ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00890526Updated Jun 21, 2012

Intervention for Reduced Sound Tolerance

A Phase 1 interventional study of Sound Therapy (Tinnitus Retraining Therapy) and Counseling (Tinnitus Retraining Therapy) in Hyperacusis, sponsored by University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-06-21.

Sponsored by University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hyperacusis is the intolerance to sound levels that normally are judged acceptably loud to others. The presence of hyperacusis (diagnosed or undiagnosed) can be an important reason why some persons reject amplified sound from hearing aids. Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT), originally proposed for the treatment of persons with debilitating tinnitus, offers the significant secondary benefit of increased Loudness Discomfort Levels (LDLs), along with expansion of the dynamic range for loudness. TRT uses both counseling and sound therapy from daily exposure to soft sound from bilateral noise generator devices (NGs) and has been promoted as an intervention for hyperacusis. The hypothesis of this investigational study is that the counseling and sound therapy principles used in TRT can be applied successfully to treat hearing-impaired hearing-aid candidates with reduced sound tolerance who are otherwise should benefit from hearing aids.

Read the detailed description

Hyperacusis is the intolerance to sound levels that normally are judged acceptably loud to others. The presence of hyperacusis (diagnosed or undiagnosed) can be an important reason why some persons reject amplified sound from hearing aids. Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT), originally proposed for the treatment of persons with debilitating tinnitus, offers the significant secondary benefit of increased Loudness Discomfort Levels (LDLs), along with expansion of the dynamic range for loudness. TRT uses both counseling and sound therapy from daily exposure to soft sound from bilateral noise generator devices (NGs) and has been promoted as an intervention for hyperacusis. The hypothesis of this investigational study is that the counseling and sound therapy principles used in TRT can be applied successfully to treat hearing-impaired hearing-aid candidates with reduced sound tolerance who are otherwise should benefit from hearing aids.

The current study is being implemented as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of a TRT-based intervention for reduced sound tolerance in hearing-aid eligible persons with hyperacusis and/or restricted dynamic ranges. The trial design allows for the evaluation of the efficacy of partial treatments, including the effects of counseling separately from the effects of sound therapy. Forty hearing-impaired subjects (without primary tinnitus) are being assigned randomly to one of four treatment groups: 1) full treatment, both counseling and sound-therapy (n=10); 2) counseling with placebo sound therapy (n=10); 3) sound therapy without counseling (n=10); and 4) placebo sound therapy without counseling (n=10). Subjects are being evaluated at least monthly, typically for five months or more, on a variety of audiometric tests, including LDLs, the Contour Test for Loudness for tones and speech, word recognition measured at each session's comfortable and loud levels, and electrophysiological measures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hyperacusis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT)
03

In context

Hyperacusis

32 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperacusis; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 60 across 22 interventional studies indexed under Hyperacusis.

Browse Hyperacusis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa is the lead sponsor of 42 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • One hundred adults, who have hearing losses and who have unsuccessfully used hearing aids because of tolerance problems (hyperacusis).
  • All subjects must be committed to the use of amplification if and when the hyperacusis is resolved.
  • Each patient will have demonstrable hyperacusis, but will be free from tinnitus, and must be willing to wear and usc binaural in-the-ear sound generators (or placebo generators) chronically as prescribed.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of conductive, mixed hearing loss, or CNS disease.
  • Abnormal tone and/or acoustic reflex decay will also preclude subject participation because of the potential for these patients to adapt to the chronic sound therapy.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Full treatment = Counseling + sound therapy.

    Other: Sound Therapy (Tinnitus Retraining Therapy) · Other: Counseling (Tinnitus Retraining Therapy)

  • Experimental
    2

    Counseling + placebo sound therapy.

    Other: Counseling (Tinnitus Retraining Therapy) · Other: Placebo Sound Therapy

  • Experimental
    3

    No Counseling + Sound Therapy

    Other: Sound Therapy (Tinnitus Retraining Therapy) · Other: No Counseling

  • Placebo comparator
    4

    No counseling + Placebo sound therapy.

    Other: No Counseling · Other: Placebo Sound Therapy

Interventions

  • OtherSound Therapy (Tinnitus Retraining Therapy)

    The conventional sound therapy will be achieved with commercially available noise generators. Our clinic uses General Hearing Instruments (OHI) model Tranquil devices as noise sources for TRT. These flexible devices offer an adjustable volume control, with a frequency response extending from \~500 to 8000 Hz. Matched devices will be fitted binaurally and adjusted to each individual ear to achieve audibility of the noise sources (assessed by slight threshold shifts. typically 10- 15 dB, across the audiometric frequency range above 500 Hz). The sound pressure level output and frequency response of each noise source will be measured and documented using both real ear and standard electroacoustic methodologies. Each subject will be carefully instructed as to care of the instruments and correct volume setting. The bilateral noise generators will be used chronically during the intervention period except during sleep.

  • OtherCounseling (Tinnitus Retraining Therapy)

    The directive counseling to be used will include an in-depth participatory discussion with the patient to review audiometric and functional test results, along with the anatomy and physiology of the auditory system. A minimum of two hours will be scheduled to impart this information to the patients so that they will have a clear understanding of the disorder based upon the most current scientific data. The counseling will be focused on educating the patient, neutralizing their negative emotional association with the hyperacusis, and discussing their treatment.

  • OtherNo Counseling

    Patients who are enrolled in Arms 3 and 4 of this study will not be offered directive counseling, but will be fitted with either conventional or placebo noise generators for their sound therapy components. These patients will be told only that their treatment for hyperacusis uses sound therapy. Otherwise, in the instrument fitting appointment (either for the conventional instrument or the placebo device), these patients will receive the same instruction in the care and use of sound generators as those patients enrolled in Treatment Arms 1 and 2 of the clinical trial.

  • OtherPlacebo Sound Therapy

    The placebo sound therapy will use factory-modified GHI Tranquil noise generators, which will appear identical to the conventional Tranquil devices. The placebo Tranquil devices will have a control sensor installed to detect insertion of the device in the ear canal. When the sensor detects the insertion of the placebo device into the ear canal it will trigger gradual decay of the sound output from the placebo device, The time constant of the decaying noise output will be sufficiently long to allow the clinician time to set the volume of each binaural set of devices and to instruct the patient in their use before any noticeable sound attenuation occurs.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. >=dB-10 change in loudness discomfort level.

    Time frame: 5 consecutive monthly appointments

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in the contour 7.

    Time frame: 5 consecutive monthly appointments

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Univ. of Maryland - Baltimore
    Baltimore, Maryland, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jul 2002, a primary completion of Sep 2010 and a completion of Sep 2010. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 28, 2009
First posted
Apr 30, 2009
Start
Jul 2002
Primary completionActual
Sep 2010
CompletionActual
Sep 2010
Last update
Jun 21, 2012
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 21, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00890526
Lead sponsor
University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa
Collaborators
University of Maryland, University of Memphis
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 30, 2009
Start date
Jul 2002
Primary completion
Sep 2010
Completion
Sep 2010
Last update
Jun 21, 2012

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion