CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00960440Updated Dec 19, 2018Results posted

Study of CP-690,550 Versus Placebo In Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients On Background Methotrexate With Inadequate Response To Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inhibitors

A Phase 3 interventional study of CP-690,550 and CP-690,550 in Arthritis, Rheumatoid, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 92 sites in 14 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-12-19.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
399
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will test if CP-690,550 is safe and effective in rheumatoid arthritis patients taking methotrexate who have an inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Keywords

  • randomized double-blind placebo-controlled investigational drug oral therapy safety and efficacy
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 399 is above the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis on a stable dose of methotrexate who have inadequate response to Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inhibitors.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy, severe acute or chronic medical conditions, including serious infections or clinically significant laboratory abnormalities.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
399 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sequence 1

    Drug: CP-690,550

  • Experimental
    Sequence 2

    Drug: CP-690,550

  • Placebo comparator
    Sequence 3

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: CP-690,550

  • Placebo comparator
    Sequence 4

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: CP-690,550

Interventions

  • DrugCP-690,550

    Oral tablets administered at 5 mg BID daily for 6 months during the double-blind, placebo-controlled period.

  • DrugCP-690,550

    Oral tablets administered at 10 mg BID daily for 6 months during the double-blind, placebo-controlled period.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Oral placebo tablets administered BID daily during the first 3 months of the double-blind, study period.

    Also known as: double-blind, placebo-controlled phase

  • DrugCP-690,550

    Oral tablets administered at 5 mg BID daily during the second 3 months of the double-blind, study period.

    Also known as: double-blind, extension phase

  • DrugPlacebo

    Oral placebo tablets administered BID daily during the first 3 months of the double-blind, placebo-controlled period.

    Also known as: double-blind, placebo-controlled phase

  • DrugCP-690,550

    Oral tablets administered at 10 mg BID daily during the second 3 months of the double-blind, study period.

    Also known as: double-blind, extension phase

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 3

    ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joints count (TJC); \>= 20% improvement in swollen joints count (SJC); and \>= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 3 analysis.

    Time frame: Month 3

  2. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 3

    HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities:dress/groom;arise;eat; walk;reach;grip; hygiene;common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3:0=no difficulty;1=some difficulty;2=much difficulty;3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3:0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 3 analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

  3. Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 3

    DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)(millimeter/hour \[mm/hour\]) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment). Total score range:0-9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than or equal to (\<=)3.2 implied low disease activity, greater than (\>)3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, less than (\<)2.6=remission. For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 3 analysis.

    Time frame: Month 3

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 2 and Month 1

    ACR20 response: \>=20% improvement in TJC; \>=20% improvement in SJC; and \>= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

    Time frame: Week 2, Month 1

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 4.5 and 6

    ACR20 response: \>=20% improvement in TJC; \>=20% improvement in SJC; and \>=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

    Time frame: Month 4.5, 6

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 2, Month 1 and 3

    ACR50 response: \>= 50% improvement in TJC or SJC and 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

    Time frame: Week 2, Month 1, 3

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Month 4.5 and 6

    ACR50 response: \>= 50% improvement in TJC or SJC and 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

    Time frame: Month 4.5 and 6

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 2, Month 1 and 3

    ACR70 response: \>=70% improvement in TJC or SJC and 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

    Time frame: Week 2, Month 1, 3

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Month 4.5 and 6

    ACR70 response: \>=70% improvement in TJC or SJC and 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

    Time frame: Month 4.5, 6

  7. Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3

    DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) \<=3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-3 (CRP) \<2.6 = remission.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, 3

  8. Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Month 4.5 and 6

    DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-3 (CRP) \<2.6 = remission.

    Time frame: Month 4.5, 6

  9. Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Baseline and Month 3

    DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 = remission.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

  10. Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Month 6

    DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 = remission.

    Time frame: Month 6

  11. Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 2, Month 1 and 3

    HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3:0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3:0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty.

    Time frame: Week 2, Month 1, 3

  12. Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Month 4.5 and 6

    HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3:0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3:0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty.

    Time frame: Month 4.5, 6

  13. Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3

    Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, 3

  14. Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Month 4.5 and 6

    Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.

    Time frame: Month 4.5, 6

  15. Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3

    Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, 3

  16. Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Month 4.5 and 6

    Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.

    Time frame: Month 4.5, 6

  17. Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3

    Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, 3

  18. Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Month 4.5 and 6

    Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.

    Time frame: Month 4.5, 6

  19. 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains (of 2 components; physical and mental) of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role (role-physical, role-emotional) limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, 3

  20. 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 6

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains (of 2 components; physical and mental) of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role (role-physical, role-emotional) limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).

    Time frame: Month 6

  21. Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3

    Participant-rated 12-item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week; 7 subscales:sleep disturbance,snoring,awakened short of breath,sleep adequacy,somnolence (range:0-100);sleep quantity (range:0-24),optimal sleep(yes/no), and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores:sleep problem summary,overall sleep problem.Except adequacy,optimal sleep and quantity,higher scores=more impairment.Scores transformed(actual raw score\[RS\] minus lowest possible score divided by possible RS range\*100);total score range:0-100;higher score=more intensity of attribute.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, 3

  22. Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 6

    Participant-rated 12-item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week; 7 subscales:sleep disturbance,snoring,awakened short of breath,sleep adequacy,somnolence (range:0-100);sleep quantity (range:0-24),optimal sleep(yes/no), and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores:sleep problem summary,overall sleep problem.Except adequacy,optimal sleep and quantity,higher scores=more impairment.Scores transformed(actual raw score\[RS\] minus lowest possible score divided by possible RS range\*100);total score range:0-100;higher score=more intensity of attribute.

    Time frame: Month 6

  23. Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, and 3

    MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity and optimal sleep. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not optimal by choosing yes or no. Number of participants with optimal sleep is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, 3

  24. Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 6

    MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity and optimal sleep. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not optimal by choosing yes or no. Number of participants with optimal sleep is reported.

    Time frame: Month 6

  25. Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Baseline and Month 3

    FACIT-Fatigue Scale (FS):13-item questionnaire, participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as 4 minus the participant's response. The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-FS for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

  26. Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Month 6

    FACIT-FS:13-item questionnaire, participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as 4 minus the participant's response. The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-FS for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.

    Time frame: Month 6

  27. Euro Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)- Health State Profile Utility Score at Baseline, Month 1 and 3

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3

  28. Euro Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Month 6

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Time frame: Month 6

  29. Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3

    Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months for direct, indirect medical cost domains. Direct cost:visit to doctor,non-medical practitioner,nursing home,hospital,surgery,emergency room(ER) treatment,diagnostic tests, over-night stay,home healthcare services, aids/devices used. Indirect costs associated with functional disability:employment status,willingness to work,work disability due to RA,sick leave,part time work,ability to perform chores,chores done by family/friends/housekeeper. Assessment was based on 0 to 2-point scale;higher score=higher medical cost.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

  30. Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 6

    RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months for direct, indirect medical cost domains. Direct cost: visit to doctor, non-medical practitioner, nursing home, hospital, surgery, emergency room(ER) treatment, diagnostic tests, over-night stay, home healthcare services, aids/devices used. Indirect costs associated with functional disability: employment status, willingness to work, work disability due to RA, sick leave, part time work, ability to perform chores, chores done by family/friends/housekeeper. Assessment was based on 0 to 2-point scale; higher score=higher medical cost.

    Time frame: Month 6

  31. Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline and Month 3

    RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA/non-RA related number of events including visits to doctor, non-medical practitioner, hospital ER treatment, hospitalizations, number of surgeries, diagnostic tests, and devices/aids used were reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

  32. Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 6

    RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA/non-RA related number of events including visits to doctor, non-medical practitioner, hospital ER treatment, hospitalizations, number of surgeries, diagnostic tests, and devices/aids used were reported.

    Time frame: Month 6

  33. Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline and Month 3

    RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of days spent in hospital, nursing home, aids/devices used, on sick leave, work per week, performed part time work, performed paid work, chores done by housekeeper and chores done by family/friends were reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

  34. Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 6

    RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of days spent in hospital, nursing home, aids/devices used, on sick leave, work per week, performed part time work, performed paid work, chores done by housekeeper and chores done by family/friends were reported.

    Time frame: Month 6

  35. Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline and Month 3

    RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of hours spent per day for home healthcare services, chores done by housekeeper, chores done by family or friends, hours affected per day and average number of hours missed work per day were reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

  36. Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Month 6

    RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of hours spent per day for home healthcare services, chores done by housekeeper, chores done by family or friends, hours affected per day and average number of hours missed work per day were reported.

    Time frame: Month 6

  37. Work Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline and Month 3

    Work performance of participants on number of days bothered was based on 10-point scale, where higher score indicated lower work performance.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

  38. Work Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 6

    Work performance of participants on number of days bothered was based on 10-point scale, where higher score indicated lower work performance.

    Time frame: Month 6

  39. Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline and Month 3

    WLQ: participant-reported 25-item scale to evaluate degree to which health problems interfere with an ability to perform job roles along 4 dimensions: Time Management scale (TMS)(5-items); Physical Demands scale (PDS) (6-item); Mental-Interpersonal Demands Scale (MIDS) (9-items); Output Demands Scale (ODS) (5-items). All the scales ranged from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all of the time). Work Loss Index (WLI), which represented percentage of lost work over time period relative to a normative population, was derived (total score: 0 \[no loss\] to 100 \[complete loss of work\]).

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

  40. Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Month 6

    WLQ: participant-reported 25-item scale to evaluate degree to which health problems interfere with an ability to perform job roles along 4 dimensions: Time Management scale (TMS)(5-items); Physical Demands scale (PDS) (6-item); Mental-Interpersonal Demands Scale (MIDS) (9-items); Output Demands Scale (ODS) (5-items). All the scales ranged from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all of the time). Work Loss Index (WLI), which represented percentage of lost work over time period relative to a normative population, was derived (total score: 0 \[no loss\] to 100 \[complete loss of work\]).

    Time frame: Month 6

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than 2.6 and Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Week 2, Month 1 and 3

    DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) \<=3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-3 (CRP) \<2.6 = remission.

    Time frame: Week 2, Month 1, 3

  2. Number of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than 2.6 and Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 4.5 and 6

    DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) \<=3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-3 (CRP) \<2.6 = remission.

    Time frame: Month 4.5, 6

  3. Number of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 and Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 3

    DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 = remission.

    Time frame: Month 3

  4. Number of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 and Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 6

    DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 = remission.

    Time frame: Month 6

07

Results

Posted Jan 10, 2013

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Started1331346666
Completed1071035348
Not completed26311318
Withdrew: Death0001
Withdrew: Adverse event121244
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy2538
Withdrew: Protocol violation2834
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject9521
Withdrew: Other1110

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 3

ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joints count (TJC); \>= 20% improvement in swollen joints count (SJC); and \>= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 3 analysis.

Time frame:
Month 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 3
percentage of participantsCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 341.6748.1224.43
Statistical analysis
  • CP-690,550 10 mg vs Placebo · Normal Approximation · p = <0.0001 (A step-down procedure was used to control for multiple comparisons. In order for the comparison to 5 mg to be statistically significant, the comparison to 10 mg had to be statistically significant.) · Percentage difference: 23.69 · 95% CI 12.45 to 34.92
  • CP-690,550 5 mg vs Placebo · Normal Approximation · p = 0.0024 (A step-down procedure was used to control for multiple comparisons. In order for the comparison to 5 mg to be statistically significant, the comparison to 10 mg had to be statistically significant.) · Percentage difference: 17.23 · 95% CI 6.06 to 28.41
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 3

HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities:dress/groom;arise;eat; walk;reach;grip; hygiene;common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3:0=no difficulty;1=some difficulty;2=much difficulty;3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3:0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 3 analysis.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 3
Units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline (n=132,134,132)1.60 ± 0.661.50 ± 0.611.63 ± 0.66
Change at Month 3 (n=117,125,118)-0.41 ± 0.52-0.41 ± 0.52-0.17 ± 0.41
Statistical analysis
  • CP-690,550 10 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 (A step-down procedure was used to control for multiple comparisons. For the comparison of 10 mg to placebo to be statistically significant in this measure, the comparison of 10 mg to placebo in ACR20 had to be significant.) · Ls mean difference: -0.28 · 95% CI -0.38 to -0.17
  • CP-690,550 5 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 (Step-down procedure: For the comparison of 5 mg to placebo to be statistically significant in this measure, the comparison of 10 mg to placebo as well as the comparison of 5 mg to placebo in ACR20 had to be statistically significant.) · Ls mean difference: -0.25 · 95% CI -0.36 to -0.15
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 3

DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)(millimeter/hour \[mm/hour\]) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment). Total score range:0-9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than or equal to (\<=)3.2 implied low disease activity, greater than (\>)3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, less than (\<)2.6=remission. For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 3 analysis.

Time frame:
Month 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 3
percentage of participantsCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 36.7211.201.67
Statistical analysis
  • CP-690,550 10 mg vs Placebo · Normal Approximation · p = 0.0017 (A step-down procedure was used to control for multiple comparisons. For the comparison of 10 mg to placebo to be statistically significant in this measure, the comparison of 10 mg to placebo in HAQ-DI had to be statistically significant.) · Percentage difference: 9.53 · 95% CI 3.54 to 15.51
  • CP-690,550 5 mg vs Placebo · Normal Approximation · p = 0.0496 (Step-down procedure: For the comparison of 5 mg to placebo to be statistically significant in this measure, the comparison of 10 mg to placebo as well as comparison of 5 mg to placebo in HAQ-DI had to be statistically significant.) · Percentage difference: 5.05 · 95% CI 0.00 to 10.10
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 2 and Month 1

ACR20 response: \>=20% improvement in TJC; \>=20% improvement in SJC; and \>= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

Time frame:
Week 2, Month 1
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 2 and Month 1
percentage of participantsCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Week 227.6932.8116.67
Month 142.4244.3627.48
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 4.5 and 6

ACR20 response: \>=20% improvement in TJC; \>=20% improvement in SJC; and \>=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

Time frame:
Month 4.5, 6
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 4.5 and 6
percentage of participantsCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 4.554.5547.3750.0046.15
Month 651.5254.8945.4540.00
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 2, Month 1 and 3

ACR50 response: \>= 50% improvement in TJC or SJC and 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

Time frame:
Week 2, Month 1, 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 2, Month 1 and 3
percentage of participantsCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Week 27.695.471.59
Month 112.8817.296.11
Month 326.5227.828.40
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Month 4.5 and 6

ACR50 response: \>= 50% improvement in TJC or SJC and 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

Time frame:
Month 4.5 and 6
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Month 4.5 and 6
percentage of participantsCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 4.528.7928.5730.3020.00
Month 637.1230.0828.7920.00
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 2, Month 1 and 3

ACR70 response: \>=70% improvement in TJC or SJC and 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

Time frame:
Week 2, Month 1, 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 2, Month 1 and 3
percentage of participantsCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Week 22.312.340.00
Month 17.586.770.00
Month 313.6410.531.53
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Month 4.5 and 6

ACR70 response: \>=70% improvement in TJC or SJC and 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

Time frame:
Month 4.5, 6
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Month 4.5 and 6
percentage of participantsCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 4.510.6112.7812.127.69
Month 615.9115.7910.619.23
SecondaryDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3

DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) \<=3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-3 (CRP) \<2.6 = remission.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline (n=133,134,132)5.38 ± 1.005.31 ± 0.905.39 ± 0.95
Week 2 (n=127,125,124)4.46 ± 1.234.13 ± 1.045.10 ± 1.13
Month 1 (n=123,123,123)4.14 ± 1.273.92 ± 1.194.92 ± 1.20
Month 3 (n=118,124,118)3.74 ± 1.313.45 ± 1.324.78 ± 1.34
SecondaryDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Month 4.5 and 6

DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-3 (CRP) \<2.6 = remission.

Time frame:
Month 4.5, 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Month 4.5 and 6
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 4.5 (n=112,113,56,51)3.43 ± 1.253.30 ± 1.373.57 ± 1.153.69 ± 1.15
Month 6 (n=100,102,51,48)3.36 ± 1.243.07 ± 1.183.46 ± 1.133.68 ± 1.19
SecondaryDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Baseline and Month 3

DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 = remission.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Baseline and Month 3
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline (n=126,128,130)6.48 ± 1.036.40 ± 0.896.47 ± 0.98
Month 3 (n=112,121,110)4.58 ± 1.394.26 ± 1.485.56 ± 1.45
SecondaryDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Month 6

DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 = remission.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Month 6
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Month 63.99 ± 1.413.70 ± 1.254.07 ± 1.264.39 ± 1.27
SecondaryHealth Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 2, Month 1 and 3

HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3:0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3:0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty.

Time frame:
Week 2, Month 1, 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 2, Month 1 and 3
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Week 2 (n=130,128,125)1.38 ± 0.711.28 ± 0.581.49 ± 0.63
Month 1 (n=123,123,123)1.37 ± 0.681.19 ± 0.651.38 ± 0.72
Month 3 (n=118,125,118)1.20 ± 0.721.10 ± 0.661.44 ± 0.72
SecondaryHealth Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Month 4.5 and 6

HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3:0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3:0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty.

Time frame:
Month 4.5, 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Month 4.5 and 6
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 4.5 (n=112,114,57,53)1.19 ± 0.691.10 ± 0.701.08 ± 0.601.26 ± 0.75
Month 6 (n=104,103,51,49)1.10 ± 0.701.02 ± 0.651.00 ± 0.591.29 ± 0.72
SecondaryPatient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3

Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline (n=127,128,131)65.73 ± 22.7960.10 ± 23.1660.74 ± 23.50
Week 2 (n=130,128,125)49.79 ± 26.6042.35 ± 22.1155.88 ± 23.85
Month 1 (n=124,122,123)45.59 ± 26.0239.09 ± 24.0552.29 ± 25.65
Month 3 (n=119,124,116)38.91 ± 27.1137.72 ± 26.9953.40 ± 26.52
SecondaryPatient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Month 4.5 and 6

Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.

Time frame:
Month 4.5, 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Month 4.5 and 6
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 4.5 (n=112,115,56,53)38.93 ± 26.4035.01 ± 24.6033.11 ± 23.4440.62 ± 26.67
Month 6 (n=104,103,51,49)34.38 ± 25.3329.56 ± 22.7731.37 ± 24.7640.71 ± 25.88
SecondaryPatient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3

Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline (n=127,128,131)64.69 ± 23.2258.79 ± 23.5961.87 ± 22.92
Week 2 (n=130,128,124)48.24 ± 25.5441.75 ± 21.7957.70 ± 23.77
Month 1 (n=124,123,123)44.86 ± 25.6238.35 ± 23.3851.39 ± 26.01
Month 3 (n=119,125,118)41.23 ± 27.0637.23 ± 25.6552.85 ± 25.64
SecondaryPatient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Month 4.5 and 6

Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.

Time frame:
Month 4.5, 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Month 4.5 and 6
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 4.5 (n=112,115,56,53)37.40 ± 24.6536.01 ± 25.4634.38 ± 23.4738.79 ± 26.17
Month 6 (n=104,103,51,49)34.59 ± 24.8231.25 ± 23.2534.88 ± 23.8438.61 ± 22.27
SecondaryPhysician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3

Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline (n=126,128,131)65.38 ± 18.2158.68 ± 19.4264.36 ± 16.70
Week 2 (n=129,128,123)46.51 ± 23.3841.29 ± 20.5851.36 ± 21.87
Month 1 (n=123,122,123)39.88 ± 22.1936.28 ± 21.5247.67 ± 20.84
Month 3 (n=117,124,116)34.94 ± 25.2230.64 ± 22.2044.08 ± 23.53
SecondaryPhysician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Month 4.5 and 6

Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.

Time frame:
Month 4.5, 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Month 4.5 and 6
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 4.5 (n=110,114,55,53)27.50 ± 18.8726.12 ± 22.2828.67 ± 19.7728.17 ± 21.50
Month 6 (n=101,101,51,48)24.17 ± 18.5519.65 ± 17.1523.55 ± 18.3023.75 ± 16.20
Secondary36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains (of 2 components; physical and mental) of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role (role-physical, role-emotional) limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline:Physical Functioning (n=133,134,132)30.54 ± 10.7631.61 ± 8.5828.32 ± 9.30
Baseline:Role Physical (n=133,134,132)33.66 ± 10.2134.08 ± 9.6732.53 ± 9.66
Baseline:Bodily Pain (n=133,134,132)31.09 ± 8.1332.55 ± 7.4531.95 ± 7.70
Baseline:General Health (n=133,134,132)35.84 ± 9.5037.73 ± 9.1834.82 ± 8.67
Baseline:Vitality (n=133,134,132)39.71 ± 9.8740.11 ± 10.2638.41 ± 10.77
Baseline:Social Functioning (n=133,134,132)37.40 ± 13.1039.47 ± 12.1135.95 ± 12.39
Baseline:Role Emotional (n=133,134,132)37.58 ± 14.0836.75 ± 13.5835.52 ± 14.22
Baseline:Mental Health (n=133,134,132)40.66 ± 11.6341.91 ± 11.9939.69 ± 12.66
Baseline:Physical Component Score(n=133,134,132)30.72 ± 9.2932.13 ± 7.5829.98 ± 7.99
Baseline: Mental Component Score (n=133,134,132)42.82 ± 12.6943.24 ± 12.8141.34 ± 13.25
Week 2:Physical Functioning (n=130,128,125)33.28 ± 11.0634.25 ± 9.3030.25 ± 10.30
Week 2:Role Physical (n=130,128,125)36.71 ± 10.2338.45 ± 9.0436.05 ± 10.48
Week 2:Bodily Pain (n=130,128,125)37.01 ± 9.3438.42 ± 7.7033.77 ± 7.80
Week 2:General Health (n=130,128,125)37.38 ± 8.5238.57 ± 8.6135.85 ± 8.76
Week 2:Vitality (n=130,128,125)43.02 ± 10.1843.89 ± 10.7141.11 ± 10.62
Week 2:Social Functioning (n=130,128,125)41.18 ± 12.7942.29 ± 11.2938.08 ± 12.18
Week 2:Role Emotional (n=130,128,125)40.54 ± 12.9440.62 ± 11.9937.69 ± 13.49
Week 2:Mental Health (n=130,128,125)43.72 ± 11.4844.25 ± 11.1942.07 ± 12.31
Week 2:Physical Component Score (n=130,128,125)34.04 ± 9.5135.69 ± 7.7431.99 ± 8.58
Week 2:Mental Component Score (n=130,128,125)45.77 ± 11.9345.98 ± 11.9543.57 ± 12.74
Month 1:Physical Functioning (n=124,123,123)33.56 ± 11.1435.64 ± 10.0631.01 ± 10.15
Month 1: Role Physical (n=124,123,123)38.25 ± 10.0639.59 ± 9.9836.33 ± 10.56
Month 1:Bodily Pain(n=124,123,123)37.50 ± 9.4540.02 ± 8.4235.35 ± 8.77
Month 1:General Health (n=124,123,123)38.09 ± 9.3239.82 ± 9.2536.64 ± 8.75
Month 1:Vitality (n=124,123,123)44.33 ± 9.3545.65 ± 11.4741.85 ± 11.50
Month 1:Social Functioning (n=124,123,123)40.96 ± 11.6244.12 ± 11.6539.00 ± 12.49
Month 1:Role Emotional (n=124,123,123)41.05 ± 13.2340.84 ± 12.8638.87 ± 12.84
Month 1:Mental Health (n=124,123,123)44.13 ± 11.6846.18 ± 11.6442.89 ± 11.92
Month 1:Physical Component Score (n=124,123,123)34.88 ± 9.2437.07 ± 8.4032.72 ± 9.18
Month 1:Mental Component Score (n=124,123,123)46.13 ± 11.9447.28 ± 12.4744.53 ± 12.42
Month 3:Physical Functioning (n=118,125,117)34.78 ± 11.4336.70 ± 10.5630.54 ± 10.67
Month 3: Role Physical (n=118,125,117)38.40 ± 10.4940.19 ± 10.9535.09 ± 10.66
Month 3:Bodily Pain (n=118,125,117)39.25 ± 9.7840.93 ± 9.6734.26 ± 9.62
Month 3:General Health (n=118,125,117)39.22 ± 9.7840.21 ± 9.4635.30 ± 9.30
Month 3:Vitality (n=118,125,117)45.23 ± 10.8946.23 ± 11.7340.30 ± 11.71
Month 3:Social Functioning (n=118,125,117)41.91 ± 12.3744.49 ± 11.2137.74 ± 12.12
Month 3:Role Emotional (n=118,125,116)41.21 ± 12.5741.84 ± 12.6736.16 ± 14.50
Month 3:Mental Health (n=118,125,117)44.58 ± 11.9545.83 ± 11.5940.89 ± 12.46
Month 3:Physical Component Score (n=118,125,116)36.18 ± 9.9638.01 ± 9.3532.38 ± 9.35
Month 3:Mental Component Score (n=118,125,116)46.40 ± 11.8747.37 ± 12.0141.91 ± 12.85
Secondary36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 6

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains (of 2 components; physical and mental) of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role (role-physical, role-emotional) limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 6
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 6:Physical Functioning35.62 ± 11.6338.47 ± 10.1435.00 ± 10.3133.97 ± 10.58
Month 6: Role Physical40.72 ± 9.9543.51 ± 11.2139.54 ± 10.5538.02 ± 9.81
Month 6:Bodily Pain41.53 ± 9.6143.63 ± 9.2742.40 ± 10.2239.60 ± 9.01
Month 6:General Health39.49 ± 9.5441.68 ± 10.3538.95 ± 9.5137.89 ± 8.45
Month 6:Vitality46.49 ± 9.8247.59 ± 10.9345.09 ± 12.2644.26 ± 8.73
Month 6:Social Functioning44.05 ± 10.9344.66 ± 11.9243.33 ± 12.2740.38 ± 11.11
Month 6:Role Emotional42.36 ± 13.3445.06 ± 12.2741.07 ± 13.1839.53 ± 12.93
Month 6:Mental Health45.29 ± 12.1247.48 ± 11.6144.85 ± 14.6146.19 ± 9.65
Month 6:Physical Component Score37.78 ± 9.2040.21 ± 9.2437.84 ± 9.5935.43 ± 8.69
Month 6:Mental Component Score47.41 ± 12.3248.83 ± 12.6546.17 ± 15.0646.03 ± 11.52
SecondaryMedical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3

Participant-rated 12-item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week; 7 subscales:sleep disturbance,snoring,awakened short of breath,sleep adequacy,somnolence (range:0-100);sleep quantity (range:0-24),optimal sleep(yes/no), and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores:sleep problem summary,overall sleep problem.Except adequacy,optimal sleep and quantity,higher scores=more impairment.Scores transformed(actual raw score\[RS\] minus lowest possible score divided by possible RS range\*100);total score range:0-100;higher score=more intensity of attribute.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1 and 3
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline: Sleep Problem Summary (n=133,132,129)40.55 ± 21.1339.87 ± 18.0344.65 ± 20.56
Baseline: Overall Sleep Problem (n=133,132,129)43.10 ± 21.0041.57 ± 17.8846.08 ± 20.73
Baseline: Sleep Adequacy (n=133,133,129)46.39 ± 27.8943.16 ± 25.8939.53 ± 27.95
Baseline: Awakened Short of Breath (n=133,133,130)16.99 ± 24.5619.10 ± 24.1021.54 ± 26.19
Baseline: Sleep Disturbance (n=133,133,129)47.43 ± 28.3943.20 ± 24.8347.98 ± 27.00
Baseline: Sleep Quantity (n=132,131,129)6.47 ± 1.556.44 ± 1.356.33 ± 1.46
Baseline: Snoring (n=131,131,127)42.14 ± 31.8937.10 ± 33.7540.00 ± 33.62
Baseline: Somnolence (n=133,132,129)36.39 ± 22.4734.19 ± 22.8338.55 ± 23.60
Week 2: Sleep Problem Summary (n=129,127,125)36.87 ± 20.8437.03 ± 18.9740.35 ± 20.10
Week 2: Overall Sleep Problem (n=129,127,124)38.04 ± 20.7837.69 ± 18.8341.47 ± 20.01
Week 2: Sleep Adequacy (n=129,127,125)48.06 ± 28.7044.17 ± 28.3542.72 ± 26.77
Week 2: Awakened Short of Breath (n=129,127,125)17.83 ± 25.2817.32 ± 21.5818.72 ± 25.75
Week 2: Sleep Disturbance (n=129,127,125)39.59 ± 28.2436.41 ± 22.8942.28 ± 26.45
Week 2: Sleep Quantity (n=129,127,124)6.40 ± 1.576.68 ± 1.416.48 ± 1.75
Week 2: Snoring (n=128,125,122)36.25 ± 34.2135.84 ± 34.4840.49 ± 32.67
Week 2: Somnolence (n=129,127,124)31.78 ± 21.8532.18 ± 23.4736.45 ± 23.18
Month 1: Sleep Problem Summary (n=124,123,123)36.21 ± 20.6934.53 ± 20.0837.37 ± 20.42
Month 1: Overall Sleep Problem (n=124,123,123)37.23 ± 20.7035.40 ± 19.9438.79 ± 20.58
Month 1: Sleep Adequacy (n=124,123,123)49.84 ± 28.3148.13 ± 29.3549.11 ± 28.86
Month 1: Awakened Short of Breath (n=124,123,123)15.81 ± 21.5315.45 ± 23.1619.84 ± 26.30
Month 1: Sleep Disturbance (n=124,123,123)39.12 ± 28.1634.82 ± 25.1239.64 ± 26.26
Month 1: Sleep Quantity (n=124,123,123)6.59 ± 1.346.80 ± 1.436.43 ± 1.42
Month 1: Snoring (n=124,122,120)36.13 ± 33.4234.10 ± 32.8041.50 ± 33.12
Month 1: Somnolence (n=124,123,123)30.91 ± 22.3030.84 ± 23.9734.91 ± 23.67
Month 3: Sleep Problem Summary (n=117,125,117)36.81 ± 21.1035.68 ± 19.3640.14 ± 20.20
Month 3: Overall Sleep Problem (n=117,125,117)37.23 ± 20.7236.08 ± 19.4042.00 ± 20.41
Month 3: Sleep Adequacy (n=118,125,117)48.64 ± 30.3248.56 ± 29.0443.68 ± 27.47
Month 3: Awakened Short of Breath (n=118,125,117)18.14 ± 23.6819.68 ± 24.0917.95 ± 24.27
Month 3: Sleep Disturbance (n=118,125,117)38.44 ± 28.3734.61 ± 23.2143.27 ± 26.45
Month 3: Sleep Quantity (n=117,124,117)6.58 ± 1.506.71 ± 1.426.27 ± 1.49
Month 3: Snoring (n=118,123,117)36.44 ± 32.8336.26 ± 32.6341.37 ± 31.92
Month 3: Somnolence (n=117,125,117)30.14 ± 23.5331.31 ± 23.6836.47 ± 23.10
SecondaryMedical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 6

Participant-rated 12-item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week; 7 subscales:sleep disturbance,snoring,awakened short of breath,sleep adequacy,somnolence (range:0-100);sleep quantity (range:0-24),optimal sleep(yes/no), and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores:sleep problem summary,overall sleep problem.Except adequacy,optimal sleep and quantity,higher scores=more impairment.Scores transformed(actual raw score\[RS\] minus lowest possible score divided by possible RS range\*100);total score range:0-100;higher score=more intensity of attribute.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 6
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 6: Sleep Problem Summary35.32 ± 21.4632.03 ± 18.4238.78 ± 20.8135.35 ± 19.05
Month 6: Overall Sleep Problem35.75 ± 20.6832.92 ± 18.3339.73 ± 20.8536.02 ± 18.45
Month 6: Sleep Adequacy50.48 ± 30.6452.75 ± 28.4643.47 ± 30.9950.42 ± 26.89
Month 6: Awakened Short of Breath16.73 ± 24.1514.12 ± 22.6218.37 ± 21.5417.92 ± 21.13
Month 6: Sleep Disturbance36.84 ± 26.1933.88 ± 23.5140.92 ± 26.8935.10 ± 25.26
Month 6: Sleep Quantity6.56 ± 1.456.93 ± 1.296.27 ± 1.296.80 ± 1.26
Month 6: Snoring34.62 ± 31.8035.84 ± 31.7937.96 ± 31.9538.75 ± 32.59
Month 6: Somnolence29.74 ± 22.2426.14 ± 19.4030.61 ± 22.5633.19 ± 20.09
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, and 3

MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity and optimal sleep. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not optimal by choosing yes or no. Number of participants with optimal sleep is reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, 3
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Week 2, Month 1, and 3
participantsCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline (n= 133, 134, 132)535948
Week 2 (n= 130, 128, 126)526250
Month 1 (n= 124, 123, 124)595853
Month 3 (n= 118, 125, 118)535647
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 6

MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity and optimal sleep. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not optimal by choosing yes or no. Number of participants with optimal sleep is reported.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 6
participantsCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 650572124
SecondaryFunctional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Baseline and Month 3

FACIT-Fatigue Scale (FS):13-item questionnaire, participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as 4 minus the participant's response. The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-FS for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Baseline and Month 3
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline (n=132,134,129)27.84 ± 11.1229.48 ± 11.3926.98 ± 11.52
Month 3 (n=118,125,117)33.30 ± 11.7233.66 ± 12.2727.93 ± 12.36
SecondaryFunctional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Month 6

FACIT-FS:13-item questionnaire, participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as 4 minus the participant's response. The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-FS for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Month 6
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Month 634.69 ± 10.8135.98 ± 11.5533.57 ± 12.2131.63 ± 10.16
SecondaryEuro Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)- Health State Profile Utility Score at Baseline, Month 1 and 3

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 1, 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Euro Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)- Health State Profile Utility Score at Baseline, Month 1 and 3
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline (n=131,134,129)0.38 ± 0.340.47 ± 0.320.38 ± 0.33
Month 1 (n=122,121,120)0.56 ± 0.280.63 ± 0.240.49 ± 0.30
Month 3 (n=117,123,117)0.55 ± 0.300.62 ± 0.250.43 ± 0.35
SecondaryEuro Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Month 6

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Euro Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Month 6
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Euro Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Month 60.62 ± 0.280.68 ± 0.240.60 ± 0.240.55 ± 0.29
SecondaryWork Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months for direct, indirect medical cost domains. Direct cost:visit to doctor,non-medical practitioner,nursing home,hospital,surgery,emergency room(ER) treatment,diagnostic tests, over-night stay,home healthcare services, aids/devices used. Indirect costs associated with functional disability:employment status,willingness to work,work disability due to RA,sick leave,part time work,ability to perform chores,chores done by family/friends/housekeeper. Assessment was based on 0 to 2-point scale;higher score=higher medical cost.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline: Seen any doctor (n=133,133,130)1.11 ± 0.311.09 ± 0.291.15 ± 0.35
Baseline: Treated in ER (n=133,134,130)1.89 ± 0.321.96 ± 0.191.93 ± 0.25
Baseline: Admitted for overnight stay (n=16,6,9)0.19 ± 0.540.17 ± 0.410.33 ± 0.71
Baseline: Hospitalization (n=133,134,130)1.97 ± 0.171.97 ± 0.171.95 ± 0.23
Baseline: Had outpatient surgeries (n=133,134,130)1.95 ± 0.211.97 ± 0.171.93 ± 0.25
Baseline:Non-study diagnostic tests(n=133,134,130)1.74 ± 0.441.75 ± 0.431.74 ± 0.44
Baseline: In nursing home (n=133,134,130)1.99 ± 0.091.99 ± 0.091.99 ± 0.09
Baseline: Home HC services (n=133,134,130)1.98 ± 0.121.99 ± 0.091.96 ± 0.19
Baseline: Home healthcare services (n=2,2,5)1.50 ± 0.710.50 ± 0.710.80 ± 0.84
Baseline:Required aids/devices (n=133,134,130)1.77 ± 0.421.86 ± 0.351.82 ± 0.39
Baseline: Seen NM practitioner (n=133,134,130)1.97 ± 0.171.96 ± 0.211.96 ± 0.19
Baseline: Currently employed (n=132,134,130)1.70 ± 0.461.66 ± 0.481.68 ± 0.47
Baseline: Feel well enough to work (n=84,78,83)1.85 ± 0.361.82 ± 0.391.82 ± 0.39
Baseline: Retired (n=85,80,86)1.49 ± 0.501.43 ± 0.501.49 ± 0.50
Baseline: Lost job/retired early (n=83,77,80)1.58 ± 0.501.69 ± 0.471.55 ± 0.50
Baseline: Unable to work due to RA (n=84,77,83)1.36 ± 0.481.48 ± 0.501.40 ± 0.49
Baseline: Work disabled due to RA (n=83,77,79)1.46 ± 0.501.55 ± 0.501.48 ± 0.50
Baseline: Sick leave due to RA (n=104,109,100)1.83 ± 0.381.80 ± 0.401.71 ± 0.46
Baseline: Performed part time work (n=103,108,100)1.94 ± 0.241.94 ± 0.251.88 ± 0.33
Baseline: Performed paid work (n=102,109,98)1.65 ± 0.481.63 ± 0.481.65 ± 0.48
Baseline: Unable to do chores (n=130,130,126)1.37 ± 0.481.42 ± 0.491.27 ± 0.45
Baseline: Chores by housekeeper (n=130,134,130)1.85 ± 0.361.86 ± 0.351.82 ± 0.39
Baseline: Chores by family/friends (n=131,134,130)1.44 ± 0.501.49 ± 0.501.48 ± 0.50
Month 3: Seen any doctor (n=117,125,117)1.23 ± 0.421.21 ± 0.411.21 ± 0.41
Month 3: Treated in ER (n=116,125,117)1.94 ± 0.241.94 ± 0.251.93 ± 0.25
Month 3: Admitted for overnight stay (n=7,8,8)0.29 ± 0.760.00 ± 0.000.13 ± 0.35
Month 3: Hospitalization (n=116,124,117)1.99 ± 0.092.00 ± 0.001.98 ± 0.13
Month 3: Had outpatient surgeries (n=116,125,117)1.94 ± 0.241.98 ± 0.151.97 ± 0.18
Month 3:Non study diagnostic tests (n=116,125,117)1.80 ± 0.401.82 ± 0.381.77 ± 0.42
Month 3: In nursing home (n=116,125,117)1.99 ± 0.091.99 ± 0.091.99 ± 0.09
Month 3: Home HC services (n=116,123,117)1.97 ± 0.161.99 ± 0.091.97 ± 0.16
Month 3: Required aids/devices (n=116,125,117)1.81 ± 0.391.91 ± 0.281.76 ± 0.43
Month 3: Seen NM practitioner (n=116,125,117)1.97 ± 0.181.97 ± 0.181.97 ± 0.18
Month 3: Currently employed (n=115,125,117)1.70 ± 0.461.62 ± 0.491.68 ± 0.47
Month 3: Feel well enough to work (n=68,67,70)1.82 ± 0.381.78 ± 0.421.83 ± 0.38
Month 3: Retired (n=68,66,72)1.56 ± 0.501.36 ± 0.481.53 ± 0.50
Month 3: Lost job/retired early (n=67,68,69)1.70 ± 0.461.69 ± 0.471.59 ± 0.49
Month 3: Unable to work due to RA (n=68,66,71)1.41 ± 0.501.53 ± 0.501.44 ± 0.50
Month 3: Work disabled due to RA (n=67,67,69)1.48 ± 0.501.57 ± 0.501.54 ± 0.50
Month 3: Sick leave due to RA (n=95,100,97)1.88 ± 0.321.86 ± 0.351.82 ± 0.38
Month 3: Performed part time work (n=96,100,96)1.96 ± 0.201.94 ± 0.241.94 ± 0.24
Month 3: Performed paid work (n=96,99,97)1.78 ± 0.421.69 ± 0.471.67 ± 0.47
Month 3: Unable to do chores (n=112,120,113)1.57 ± 0.501.63 ± 0.491.45 ± 0.50
Month 3: Chores by housekeeper (n=116,122,117)1.86 ± 0.351.89 ± 0.321.85 ± 0.35
Month 3: Chores by family/friends (n=116,122,116)1.55 ± 0.501.66 ± 0.481.53 ± 0.50
SecondaryWork Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 6

RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months for direct, indirect medical cost domains. Direct cost: visit to doctor, non-medical practitioner, nursing home, hospital, surgery, emergency room(ER) treatment, diagnostic tests, over-night stay, home healthcare services, aids/devices used. Indirect costs associated with functional disability: employment status, willingness to work, work disability due to RA, sick leave, part time work, ability to perform chores, chores done by family/friends/housekeeper. Assessment was based on 0 to 2-point scale; higher score=higher medical cost.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 6
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 6: Seen any doctor (n=102,101,50,49)1.29 ± 0.461.22 ± 0.411.20 ± 0.401.27 ± 0.45
Month 6: Treated in ER (n=103,102,50,49)1.96 ± 0.191.93 ± 0.251.94 ± 0.241.98 ± 0.14
Month 6: Admitted for overnight stay (n=5,7,3,1)0.20 ± 0.450.00 ± 0.001.33 ± 1.150.00 ± NA
Month 6: Hospitalization (n=102,102,50,49)1.98 ± 0.141.99 ± 0.101.96 ± 0.201.98 ± 0.14
Month 6:Had outpatient surgeries (n=103,102,50,49)2.00 ± 0.001.95 ± 0.221.96 ± 0.201.96 ± 0.20
Month 6:Non-study diagnostic test(n=103,102,50,49)1.85 ± 0.351.84 ± 0.371.74 ± 0.441.86 ± 0.35
Month 6: In nursing home (n=103,102,50,49)1.98 ± 0.142.00 ± 0.002.00 ± 0.001.96 ± 0.20
Month 6: Home HC services (n=101,102,50,49)2.00 ± 0.001.98 ± 0.142.00 ± 0.002.00 ± 0.00
Month 6: Required aids/devices (n=103,102,50,48)1.82 ± 0.391.91 ± 0.291.90 ± 0.301.83 ± 0.38
Month 6: Seen NM practitioner (n=103,102,50,49)1.99 ± 0.101.96 ± 0.201.98 ± 0.141.96 ± 0.20
Month 6: Currently employed (n=103,102,50,49)1.67 ± 0.471.63 ± 0.491.60 ± 0.491.71 ± 0.46
Month 6: Feel well enough to work (n=62,57,27,32)1.81 ± 0.401.68 ± 0.471.70 ± 0.471.88 ± 0.34
Month 6: Retired (n=62,56,28,31)1.45 ± 0.501.36 ± 0.481.43 ± 0.501.39 ± 0.50
Month 6: Lost job/retired early (n=62,54,27,32)1.71 ± 0.461.74 ± 0.441.59 ± 0.501.44 ± 0.50
Month 6: Unable to work due to RA (n=62,55,27,32)1.48 ± 0.501.67 ± 0.471.56 ± 0.511.41 ± 0.50
Month 6: Work disabled due to RA (n=61,53,27,32)1.57 ± 0.501.70 ± 0.461.56 ± 0.511.50 ± 0.51
Month 6: Sick leave due to RA (n=85,84,41,37)1.92 ± 0.281.88 ± 0.331.88 ± 0.331.86 ± 0.35
Month 6: Performed part time work (n=85,84,40,36)1.96 ± 0.191.95 ± 0.212.00 ± 0.001.92 ± 0.28
Month 6: Performed paid work (n=83,84,40,36)1.71 ± 0.461.75 ± 0.441.65 ± 0.481.64 ± 0.49
Month 6: Unable to do chores (n=101,98,49,48)1.65 ± 0.481.73 ± 0.441.51 ± 0.511.44 ± 0.50
Month 6: Chores by housekeeper (n=103,99,50,49)1.92 ± 0.271.91 ± 0.291.82 ± 0.391.90 ± 0.31
Month 6: Chores by family/friends (n=103,99,50,49)1.69 ± 0.471.77 ± 0.421.62 ± 0.491.55 ± 0.50
SecondaryNumber of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline and Month 3

RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA/non-RA related number of events including visits to doctor, non-medical practitioner, hospital ER treatment, hospitalizations, number of surgeries, diagnostic tests, and devices/aids used were reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · number of events
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline and Month 3
number of eventsCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline: Doctor visit (n=119,121,111)5.07 ± 5.005.09 ± 5.104.58 ± 3.82
Baseline: NM practitioner visits (n=4,6,5)5.75 ± 4.354.83 ± 3.2521.40 ± 29.75
Baseline: Hospital ER visit (n=14,5,9)1.79 ± 1.532.00 ± 1.731.22 ± 0.44
Baseline: Hospitalization (n=4,4,7)1.25 ± 0.501.00 ± 0.001.14 ± 0.38
Baseline: Outpatient surgery (n=6,4,8)1.17 ± 0.411.00 ± 0.001.00 ± 0.00
Baseline: Non-study diagnostic tests (n=34,32,32)1.85 ± 1.022.06 ± 1.721.69 ± 0.97
Baseline: RA related doctor visit (n=117,120,111)1.46 ± 0.911.18 ± 0.841.44 ± 0.93
Baseline: RA related ER visit (n=15,6,9)0.67 ± 0.900.67 ± 0.820.89 ± 0.93
Baseline: RA related diagnostic test (n=35,33,34)0.71 ± 0.830.79 ± 1.140.82 ± 0.76
Baseline: RA related hospitalization (n=4,5,7)0.75 ± 0.960.80 ± 1.100.86 ± 0.69
Baseline: RA related outpatient surgery (n=6,5,9)0.33 ± 0.820.80 ± 0.840.89 ± 0.93
Baselin:RA related NM visit (n=4,7,5)1.25 ± 0.960.57 ± 0.531.00 ± 1.00
Month 3: Doctor visit (n=89,99,93)3.30 ± 2.913.69 ± 3.734.04 ± 4.59
Month 3: NM practitioners visits (n=4,4,4)36.25 ± 40.255.00 ± 2.008.75 ± 10.63
Month 3: Hospital ER visit (n=7,8,8)1.00 ± 0.001.38 ± 1.061.38 ± 0.74
Month 3: Hospitalization (n=1,0,2)1.00 ± NANA ± NA1.00 ± 0.00
Month 3: Outpatient surgery (n=7,3,4)1.14 ± 0.381.00 ± 0.001.00 ± 0.00
Month 3: Non-study diagnostic tests (n=22,22,26)1.82 ± 1.651.14 ± 0.351.62 ± 1.27
Month 3: RA related doctor visit (n=90,98,93)1.16 ± 1.080.82 ± 0.651.13 ± 0.92
Month 3: RA related ER visit (n=7,8,8)0.43 ± 0.790.00 ± 0.000.75 ± 1.39
Month 3: RA related diagnostic test (n=23,22,26)0.30 ± 0.470.23 ± 0.430.35 ± 0.56
Month 3: RA related hospitalization (n=1,0,2)0.00 ± NANA ± NA0.00 ± 0.00
Month 3:RA related outpatient surgery (n=7,3,4)0.43 ± 0.790.67 ± 1.151.00 ± 1.15
Month 3:RA related NM visit (n=4,4,4)0.75 ± 0.961.25 ± 0.961.25 ± 0.96
SecondaryNumber of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 6

RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA/non-RA related number of events including visits to doctor, non-medical practitioner, hospital ER treatment, hospitalizations, number of surgeries, diagnostic tests, and devices/aids used were reported.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · number of events
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 6
number of eventsCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 6: Doctor visit (n=73,80,39,36)3.26 ± 2.833.84 ± 4.253.64 ± 4.034.97 ± 6.73
Month 6: NM practitioner visit (n=1,4,1,2)5.00 ± NA15.50 ± 10.6320.00 ± NA4.00 ± 0.00
Month 6: Hospital ER visit (n=4,7,3,1)1.25 ± 0.501.43 ± 0.791.67 ± 1.151.00 ± NA
Month 6: Hospitalization (n=2,1,2,1)2.00 ± 0.001.00 ± NA1.00 ± 0.001.00 ± NA
Month 6: Outpatient surgery (n=0,5,2,2)NA ± NA1.00 ± 0.002.50 ± 0.711.50 ± 0.71
Month 6: Non-study diagnostic test (n=15,16,13,7)2.07 ± 2.021.19 ± 0.541.85 ± 0.991.14 ± 0.38
Month 6: RA related doctor visit (n=73,80,40,36)1.10 ± 0.870.86 ± 0.760.85 ± 0.831.00 ± 0.96
Month 6: RA related ER visit (n=4,7,3,1)0.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± NA
Month 6: RA related diagnostic test (n=16,16,13,7)0.44 ± 0.730.00 ± 0.000.31 ± 0.850.29 ± 0.49
Month 6: RA related hospitalization (n=2,1,2,1)0.00 ± 0.000.00 ± NA0.00 ± 0.002.00 ± NA
Month 6:RA related outpatient surgery (n=5,2,0,2)0.00 ± 0.002.00 ± 0.00NA ± NA0.00 ± 0.00
Month6:RA related NM practitioner visit(n=1,4,1,2)1.00 ± NA2.00 ± 1.630.00 ± NA1.00 ± 1.41
SecondaryNumber of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline and Month 3

RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of days spent in hospital, nursing home, aids/devices used, on sick leave, work per week, performed part time work, performed paid work, chores done by housekeeper and chores done by family/friends were reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · days
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline and Month 3
daysCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline: Hospital length of stay (n=4,4,7)1.75 ± 0.967.00 ± 7.575.43 ± 3.78
Baseline: Days in nursing home (n=1,1,1)2.00 ± NA28.00 ± NA28.00 ± NA
Baseline: Days devices/aids used (n=31,18,24)122.94 ± 139.56100.28 ± 122.8294.63 ± 86.62
Baseline: Days of work per week (n=39,46,41)4.67 ± 1.244.83 ± 1.294.90 ± 1.18
Baseline: Chores by housekeeper (n=20,18,24)13.35 ± 20.3220.56 ± 32.5315.88 ± 23.45
Baseline: Chores by family/friend (n=71,65,66)27.55 ± 31.8826.31 ± 32.2727.38 ± 30.75
Baseline: Days on sick leave (n=17,22,28)19.76 ± 25.5913.09 ± 16.1523.71 ± 31.28
Baseline: Days of part time work (n=6,6,11)41.33 ± 40.416.83 ± 4.9612.36 ± 16.20
Baseline: Paid work, bothered by RA (n=36,40,32)50.72 ± 63.3639.75 ± 32.8531.00 ± 30.79
Baseline: RA related devices/aids used (31,20,24)2.06 ± 1.591.75 ± 1.481.79 ± 0.88
Month 3: Hospital length of stay (n=1,0,2)12.00 ± NANA ± NA11.00 ± 12.73
Month 3: Days in nursing home (n=1,1,1)9.00 ± NA21.00 ± NA21.00 ± NA
Month 3: Days devices/aids used (n=21,10,26)113.24 ± 102.65264.10 ± 429.4873.85 ± 70.60
Month 3: Days of work per week (n=33,47,37)4.94 ± 1.094.89 ± 1.094.65 ± 1.06
Month 3: Chores by housekeeper (n=15,14,17)13.00 ± 16.7616.93 ± 31.2210.12 ± 12.84
Month 3: Chores by family/friend (n=50,41,52)27.30 ± 31.1324.24 ± 32.5425.19 ± 36.03
Month 3: Days on sick leave (n=11,13,16)22.09 ± 28.516.62 ± 4.9413.69 ± 20.16
Month 3: Days of part time work (n=4,4,5)8.25 ± 9.469.25 ± 7.898.20 ± 11.12
Month 3: Paid work, bothered by RA (n=19,29,28)26.58 ± 30.3017.76 ± 23.9830.54 ± 30.39
Month 3: RA related devices/aids used (22,11,27)2.09 ± 1.313.00 ± 4.452.04 ± 1.26
SecondaryNumber of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 6

RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of days spent in hospital, nursing home, aids/devices used, on sick leave, work per week, performed part time work, performed paid work, chores done by housekeeper and chores done by family/friends were reported.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · days
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 6
daysCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 6: Hospital length of stay (n=2,1,2,1)32.00 ± 33.943.00 ± NA25.00 ± 21.2124.00 ± NA
Month 6: Days in nursing home (n=2,0,0,2)21.50 ± 0.71NA ± NANA ± NA13.50 ± 2.12
Month 6: Days devices/aids used (n=18,7,5,8)141.28 ± 105.3168.43 ± 30.12182.40 ± 87.1175.00 ± 79.33
Month 6: Days of work per week (n=34,36,20,14)4.62 ± 1.334.97 ± 1.004.85 ± 0.994.71 ± 1.49
Month 6: Chores by housekeeper (n=8,9,9,5)12.75 ± 13.2124.89 ± 36.099.22 ± 10.737.80 ± 4.55
Month 6: Chores by family/friend (n=32,23,18,19)28.91 ± 32.1018.83 ± 26.9719.33 ± 24.1417.63 ± 26.46
Month 6: Days on sick leave (n=7,10,5,5)21.00 ± 31.8610.40 ± 14.499.20 ± 11.1742.60 ± 44.81
Month 6: Days of part time work (n=3,3,0,3)5.67 ± 8.089.33 ± 5.03NA ± NA21.33 ± 33.49
Month 6: Paid work, bothered by RA (n=21,19,12,11)25.00 ± 32.7614.95 ± 20.8522.17 ± 31.9819.64 ± 21.73
Month 6: RA related devices/aids used (19,8,5,8)2.05 ± 1.221.13 ± 0.642.20 ± 0.841.63 ± 1.19
SecondaryNumber of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline and Month 3

RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of hours spent per day for home healthcare services, chores done by housekeeper, chores done by family or friends, hours affected per day and average number of hours missed work per day were reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · hours per day
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline and Month 3
hours per dayCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline: Home healthcare services (n=2,1,4)5.00 ± 4.243.00 ± NA7.25 ± 11.18
Baseline: Work done (n=39,45,41)9.41 ± 8.528.18 ± 7.188.98 ± 7.35
Baseline: Chores by housekeeper (n=19,18,23)4.68 ± 3.233.83 ± 1.544.78 ± 2.37
Baseline: Chores by family/friend (n=71,63,66)2.85 ± 1.894.44 ± 11.213.42 ± 2.61
Baseline: Missed work due to RA (n=6,6,11)2.67 ± 1.973.17 ± 2.237.55 ± 7.31
Baseline: RA related home HC services (n=2,2,5)1.50 ± 0.710.50 ± 0.710.80 ± 0.84
Month 3: Home healthcare services (n=3,1,3)4.00 ± 3.462.00 ± NA9.33 ± 12.70
Month 3: Work done (n=34,46,37)7.97 ± 4.729.20 ± 8.527.76 ± 1.98
Month 3: Chores by housekeeper (n=15,14,17)4.00 ± 2.203.71 ± 1.145.41 ± 5.26
Month 3: Chores by family/friend (n=50,41,49)3.50 ± 3.722.83 ± 2.574.00 ± 5.34
Month 3: Missed work due to RA (n=4,4,5)3.00 ± 2.006.25 ± 6.187.80 ± 9.12
Month 3: RA related home HC services (n=3,1,3)1.33 ± 0.581.00 ± NA1.67 ± 0.58
SecondaryNumber of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Month 6

RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of hours spent per day for home healthcare services, chores done by housekeeper, chores done by family or friends, hours affected per day and average number of hours missed work per day were reported.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · hours per day
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Month 6
hours per dayCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 6: Home healthcare services (n=0,2,0,0)NA ± NA2.00 ± 1.41NA ± NANA ± NA
Month 6: Work done (n=34,36,20,14)7.53 ± 2.1910.36 ± 9.857.65 ± 2.1610.21 ± 8.78
Month 6: Chores by housekeeper (n=8,9,9,5)2.88 ± 2.363.78 ± 1.205.00 ± 3.285.00 ± 1.58
Month 6: Chores by family/friend (n=31,22,18,19)3.16 ± 2.572.05 ± 1.052.72 ± 1.673.63 ± 5.58
Month 6: Missed work due to RA (n=3,3,0,3)4.00 ± 0.002.67 ± 1.15NA ± NA2.00 ± 1.73
Month 6: RA related home HC services (n=0,2,0,0)NA ± NA1.00 ± 0.00NA ± NANA ± NA
SecondaryWork Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline and Month 3

Work performance of participants on number of days bothered was based on 10-point scale, where higher score indicated lower work performance.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Work Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline and Month 3
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline (n=73,76,72)4.27 ± 3.204.38 ± 3.124.65 ± 3.23
Month 3 (n=63,72,73)3.52 ± 3.243.51 ± 4.734.04 ± 3.37
SecondaryWork Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 6

Work performance of participants on number of days bothered was based on 10-point scale, where higher score indicated lower work performance.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Work Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 6
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Work Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 63.27 ± 2.942.63 ± 2.753.33 ± 3.224.83 ± 3.33
SecondaryWork Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline and Month 3

WLQ: participant-reported 25-item scale to evaluate degree to which health problems interfere with an ability to perform job roles along 4 dimensions: Time Management scale (TMS)(5-items); Physical Demands scale (PDS) (6-item); Mental-Interpersonal Demands Scale (MIDS) (9-items); Output Demands Scale (ODS) (5-items). All the scales ranged from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all of the time). Work Loss Index (WLI), which represented percentage of lost work over time period relative to a normative population, was derived (total score: 0 \[no loss\] to 100 \[complete loss of work\]).

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline and Month 3
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Baseline: TMS (n=42,54,48)43.96 ± 26.3948.53 ± 25.0350.91 ± 28.08
Baseline: PDS (n=43,55,55)49.44 ± 28.4948.95 ± 21.5051.86 ± 25.25
Baseline: MIDS (n=42,54,56)28.44 ± 24.3531.79 ± 23.6634.36 ± 27.68
Baseline: ODS (n=41,50,52)41.95 ± 31.5037.30 ± 25.7440.20 ± 25.89
Baseline: WLI (n=44,57,57)10.51 ± 6.0710.27 ± 5.7110.99 ± 5.96
Month 3: TMS (n=38,50,42)36.09 ± 26.8336.47 ± 26.7247.62 ± 29.23
Month 3: PDS (n=40,51,43)52.08 ± 30.7447.20 ± 26.3942.31 ± 24.32
Month 3: MIDS (n=40,54,44)27.82 ± 28.8028.60 ± 27.3437.22 ± 28.70
Month 3: ODS (n=39,51,43)26.30 ± 29.1630.78 ± 26.1242.67 ± 28.97
Month 3: WLI (n=43,56,44)8.30 ± 6.578.73 ± 6.1111.67 ± 6.29
SecondaryWork Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Month 6

WLQ: participant-reported 25-item scale to evaluate degree to which health problems interfere with an ability to perform job roles along 4 dimensions: Time Management scale (TMS)(5-items); Physical Demands scale (PDS) (6-item); Mental-Interpersonal Demands Scale (MIDS) (9-items); Output Demands Scale (ODS) (5-items). All the scales ranged from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all of the time). Work Loss Index (WLI), which represented percentage of lost work over time period relative to a normative population, was derived (total score: 0 \[no loss\] to 100 \[complete loss of work\]).

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Month 6
units on a scaleCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 6: TMS (n=39,42,23,18)26.96 ± 29.7230.77 ± 27.8332.50 ± 30.7932.73 ± 25.10
Month 6: PDS (n=38,42,24,18)47.53 ± 36.9744.65 ± 30.6040.94 ± 27.8247.15 ± 29.47
Month 6: MIDS (n=40,45,24,19)18.50 ± 26.9029.84 ± 29.0331.95 ± 32.2630.68 ± 32.09
Month 6: ODS (n=39,44,24,19)21.32 ± 27.7429.20 ± 29.0030.50 ± 31.9433.68 ± 28.02
Month 6: WLI (n=40,45,24,19)6.87 ± 6.538.78 ± 7.079.27 ± 7.069.62 ± 7.41
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than 2.6 and Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Week 2, Month 1 and 3

DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) \<=3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-3 (CRP) \<2.6 = remission.

Time frame:
Week 2, Month 1, 3
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than 2.6 and Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Week 2, Month 1 and 3
participantsCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Week 2: DAS28-3(CRP) <2.6 (n=127,125,124)8122
Week 2: DAS28-3(CRP) <=3.2 (n=127,125,124)19234
Month 1: DAS28-3(CRP) <2.6 (n=132,133,131)1473
Month 1: DAS28-3(CRP) <=3.2 (n=132,133,131)274211
Month 3: DAS28-3(CRP) <2.6 (n=132,133,131)27356
Month 3: DAS28-3(CRP) <=3.2 (n=132,133,131)455713
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than 2.6 and Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 4.5 and 6

DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) \<=3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-3 (CRP) \<2.6 = remission.

Time frame:
Month 4.5, 6
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than 2.6 and Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 4.5 and 6
participantsCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 4.5: DAS28-3(CRP) <2.631421412
Month 4.5: DAS28-3(CRP) <=3.250572119
Month 6: DAS28-3(CRP) <2.63536119
Month 6: DAS28-3(CRP) <=3.257592319
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 and Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 3

DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 = remission.

Time frame:
Month 3
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 and Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 3
participantsCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo
Month 3: DAS28-4 (ESR) <2.68142
Month 3: DAS28-4 (ESR) <=3.217286
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 and Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 6

DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 = remission.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 and Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 6
participantsCP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Month 6: DAS28-4(ESR) <2.6132072
Month 6: DAS28-4 (ESR) <=3.235371111

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
CP-690,550 5 mg Up to Month 3—2/133 (1.5%)37/133 (27.8%)
CP-690,550 10 mg Up to Month 3—2/134 (1.5%)43/134 (32.1%)
Placebo Up to Month 3—6/132 (4.5%)46/132 (34.8%)
CP-690,550 5 mg From Month 3 to 6—8/199 (4%)35/199 (17.6%)
CP-690,550 10 mg From Month 3 to 6—8/200 (4%)30/200 (15%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 31
Most frequent serious events
EventCP-690,550 5 mg Up to Month 3CP-690,550 10 mg Up to Month 3Placebo Up to Month 3CP-690,550 5 mg From Month 3 to 6CP-690,550 10 mg From Month 3 to 6
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders1/1330/1340/1322/1990/200
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/1330/1340/1320/1992/200
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1330/1340/1320/1992/200
Drug ineffectiveGeneral disorders0/1330/1341/1320/1990/200
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations0/1330/1341/1320/1990/200
ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1330/1341/1320/1990/200
Foot fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1330/1341/1320/1990/200
Joint sprainInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1330/1341/1320/1990/200
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/1330/1341/1320/1990/200
HyponatraemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/1330/1341/1320/1990/200
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 25
Most frequent other events
EventCP-690,550 5 mg Up to Month 3CP-690,550 10 mg Up to Month 3Placebo Up to Month 3CP-690,550 5 mg From Month 3 to 6CP-690,550 10 mg From Month 3 to 6
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders4/1332/1349/1324/1991/200
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders8/1335/1345/1320/1990/200
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/1338/1341/1321/1994/200
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations5/1336/1344/1326/1995/200
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations5/1332/1344/1325/1998/200
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/1330/1345/1320/1990/200
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders3/1331/1345/1320/1990/200
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1331/1345/1320/1990/200
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations5/1333/1343/1324/1992/200
Rheumatoid arthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/1331/1344/1327/1990/200

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mgTotal
Mean55.4 ± 11.555.1 ± 11.354.3 ± 11.754.5 ± 11.055.0 ± 11.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CP-690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 10 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mgPlacebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mgTotal
Female1131165353335
Male2018131364
08

Study locations

92 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    San Diego, California 92108, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Farmington, Connecticut 06030-5353, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Trumbull, Connecticut 06611, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Aventura, Florida 33180, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Tampa, Florida 33614, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30342, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Boise, Idaho 83702, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Idaho Falls, Idaho 83404, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Springfield, Illinois 62704, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46227, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70115, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Portland, Maine 04102, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Cumberland, Maryland 21502, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01610, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Flowood, Mississippi 39232, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Tupelo, Mississippi 38801, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Voorhees, New Jersey 08043, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27804, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015-1153, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Willow Grove, Pennsylvania 19090, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania 19610, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Hixson, Tennessee 37343, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37909, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Fort Worth, Texas 76107, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Houston, Texas 77034, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Lubbock, Texas 79424, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Vancouver, Washington 98664, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Vancouver, Washington 98684, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Vancouver, Washington 98686, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kogarah, New South Wales 2217, Australia
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Daw Park, South Australia 5041, Australia
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Heidelberg, Victoria 3081, Australia
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Wien, 1090, Austria
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Wien, 1100, Austria
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Wien, A-1100, Austria
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Wien, Austria
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Genk, 3600, Belgium
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Hasselt, 3500, Belgium
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kortrijk, Belgium
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Liège, 4020, Belgium
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Goiania, GO 74110-120, Brazil
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Curitiba, PR 80060-240, Brazil
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Porto Alegre, RS 90610-000, Brazil
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Sao Paulo, SP 04266-010, Brazil
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3A 1M3, Canada
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 1Y2, Canada
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 2B6, Canada
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 1A2, Canada
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Montreal, Quebec H2L 1S6, Canada
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Pointe Claire, Quebec H9R 3J1, Canada
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Amiens, 80054, France
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Lyon, France
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Orleans Cedex 1, 45032, France
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Orleans, 45000, France
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Paris, 75014, France
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Paris, France
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Berlin, 14163, Germany
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Erlangen, 91054, Germany
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Frankfurt am Main, 60590, Germany
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Halle, 06108, Germany
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Hamburg, 22081, Germany
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Koeln, 50937, Germany
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Leipzig, 04103, Germany
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Rheine, 48431, Germany
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Wuerzburg, 97080, Germany
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Croom, Co. Limerick, Ireland
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Dublin, 4, Ireland
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Firenze, 50139, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Jesi, Italy
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Busan, 602-715, Korea, Republic of
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Daegu, 705-718, Korea, Republic of
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Seoul, 135-720, Korea, Republic of
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    San Juan, 00910, Puerto Rico
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña 15705, Spain
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Merida, Badajoz 06800, Spain
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Bilbao, Bizkaia 48013, Spain
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Santander, Cantabria 39008, Spain
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Baracaldo, Vizcaya 48903, Spain
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Madrid, 28007, Spain
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Valencia, 46017, Spain
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Niao Sung Hsiang, Kaohsiung County 833, Taiwan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kweishan, Taoyuan County 333, Taiwan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Changhua, 500, Taiwan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kaohsiung, 813, Taiwan
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Dikranian AH, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Wellborne F, Alvaro-Gracia JM, Takiya L, Stockert L, Paulissen J, Shi H, Tatulych S, Curtis JR. Efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis stratified by baseline body mass index: an analysis of pooled data from phase 3 studies. RMD Open. 2022 May;8(1):e002103. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002103. PubMed 35577477 ↗
  • Dikranian A, Gold D, Bessette L, Nash P, Azevedo VF, Wang L, Woolcott J, Shapiro AB, Szumski A, Fleishaker D, Wollenhaupt J. Frequency and Duration of Early Non-serious Adverse Events in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with Tofacitinib. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Apr;9(2):411-433. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00405-w. Epub 2021 Dec 17. PubMed 34921355 ↗
  • Winthrop KL, Curtis JR, Yamaoka K, Lee EB, Hirose T, Rivas JL, Kwok K, Burmester GR. Clinical Management of Herpes Zoster in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis or Psoriatic Arthritis Receiving Tofacitinib Treatment. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Feb;9(1):243-263. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00390-0. Epub 2021 Dec 6. PubMed 34870800 ↗
  • Cohen SB, Tanaka Y, Mariette X, Curtis JR, Lee EB, Nash P, Winthrop KL, Charles-Schoeman C, Wang L, Chen C, Kwok K, Biswas P, Shapiro A, Madsen A, Wollenhaupt J. Long-term safety of tofacitinib up to 9.5 years: a comprehensive integrated analysis of the rheumatoid arthritis clinical development programme. RMD Open. 2020 Oct;6(3):e001395. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001395. PubMed 33127856 ↗
  • Strand V, Kaine J, Alten R, Wallenstein G, Diehl A, Shi H, Germino R, Murray CW. Associations between Patient Global Assessment scores and pain, physical function, and fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of data from phase 3 trials of tofacitinib. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Oct 15;22(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02324-7. PubMed 33059710 ↗
  • Panaccione R, Isaacs JD, Chen LA, Wang W, Marren A, Kwok K, Wang L, Chan G, Su C. Characterization of Creatine Kinase Levels in Tofacitinib-Treated Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Results from Clinical Trials. Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Aug;66(8):2732-2743. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06560-4. Epub 2020 Aug 20. Erratum In: Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Sep;66(9):3214-3215. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06638-z. PubMed 32816215 ↗
  • Kivitz AJ, Cohen S, Keystone E, van Vollenhoven RF, Haraoui B, Kaine J, Fan H, Connell CA, Bananis E, Takiya L, Fleischmann R. A pooled analysis of the safety of tofacitinib as monotherapy or in combination with background conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in a Phase 3 rheumatoid arthritis population. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Dec;48(3):406-415. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 19. PubMed 30177460 ↗
  • Hall S, Nash P, Rischmueller M, Bossingham D, Bird P, Cook N, Witcombe D, Soma K, Kwok K, Thirunavukkarasu K. Tofacitinib, an Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor: Pooled Efficacy and Safety Analyses in an Australian Rheumatoid Arthritis Population. Rheumatol Ther. 2018 Dec;5(2):383-401. doi: 10.1007/s40744-018-0118-2. Epub 2018 Jun 11. PubMed 29949132 ↗
  • Mariette X, Chen C, Biswas P, Kwok K, Boy MG. Lymphoma in the Tofacitinib Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Development Program. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 May;70(5):685-694. doi: 10.1002/acr.23421. Epub 2018 Apr 2. PubMed 28941219 ↗
  • Cohen SB, Tanaka Y, Mariette X, Curtis JR, Lee EB, Nash P, Winthrop KL, Charles-Schoeman C, Thirunavukkarasu K, DeMasi R, Geier J, Kwok K, Wang L, Riese R, Wollenhaupt J. Long-term safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis up to 8.5 years: integrated analysis of data from the global clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jul;76(7):1253-1262. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210457. Epub 2017 Jan 31. PubMed 28143815 ↗
  • Vieira MC, Zwillich SH, Jansen JP, Smiechowski B, Spurden D, Wallenstein GV. Tofacitinib Versus Biologic Treatments in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors: Results From a Network Meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2016 Dec;38(12):2628-2641.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 24. PubMed 27889300 ↗
  • Charles-Schoeman C, Burmester G, Nash P, Zerbini CA, Soma K, Kwok K, Hendrikx T, Bananis E, Fleischmann R. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib following inadequate response to conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jul;75(7):1293-301. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-207178. Epub 2015 Aug 14. Erratum In: Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Mar;76(3):611. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-207178corr1. PubMed 26275429 ↗
  • Strand V, Burmester GR, Zerbini CA, Mebus CA, Zwillich SH, Gruben D, Wallenstein GV. Tofacitinib with methotrexate in third-line treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: patient-reported outcomes from a phase III trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Apr;67(4):475-83. doi: 10.1002/acr.22453. PubMed 25186034 ↗
  • Cohen S, Radominski SC, Gomez-Reino JJ, Wang L, Krishnaswami S, Wood SP, Soma K, Nduaka CI, Kwok K, Valdez H, Benda B, Riese R. Analysis of infections and all-cause mortality in phase II, phase III, and long-term extension studies of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;66(11):2924-37. doi: 10.1002/art.38779. PubMed 25047021 ↗
  • Burmester GR, Blanco R, Charles-Schoeman C, Wollenhaupt J, Zerbini C, Benda B, Gruben D, Wallenstein G, Krishnaswami S, Zwillich SH, Koncz T, Soma K, Bradley J, Mebus C; ORAL Step investigators. Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013 Feb 9;381(9865):451-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61424-X. Epub 2013 Jan 5. PubMed 23294500 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 19, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00960440
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 17, 2009
Start date
Oct 2009
Primary completion
Mar 2011
Completion
Mar 2011
Results posted
Jan 10, 2013
Last update
Dec 19, 2018

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion