A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Fludarabine, Busulfan, Thymoglobulin in Acute Myeloid Leukemia, sponsored by The Korean Society of Pediatric Hematology Oncology. Status unknown at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 21 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-03-26.
Sponsored by The Korean Society of Pediatric Hematology Oncology · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment
Cord blood transplantation (CBT) is an alternative option for patients with pediatric acute leukemia that indicated stem cell transplantation. Although CBT is as affective as unrelated bone marrow transplantation with lower graft versus host disease (GVHD) severity and incidence, transplantation related mortality (TRM) has been major problems after myeloablative conditioning. To reduce TRM, CBT with non-myeloablative conditionings have been performed but not so satisfactory especially for engraftment rate. Recently reduced toxicity myeloablative conditioning regimen was developed with promising result in adult bone marrow or mobilized peripheral blood transplantation. To increase the engraftment potential with low TRM rate, reduced toxicity myeloablative conditioning composed of fludarabine, intravenous busulfan plus thymoglobulin is planned for pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Since the first successful transplantation using umbilical cord blood (UCB) to treat a patient with Fanconi anemia in 1988 (Gluckman E, 1989), cord blood transplantation (CBT) has become an alternative to bone marrow transplantation (BMT) to treat a variety of diseases. Cord blood cells have many theoretical advantages as grafts for stem cell transplantation because of the immaturity of newborn cells. Compared to adults, UCB stem cells produce larger in vitro hematopoietic colonies, are able to expand in long-term culture in vitro (Ahn HS, 2003). The properties of UCB cells should theoretically compensate for the relatively low number of cells obtained in a single UCB unit and, through rapid expansion, reconstitute myeloablated patients with fewer nucleated cells (by 1-2 logs) than bone marrow (Barker JN, 2003-1).
Recent results of CBT revealed that HLA-matched and 1-antigen mismatched unrelated CBT had similar survival as HLA-matched unrelated BMT and both the cell dose and HLA-disparity influenced the outcome of CBT (CIBMTR data). But the major problems of CBT were engraftment failure and transplantation related mortality (TRM) that compromised the outcomes of CBT. As the numbers of stem cells are lower and immune cells are immature in cord blood than bone marrow, the engraftment and immunologic recovery are delayed in CBT than BMT and these properties of CBT result in higher rate of TRM up to 39% during 100 days after CBT (Rocha V, 2001). Early results of CBT also reported upto 50% of TRM (Gluckman E, 1997; Rubinstein P, 1998) and CIBMTR also reported that the cumulative incidence of TRM in pediatric study is about 40%.
As the TRM is higher in CBT especially after conventional myeloablative conditioning, non-myeloablative conditioning regimens are investigated especially for adult CBT (Barker JN, 2003-2; Chao NJ, 2004). But studies about pediatric acute leukemia patients are not so much and our pilot data suggested that CBT with non-myeloablative conditioning resulted in lower engraftment rate and anti-leukemic effect although with low morbidity and mortality (Ahn HS, 2004).
Recently, fludarabine based reduced toxicity myeloablative regimens were investigated with promising result in adult transplant with bone marrow or mobilized peripheral blood (Russell JA, 2002; Bornhauser M, 2003; de Lima M, 2004).
Purine-analog, in particular fludarabine, has some advantage over cyclophosphamide. It has immunosuppressive property that allows the engraftment of hematopoietic stem cells with minimal extramudullary toxicity. Fludarabine also inhibit the repair mechanism of alkylating agent induced DNA damage, thus providing a synergistic effect if pre-exposed to the target tissue.
As the fludarabine plus myeloablative dose of busulfan allowed good engraftment and reduced toxicity in transplant with bone marrow or mobilized peripheral blood, this combination could be optimal for the conditioning regimen for CBT, which has high TRM and lower engraftment rate with conventional myeloablative conditioning.
To increase the engraftment potential with low TRM rate, reduced toxicity myeloablative conditioning composed of fludarabine, intravenous busulfan, thymoglobulin for CBT is planned for pediatric patients with AML.
5,441 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia; 636 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 35 is close to the median of 38 across 4,247 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia.
Browse Leukemia studies →The Korean Society of Pediatric Hematology Oncology is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Drug: Fludarabine, Busulfan, Thymoglobulin
fludarabine (40 mg/m2 once daily i.v. on days -8, -7, -6, -5, -4 \& -3) busulfan (0.8 mg/kg every 6 hours i.v. on days -6, -5, -4, \& -3) thymoglobulin (2.5 mg/kg once daily i.v. on days -8, -7, \& -6)
To evaluate the engraftment potential of fludarabine, busulfan plus thymoglobulin conditioning regimen for CBT in AML.
Time frame: From June 2006 to May 2010
To evaluate the incidence and severity of toxicity and treatment related mortality.
Time frame: From June 2006 to May 2010
To evaluate overall and event free survival rate.
Time frame: From June 2006 to May 2010
To evaluate acute and chronic GVHD.
Time frame: From June 2006 to May 2010
To evaluate immunologic recovery after CBT.
Time frame: From June 2006 to May 2010
This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
The Korean Society of Pediatric Hematology Oncology