An interventional study of Full Computerized cognitive training and Limited computerized cognitive training in HIV Infections, sponsored by Michigan State University. Completed at 1 site in Uganda. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 12 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-03-06.
Sponsored by Michigan State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
One-hundred and fifty-nine school-age children with HIV in Kayunga District, Uganda were randomized to one of 3 treatment arms: 24 training sessions of a computerized cognitive rehabilitation therapy (CCRT) program called Captain's Log; 24 sessions of Captain's Log not titrated to child's performance; or no training intervention. Study Aim 1: To compare the neuropsychological benefit of 24 training sessions of Captain's Log CCRT to the active and passive control groups over a 8-week period, and at 3-month follow-up. Study Aim 2: To compare the psychiatric benefit of 24 training sessions of Captain's Log CCRT to the active and passive control groups over an 8-week period, and at 3-month follow-up. Study Aim 3: To evaluate how ART treatment status, and the corresponding clinical stability of the child modifies CCRT neuropsychological performance gains and psychiatric symptom reduction. Outcome Assessments: The Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd ed. (KABC-2), Tests of Variables of Attention (TOVA) visual and auditory tests, CogState computerized neuropsychological screening test, Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2), and Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) will be administered before and after the 8-week training period and at 3-month follow-up post training. Captain's Log has an internal evaluator feature which will help us monitor the specific training tasks to which the children best respond. Analyses: We will compare neuropsychological and psychiatric gains over the 8-week training period and at 3-mo follow-up for our three study groups, anticipating that they will be significantly greater for the CCRT intervention children (Study Aims 1 \& 2). These neuropsychological gains will be associated with improved school performance over the long-term. Intervention children clinically stable on ART will have greater gains than those not stable or virally suppressed on ART. Conclusion: CCRT will prove effective and sustainable for enhancing neurocognitive status in HIV children. Futher work will prove this approach viable for assessing and treating children in resource-poor settings.
Aim 1. To evaluate the effectiveness of CCRT in improving cognitive performance outcomes in Ugandan children with HIV.
Hypothesis 1a: CCRT can improve short and long-term cognitive outcomes in children with HIV; Hypothesis 1b: Improvements in performance associated with CCRT are not solely due to increased computer exposure.
One-hundred and fifty school-age children with HIV in Kayunga District, Uganda, will undergo baseline neuropsychological testing using the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC-2), the computerized Tests of Variables of Attention (TOVA: auditory and visual tests), the brief CogState computerized neuropsychological test battery (CogState), and the Bruininks-Oseretsky Tests of Motor Proficiency (2nd edition) (BOT-2). Cogstate is designed as a neuropsychological screening tool with minimal practice effects and suitable in a repeated measures design for monitoring the benefits of treatment on neurocognitive disability11. Children then will be randomized to either: CCRT intervention group (Captain's Log active rehabilitation), active control group (Captain's Log locked, non-rehabilitation mode), or passive control group (no computer intervention). CCRT or computer controls will be presented over 24 sessions (\~ 45 min) for 8 weeks (3 sessions per week). After the 8-weeks, neurocognitive gains will be assessed with CogState and the KABC-2 working memory subscales (primary expected outcome measures). The full KABC-2, TOVA, CogState, and BOT-2 will be re-administered 3 months after the 8-week assessment. Thus, the full battery will be administered at enrollment and at 3-month follow-up, while the most strategic portions of the battery will be administered following the 8 weeks CCRT intervention period. The combined testing will allow us to assess both the short-term and longer-term neuropsychological benefits of CCRT.
Aim 2. To evaluate the effectiveness of CCRT in reducing psychiatric symptoms in Ugandan children with HIV.
Hypothesis 2: CCRT can reduce short- and long-term psychiatric symptoms in children with HIV.
Previously in cerebral malaria survivors, we demonstrated a significant reduction in short-term symptoms related to anxiety, depression, and somatic complaints as assessed by the Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) following CCRT intervention12. In this aim, caregiver-reported psychiatric symptoms on the CBCL will be assessed at enrollment, after the 8-week CCRT intervention period, and 3 months after enrollment. The CBCL assessment will also help us gauge the psychosocial benefits of the social attention and enrichment surrounding computer exposure in the active control condition, rather than the rehabilitative aspects of CCRT per se. This will be evident as we compare the active and passive control groups.
Aim 3. To evaluate how ARV treatment status and clinical response along with corresponding immunological status of the child modifies CCRT neuropsychological performance gains and psychiatric symptom reduction; .after controlling for quality of home environment, nutrition, and other risk factors of poverty.
Hypothesis 3: Children virally suppressed on ART treatment with a history of fewer opportunistic illnesses and better CD4 counts will have better neuropsychological outcomes in response to CCRT training.The moderating effects of HIV progressive encephalopathy on brain plasticity can also be monitored by CCRT training progress, measures by the Captain's Log Internal Evaluator (CLIE) feature of the CCRT program.
4,258 studies on the registry are indexed under HIV Infections; 240 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 159 is above the median of 83 across 3,251 interventional studies indexed under HIV Infections.
Browse HIV Infections studies →Michigan State University is the lead sponsor of 139 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Intervention is a Computer Cognitive Rehabilitation Training delivered in 24 sessions over 8 weeks (3 times/week). A training session lasts about an hour and consists of 9 training games or programs, 3 pertaining to improving attention, 3 pertaining to improving visual-spatial memory, and 3 pertaining to improving reasoning/planning. Each training game become more difficult as the child gains proficiency.
Behavioral: Full Computerized cognitive training
Passive Control with no intervention training (computer cognitive games) for 8 weeks.
Intervention is a Computer Cognitive Rehabilitation Training delivered in 24 sessions over 8 weeks (3 times/week). A training session lasts about an hour and consists of 9 training games or programs, 3 pertaining to improving attention, 3 pertaining to improving visual-spatial memory, and 3 pertaining to improving reasoning/planning. In this arm, however, the training games do NOT become progressively more difficult as the child gains proficiency, but rotates randomly among simpler to moderate levels of difficulty for each game. The purpose to to give children int he "limited" CCRT arm comparable exposure to the cognitive games training as with the "full CCRT" arm, with the exception of the titrating nature of the game training.
Behavioral: Limited computerized cognitive training
8 weeks of 3 times weekly intervention for 60 min per session with the full titrating version of Captain's Log program (3 games for attention, 3 games for visual spatial working memory, 3 games for reasoning/planning
Also known as: computerized cognitive games, computerized cognitive rehabilitation therapy (CCRT)
Locked Captain's Log CCRT that rotates randomly among simplest level of computer cognitive games training. 8 weeks of 3 times weekly intervention for 60 min per session with the non-titrating version of Captain's Log program (3 games for attention, 3 games for visual spatial working memory, 3 games for reasoning/planning).
Also known as: computerized cognitive rehabilitation therapy (CCRT)
Neuropsychological Performance (KABC2)
Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd edition (KABC-II) Mental Processing Index (MPI), which is a global cognitive ability performance composite that is a standard score with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15, with scores for our population of children typically ranging from 55 to 130. the MPI is comprised of the standardized global scores for the cognitive domains of Sequential Processing, Simultaneous Processing, Learning, and Planning. These standardized global domain scores are summed and converted (on the basis of age of child, using American norms) to a composite global performance measure called the Mental Processing Index (MPI) standard score (T score). Higher T scores indicate better performance and a better neuropsychological outcome.
Time frame: KABC-II MPI score at post-training 3 mo follow-up assessment, adjusted for baseline KABC-II MPI performance. Therefore, only a single score appears in the table.
Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Score
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) total score Total problems T-scores (standardized). This is a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating more symptoms of either emotional (internalizing) or behavioral (externalizing) or other (e.g., sleep disturbances) nature. Range for our children on this scale is typically from 40 to 80. These are t scores based on Cross-Cultural norms, whereby higher scores (more symptoms or problems) indicate a worse outcome.
Time frame: CBCL total score at post-training (3 months), adjusted by the baseline score, so that a single score appears in the results table.
159 school-age clinically stable children receiving monthly out-patient care at the Walter Reed Children's Clinic at the Kayunga District Hospital Kayunga town, Uganda.
| Milestone | CCRT Intervention | Control | Limited CCRT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 53 | 54 | 52 |
| Completed | 53 | 54 | 52 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Milestone | CCRT Intervention | Control | Limited CCRT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 53 | 54 | 52 |
| Completed | 52 | 54 | 52 |
| Not completed | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Milestone | CCRT Intervention | Control | Limited CCRT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 52 | 54 | 52 |
| Completed | 51 | 54 | 52 |
| Not completed | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd edition (KABC-II) Mental Processing Index (MPI), which is a global cognitive ability performance composite that is a standard score with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15, with scores for our population of children typically ranging from 55 to 130. the MPI is comprised of the standardized global scores for the cognitive domains of Sequential Processing, Simultaneous Processing, Learning, and Planning. These standardized global domain scores are summed and converted (on the basis of age of child, using American norms) to a composite global performance measure called the Mental Processing Index (MPI) standard score (T score). Higher T scores indicate better performance and a better neuropsychological outcome.
| T scores from USA norms for this test | CCRT Intervention | Control | Limited CCRT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neuropsychological Performance (KABC2) | 63.32 ± 0.60 | 61.13 ± 0.57 | 62.65 ± 0.62 |
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) total score Total problems T-scores (standardized). This is a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating more symptoms of either emotional (internalizing) or behavioral (externalizing) or other (e.g., sleep disturbances) nature. Range for our children on this scale is typically from 40 to 80. These are t scores based on Cross-Cultural norms, whereby higher scores (more symptoms or problems) indicate a worse outcome.
| T scores based on cross cultural norms | CCRT Intervention | Control | Limited CCRT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Score | 55.61 ± 0.83 | 54.45 ± 0.78 | 53.46 ± 0.86 |
Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCRT Intervention | 0/51 (0%) | 0/51 (0%) | 0/51 (0%) |
| Control | 0/54 (0%) | 0/54 (0%) | 0/54 (0%) |
| Limited CCRT | 0/52 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) | 0/52 (0%) |
| Age, Continuous(years) | CCRT Intervention | Control | Limited CCRT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 9.3 ± 1.7 | 8.8 ± 1.9 | 8.7 ± 2.0 | 8.9 ± 1.9 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | CCRT Intervention | Control | Limited CCRT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 24 | 27 | 30 | 81 |
| Male | 29 | 27 | 22 | 78 |
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Michigan State University