ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00931268Updated Sep 28, 2022Results posted

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Buttock Lipoatrophy Treatment With Macrolane

An interventional study of Macrolane VRF 30 in Atrophy, sponsored by Galderma R&D. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-28.

Primary conditionAtrophy(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?Atrophy is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by Galderma R&D (part of Galderma Group AG) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study is being undertaken to establish the effectiveness and safety of Macrolane volume restoration factor 30 (VRF30) when used for treatment of HIV-infected subjects with buttocks lipoatrophy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrophy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Lipoatrophy
  • Buttock treatment
03

In context

Atrophy Unverified

125 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrophy; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 36 across 104 interventional studies indexed under Atrophy.

Browse Atrophy studies →

Lead sponsor

Galderma R&D is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Of its 60 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 55 (92%) have results posted.

Compared within Atrophy, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have buttocks lipoatrophy and is unable to remain seated for more than 30 minutes due to pain.
  • Have undergone treatment for more than 2 years.
  • Have RNA copies less than 50/ml.
  • Have CD4 more than 200 cell/mm3.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active infections.
  • Active skin disease, inflammation or related conditions.
  • Perineal pathology.
  • Condition that may affect pain assessment.
  • Skin with underlying fibrous tissue.
  • less than 19.
  • Insufficient tissue cover in the area to be treated.
  • Concomitant anticoagulant therapy and therapy with inhibitors of aggregation within 14 days prior to treatment, or a history of bleeding disorders.
  • Permanent implant placed in the treatment area.
  • Other injectable implant, liposuction or other surgical therapy in the treatment area.
  • Presence or history of connective tissue diseases.
  • Tumors or pre-malign tissue disorder near or on the area to be treated.
  • for MRI
  • Previous to hyaluronic acid, or to the local anesthetic or antibiotic used in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Macrolane VRF 30

    Open label, baseline-controlled, one treatment session with injection of Macrolane VRF30 to each buttock, not exceeding 400 ml per subject.

    Device: Macrolane VRF 30

Interventions

  • DeviceMacrolane VRF 30

    One administration

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From 6 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of Sitting

    Pain at sitting was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS with the descriptors 0 = "no pain" to the left and 100 = "worst possible pain" to the right. Pain was assessed by the subject after sitting 15 minutes on a standardized chair. The VAS pain at 6 months was compared to baseline and the change was calculated.

    Time frame: 6 months after treatment compared to baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From up to 18 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of Sitting

    Pain at sitting was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS with the descriptors 0 = "no pain" to the left and 100 = "worst possible pain" to the right. Pain was assessed by the subject after sitting 15 minutes on a standardized chair. The change in VAS pain was assessed at the time points 1, 3, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 18 months after treatment

  2. Quality of Life Assessed by MOS-HIV (Medical Outcome Study-HIV) Questionnaire

    A physical health summary score and a mental health summary score was generated on a rating scale of 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate better health. The change in health summary scores were assessed at the time points 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and at 6 months after treatment

  3. Number of Participants With Global Esthetic Improvement

    Number of participants maintaining an improvement compared to baseline using the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS) consisting of 5 grades (worse/no change/improved/much improved/very much improved), where the three latter indicates improvement. GEIS was assessed at the time points 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to pre-treatment photos.

    Time frame: One month and up to 18 months after treatment

  4. Number of Participants With Gel Displacement Evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    MRI was performed at baseline and at 1, 6, 9, and 12 months to determine the implant volume, thickness, localization and the possible local displacement of the implant. At the 6, 9 and 12 month visits any displacement was evaluated with MRI by comparison to the 1-month position of the gel. The number of participants with gel displacement are shown below.

    Time frame: 12 months after treatment

  5. Adverse Event Recording

    Adverse events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, investigator findings, spontaneous reports and by direct questioning in the Case Report Form (CRF).

    Time frame: Up to 18 months after treatment

  6. Time Until it Became Impossible to Stay Sitting

    Evaluation of when (in minutes) it became impossible for the subject to stay in the sitting position on a standardized chair, at the time points 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to baseline. In this analysis "more than 60 minutes" was handled as 60 minutes.

    Time frame: Baseline and at 6 months after treatment

07

Results

Posted Dec 19, 2013

Participant flow

First subject enrolled (screened) and treated: 11 August 2009. Last subject completed study: 2 September 2011.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMacrolane VRF 30
Started10
Completed4
Not completed6
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up6

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From 6 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of Sitting

Pain at sitting was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS with the descriptors 0 = "no pain" to the left and 100 = "worst possible pain" to the right. Pain was assessed by the subject after sitting 15 minutes on a standardized chair. The VAS pain at 6 months was compared to baseline and the change was calculated.

Time frame:
6 months after treatment compared to baseline
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Change From 6 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of Sitting
mmMacrolane VRF 30
Change From 6 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of Sitting-28.1 ± 22.2
SecondaryChange From up to 18 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of Sitting

Pain at sitting was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS with the descriptors 0 = "no pain" to the left and 100 = "worst possible pain" to the right. Pain was assessed by the subject after sitting 15 minutes on a standardized chair. The change in VAS pain was assessed at the time points 1, 3, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to 18 months after treatment
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Change From up to 18 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of Sitting
mmMacrolane VRF 30
VAS pain; change from 1 month to baseline-14.3 ± 15.3
VAS pain; change from 3 months to baseline-40.3 ± 8.9
VAS pain; change from 9 months to baseline-29.4 ± 22.3
VAS pain; change from 12 months to baseline-22.4 ± 25.2
VAS pain; change from 18 months to baseline-15.8 ± 12.7
SecondaryQuality of Life Assessed by MOS-HIV (Medical Outcome Study-HIV) Questionnaire

A physical health summary score and a mental health summary score was generated on a rating scale of 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate better health. The change in health summary scores were assessed at the time points 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline and at 6 months after treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Quality of Life Assessed by MOS-HIV (Medical Outcome Study-HIV) Questionnaire
units on a scaleMacrolane VRF 30
Physical health; change from 6 months to baseline9.0 ± 6.2
Mental health; change from 6 months to baseline5.1 ± 15.6
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Global Esthetic Improvement

Number of participants maintaining an improvement compared to baseline using the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS) consisting of 5 grades (worse/no change/improved/much improved/very much improved), where the three latter indicates improvement. GEIS was assessed at the time points 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to pre-treatment photos.

Time frame:
One month and up to 18 months after treatment
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Global Esthetic Improvement
participantsMacrolane VRF 30
Subject assessed improvement at 6 months10
Physician assessed improvement at 6 months10
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Gel Displacement Evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

MRI was performed at baseline and at 1, 6, 9, and 12 months to determine the implant volume, thickness, localization and the possible local displacement of the implant. At the 6, 9 and 12 month visits any displacement was evaluated with MRI by comparison to the 1-month position of the gel. The number of participants with gel displacement are shown below.

Time frame:
12 months after treatment
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Gel Displacement Evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
participantsMacrolane VRF 30
Gel displacement right buttock0
Gel displacement left buttock0
SecondaryAdverse Event Recording

Adverse events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, investigator findings, spontaneous reports and by direct questioning in the Case Report Form (CRF).

Time frame:
Up to 18 months after treatment
Reported as:
Number · participants
Adverse Event Recording
participantsMacrolane VRF 30
Adverse Event Recording3
SecondaryTime Until it Became Impossible to Stay Sitting

Evaluation of when (in minutes) it became impossible for the subject to stay in the sitting position on a standardized chair, at the time points 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months compared to baseline. In this analysis "more than 60 minutes" was handled as 60 minutes.

Time frame:
Baseline and at 6 months after treatment
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Time Until it Became Impossible to Stay Sitting
minutesMacrolane VRF 30
Mean value at baseline23.8 ± 4.1
Mean value at 6 months59.0 ± 3.2

Adverse events

Collected over From treatment up to 18 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Macrolane VRF 30—0/10 (0%)3/10 (30%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventMacrolane VRF 30
Injection site inflammationGeneral disorders3/10
Implant site effusionGeneral disorders2/10

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Macrolane VRF 30
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years10
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Macrolane VRF 30
Mean44.6 ± 3.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Macrolane VRF 30
Female5
Male5
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Macrolane VRF 30
France10
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Henri Mondor Hospital
    Créteil, France
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 28, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00931268
Lead sponsor
Galderma R&D
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 2, 2009
Start date
Aug 2009
Primary completion
Sep 2011
Completion
May 2012
Results posted
Dec 19, 2013
Last update
Sep 28, 2022

Study contacts

Head of Medical Affairs
study director · Galderma R&D

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion