CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00952978Updated Aug 6, 2009

Ilaprazole for the Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer in Chinese Patients (Phase 3)

A Phase 3 interventional study of 10 mg ilaprazole and 20 mg omeprazole in Duodenal Ulcer, sponsored by Livzon Pharmaceutical Group Inc.. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-08-06.

Sponsored by Livzon Pharmaceutical Group Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
496
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with endoscopically diagnosed active duodenal ulcer disease were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, parallel and positive-controlled trial. They were randomly assigned into two groups, 10 mg/day ilaprazole and 20 mg/day omeprazole, to be treated for up to four weeks and be seen at week 1, 2 and 4. The primary endpoint was the ulcer healing rate at week 4. Healing of ulcer was determined by its resolution from active to scarring stage. Symptoms relief was evaluated as secondary end points by using a graded score. Safety and tolerability were evaluated on basis of clinical assessments.

Read the detailed description

The primary endpoint was the healing rate of ulcers, which based on post-treatment (week 4) endoscopic changes in stage of the ulcer relative to baseline (week 0) levels. Stages of the ulcers were endoscopically assessed according to the degree of ulceration, regenerating epithelialization, and scarring, which was defined as follows: A stage (active stage, A1 \& A2) where A1 stage is more severe than A2 stage, H stage (healing stage, H1 \& H2) where H2 stage is better than H1 stage, and S stage (scarring stage, S1 (red scar) \& S2 (white scar)) where S stage is the best stage in the three stages and S2 stage is better than S1.Healing of ulcer is deemed successful if an ulcer in A stage resolved to S stage at the end of the treatment period, regardless of S1 or S2. When endoscopy demonstrated successful ulcer healing, study medication was discontinued. Patients returned at week 2, and if unhealed further endoscopic assessment would be done at week 4. Secondary endpoints included post-treatment resolution of related gastrointestinal symptoms such as upper abdominal pain, heartburn, acid regurgitation, nausea \& vomiting, eructation, and increased flatus. These symptoms were recorded on a scale ranging from 0 to 3(0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) at baseline, week 1, 2, and 4. Resolution of symptoms were defined as "excellence", "effective", "improved", or "ineffective" relative to baseline levels, of which complete symptom relief or complete absence of the symptom without recurrence was deemed as "excellence". Safety assessments based mainly on the occurrence, frequency, and severity of adverse events, which were monitored throughout the duration of the study, and also based on comprehensive indexes, including physical examination, electrocardiography, and routine laboratory investigations, which were performed at baseline and repeated at the end of the treatment period. For all adverse events, where necessary, patients were withdrawn from the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Duodenal Ulcer

Keywords

  • Ilaprazole
  • Proton pump inhibitor
  • Duodenal ulcer
  • Acid suppression
  • Randomized trial
03

In context

Duodenal Ulcer

75 studies on the registry are indexed under Duodenal Ulcer; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 496 is above the median of 284 across 50 interventional studies indexed under Duodenal Ulcer.

Browse Duodenal Ulcer studies →

Lead sponsor

Livzon Pharmaceutical Group Inc. is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Consenting patients were eligible for enrollment if they:

    1. were 18-65 years of age,
    2. had endoscopically diagnosed active duodenal ulcers within the previous 72 hours and
    3. the number of ulcers was at least one, but no more than two with the larger diameter 0.3-2.0cm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients were ineligible if they:

    1. had cancerous or complex ulcers, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, esophageal erosion or ulcer, varices of esophagus or fundus of stomach, or pyloric stenosis,
    2. had a known history of gastric acid suppression operation, esophageal operation or peptic operation other than simple closure of perforation,
    3. had severe complications (e.g., pyloric obstruction, active bleeding under endoscope), severe other diseases of digestive tract such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and severe other systemic diseases,
    4. were female patients who were breast feeding, pregnant, or intended to become pregnant during the study,
    5. had taken proton pump inhibitors within the 5 days or for more than three consecutive days within the two weeks immediately preceding start of study drug,
    6. participated in a clinical trial with an investigational drug or device within the past three months,
    7. had hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to omeprazole or any other benzimidazole,
    8. had alcoholic intemperance, drug addiction or any other improper habits.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
496 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    10 mg ilaprazole

    Drug: 10 mg ilaprazole

  • Active comparator
    20 mg omeprazole

    Drug: 20 mg omeprazole

Interventions

  • Drug10 mg ilaprazole

    Two 5-mg ilaprazole tablets(Livzon Pharm Group Inc., China) together with one placebo capsule in a package being taken orally each morning on an empty stomach for 4 weeks

  • Drug20 mg omeprazole

    One 20-mg omeprazole capsule (AstraZeneca, Losec) together with two placebo tablets in a package being taken orally each morning on an empty stomach for 4 weeks

    Also known as: Losec,AstraZeneca

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary endpoint was the healing rate of ulcers, which based on post-treatment (week 4) endoscopic changes in stage of the ulcer relative to baseline (week 0) levels.

    Time frame: week 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary endpoints included post-treatment resolution of related gastrointestinal symptoms such as nightly pain, heartburn, nightly acid regurgitation, nausea & vomiting, eructation, and increased flatus.

    Time frame: week 4

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Peking University Third Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wang L, Zhou L, Hu H, Lin S, Xia J. Ilaprazole for the treatment of duodenal ulcer: a randomized, double-blind and controlled phase III trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):101-9. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.639353. Epub 2012 Jan 3. PubMed 22070512 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 6, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00952978
Lead sponsor
Livzon Pharmaceutical Group Inc.
First posted
Aug 6, 2009
Start date
Sep 2005
Primary completion
Feb 2006
Completion
May 2006
Last update
Aug 6, 2009

Study contacts

S R Lin, M.D
principal investigator · Peking University Third Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion