CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00898534Updated May 12, 2009

Effect of Immediate Hemoglobin A1c on Glycemic Control in Children With Type I Diabetes Mellitus

A Phase 4 interventional study of Bayer DCA2000+ Hemoglobin A1c analyzer in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Glycemic Control, sponsored by Boston Children's Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-05-12.

Sponsored by Boston Children's Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
234
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Immediate feedback of hemoglobin A1c (A1c) results to adults with type 1 and 2 diabetes allows more appropriate care decisions at the clinic visit and may improve glycemic control. The investigators' objective is to determine whether immediate feedback of A1c results to children with type 1 diabetes will improve patient care and glycemic control.

Read the detailed description

Because glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) has been shown to reflect average glycemia over several months and has a strong predictive value for diabetes complications, routine quarterly measurements is a standard of care in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. The A1c value determines whether the patient's glycemic targets have been reached or maintained. The availability of the A1c result at the time the patient is seen (point-of-care testing) has been reported in adults with diabetes to result in increased intensification of therapy and improvement in glycemic control in type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and in type 2 diabetes. The A1c may also serve as a check on the accuracy of the patient's glucose meter and the validity of the patient's reported self monitored blood glucose (SMBG) results.

In many clinical settings, A1c is determined in a central laboratory on a blood sample obtained by venipuncture and results usually are available one to two business days after the sample is obtained. If the A1c value is different than predicted from a review of available SMBG data at the visit, the practitioner must contact the family to review the results and, revise any care decisions made during the visit. This system is inefficient and fraught with the potential for less than optimal care relating to delays in the practitioner seeing the result, delays in reaching the subject or parents, and absence of the subject's participation in the phone call updating the care plan. Furthermore, many children dread venipuncture, which is often poorly tolerated and makes clinic visits painful, emotionally traumatic and unpleasant experiences.

Because there are no published data on the utility of point-of-care A1c testing in children and adolescents with diabetes, we designed a prospective randomized controlled trial to determine if subjects who received immediate feedback of A1c results at their clinic visits would have a lower A1c as compared to those who received A1c results after the clinic visit. We intend to determine whether immediate feedback of A1c results will enable the clinicians providing diabetes care to make more adjustments to the subject's management plan at the time of the clinic visit, and whether this will lead to fewer communications with the subject/family between visits. Finally we will assess the relative pain caused by fingerstick blood sampling as compared to venipuncture.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
  • Glycemic Control

Keywords

  • Pediatrics
  • Hemoglobin A1c
  • Point of Care testing
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 234 is above the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston Children's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 598 studies on the registry; 151 are open to participants now.

Of its 31 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus diagnosed at least 2 years prior to enrollment in study
  • Less than 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cystic fibrosis related diabetes
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Any other suspected non-type 1 diabetes (e.g., maturity onset diabetes of the young)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
234 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Immediate Feedback

    Subjects receive point-of-care hemoglobin A1c testing prior to their diabetes clinic visit, with results made available to the provider during the visit.

    Device: Bayer DCA2000+ Hemoglobin A1c analyzer

  • No intervention
    Conventional Feedback

    Subjects receive laboratory hemoglobin A1c testing at the clinic visit, with results made available to the provider several days later.

Interventions

  • DeviceBayer DCA2000+ Hemoglobin A1c analyzer

    Point-of-care hemoglobin A1c measurement of blood obtained by fingerstick

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hemoglobin A1c

    Time frame: 1 year after enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hemoglobin A1c

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months after enrollment

  2. Pain rating of hemoglobin A1c test

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after enrollment

  3. Change in diabetes management (insulin, diet, exercise, glucose self-monitoring)

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after enrollment

  4. Episodes of severe hypoglycemia

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after enrollment

  5. Hospital admissions for diabetes related event

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after enrollment

  6. Number of phone and/or email contacts between practitioner and patient

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after enrollment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Children's Hospital Boston
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Agus MS, Alexander JL, Wolfsdorf JI. Utility of immediate hemoglobin A1c in children with type I diabetes mellitus. Pediatr Diabetes. 2010 Nov;11(7):450-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00635.x. PubMed 20070556 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00898534
Lead sponsor
Boston Children's Hospital
First posted
May 12, 2009
Start date
Nov 2003
Primary completion
Sep 2005
Completion
Jan 2006
Last update
May 12, 2009

Study contacts

Michael SD Agus, MD
principal investigator · Boston Children's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion