CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00884130Updated Apr 20, 2009

Cost Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

An observational study in Colorectal Surgery, sponsored by University of Surrey. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-04-20.

Sponsored by University of Surrey · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hypothesis: The total costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery are less than those of open surgery.

Secondary hypothesis: Patients quality of life is higher following laparoscopic surgery, as compared to open colorectal surgery.

Research objectives:

  1. To estimate the cost implications and clinical benefits of incorporating laparoscopic colorectal surgery into routine clinical practice.
  2. To examine whether the increased operative costs of laparoscopic surgery are compensated for by a faster recovery, shorter duration of hospital stay, and a reduction in late complications, as compared to open surgery.
  3. To investigate whether there are differences in quality of life following laparoscopic colorectal surgery as compared to open surgery.

Lay summary:

Patients needing an operation for a bowel problem have traditionally had an open operation with an incision on the abdomen, and this is the type of operation that is currently performed in the majority of cases in the United Kingdom today (over 90%). Laparoscopic (or keyhole) surgery has been introduced into bowel surgery, but is currently not widely performed. This is because thus far there have been no clear-cut benefits demonstrated with this technique and the perceived costs are higher than an open operation. The investigators aim to evaluate both of these issues.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Surgery

Keywords

  • Laparoscopy
  • Colorectal surgery
  • Quality of life
  • economic analysis
  • Patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Surrey is the lead sponsor of 90 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients requiring a colorectal resection between January 2006 and August 2007 at The Royal Surrey County Hospital, UK.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients having a colorectal resection, including benign and malignant tumours, inflammatory bowel disease, diverticular disease, and endometriosis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children
  • Emergency procedures
  • Patients unable to consent, unable to complete a quality of life diary
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Laparoscopic

    Patients having a laparoscopic colorectal resection

    Procedure: laparoscopic colorectal resection

  • Open

    Patients having an open colorectal resection

    Procedure: open colorectal resection

Interventions

  • Procedurelaparoscopic colorectal resection
  • Procedureopen colorectal resection
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The cost effectiveness of laparoscopic colorectal surgery

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Costs of laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Quality of life of patients having laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Royal Surrey County Hospital
    Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XX, United Kingdom
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 20, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00884130
Lead sponsor
University of Surrey
Collaborators
Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit, Ethicon Endo-Surgery (Europe) GmbH
First posted
Apr 20, 2009
Start date
Jan 2006
Primary completion
Aug 2007
Completion
Oct 2007
Last update
Apr 20, 2009

Study contacts

Henry m Dowson, MBBS FRCS
principal investigator · Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit
Timothy Rockall, MBBS FRCS
study chair · Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion