CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00925288GirasolUpdated Oct 11, 2012Results posted

Acceptability of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine in Female Sex Workers

A Phase 4 interventional study of Gardasil in Human Papillomavirus Infection, sponsored by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Completed at 1 site in Peru. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 26 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-10-11.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 26 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The primary objectives of this study are to determine the acceptance and potential for the effective use of HPV vaccine in the standard and a modified schedule in female sex workers. Secondary objectives include ascertaining the prevalence of HPV types among female sex workers by age and sexual experience.

Read the detailed description

FSWs are at higher risk of HPV infection and presumably cervical cancer, and the recently available vaccine has been shown to protect against persistent infection from these types. If this study gives evidence showing the vaccine is acceptable in preventing cervical HPV infection by types 16 and 18 in this population, then the burden of cervical cancer and cancer precursors could be drastically decreased through widespread vaccination of this target group. Vaccination at the point of entry of brothel based sex work may become a requirement to lower the burden of cervical cancer among FSWs and also among all other sex partners of clients of FSWs. A modified schedule may prove beneficial for FSWs in Peru to complete the vaccine regimen.

02

Conditions studied

  • Human Papillomavirus Infection

Keywords

  • Female sex worker
  • Peru
  • Cervical infection
  • Cervical abnormality
  • Serum antibody
  • Vaccine acceptance
  • Alternative schedule
  • Viral infections
  • Human papillomavirus vaccine
  • Human papillomavirus (HPV)
  • non inferiority
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 120 across 4,200 interventional studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health is the lead sponsor of 364 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 26 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Between the age of 18 and 26 years
  • Registered female sex worker living in Lima
  • Healthy with no known immune deficiency
  • Willing to participate in a study of HPV vaccine including a Pap smear, three pregnancy tests, blood draws, and three vaccine administrations over 7 months
  • Willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently pregnant or planning to get pregnant in the next six months
  • Known immune deficiency disorder
  • Current receipt of immunosuppressive drugs
  • Allergy to yeast or known contraindication to HPV vaccine
  • Women who have had their cervix removed
  • Previous HPV vaccination
  • Current fever over 100 degrees Fahrenheit
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Regular schedule

    Duration: Gardasil HPV vaccine administered intramuscularly at 0,2,6 months

    Biological: Gardasil

  • Experimental
    Modified Schedule

    Duration: Gardasil HPV vaccine administered intramuscularly at 0,3,6 months

    Biological: Gardasil

Interventions

  • BiologicalGardasil

    Dosage Form: 0.5 ml intramuscular injection Dosage: Gardasil 0.5ml suspension Frequency: 3 doses

    Also known as: Human Papillomavirus Quadrivalent Vaccine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Antibody Response to HPV Vaccine for HPV 6,11,16,18.

    We measured anitbody response to HPV vaccine for HPV subtypes 6,11,16, and 18. This was compared by study arm, namely the regular and modified vaccination schedules.

    Time frame: Month 7

  2. Proportion of Female Sex Workers Who Complete the Three Dose (0, 2, 6 Month) HPV Schedule in a Timely Manner Compared to the Modified (0, 3, 6 Month) Schedule.

    Completion of 3 doses of HPV4 vaccine was measured at 6 months for women receiving the vaccine in 0,2,6 month regimen or the modified 0,3,6 month regimen. Completion was measured as receiving dose 3 of the vaccine during the study.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of Infection With HPV Subtypes (6,11,16,18) Among Female Sex Workers

    Type specific prevalence of HPV6,11,16,18 among study participants, calculated using Linear Array testing.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Identify Barriers to Acceptance of HPV Vaccine Among Female Sex Workers

    Listed doubts about the HPV vaccine. Participants were asked if they had any doubts about the vaccine prior to learning about it from the health professional. Herein we present the total number of participants who reported doubts by study arm.

    Time frame: Month 0

07

Results

Posted Oct 11, 2012
Limitations and caveats
Small time difference between study arms (0,2,6 and 0,3,6 months); We cannot distinguish between antibodies resulting from vaccination and antibodies resulting from natural HPV infection;

Participant flow

FSWs 18-26 years of age were recruited in person between August 28, 2009 and March 3, 2010 from 49 different sex locales in Lima, Peru by trained medical staff and 8 health promoters. If they fulfilled inclusion criteria, women were asked to report to the study clinic for completion of surveys, vaccination, Pap smears, and counseling.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRegular ScheduleModified Schedule
Started100100
Completed9193
Not completed97
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up97

Outcome measures

PrimaryAntibody Response to HPV Vaccine for HPV 6,11,16,18.

We measured anitbody response to HPV vaccine for HPV subtypes 6,11,16, and 18. This was compared by study arm, namely the regular and modified vaccination schedules.

Time frame:
Month 7
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Milli Merck Units
Antibody Response to HPV Vaccine for HPV 6,11,16,18.
Milli Merck UnitsRegular ScheduleModified Schedule
HPV 61086.49 (854.16 to 1382.0)1054.13 (808.42 to 1374.53)
HPV11745.06 (588.82 to 942.76)776.84 (644.03 to 936.21)
HPV163235.89 (2661.93 to 3933.61)2704.62 (2301.71 to 3178.06)
HPV18603.39 (487.81 to 746.35)531.66 (441.68 to 639.97)
Statistical analysis
  • Regular Schedule vs Modified Schedule · Regression, Logistic · p = >0.20
PrimaryProportion of Female Sex Workers Who Complete the Three Dose (0, 2, 6 Month) HPV Schedule in a Timely Manner Compared to the Modified (0, 3, 6 Month) Schedule.

Completion of 3 doses of HPV4 vaccine was measured at 6 months for women receiving the vaccine in 0,2,6 month regimen or the modified 0,3,6 month regimen. Completion was measured as receiving dose 3 of the vaccine during the study.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Proportion of Female Sex Workers Who Complete the Three Dose (0, 2, 6 Month) HPV Schedule in a Timely Manner Compared to the Modified (0, 3, 6 Month) Schedule.
participantsRegular ScheduleModified Schedule
Proportion of Female Sex Workers Who Complete the Three Dose (0, 2, 6 Month) HPV Schedule in a Timely Manner Compared to the Modified (0, 3, 6 Month) Schedule.9193
Statistical analysis
  • Regular Schedule vs Modified Schedule · Chi-squared · p = 0.60
SecondaryPrevalence of Infection With HPV Subtypes (6,11,16,18) Among Female Sex Workers

Type specific prevalence of HPV6,11,16,18 among study participants, calculated using Linear Array testing.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Number · participants
Prevalence of Infection With HPV Subtypes (6,11,16,18) Among Female Sex Workers
participantsRegular ScheduleModified Schedule
Prevalence of Infection With HPV Subtypes (6,11,16,18) Among Female Sex Workers2125
Statistical analysis
  • Regular Schedule vs Modified Schedule · Chi-squared · p = 0.53
SecondaryIdentify Barriers to Acceptance of HPV Vaccine Among Female Sex Workers

Listed doubts about the HPV vaccine. Participants were asked if they had any doubts about the vaccine prior to learning about it from the health professional. Herein we present the total number of participants who reported doubts by study arm.

Time frame:
Month 0
Reported as:
Number · participants
Identify Barriers to Acceptance of HPV Vaccine Among Female Sex Workers
participantsRegular ScheduleModified Schedule
Identify Barriers to Acceptance of HPV Vaccine Among Female Sex Workers2620

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Regular Schedule—0/200 (0%)0/200 (0%)
Modified Schedule—0/200 (0%)0/200 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Regular ScheduleModified ScheduleTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years100100200
>=65 years000
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Regular ScheduleModified ScheduleTotal
Mean22.86 ± 2.3322.97 ± 2.1722.92 ± 3.18
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Regular ScheduleModified ScheduleTotal
Female100100200
Male000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Regular ScheduleModified ScheduleTotal
Peru100100200
08

Study locations

1 site
  • NGO Via Libre
    Lima, Peru
09

References and documents

Publications

  • de Sanjose S, Diaz M, Castellsague X, Clifford G, Bruni L, Munoz N, Bosch FX. Worldwide prevalence and genotype distribution of cervical human papillomavirus DNA in women with normal cytology: a meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Jul;7(7):453-9. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70158-5. PubMed 17597569 ↗
  • Mak R, Van Renterghem L, Cuvelier C. Cervical smears and human papillomavirus typing in sex workers. Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Apr;80(2):118-20. doi: 10.1136/sti.2002.003749. PubMed 15054172 ↗
  • Juarez-Figueroa LA, Wheeler CM, Uribe-Salas FJ, Conde-Glez CJ, Zampilpa-Mejia LG, Garcia-Cisneros S, Hernandez-Avila M. Human papillomavirus: a highly prevalent sexually transmitted disease agent among female sex workers from Mexico City. Sex Transm Dis. 2001 Mar;28(3):125-30. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200103000-00001. PubMed 11289192 ↗
  • Ford K, Reed BD, Wirawan DN, Muliawan P, Sutarga M, Gregoire L. The Bali STD/AIDS study: human papillomavirus infection among female sex workers. Int J STD AIDS. 2003 Oct;14(10):681-7. doi: 10.1258/095646203322387947. PubMed 14596772 ↗
  • del Amo J, Gonzalez C, Losana J, Clavo P, Munoz L, Ballesteros J, Garcia-Saiz A, Belza MJ, Ortiz M, Menendez B, del Romero J, Bolumar F. Influence of age and geographical origin in the prevalence of high risk human papillomavirus in migrant female sex workers in Spain. Sex Transm Infect. 2005 Feb;81(1):79-84. doi: 10.1136/sti.2003.008060. PubMed 15681729 ↗
  • Canadas MP, Bosch FX, Junquera ML, Ejarque M, Font R, Ordonez E, de Sanjose S. Concordance of prevalence of human papillomavirus DNA in anogenital and oral infections in a high-risk population. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Mar;42(3):1330-2. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.3.1330-1332.2004. PubMed 15004111 ↗
  • Kjaer SK, Svare EI, Worm AM, Walboomers JM, Meijer CJ, van den Brule AJ. Human papillomavirus infection in Danish female sex workers. Decreasing prevalence with age despite continuously high sexual activity. Sex Transm Dis. 2000 Sep;27(8):438-45. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200009000-00003. PubMed 10987448 ↗
  • Tideman RL, Thompson C, Rose B, Gilmour S, Marks C, van Beek I, Berry G, O'Connor C, Mindel A. Cervical human papillomavirus infections in commercial sex workers-risk factors and behaviours. Int J STD AIDS. 2003 Dec;14(12):840-7. doi: 10.1258/095646203322556192. PubMed 14678594 ↗
  • Anhang R, Goodman A, Goldie SJ. HPV communication: review of existing research and recommendations for patient education. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004 Sep-Oct;54(5):248-59. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.54.5.248. PubMed 15371283 ↗
  • Roden R, Wu TC. How will HPV vaccines affect cervical cancer? Nat Rev Cancer. 2006 Oct;6(10):753-63. doi: 10.1038/nrc1973. PubMed 16990853 ↗
  • Burchell AN, Winer RL, de Sanjose S, Franco EL. Chapter 6: Epidemiology and transmission dynamics of genital HPV infection. Vaccine. 2006 Aug 31;24 Suppl 3:S3/52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.031. Epub 2006 Jun 2. PubMed 16950018 ↗
  • Stanley M. Immune responses to human papillomavirus. Vaccine. 2006 Mar 30;24 Suppl 1:S16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.09.002. PubMed 16219398 ↗
  • Moscicki AB, Schiffman M, Kjaer S, Villa LL. Chapter 5: Updating the natural history of HPV and anogenital cancer. Vaccine. 2006 Aug 31;24 Suppl 3:S3/42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.06.018. Epub 2006 Jun 23. PubMed 16950017 ↗
  • Holowaty P, Miller AB, Rohan T, To T. Natural history of dysplasia of the uterine cervix. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Feb 3;91(3):252-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.3.252. PubMed 10037103 ↗
  • Parkin DM, Bray F. Chapter 2: The burden of HPV-related cancers. Vaccine. 2006 Aug 31;24 Suppl 3:S3/11-25. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.111. PubMed 16949997 ↗
  • Santos C, Munoz N, Klug S, Almonte M, Guerrero I, Alvarez M, Velarde C, Galdos O, Castillo M, Walboomers J, Meijer C, Caceres E. HPV types and cofactors causing cervical cancer in Peru. Br J Cancer. 2001 Sep 28;85(7):966-71. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1948. PubMed 11592767 ↗
  • Clifford GM, Gallus S, Herrero R, Munoz N, Snijders PJ, Vaccarella S, Anh PT, Ferreccio C, Hieu NT, Matos E, Molano M, Rajkumar R, Ronco G, de Sanjose S, Shin HR, Sukvirach S, Thomas JO, Tunsakul S, Meijer CJ, Franceschi S; IARC HPV Prevalence Surveys Study Group. Worldwide distribution of human papillomavirus types in cytologically normal women in the International Agency for Research on Cancer HPV prevalence surveys: a pooled analysis. Lancet. 2005 Sep 17-23;366(9490):991-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67069-9. PubMed 16168781 ↗
  • Jacobs MV, Walboomers JM, Snijders PJ, Voorhorst FJ, Verheijen RH, Fransen-Daalmeijer N, Meijer CJ. Distribution of 37 mucosotropic HPV types in women with cytologically normal cervical smears: the age-related patterns for high-risk and low-risk types. Int J Cancer. 2000 Jul 15;87(2):221-7. PubMed 10861478 ↗
  • Melkert PW, Hopman E, van den Brule AJ, Risse EK, van Diest PJ, Bleker OP, Helmerhorst T, Schipper ME, Meijer CJ, Walboomers JM. Prevalence of HPV in cytomorphologically normal cervical smears, as determined by the polymerase chain reaction, is age-dependent. Int J Cancer. 1993 Apr 1;53(6):919-23. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910530609. PubMed 8386137 ↗
  • Kitchener HC, Castle PE, Cox JT. Chapter 7: Achievements and limitations of cervical cytology screening. Vaccine. 2006 Aug 31;24 Suppl 3:S3/63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.113. PubMed 16950019 ↗
  • Villa LL, Costa RL, Petta CA, Andrade RP, Paavonen J, Iversen OE, Olsson SE, Hoye J, Steinwall M, Riis-Johannessen G, Andersson-Ellstrom A, Elfgren K, Krogh Gv, Lehtinen M, Malm C, Tamms GM, Giacoletti K, Lupinacci L, Railkar R, Taddeo FJ, Bryan J, Esser MT, Sings HL, Saah AJ, Barr E. High sustained efficacy of a prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus types 6/11/16/18 L1 virus-like particle vaccine through 5 years of follow-up. Br J Cancer. 2006 Dec 4;95(11):1459-66. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603469. Epub 2006 Nov 21. PubMed 17117182 ↗
  • FUTURE II Study Group. Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 10;356(19):1915-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061741. PubMed 17494925 ↗
  • Halsey NA, Moulton LH, O'Donovan JC, Walcher JR, Thoms ML, Margolis HS, Krause DS. Hepatitis B vaccine administered to children and adolescents at yearly intervals. Pediatrics. 1999 Jun;103(6 Pt 1):1243-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.6.1243. PubMed 10353936 ↗
  • Nunez JT, Delgado M, Giron H, Pino G. Prostitution and other cofactors in preinvasive and invasive lesions of the cervix. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Jun;44(3):239-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00222.x. PubMed 15191449 ↗
  • Winer RL, Hughes JP, Feng Q, O'Reilly S, Kiviat NB, Holmes KK, Koutsky LA. Condom use and the risk of genital human papillomavirus infection in young women. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 22;354(25):2645-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa053284. PubMed 16790697 ↗
  • Ohshige K, Morio S, Mizushima S, Kitamura K, Tajima K, Suyama A, Usuku S, Tia P, Hor LB, Heng S, Saphonn V, Tochikubo O, Soda K. Behavioural and serological human immunodeficiency virus risk factors among female commercial sex workers in Cambodia. Int J Epidemiol. 2000 Apr;29(2):344-54. doi: 10.1093/ije/29.2.344. PubMed 10817135 ↗
  • Miller GA, Mendoza W, Krone MR, Meza R, Caceres CF, Coates TJ, Klausner JD. Clients of female sex workers in Lima, Peru: a bridge population for sexually transmitted disease/HIV transmission? Sex Transm Dis. 2004 Jun;31(6):337-42. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200406000-00003. PubMed 15167641 ↗
  • Trujillo L, Munoz D, Gotuzzo E, Yi A, Watts DM. Sexual practices and prevalence of HIV, HTLV-I/II, and Treponema pallidum among clandestine female sex workers in Lima, Peru. Sex Transm Dis. 1999 Feb;26(2):115-8. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199902000-00010. PubMed 10029987 ↗
  • Paris M, Gotuzzo E, Goyzueta G, Aramburu J, Caceres CF, Castellano T, Jordan NN, Vermund SH, Hook EW 3rd. Prevalence of gonococcal and chlamydial infections in commercial sex workers in a Peruvian Amazon city. Sex Transm Dis. 1999 Feb;26(2):103-7. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199902000-00008. PubMed 10029985 ↗
  • Garcia PJ, Chavez S, Feringa B, Chiappe M, Li W, Jansen KU, Carcamo C, Holmes KK. Reproductive tract infections in rural women from the highlands, jungle, and coastal regions of Peru. Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Jul;82(7):483-92. PubMed 15508193 ↗
  • Sanchez J, Gotuzzo E, Escamilla J, Carrillo C, Phillips IA, Barrios C, Stamm WE, Ashley RL, Kreiss JK, Holmes KK. Gender differences in sexual practices and sexually transmitted infections among adults in Lima, Peru. Am J Public Health. 1996 Aug;86(8):1098-107. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.8_pt_1.1098. PubMed 8712268 ↗
  • Sanchez J, Campos PE, Courtois B, Gutierrez L, Carrillo C, Alarcon J, Gotuzzo E, Hughes J, Watts D, Hillier SL, Buchanan K, Holmes KK. Prevention of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in female sex workers: prospective evaluation of condom promotion and strengthened STD services. Sex Transm Dis. 2003 Apr;30(4):273-9. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200304000-00001. PubMed 12671544 ↗
  • Barnabas RV, Laukkanen P, Koskela P, Kontula O, Lehtinen M, Garnett GP. Epidemiology of HPV 16 and cervical cancer in Finland and the potential impact of vaccination: mathematical modelling analyses. PLoS Med. 2006 May;3(5):e138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030138. Epub 2006 Apr 4. PubMed 16573364 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 11, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00925288
Lead sponsor
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, NGO Via Libre, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
Responsible party
Neal Halsey (Professor of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 22, 2009
Start date
Oct 2009
Primary completion
Aug 2011
Completion
Aug 2011
Results posted
Oct 11, 2012
Last update
Oct 11, 2012

Study contacts

Neal Halsey, MD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion