CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00878631TOPHR HITUpdated Apr 9, 2009

Feasibility Trial of Traumatic Brain Injured Patients Randomized in the Prehospital Setting to Either Hypertonic Saline and Dextran Versus Normal Saline

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of hypertonic saline mixed with dextran and Normal Saline in Brain Injuries, sponsored by Unity Health Toronto. Completed at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-04-09.

Sponsored by Unity Health Toronto · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
113
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical trial will evaluate the ease of conducting a randomized trial on patients with severe head injury who are cared for by paramedics in the out of hospital setting. The trial will compare two different kinds of fluids that are commonly used to elevate blood pressure and minimize the impact of the brain injury. The two solutions are a salt solution of different concentrations. One is a normal saline solution similar to the consistency of human blood and the other is a higher concentration mixed with a sugar that helps to keep the solution in the blood stream longer. This study is conducted without patient consent at the time of the study enrolment. The study will report on whether this trial is feasible in the out of hospital setting before launching into a larger definitive trial.

Read the detailed description

The Toronto Prehospital Hypertonic Resuscitation-Head Injury and Multi Organ Dysfunction Trial (TOPHR HIT) is a randomized, placebo-controlled out of hospital trial of blunt trauma patients with head injuries. The study compares a group receiving normal saline according to a paramedic's protocol, with a treatment group receiving a single dose 250 ml of 7.5% hypertonic saline in 6% dextran 70 (RescueFlow BioPhausia AB, Stockholm Sweden).

The primary objective of this study is to report feasibility in accordance with the methodology described by Lancaster and Dodds*, specifically addressing:

  1. baseline survival rates for the treatment and control group to aid in the design of a definitive multicentre trial.
  2. randomization compliance rate.
  3. ease of protocol implementation in the out-of-hospital setting.
  4. adverse rate of HSD infusion.

The secondary objectives include measuring the effect of HSD in modulating the immuno-inflammatory response to severe head injury and its effect on modulating the release of neuro-biomarkers into serum; evaluating the role of serum neuro-biomarkers in predicting patient outcome and clinical response to HSD intervention; evaluating effects of HSD on brain atrophy post-injury and neurocognitive and neuropsychological outcomes.

*Lancaster, G.A., S. Dodd, and P.R. Williamson, Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract, 2004. 10(2): p. 307-12.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Injuries

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • emergency medical services
  • traumatic brain injury
  • hypertonic saline with dextran
  • fluid resuscitation
03

In context

Brain Injuries

2,112 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 384 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 113 is above the median of 48 across 1,331 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries.

Browse Brain Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Unity Health Toronto is the lead sponsor of 434 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 16;
  • Initial assessment of GCS 8 or less;
  • Blunt traumatic mechanism of injury.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known pregnancy;
  • Primary injury penetrating;
  • VSA prior to randomization;
  • Previous Intravenous therapy ≥ 50 ml;
  • Time interval between arrival at scene and intravenous access exceeds four hours;
  • Amputation above wrist or ankle;
  • Any burn (thermal, chemical, electrical, radiation)
  • Suspected hypothermia;
  • Asphyxia (strangulation, hanging, choking, suffocation, drowning)
  • Fall from height ≤ 1m or ≤ 5 Stairs
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
113 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1 Normal Saline

    infusion of 250 ccs of Normal Saline within 4 hours of the accident

    Drug: Normal Saline

  • Experimental
    2 - hypertonic saline mixed with dextran

    a single dose 250 ml of 7.5% hypertonic saline in 6% dextran 70 infused within 4 hours of the accident

    Drug: hypertonic saline mixed with dextran

Interventions

  • Drughypertonic saline mixed with dextran

    a single dose 250 ml of 7.5% hypertonic saline in 6% dextran 70 is given within 4 hours from the time of the accident

    Also known as: RescueFlow BioPhausia AB, Stockholm Sweden

  • DrugNormal Saline

    250 ccs of normal saline infused within 4 hours of the accident

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. baseline survival rates for the treatment and control group to aid in the design of a definitive multicentre trial

    Time frame: survival at 48 hours, hospital discharge, 30 days and 4 months

  2. randomization compliance rate

    Time frame: duration of enrolment

  3. ease of protocol implementation in the out-of-hospital setting

    Time frame: duration of study

  4. adverse event rate of hypertonic saline dextran infusion

    Time frame: duration of study

Secondary outcomes

  1. neurocognitive outcomes at discharge (cerebral performance category) and at 4 months (functional independence measure, disability rating scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale and Glasgow outcome Scale Extended

    Time frame: discharge and at 4 months post incident

  2. neuropsychological outcomes including learning and memory, working memory, executive function, language function, visuospatial function, speed of processing and Beck Depression Scale. A focused attention reaction time test was added to 12 month testing.

    Time frame: at 4 and 12 months post incident

  3. magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate effects of HSD on brain atrophy post-injury

    Time frame: 4 months post incident

  4. the effect of HSD in modulating the immuno-inflammatory response to severe head injury and its effect on modulation the release of neuro-biomarkers into serum; evaluating the role of serum neuro-biomarkers in predicting patient outcome

    Time frame: samples taken within 48 hours of incident

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center
    Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
  • St Michael's Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5V 1W8, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Morrison LJ, Rizoli S, Schwartz B, Rhind S, Black S, Stuss DT, Baker A, Univ of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; on behalf of the TOPHR HIT Investigators. The Toronto Prehospital Resuscitation Head Injury and Multi-Organ Dysfunction Trial (TOPHR HIT). Circulation October 31, 2006; 114(18): #104.
  • Morrison LJ, Rizoli S, Schwartz B, Rhind S, Black S, Stuss DT, Baker A, Stuss DT, Baker A, Simitciu M, Perreira T, MacDonald RD. University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Canada; on behalf of the TOPHR HIT Investigators. The Toronto Prehospital Hypertonic Resuscitation Head Injury and Multi-Organ Dysfunction Trial (TOPHR HIT). Prehosp Emerg Care 2007; 11(1): 94.
  • Rhind SG, Crnko NT, Baker AJ, Morrison LJ, Shek PN, Scarpelini S, Rizoli SB. Prehospital resuscitation with hypertonic saline-dextran modulates inflammatory, coagulation and endothelial activation marker profiles in severe traumatic brain injured patients. J Neuroinflammation. 2010 Jan 18;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-7-5. PubMed 20082712 ↗
  • Morrison LJ, Rizoli SB, Schwartz B, Rhind SG, Simitciu M, Perreira T, Macdonald R, Trompeo A, Stuss DT, Black SE, Kiss A, Baker AJ. The Toronto prehospital hypertonic resuscitation-head injury and multi organ dysfunction trial (TOPHR HIT)--methods and data collection tools. Trials. 2009 Nov 20;10:105. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-105. PubMed 19930566 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 9, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00878631
Lead sponsor
Unity Health Toronto
Collaborators
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Defence Research and Development Canada
First posted
Apr 9, 2009
Start date
Sep 2004
Primary completion
Jan 2006
Completion
Dec 2008
Last update
Apr 9, 2009

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion