CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00874224ORANGE IIUpdated Mar 9, 2016

Surgical Recovery After Left Lateral Hepatic Sectionectomy: Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery.

An interventional study of laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy and open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy in Colorectal Cancer, Liver Metastasis and Liver Disease, sponsored by Maastricht University Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-09.

Sponsored by Maastricht University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
110
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The ORANGE II trial is a double blinded randomised controlled trial that will provide evidence on the merits of laparoscopic surgery in patients undergoing a left lateral hepatic sectionectomy in terms of time to functional recovery, hospital length of stay, quality of life, readmission percentage, morbidity and mortality, hospital costs, body image and cosmesis, and long term incidence of incisional hernias.

Read the detailed description

Recent developments in liver surgery include the introduction of laparoscopic surgery and enhanced recovery programmes. Laparoscopic surgery and enhanced recovery programmes both focus on faster recovery and consequently shorter hospital length of stay.

The ORANGE-II trial is a prospective randomised controlled parallel group superiority trial with a double-blinded experimental and a prospective registry design to determine whether laparoscopic surgery is to be preferred over open surgery in patients undergoing a left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery programme. The experimental design produces two randomised arms; (a) open LLS and (b) laparoscopic LLS. An additional registry arm will be based on surgeons/patients that do not want to be randomised because they have an explicit preference for either the laparoscopic LLS or for the open LLS (c).

The primary endpoint of the ORANGE II trial is time to functional recovery. The functional recovery criteria consist of adequate pain control with oral analgetics only, mobility restored to an independent level, absence of intravenous fluid administration, ability to eat solid foods and finally a normal or decreasing serum bilirubin level. A patient is fully functionally recovered when all of the five criteria are satisfied.

Secondary endpoints of this trial are postoperative length of hospital stay, readmission percentage, (liver specific) morbidity, quality of life, body image and cosmetic result, hospital and societal costs during one year and long-term incidence of incisional hernias.

The ORANGE-II trial is a randomised controlled multicentre trial that will provide evidence on the merits of laparoscopic surgery in patients undergoing a left lateral hepatic sectionectomy and participating in an enhanced recovery programme.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Liver Metastasis
  • Liver Disease

Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer liver metastasis
  • Benign liver disease
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,599 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,459 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 110 is above the median of 77 across 4,123 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Maastricht University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 835 studies on the registry; 122 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients suitable for undergoing both laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy as well as open left lateral sectionectomy of the liver.
  • Able to understand the nature of the study and what will be required of them.
  • Men and non-pregnant, non-lactating women between age 18-80.
  • BMI between 18-35.
  • Patients with ASA I-II-III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give written informed consent.
  • Patients undergoing liver resection other than left lateral hepatic sectionectomy.
  • Patients with ASA IV-V
  • Underlying liver disease
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
110 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    patients undergoing open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy

    Procedure: open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy

  • Active comparator
    2

    patients undergoing a laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy

    Procedure: laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy

  • Active comparator
    3

    Prospective registry of patients that cannot be randomized (both open and laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy)

    Procedure: laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy · Procedure: open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy

Interventions

  • Procedurelaparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy

    laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy

  • Procedureopen left lateral hepatic sectionectomy

    open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to functional Recovery

    The functional recovery criteria consist of adequate pain control with oral analgetics only, mobility restored to an independent level, absence of intravenous fluid administration, ability to eat solid foods and finally a normal or decreasing serum bilirubin level. A patient is fully functionally recovered when all of the five criteria are satisfied. It is medically justified to discharge patients when the criteria for full functional recovery are met and if the patient is willing to go home.

    Time frame: Date the functional recovery criteria are met

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative length of hospital stay

    including readmission \<30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Readmission percentage

    Readmission percentage during one year follow-up

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Total morbidity

    Morbidity will be classified and analysed according to the validated classification for postoperative morbidity as described by Dindo et al.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Composite endpoint of liver surgery specific morbidity

    Parameter composed of a combination of procedure-specific complications and considered as a single, dichotomous outcome: operative mortality, intra-abdominal haemorrhage, ascites, bile leakage, intra-abdominal abscess and postresectional liver failure. These components, which are all specific to liver surgery and have substantial clinical relevance, reflect Dindo grade 3-5 complications. A composite score of 1 (=failure) will reflect the occurrence of at least one of the above liver specific complications, consequently a score of 0 (=success) will be assigned if none occur.

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Quality of life

    To assess quality of life the Dutch version of the EQ-5D (EuroQol Group) status test in Dutch centres and the translated EQ-5D for international centres will be used. Furthermore, the EORTC QLQ-C30 with the LM21 module will be used for liver specific treatment measurements. Assessment of the patients' quality of life will be performed at the time of consent, discharge and 10 days, 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge.

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. Body image and cosmesis

    To evaluate differences in postoperative body image and cosmesis, the Body image Questionnaire (BIQ) will be used. The BIQ consists of 8 questions regarding body image and cosmesis. The body image assessment will be performed preoperatively at time of consent. Both the body image and the cosmesis assessment will take place at discharge, 10 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after discharge

    Time frame: 1 year

  7. Hospital and societal costs

    The economic evaluation will include a cost-utility analysis from a Dutch societal perspective. The incremental costs per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gained will be based on utility scores from the EQ-5D. All hospital expenses (direct and indirect) related to both interventions will be monitored. In addition, a cost questionnaire offered at the regular follow-up consultation (3, 6 and 12 months) will help us to assess the societal and individual costs outside health care relating to patients' absence, impaired mobility, work or normal daily activities.

    Time frame: 1 year

  8. Incidence of incisional hernias

    To assess the incidence of incisional hernias in laparoscopic and open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy patients will be contacted at a mean time of 1 year after resection to receive an ultrasound to diagnose incisional hernia.

    Time frame: 1 year

  9. Reasons for delay of discharge after functional recovery

    Factors delaying discharge after functional recovery will be monitored.

    Time frame: untill Discharge

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre
    Maastricht, Limburg 6202 AZ, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Dam RM, van Breukelen GJ, Tanis PJ, Ratti F, van Hillegersberg R, Slooter GD, de Wilt JH, Liem MS, de Boer MT, Klaase JM, Neumann UP, Aldrighetti LA, Dejong CH; ORANGE II Collaborative Group. Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme (ORANGE II study). Br J Surg. 2017 Apr;104(5):525-535. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10438. Epub 2017 Jan 31. PubMed 28138958 ↗
  • van Dam RM, Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Breukelen GJ, Stoot JH, van der Vorst JR, Bemelmans MH, Olde Damink SW, Lassen K, Dejong CH; ORANGE II Study Group. Open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery ERAS(R) programme (ORANGE II-trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2012 May 6;13:54. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-54. PubMed 22559239 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 9, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00874224
Lead sponsor
Maastricht University Medical Center
Collaborators
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA), UMC Utrecht, Medisch Spectrum Twente, University Medical Center Groningen, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Nijmegen, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Maxima Medical Center, Isala, San Raffaele University Hospital, Italy, University Hospital, Aachen, Deventer Ziekenhuis
Responsible party
R.S. Fichtinger (Drs. R.M. van dam, Maastricht University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 2, 2009
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Jul 2014
Completion
Jul 2014
Last update
Mar 9, 2016

Study contacts

Ronald M van Dam, MD
study director · Maastricht University Medical Centre
Cornelis HC Dejong, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Maastricht University Medical Centre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion