A Phase 1 interventional study of Intracoronary Transplantation of Bone Marrow Stem Cells in Myocardial Infarction, sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-02.
Sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment
This research is being done because currently there is no effective way in regenerating or replacing the heart muscle that has been damaged after a heart attack.
The purpose of this study is to test whether injecting cells obtained from the patient's bone marrow into the coronary artery can regenerate and replace heart tissue to strengthen heart and prevent heart from dilating and developing heart failure.
The main objective of this study is to investigate the safety and clinical outcome of intracoronary infusion of autologous bone marrow cells in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). We hypothesize that patients treated with stem cell therapy will have beneficial effects on left ventricular (LV) remodeling and functional regeneration after MI and successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in setting of prospective randomized controlled trial.
Congestive heart failure (CHF), which is most commonly caused by acute myocardial infarction (AMI), is the most frequent cause of hospitalization in the United States in patients over the age of 65. Although current pharmacotherapy can inhibit neurohormonal activation, this falls short in preventing LV remodeling and the development of CHF. Stem cells are undifferentiated pluripotent cells that can be obtained from the patient and have the potential to proliferate and differentiation into cardiomyocytes. The majority of the data on stem cell transplantation comes from preclinical animal studies. Although the results are interesting and perhaps safe, early phase I clinical studies are small and are very preliminary. Data from large, randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the short and long term effects of cellular cardiomyoplasty.
2,779 studies on the registry are indexed under Myocardial Infarction; 417 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 27 is below the median of 148 across 1,613 interventional studies indexed under Myocardial Infarction.
Browse Myocardial Infarction studies →Cedars-Sinai Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 455 studies on the registry; 108 are open to participants now.
Of its 65 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 49 (75%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Patients with acute myocardial infarction (ST elevation in at least 2 leads ≥ 0.2 mV in V1,V2 or V3 or ≥ 0.1 mV in other leads), treated by one of the following procedures:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients within 3 to 14 days from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and stent implantation for Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) will receive either 50 cc's or 100 cc's of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells through an intracoronary tranplantation of stem cells into the infarct-related coronary artery.
Drug: Intracoronary Transplantation of Bone Marrow Stem Cells
Intracoronary application of autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells in infarct artery 3 - 14 days after PCI for acute myocardial infarction.
Also known as: REVITALIZE
Safety and feasibility of intracoronary administration of autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells; Improvement of global left ventricular ejection fraction by cardiac MRI and echocardiography after 4 months.
Time frame: 4 months from procedure
Freedom from Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Time frame: 12 months from procedure
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.