An observational study in Colorectal Surgery, sponsored by University of Surrey. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-04-20.
Sponsored by University of Surrey · Observational
Hypothesis: The total costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery are less than those of open surgery.
Secondary hypothesis: Patients quality of life is higher following laparoscopic surgery, as compared to open colorectal surgery.
Research objectives:
Lay summary:
Patients needing an operation for a bowel problem have traditionally had an open operation with an incision on the abdomen, and this is the type of operation that is currently performed in the majority of cases in the United Kingdom today (over 90%). Laparoscopic (or keyhole) surgery has been introduced into bowel surgery, but is currently not widely performed. This is because thus far there have been no clear-cut benefits demonstrated with this technique and the perceived costs are higher than an open operation. The investigators aim to evaluate both of these issues.
University of Surrey is the lead sponsor of 90 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
All patients requiring a colorectal resection between January 2006 and August 2007 at The Royal Surrey County Hospital, UK.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients having a laparoscopic colorectal resection
Procedure: laparoscopic colorectal resection
Patients having an open colorectal resection
Procedure: open colorectal resection
The cost effectiveness of laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Time frame: 6 weeks
Costs of laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery
Time frame: 6 weeks
Quality of life of patients having laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery
Time frame: 6 weeks
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Surrey