CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00911820Updated Nov 8, 2022Results posted

Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab (PCA) Versus Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab (TPCA) in Metastatic Esophageal and Gastric Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of Bevacizumab and Cisplatin in Esophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer and Stomach Cancer, sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-08.

Sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
88
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There is no clear standard of care for metastatic stomach or esophageal cancer in the United States. The purpose of this research study is to determine the differences between two regimens of chemotherapy; Arm A: PCA (Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab) and Arm B: TPCA (Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab). Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and Irinotecan are traditional chemotherapy drugs. Bevacizumab is an antibody (a protein that attacks a foreign substance in the body). Bevacizumab is believed to stop the formation of new blood vessels that carry nutrients to tumors. Both of the chemotherapy regimens (PCA and TPCA) have been studied in patients with esophageal and gastric cancer, and we are trying to determine if one regimen will keep your cancer from growing and improve how long you can live.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* To evaluate progression-free survival at 7 months in metastatic esophageal and gastric patients treated with either PCA or TPCA

Secondary

  • To determine overall survival
  • To determine the response rate (RECIST) in measurable disease patients
  • To evaluate type and severity of toxicities associated with each regimen

Exploratory:

  • To correlate expression of tumoral and serum VEGF with response and survival
  • To correlate TGF alpha levels and tumor microvessel density with clinical activity of the combination of PCA or TPCA
  • To examine circulating endothelial cells (CECs) as surrogate markers of antitumor activity of bevacizumab
  • To explore if 7/7 and 7/6 UGT1A1 polymorphisms correlate with grade III/IV irinotecan-related diarrhea and neutropenia when irinotecan is given at relatively low dose to patients with esophageal and gastric cancer

DESIGN:

This trial was designed to compare 7-month progression-free survival between arms. The hypothesis was that TPCA would have superior outcome over PCA (70% vs 50%). With 40 eligible patients per arm followed for 1 year there was 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.48 using the log-rank test at a one-sided type I error rate of 5%. Stratification factors were ECOG performance status 0/1 vs 2 and site of primary tumor (gastric vs GE junction/esophageal).

02

Conditions studied

  • Esophageal Cancer
  • Gastric Cancer
  • Stomach Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Stomach Neoplasms

2,851 studies on the registry are indexed under Stomach Neoplasms; 864 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 88 is above the median of 67 across 2,096 interventional studies indexed under Stomach Neoplasms.

Browse Stomach Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 813 studies on the registry; 124 are open to participants now.

Of its 113 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 77 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically confirmed, unresectable esophageal, GE junction or gastric adenocarcinoma (including adenosquamous, or undifferentiated carcinoma). Measurable disease is not required.
  • 18 years of age or older
  • ECOG Performance Status=2
  • Life expectancy of 12 weeks or greater
  • Adequate bone marrow, renal and liver function as outlined in the protocol.
  • Men and women of childbearing potential must use adequate contraception

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior chemotherapy (except as part of pre- or post-operative therapy, completed at least 1 prior to start of this protocol).
  • Squamous cell carcinoma histology of esophageal, GE junction or gastric tumor
  • Known history of allergy or hypersensitivity to Chinese hamster ovary products, polysorbate 80, or any of the study drugs
  • Treatment or planned participation in an experimental drug study within 4 weeks of C1 D1. Concurrent use of herbal medications or other alternative therapies
  • Major surgical procedures, such as fine needle aspirations, port-a-cath placement, or core biopsies, within 7 days of cycle 1 day 1
  • Palliative radiation to 25% or less of bone marrow, must be completed > 2 weeks prior to day 1, palliative radiation to > 25% of bone marrow, must be completed > 4 weeks prior to day 1
  • Myocardial infarction, unstable angina, CVA or TIA or other thrombotic event in the past six months
  • Inadequately controlled hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure of >150mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure of > 100mmHg). Initiation of antihypertensive medication is recommended, however adequate control of blood pressure must be documented prior to C1 D1
  • No history of prior hypertensive crisis or hypertensive encephalopathy
  • NYHA Grade II or greater congestive heart failure
  • Clinically significant peripheral vascular disease
  • Active bleeding from primary tumor
  • Evidence of bleeding diatheses or coagulopathy (other than deep venous thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or atrial fibrillation). Patients on therapeutic anticoagulation may be enrolled provided they have been clinically stable on anticoagulation for a least 2 weeks prior to C1 D1.
  • Uncontrolled serious medical or psychiatric illness
  • Uncontrolled diarrhea
  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • No known brain or other CNS metastasis by history or clinical examination
  • Other active malignancy other than non-melanoma skin cancer or in-situ cervical carcinoma. A resected or previously treated cancer (other than in-situ carcinoma) must have demonstrated no evidence of recurrence for at least 3 years
  • Urine protein:creatinine ratio 1.0 or greater at screening
  • History of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess with 6 months of C1 D1
  • Serious, non-healing wound, ulcer or bone fracture
  • Pregnant or breast feeding
  • Inability to comply with study and/or follow-up procedures
  • History of HIV seropositivity, hepatitis C virus, acute or chronic hepatitis B, or other serious chronic infection
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
88 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm A: PCA

    Patients first received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV on day 1 of every cycle (cycle length=21 days) at approximately 0.5 mg/kg/minute. Additionally, on days 1 and 8 of each cycle, patients received cisplatin 30 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes and then irinotecan 65 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes of each 3-week cycle. Treatment could continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

    Drug: Bevacizumab · Drug: Cisplatin · Drug: Irinotecan

  • Active comparator
    Arm B: TPCA

    Patients first received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV on day 1 of every cycle (cycle length=21 days) at approximately 0.5 mg/kg/minute. Additionally on days 1 and 8 of each cycle, patients received docetaxel 30 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes followed by cisplatin 25 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes and then irinotecan 50 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes of each 3-week cycle.

    Drug: Cisplatin · Drug: Irinotecan · Device: Docetaxel

Interventions

  • DrugBevacizumab

    Also known as: Avastin

  • DrugCisplatin

    Also known as: Platinol-AQ, Platinol

  • DrugIrinotecan

    Also known as: Camptosar

  • DeviceDocetaxel

    Also known as: Taxotere, Docefrez

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 7-month Progression-Free Survival

    7-month progression-free survival is the probability of patients remaining alive and progression-free at 7-months from study entry estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.

    Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Relevant for this endpoint was disease status at 7 months of follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival

    Overall survival is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive and estimate using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods.

    Time frame: Patients in the study cohort were followed up to approximately 2.5 years as of this analysis.

  2. Best Response

    Best response on treatment was based on RECIST 1.0 criteria: Complete Response (CR) is complete disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. Both require confirmation no fewer than 4 weeks apart. CR/PR assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions. Progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Stable disease is defined as any condition not meeting above criteria.

    Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Treatment duration was a median of 5 cycles (up to approximately 1 year) in this study cohort as of this analysis..

  3. Overall Response (OR) Rate

    Overall response (OR) rate was defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) based on RECIST 1.0 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. To be assigned a status of CR or PR, changes in tumor measurements must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the response criteria are first met. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions.

    Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Treatment duration was a median of 5 cycles (up to approximately 1 year) in this study cohort as of this analysis.

  4. Progression-Free Survival

    Progression-free survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study or death. Patients alive and progression-free at last follow-up are censored. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.

    Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Patients were followed for up to 2.5 years as of this analysis.

07

Results

Posted Nov 9, 2017

Participant flow

Patients were enrolled between July 2009 and April 2011.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArm A: PCAArm B: TPCA
Started4543
Treated4441
Completed00
Not completed4543
Withdrew: Recist progression128
Withdrew: Adverse event88
Withdrew: Clinical progression75
Withdrew: Physician decision59
Withdrew: Decline in performance status42
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject34
Withdrew: Death12
Withdrew: Pursue surgery11
Withdrew: Pursue radiation10
Withdrew: Still on therapy22
Withdrew: Pathology not confirmed10
Withdrew: Withdraw before receive treatment02

Outcome measures

Primary7-month Progression-Free Survival

7-month progression-free survival is the probability of patients remaining alive and progression-free at 7-months from study entry estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.

Time frame:
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Relevant for this endpoint was disease status at 7 months of follow-up.
Reported as:
Number · probability
7-month Progression-Free Survival
probabilityArm A: PCAArm B: TPCA
7-month Progression-Free Survival0.581 (0.421 to 0.712)0.582 (0.410 to 0.719)
SecondaryOverall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive and estimate using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods.

Time frame:
Patients in the study cohort were followed up to approximately 2.5 years as of this analysis.
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival
monthsArm A: PCAArm B: TPCA
Overall Survival11.7 (9.6 to 15.4)13.4 (11.5 to 16.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Arm A: PCA vs Arm B: TPCA · Log Rank · p = 0.714
SecondaryBest Response

Best response on treatment was based on RECIST 1.0 criteria: Complete Response (CR) is complete disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. Both require confirmation no fewer than 4 weeks apart. CR/PR assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions. Progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Stable disease is defined as any condition not meeting above criteria.

Time frame:
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Treatment duration was a median of 5 cycles (up to approximately 1 year) in this study cohort as of this analysis..
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Best Response
ParticipantsArm A: PCAArm B: TPCA
Complete Response30
Partial Response2221
Stable Disease1514
Progressive Disease10
Removed Before Restaging36
SecondaryOverall Response (OR) Rate

Overall response (OR) rate was defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) based on RECIST 1.0 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. To be assigned a status of CR or PR, changes in tumor measurements must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the response criteria are first met. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions.

Time frame:
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Treatment duration was a median of 5 cycles (up to approximately 1 year) in this study cohort as of this analysis.
Reported as:
Number · proportion of patients
Overall Response (OR) Rate
proportion of patientsArm A: PCAArm B: TPCA
Overall Response (OR) Rate.568 (.41 to .717).512 (.351 to .671)
Statistical analysis
  • Arm A: PCA vs Arm B: TPCA · Fisher Exact · p = 0.605
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival

Progression-free survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study or death. Patients alive and progression-free at last follow-up are censored. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.

Time frame:
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Patients were followed for up to 2.5 years as of this analysis.
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-Free Survival
monthsArm A: PCAArm B: TPCA
Progression-Free Survival7.9 (6.1 to 10.1)8.4 (6.2 to 9.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Arm A: PCA vs Arm B: TPCA · Log Rank · p = 0.721

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were assessed weeks 1 and 2 each cycle throughout treatment.Treatment duration was a median of 5 cycles (up to approximately 2 years) in this study cohort as of this analysis.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arm A: PCA0/44 (0%)32/44 (72.7%)44/44 (100%)
Arm B: TPCA3/41 (7.3%)36/41 (87.8%)39/41 (95.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 54
Most frequent serious events
EventArm A: PCAArm B: TPCA
Diarrhea w/o prior colostomyGastrointestinal disorders10/4413/41
NeutrophilsInvestigations11/4413/41
LeukocytesInvestigations6/4411/41
FatigueGeneral disorders7/449/41
LymphopeniaInvestigations4/446/41
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders6/445/41
HyponatremiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/445/41
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders4/445/41
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders4/445/41
HemoglobinBlood and lymphatic system disorders5/443/41
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 213
Most frequent other events
EventArm A: PCAArm B: TPCA
FatigueGeneral disorders35/4434/41
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders35/4431/41
HemoglobinBlood and lymphatic system disorders34/4428/41
Diarrhea w/o prior colostomyGastrointestinal disorders31/4429/41
AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders19/4428/41
LeukocytesInvestigations23/4423/41
PlateletsInvestigations23/4417/41
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders22/4421/41
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders21/4418/41
Abdomen, painGastrointestinal disorders17/4419/41

Baseline characteristics

The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated patients.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Arm A: PCAArm B: TPCATotal
Median59 (41 to 79)61 (40 to 85)60 (40 to 85)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Arm A: PCAArm B: TPCATotal
Female8715
Male363470
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Arm A: PCAArm B: TPCATotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American202
White413980
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported123
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Arm A: PCAArm B: TPCATotal
United States444185
ECOG Performance Status (PS)
ECOG Performance Status (PS)(Participants)Arm A: PCAArm B: TPCATotal
ECOG PS 0/1434083
ECOG PS 2112
Tumor Location
Tumor Location(Participants)Arm A: PCAArm B: TPCATotal
Esophagus201737
GE Junction91221
Gastric151227
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02214, United States
  • Sarah Cannon Research Institute
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • Texas Oncology Research
    Dallas, Texas 75251, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 8, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00911820
Lead sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Collaborators
Massachusetts General Hospital, SCRI Development Innovations, LLC, Texas Oncology Cancer Center, Genentech, Inc.
Responsible party
Peter C. Enzinger, MD (Principal Investigator, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 2, 2009
Start date
Jul 2009
Primary completion
Apr 2012
Completion
Aug 2013
Results posted
Nov 9, 2017
Last update
Nov 8, 2022

Study contacts

Peter C. Enzinger, MD
principal investigator · Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion