ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00919893Updated Nov 20, 2020Results posted

Efficacy Study of a Standardized Pollen Extract Preparation (Cernilton) to Treat Inflammatory Chronic Prostatitis-Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (CP-CPPS)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Cernilton and Placebo in Chronic Prostatitis and Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome, sponsored by University of Giessen. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-20.

Sponsored by University of Giessen · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
139
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

In this placebo controlled study the safety and efficacy of Cernilton, a standardized pollen extract, in men with inflammatory chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome was investigated. The purpose of this study is to determine whether Cernilton is safe and effective in patients with inflammatory chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

Read the detailed description

We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess safety and efficacy of Cernilton, a standardized pollen extract, in men with inflammatory CP-CPPS (National Institutes of Health (NIH) type IIIA). Participants were randomized to Cernilton or placebo for 12 weeks and were evaluated using the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) individual domains and total score, the number of leukocytes in post prostatic massage urine, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the sexuality domain of a life satisfaction questionnaire at baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Prostatitis
  • Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • chronic prostatitis symptom index
  • male
  • inflammatory
  • CP-CPPS
  • Cernilton
  • pelvic pain
  • symptoms
03

In context

Pelvic Pain

376 studies on the registry are indexed under Pelvic Pain; 90 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 139 is above the median of 60 across 278 interventional studies indexed under Pelvic Pain.

Browse Pelvic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Giessen is the lead sponsor of 95 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • men between 18 and 65 years
  • symptoms of pelvic pain for at least 3 months during the 6 months before study entry
  • a score in the pain domain of the German validated version of the NIH chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) of 7 or higher
  • leukocytes of 10 or more in post prostate massage urine

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • urinary tract infection
  • acute bacterial or chronic bacterial prostatitis
  • history of urethritis with discharge 4 weeks prior to study entry
  • a history of epididymitis or sexually transmitted disease
  • residual urine volume of more than 50 mL due to bladder outlet obstruction
  • indication for or history of prostate surgery including prostate
  • treatment with phytotherapeutic agents
  • alpha-blocker agents or antimicrobial substances with prostatic penetration 4 weeks prior to study entry
  • treatment with agents influencing intraprostatic hormone metabolism 6 months prior to study entry
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
139 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Cernilton

    Men with inflammatory chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP-CPPS)

    Drug: Cernilton

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Men with inflammatory chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP-CPPS)

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugCernilton

    Oral Cernilton, 2 capsules every 8 hours with the active substance consisting of 23 mg Extractum Pollens siccatum, 4 mg L-glutamate and 0.23 mg Stigmasterol per capsule for 12 weeks.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Oral placebo, 2 capsules every 8 hours with identical capsulation and weight only containing the inactive substances in proportional doses as compared with Cernilton for 12 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Symptomatic Improvement in the Pain Domain of National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI)

    Decrease in NIH-CPSI pain score. Best value: 0. Worst value: 21.

    Time frame: 0, 6, 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Outcomes Were Symptomatic Improvement of the NIH-CPSI Total Score, the Micturition and Life Quality Domains of the NIH-CPSI Questionnaire, Decrease in the Number of Leukocytes in Urine.

    Decrease of score points. Decrease of leucocytes in urine.

    Time frame: 0, 6, 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jun 12, 2009

Participant flow

Outpatients at urologic clinics. Start date: December 1999. Stop date: January 2004.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCerniltonPlacebo
Started7069
Completed5160
Not completed199
Withdrew: Protocol violation199

Outcome measures

SecondarySecondary Outcomes Were Symptomatic Improvement of the NIH-CPSI Total Score, the Micturition and Life Quality Domains of the NIH-CPSI Questionnaire, Decrease in the Number of Leukocytes in Urine.

Decrease of score points. Decrease of leucocytes in urine.

Time frame:
0, 6, 12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Secondary Outcomes Were Symptomatic Improvement of the NIH-CPSI Total Score, the Micturition and Life Quality Domains of the NIH-CPSI Questionnaire, Decrease in the Number of Leukocytes in Urine.
participantsCerniltonPlacebo
Secondary Outcomes Were Symptomatic Improvement of the NIH-CPSI Total Score, the Micturition and Life Quality Domains of the NIH-CPSI Questionnaire, Decrease in the Number of Leukocytes in Urine.4733
PrimarySymptomatic Improvement in the Pain Domain of National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI)

Decrease in NIH-CPSI pain score. Best value: 0. Worst value: 21.

Time frame:
0, 6, 12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Symptomatic Improvement in the Pain Domain of National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI)
participantsCerniltonPlacebo
Symptomatic Improvement in the Pain Domain of National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI)4733
Statistical analysis
  • Cernilton vs Placebo · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.05

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)CerniltonPlaceboTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years7069139
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CerniltonPlaceboTotal
Mean39.7 ± 7.239.3 ± 9.139.5 ± 8.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CerniltonPlaceboTotal
Female000
Male7069139
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)CerniltonPlaceboTotal
Germany7069139
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Justus-Liebig-University
    Giessen, D-35392, Germany
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Rugendorff EW, Weidner W, Ebeling L, Buck AC. Results of treatment with pollen extract (Cernilton N) in chronic prostatitis and prostatodynia. Br J Urol. 1993 Apr;71(4):433-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb15988.x. PubMed 8499988 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Dec 1999, a primary completion of Jan 2004 and a completion of Jan 2004. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jun 2009, 5 years 5 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 10, 2009
First posted
Jun 12, 2009
Start
Dec 1999
Primary completionActual
Jan 2004
CompletionActual
Jan 2004
Results first posted
Jun 12, 2009
Last update
Nov 20, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 20, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00919893
Lead sponsor
University of Giessen
Collaborators
Strathmann AG&Co, Hamburg, Germany, Cernelle, Ängelholm, Sweden
First posted
Jun 12, 2009
Start date
Dec 1999
Primary completion
Jan 2004
Completion
Jan 2004
Results posted
Jun 12, 2009
Last update
Nov 20, 2020

Study contacts

Wolfgang Weidner, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Clinic for Urology and Pediatric Urology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion