical benefits by improving cerebral perfusion to the target vascular territory in certain patients. The validation of a simple, pragmatic, and executable image guided patient selection paradigm may identify a cohort of acute stroke patients who will benefit from interventional treatment by the Penumbra System and in whom revascularization as a treatment for acute stroke will be indicated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

  • Acute stroke
  • Large cerebral vessel occlusion
  • Core infarct volume
  • Penumbra System
  • Revascularization
  • Intracerebral hemorrhage
  • mRS
  • NIHSS
  • Procedural serious adverse events
  • All cause mortality
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 146 is above the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Penumbra Inc. is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • From 18 to 85 years of age.
  • Evidence of proximal anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (TIMI /TICI 0-1) (Tables 2A \& B). Target vessel occlusion may include the supra-clinoid segment of the ICA through the M1 segment of the MCA.
  • Presented with symptoms consistent with acute ischemic stroke within 8 hours of symptom onset. Patients who presented within 3 hours must be ineligible or refractory to IV rtPA therapy.
  • At time of enrollment, neurological deficit resulting in an NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 10 or greater.
  • Core infarct volume assessed by CTP, CTA or DWI scans within 60 minutes to arterial puncture.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of stroke in the past 3 months.
  • Vessel tortuosity too difficult to allow endovascular access.
  • Pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disease that could confound the study results such as a pre-stroke mRS score of 1 or greater.
  • Known severe allergy to contrast media.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure > 185 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 110 mmHg).
  • Noncontrast CT evidence of the following conditions before enrollment:

    • Significant mass effect with midline shift;
    • Evidence of intracranial hemorrhage.
  • Angiographic evidence of an arterial stenosis proximal to the occlusion that could prevent thrombus removal.
  • Angiographic evidence of preexisting arterial injury.
  • Life expectancy less than 90 days.
  • Participation in another clinical investigation that could confound the evaluation of the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
146 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Penumbra Device Arm

    Device: Penumbra System

Interventions

  • DevicePenumbra System

    The Penumbra System is used to revascularize clotted cerebral blood vessels.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional Outcome as Defined by a mRS of 0-2 at 90 Days Post-procedure

    Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ranges from 0 to 5, with higher scores being worse.

    Time frame: At 90 days post-procedure

  2. Angiographic Assessment of Vessel Patency as Measured by TIMI Score

    Defined by Number of participants with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 2-3. A lower score means a worse outcome and higher scores means better outcome on a scale of 0-3.

    Time frame: At immediate post-procedure

  3. Angiographic Assessment of Vessel Patency as Measured by Modified TICI Score

    Defined by number of participants with modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2-3. A lower score means a worse outcome and higher scores means better outcome on a scale of 0-3.

    Time frame: At immediate post-procedure

  4. Procedural Serious Adverse Events During the Procedure

    Defined by serious adverse events (SAEs) within 24 hours of the procedure

    Time frame: During the procedure, approximately 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Good Neurological Recovery Post-procedure as Defined by a 10 Points or More Improvement on the NIHSS at Discharge

    Time frame: At Discharge, an average of 7 days

  2. Incidence of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Hemorrhage Based on the ECASS Criteria and Patient Neurological Status Within 24 Hours of the Procedure

    Time frame: Within 24 hours of the procedure

  3. All Cause Mortality at 90 Days Post-procedure

    Time frame: At 90 days post-procedure

07

Results

Posted Nov 23, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePenumbra Device Arm
Started146
Completed127
Not completed19

Outcome measures

PrimaryFunctional Outcome as Defined by a mRS of 0-2 at 90 Days Post-procedure

Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ranges from 0 to 5, with higher scores being worse.

Time frame:
At 90 days post-procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Functional Outcome as Defined by a mRS of 0-2 at 90 Days Post-procedure
ParticipantsPenumbra Device Arm
Functional Outcome as Defined by a mRS of 0-2 at 90 Days Post-procedure57
PrimaryAngiographic Assessment of Vessel Patency as Measured by TIMI Score

Defined by Number of participants with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 2-3. A lower score means a worse outcome and higher scores means better outcome on a scale of 0-3.

Time frame:
At immediate post-procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Angiographic Assessment of Vessel Patency as Measured by TIMI Score
ParticipantsPenumbra Device Arm
Angiographic Assessment of Vessel Patency as Measured by TIMI Score122
PrimaryAngiographic Assessment of Vessel Patency as Measured by Modified TICI Score

Defined by number of participants with modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2-3. A lower score means a worse outcome and higher scores means better outcome on a scale of 0-3.

Time frame:
At immediate post-procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Angiographic Assessment of Vessel Patency as Measured by Modified TICI Score
ParticipantsPenumbra Device Arm
Angiographic Assessment of Vessel Patency as Measured by Modified TICI Score122
PrimaryProcedural Serious Adverse Events During the Procedure

Defined by serious adverse events (SAEs) within 24 hours of the procedure

Time frame:
During the procedure, approximately 24 hours
Reported as:
Number · events
Procedural Serious Adverse Events During the Procedure
eventsPenumbra Device Arm
Procedural Serious Adverse Events During the Procedure40
SecondaryGood Neurological Recovery Post-procedure as Defined by a 10 Points or More Improvement on the NIHSS at Discharge
Time frame:
At Discharge, an average of 7 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Good Neurological Recovery Post-procedure as Defined by a 10 Points or More Improvement on the NIHSS at Discharge
ParticipantsPenumbra Device Arm
Good Neurological Recovery Post-procedure as Defined by a 10 Points or More Improvement on the NIHSS at Discharge47
SecondaryIncidence of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Hemorrhage Based on the ECASS Criteria and Patient Neurological Status Within 24 Hours of the Procedure
Time frame:
Within 24 hours of the procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Hemorrhage Based on the ECASS Criteria and Patient Neurological Status Within 24 Hours of the Procedure
ParticipantsPenumbra Device Arm
Incidence of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Hemorrhage Based on the ECASS Criteria and Patient Neurological Status Within 24 Hours of the Procedure18
SecondaryAll Cause Mortality at 90 Days Post-procedure
Time frame:
At 90 days post-procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
All Cause Mortality at 90 Days Post-procedure
ParticipantsPenumbra Device Arm
All Cause Mortality at 90 Days Post-procedure37

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Penumbra Device Arm37/146 (25.3%)8/146 (5.5%)14/146 (9.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPenumbra Device Arm
Vessel perforationVascular disorders2/146
Carotid artery dissectionNervous system disorders1/146
Cerebral artery occlusionNervous system disorders1/146
Cerebral haemorrhageNervous system disorders1/146
Cerebral vasoconstrictionNervous system disorders1/146
Haemorrhagic transformation strokeNervous system disorders1/146
Ischaemic cerebral infarctionNervous system disorders1/146
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPenumbra Device Arm
Cerebral vasoconstrictionNervous system disorders7/146
Cerebral haemorrhageNervous system disorders2/146
Infusion site extravasationGeneral disorders1/146
Cerebral artery embolismNervous system disorders1/146
Cerebral haematomaNervous system disorders1/146
Haemorrhagic transformation strokeNervous system disorders1/146
Vascular dissectionNervous system disorders1/146

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Penumbra Device Arm
Mean66 ± 14
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Penumbra Device Arm
Female82
Male64
Baseline NIHSS
Baseline NIHSS(units on a scale)Penumbra Device Arm
Mean19 (14 to 23)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 23, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00963989
Lead sponsor
Penumbra Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 24, 2009
Start date
Sep 2009
Primary completion
Sep 2016
Completion
Sep 2016
Results posted
Nov 23, 2021
Last update
Nov 23, 2021

Study contacts

Siu P Sit, PhD
study director · Penumbra Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion