A Phase 2 interventional study of Bevacizumab and Cyclophosphamide in Ovarian Cancer, Peritoneal Cancer and Fallopian Tube Cancer, sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-10.
Sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
The goals of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequentially blocking the angiogenesis pathway via known antiangiogenic mechanisms, first with bevacizumab and then addition of oral cyclophosphamide upon progression of cancer through bevacizumab. The drugs used in this study were chosen because of their known antiangiogenic properties, tolerability, and anti-ovarian cancer effects.
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
Secondary
Correlative
STATISTICAL DESIGN:
This study used a two-stage design to evaluate safety and efficacy of sequential antiangiogenic blockade with a regimen of bevacizumab then cyclophosphamide added at disease progression. Safety was measured by the incidence of grade 3-5 gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) during the first 3 months of therapy and efficacy by completion of at least 3 months of therapy. The sample size was determined based on efficacy with the null and alternative therapy completion rate of 50% and 80%, respectively. If 6 or more patients enrolled in the stage one cohort (n=9 patients) completed at least 3 months of therapy then accrual would proceed to stage two (n=11 patients) if there were fewer than 2 cases of grade 3-5 GIP. There was 0.75 probability of stopping the trial at stage one if the true therapy completion rate was 50%. If 13 or fewer patients remained on therapy for at least 3 months by the end of stage two, this regimen would be deemed ineffective. The power to reject the null hypothesis with a one-sided binomial test was 87% assuming 5% significance.
9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 50 across 7,253 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.
Browse Neoplasms studies →Dana-Farber Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 813 studies on the registry; 124 are open to participants now.
Of its 113 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 77 (68%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients were given a regimen of sequential antiangiogenic blockade and disease assessed serologically and radiologically every 2 cycles/6 weeks. Patients started with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks until they experienced progressive disease (PD) \[RECIST 1.0 or Rustin criteria\] or significant toxicity. If clinically stable as assessed by their treating physician, patients then received cyclophosphamide 50 mg orally (PO) daily continuously with bevacizumab treatment. If second PD occurred, patients discontinued the combination treatment.
Drug: Bevacizumab · Drug: Cyclophosphamide
Also known as: Avastin
Also known as: cytoxan
Therapy Completion Rate
The therapy completion rate is defined as the proportion of participants who completed at least 3 months/4 cycles of therapy. Participants were treated until disease progression on the combination regimen or unacceptable toxicity. Clinical response was evaluated based on RECIST 1.0 criteria for measurable disease (MD) participants and Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) CA-125 (Rustin) criteria for non-MD participants. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, PD is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of new lesions. For non-target lesions, PD is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Serologic PD is rise in CA-125 or previously normal CA125 that rises to \>/=2xULN documented, both requiring 2nd confirmation.
Time frame: Serologic and radiologic disease assessments occurred every 2 cycles/6 weeks on treatment. Median treatment duration for this study cohort was 7.5 months (range 0.7-20.7).
Grade 3-5 Gastrointestinal Perforation
All grade 3-5 gastrointestinal perforation events based on CTCAEv3 as reported on case report forms.
Time frame: Assessed each cycle/3 weeks throughout treatment from time of first dose and up to day 30 post-treatment. Median treatment duration for this study cohort was 7.5 months (range 0.7-20.7).
Clinical Benefit Response Rate
Clinical benefit response rate is defined as the proportion of participants who achieve confirmed stable disease (SD) or better on treatment based on RECIST 1.0 criteria. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, complete response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions and partial response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. Progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started. SD is neither PR nor PD. For non-target lesions, PD is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time frame: Radiologic disease assessments occurred every 2 cycles/6 weeks on treatment. Median treatment duration for this study cohort was 7.5 months (range 0.7-20.7).
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods is defined as the duration of time from the start of bevacizumab alone to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study or death. If participant ultimately received both bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide then it was the time until PD on both agents. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, PD is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of new lesions. For non-target lesions, PD is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Serologic PD is rise in CA-125 or previously normal CA-125 that rises to \>/=2xULN documented, both requiring 2nd confirmation. Participants who were event-free were censored at the date of their last disease evaluation.
Time frame: Radiologic disease assessments occurred every 2 cycles/6 weeks on treatment and every 3 months in follow-up until PD, death or lost to follow-up. Median treatment duration was 7.5 months (range 0.7-20.7) and survival follow-up 23 months..
Overall Survival (OS)
OS estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive.
Time frame: Participants were followed long-term for survival every 3 months from the end of treatment until death or lost to follow-up. Median follow-up was 23 months in this study cohort.
20 patients were enrolled between March 2009 and October 2009.
| Milestone | Bevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab |
|---|---|
| Started | 20 |
| Completed | 0 |
| Not completed | 20 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 4 |
| Withdrew: Progressive disease | 16 |
The therapy completion rate is defined as the proportion of participants who completed at least 3 months/4 cycles of therapy. Participants were treated until disease progression on the combination regimen or unacceptable toxicity. Clinical response was evaluated based on RECIST 1.0 criteria for measurable disease (MD) participants and Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) CA-125 (Rustin) criteria for non-MD participants. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, PD is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of new lesions. For non-target lesions, PD is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Serologic PD is rise in CA-125 or previously normal CA125 that rises to \>/=2xULN documented, both requiring 2nd confirmation.
| proportion of participants | Bevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab |
|---|---|
| Therapy Completion Rate | .75 (0.59 to 0.88) |
All grade 3-5 gastrointestinal perforation events based on CTCAEv3 as reported on case report forms.
| proportion of participants | Bevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab |
|---|---|
| Grade 3-5 Gastrointestinal Perforation | 0.05 (0.003 to .22) |
Clinical benefit response rate is defined as the proportion of participants who achieve confirmed stable disease (SD) or better on treatment based on RECIST 1.0 criteria. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, complete response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions and partial response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. Progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started. SD is neither PR nor PD. For non-target lesions, PD is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
| proportion of participants | Platinum Sensitive | Platinum Resistant |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Benefit Response Rate | 1.00 (0.61 to 1.00) | 0.64 (0.39 to 0.85) |
PFS estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods is defined as the duration of time from the start of bevacizumab alone to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study or death. If participant ultimately received both bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide then it was the time until PD on both agents. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, PD is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of new lesions. For non-target lesions, PD is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Serologic PD is rise in CA-125 or previously normal CA-125 that rises to \>/=2xULN documented, both requiring 2nd confirmation. Participants who were event-free were censored at the date of their last disease evaluation.
| months | Bevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab |
|---|---|
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | 8.41 (2.83 to 15.41) |
OS estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive.
| months | Bevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab |
|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) | 22.72 (15.44 to 30.95) |
Collected over Assessed each cycle/ 3 weeks throughout treatment from time of first dose and up to day 30 post-treatment.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab | — | 14/20 (70%) | 18/20 (90%) |
| Event | Bevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab |
|---|---|
| HypertensionVascular disorders | 12/20 |
| Cardiac-ischemiaCardiac disorders | 1/20 |
| Obstruction, colonGastrointestinal disorders | 1/20 |
| FatigueGeneral disorders | 1/20 |
| Head/headacheNervous system disorders | 1/20 |
| Event | Bevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab |
|---|---|
| FatigueGeneral disorders | 16/20 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 8/20 |
| Joint, painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 8/20 |
| HypomagnesemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 7/20 |
| Head/headacheNervous system disorders | 6/20 |
| ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders | 5/20 |
| Diarrhea w/o prior colostomyGastrointestinal disorders | 5/20 |
| ProteinuriaRenal and urinary disorders | 4/20 |
| Nose, hemorrhageRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 4/20 |
| DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders | 3/20 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Bevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab |
|---|---|
| Median | 64 (44 to 82) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Bevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab |
|---|---|
| Female | 20 |
| Male | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Bevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab |
|---|---|
| United States | 20 |
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute