ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00959335Updated Mar 28, 2017

Relative Bioavailability Study of Bicalutamide 50 mg Tablet and Casodex Following a 50 mg Dose in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting Conditions

A Phase 1 interventional study of Bicalutamide 50 mg Film-Coated Tablets (Casodex) (Astrazeneca Pharmaceutical LP, USA) and Bicalutamide 50 mg Film-Coated Tablets (Sandoz Inc., USA) in Prostate Cancer and Hirsutism, sponsored by Sandoz. Completed. Open to male participants aged 19 Years to 63 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-28.

Sponsored by Sandoz (formerly part of Novartis) · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 63 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the relative bioavailability of Bicalutamide 50 mg tablet and Casodex following a 50 mg dose in healthy subjects under fasting conditions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer
  • Hirsutism

Keywords

  • treatment
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

7,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,580 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 60 across 5,348 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Sandoz is the lead sponsor of 139 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (55%) have results posted.

First submitted before Sandoz left Novartis.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 63 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • No abnormal finding on physical exam, medical history, or clinical laboratory results on screening.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Positive test results for or or C.
  • Treatment for drug or alcohol dependence.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    2

    Bicalutamide 50 mg Film-Coated Tablets (Casodex) (Astrazeneca Pharmaceutical LP, USA)

    Drug: Bicalutamide 50 mg Film-Coated Tablets (Casodex) (Astrazeneca Pharmaceutical LP, USA)

  • Experimental
    1

    Bicalutamide 50 mg Film-Coated Tablets (Sandoz Inc., USA)

    Drug: Bicalutamide 50 mg Film-Coated Tablets (Sandoz Inc., USA)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bioequivalence based on AUC and Cmax

    Time frame: 11 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2006, a primary completion of Aug 2006 and a completion of Aug 2006. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 13, 2009
First posted
Aug 14, 2009
Start
Aug 2006
Primary completionActual
Aug 2006
CompletionActual
Aug 2006
Last update
Mar 28, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 28, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00959335
Lead sponsor
Sandoz
First posted
Aug 14, 2009
Start date
Aug 2006
Primary completion
Aug 2006
Completion
Aug 2006
Last update
Mar 28, 2017

Study contacts

Richard Larouche, M.D.
principal investigator · Anapharm
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Bicalutamide

Start the discussion