CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00856180Updated Sep 10, 2018Results posted

Sequential Angiogenic Blockade for the Treatment of Recurrent Mullerian Malignancies

A Phase 2 interventional study of Bevacizumab and Cyclophosphamide in Ovarian Cancer, Peritoneal Cancer and Fallopian Tube Cancer, sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-10.

Sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goals of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequentially blocking the angiogenesis pathway via known antiangiogenic mechanisms, first with bevacizumab and then addition of oral cyclophosphamide upon progression of cancer through bevacizumab. The drugs used in this study were chosen because of their known antiangiogenic properties, tolerability, and anti-ovarian cancer effects.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Assess the efficacy of a sequential antiangiogenic blockade regimen of bevacizumab then cyclophosphamide with bevacizumab at disease progression in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer as measured by the proportion of patients who remain on study at three months (4 cycles)
  • Assess the safety profile with respect to gastrointestinal perforations

Secondary

  • Assess other toxicity/ safety profile of this metronomic antiangiogenic approach
  • Assess preliminary response rate and proportion of patients on study at 6 months
  • Assess progression-free survival, time to progression and overall survival

Correlative

  • Determine if biological correlates of angiogenesis are altered by the addition of sequential therapy
  • Determine if changes in biological markers are correlated with clinical state of cancer
  • Determine whether biomarkers of angiogenesis can predict and measure response
  • Determine whether oncogenic mutations predict response
  • Determine whether hypertension and urinary biomarkers such as varying levels of albuminuria predict response to bevacizumab
  • Determine patient risk factors for hypertension and proteinuria as toxicities of bevacizumab

STATISTICAL DESIGN:

This study used a two-stage design to evaluate safety and efficacy of sequential antiangiogenic blockade with a regimen of bevacizumab then cyclophosphamide added at disease progression. Safety was measured by the incidence of grade 3-5 gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) during the first 3 months of therapy and efficacy by completion of at least 3 months of therapy. The sample size was determined based on efficacy with the null and alternative therapy completion rate of 50% and 80%, respectively. If 6 or more patients enrolled in the stage one cohort (n=9 patients) completed at least 3 months of therapy then accrual would proceed to stage two (n=11 patients) if there were fewer than 2 cases of grade 3-5 GIP. There was 0.75 probability of stopping the trial at stage one if the true therapy completion rate was 50%. If 13 or fewer patients remained on therapy for at least 3 months by the end of stage two, this regimen would be deemed ineffective. The power to reject the null hypothesis with a one-sided binomial test was 87% assuming 5% significance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ovarian Cancer
  • Peritoneal Cancer
  • Fallopian Tube Cancer

Keywords

  • avastin
  • bevacizumab
  • cyclophosphamide
  • cytoxan
  • mullerian malignancies
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 50 across 7,253 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 813 studies on the registry; 124 are open to participants now.

Of its 113 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 77 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer.
  • Recurrent cancer and have received and failed a previous platinum-based chemotherapy regimen.
  • Up to 2 prior lines of chemotherapy in the recurrent setting (either platinum-based or non-platinum regimens). Biologic therapies count as a prior line but hormonal therapies do not count.
  • Platinum-resistant or platinum-sensitive recurrence.
  • Must be able to take oral medications and have no evidence of bowel obstruction or partial bowel obstruction
  • Measurable disease by either RECIST or Rustin criteria
  • No chemotherapy, radiation therapy, nor biologic therapy within the last three weeks prior to initiating therapy
  • ECOG score of 0 or 1
  • Life expectancy of 12 weeks or greater
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Laboratory values as outlined in the protocol
  • Patients with treated limited stage basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the breast or cervix are eligible. Subjects with stage I or II cancer treated with curative intent and no evidence of recurrent disease are also eligible.
  • No evidence of preexisting hypertension. If patient has hypertension, it must be controlled medically (less than 150/90) prior to starting bevacizumab
  • Normal blood coagulation parameters
  • No prior treatment with any other antiangiogenic agents or cyclophosphamide
  • For patients who have received prior doxorubicin or pegylated doxorubicin, LVEF must be 50% or greater.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current, recent (within 4 weeks of the first study infusion), or planned participation in an experimental drug study other than a Genentech-sponsored bevacizumab cancer study
  • Active malignancy, other than superficial basal cell and superficial squamous (skin) cell, or carcinoma in situ of the cervix within last five years
  • Uncontrolled diarrhea
  • Prior history of hypertensive crisis or hypertensive encephalopathy
  • NYHA Grade II or greater congestive heart failure
  • History of myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 6 months prior to Day 1
  • History of stroke or transient ischemic attack within 6 months prior to day 1
  • Known CNS disease, except for treated brain metastasis
  • Treated brain metastases are defined as having no evidence of progression or hemorrhage after treatment and no ongoing requirement for dexamethasone, as ascertained by clinical examination and brain imaging (MRI or CT) during the screening period. Anticonvulsants (stable dose) are allowed. Treatment for brain metastases may include whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), radiosurgery (RS: Gamma Knife, LINAC, or equivalent) or a combination as deemed appropriate by the treating physician. Patients with CNS metastases treated by neurosurgical resection or brain biopsy performed within 3 months prior to day 1 will be excluded.
  • Significant vascular disease within 6 months prior to day 1
  • History of hemoptysis within 1 month prior to day 1
  • Evidence of bleeding diathesis or significant coagulopathy (in the absence of therapeutic anticoagulation)
  • Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to day 1 or anticipation of need for major surgical procedure during the course of the study
  • Core biopsy or other minor surgical procedure, excluding placement of a vascular access device, within 7 days prior to Day 1
  • History of abdominal fistula or gastrointestinal perforation within 6 months prior to Day 1
  • Serious, non-healing wound, active ulcer, or untreated bone fracture
  • Proteinuria as demonstrated by a UPC ratio of 1.0 or greater at screening
  • Known hypersensitivity to any component of bevacizumab
  • Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test) or lactation. Use of effective means of contraception (men and women) in subjects of child-bearing potential
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bevacizumab then Cyclophosphamide with Bevacizumab

    Patients were given a regimen of sequential antiangiogenic blockade and disease assessed serologically and radiologically every 2 cycles/6 weeks. Patients started with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks until they experienced progressive disease (PD) \[RECIST 1.0 or Rustin criteria\] or significant toxicity. If clinically stable as assessed by their treating physician, patients then received cyclophosphamide 50 mg orally (PO) daily continuously with bevacizumab treatment. If second PD occurred, patients discontinued the combination treatment.

    Drug: Bevacizumab · Drug: Cyclophosphamide

Interventions

  • DrugBevacizumab

    Also known as: Avastin

  • DrugCyclophosphamide

    Also known as: cytoxan

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Therapy Completion Rate

    The therapy completion rate is defined as the proportion of participants who completed at least 3 months/4 cycles of therapy. Participants were treated until disease progression on the combination regimen or unacceptable toxicity. Clinical response was evaluated based on RECIST 1.0 criteria for measurable disease (MD) participants and Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) CA-125 (Rustin) criteria for non-MD participants. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, PD is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of new lesions. For non-target lesions, PD is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Serologic PD is rise in CA-125 or previously normal CA125 that rises to \>/=2xULN documented, both requiring 2nd confirmation.

    Time frame: Serologic and radiologic disease assessments occurred every 2 cycles/6 weeks on treatment. Median treatment duration for this study cohort was 7.5 months (range 0.7-20.7).

  2. Grade 3-5 Gastrointestinal Perforation

    All grade 3-5 gastrointestinal perforation events based on CTCAEv3 as reported on case report forms.

    Time frame: Assessed each cycle/3 weeks throughout treatment from time of first dose and up to day 30 post-treatment. Median treatment duration for this study cohort was 7.5 months (range 0.7-20.7).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Benefit Response Rate

    Clinical benefit response rate is defined as the proportion of participants who achieve confirmed stable disease (SD) or better on treatment based on RECIST 1.0 criteria. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, complete response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions and partial response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. Progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started. SD is neither PR nor PD. For non-target lesions, PD is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    Time frame: Radiologic disease assessments occurred every 2 cycles/6 weeks on treatment. Median treatment duration for this study cohort was 7.5 months (range 0.7-20.7).

  2. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods is defined as the duration of time from the start of bevacizumab alone to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study or death. If participant ultimately received both bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide then it was the time until PD on both agents. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, PD is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of new lesions. For non-target lesions, PD is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Serologic PD is rise in CA-125 or previously normal CA-125 that rises to \>/=2xULN documented, both requiring 2nd confirmation. Participants who were event-free were censored at the date of their last disease evaluation.

    Time frame: Radiologic disease assessments occurred every 2 cycles/6 weeks on treatment and every 3 months in follow-up until PD, death or lost to follow-up. Median treatment duration was 7.5 months (range 0.7-20.7) and survival follow-up 23 months..

  3. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive.

    Time frame: Participants were followed long-term for survival every 3 months from the end of treatment until death or lost to follow-up. Median follow-up was 23 months in this study cohort.

07

Results

Posted May 17, 2016

Participant flow

20 patients were enrolled between March 2009 and October 2009.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab
Started20
Completed0
Not completed20
Withdrew: Adverse event4
Withdrew: Progressive disease16

Outcome measures

PrimaryTherapy Completion Rate

The therapy completion rate is defined as the proportion of participants who completed at least 3 months/4 cycles of therapy. Participants were treated until disease progression on the combination regimen or unacceptable toxicity. Clinical response was evaluated based on RECIST 1.0 criteria for measurable disease (MD) participants and Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) CA-125 (Rustin) criteria for non-MD participants. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, PD is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of new lesions. For non-target lesions, PD is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Serologic PD is rise in CA-125 or previously normal CA125 that rises to \>/=2xULN documented, both requiring 2nd confirmation.

Time frame:
Serologic and radiologic disease assessments occurred every 2 cycles/6 weeks on treatment. Median treatment duration for this study cohort was 7.5 months (range 0.7-20.7).
Reported as:
Number · proportion of participants
Therapy Completion Rate
proportion of participantsBevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab
Therapy Completion Rate.75 (0.59 to 0.88)
PrimaryGrade 3-5 Gastrointestinal Perforation

All grade 3-5 gastrointestinal perforation events based on CTCAEv3 as reported on case report forms.

Time frame:
Assessed each cycle/3 weeks throughout treatment from time of first dose and up to day 30 post-treatment. Median treatment duration for this study cohort was 7.5 months (range 0.7-20.7).
Reported as:
Number · proportion of participants
Grade 3-5 Gastrointestinal Perforation
proportion of participantsBevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab
Grade 3-5 Gastrointestinal Perforation0.05 (0.003 to .22)
SecondaryClinical Benefit Response Rate

Clinical benefit response rate is defined as the proportion of participants who achieve confirmed stable disease (SD) or better on treatment based on RECIST 1.0 criteria. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, complete response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions and partial response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. Progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started. SD is neither PR nor PD. For non-target lesions, PD is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame:
Radiologic disease assessments occurred every 2 cycles/6 weeks on treatment. Median treatment duration for this study cohort was 7.5 months (range 0.7-20.7).
Reported as:
Number · proportion of participants
Clinical Benefit Response Rate
proportion of participantsPlatinum SensitivePlatinum Resistant
Clinical Benefit Response Rate1.00 (0.61 to 1.00)0.64 (0.39 to 0.85)
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods is defined as the duration of time from the start of bevacizumab alone to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study or death. If participant ultimately received both bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide then it was the time until PD on both agents. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, PD is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of new lesions. For non-target lesions, PD is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Serologic PD is rise in CA-125 or previously normal CA-125 that rises to \>/=2xULN documented, both requiring 2nd confirmation. Participants who were event-free were censored at the date of their last disease evaluation.

Time frame:
Radiologic disease assessments occurred every 2 cycles/6 weeks on treatment and every 3 months in follow-up until PD, death or lost to follow-up. Median treatment duration was 7.5 months (range 0.7-20.7) and survival follow-up 23 months..
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
monthsBevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)8.41 (2.83 to 15.41)
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

OS estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive.

Time frame:
Participants were followed long-term for survival every 3 months from the end of treatment until death or lost to follow-up. Median follow-up was 23 months in this study cohort.
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS)
monthsBevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab
Overall Survival (OS)22.72 (15.44 to 30.95)

Adverse events

Collected over Assessed each cycle/ 3 weeks throughout treatment from time of first dose and up to day 30 post-treatment.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Bevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab—14/20 (70%)18/20 (90%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventBevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab
HypertensionVascular disorders12/20
Cardiac-ischemiaCardiac disorders1/20
Obstruction, colonGastrointestinal disorders1/20
FatigueGeneral disorders1/20
Head/headacheNervous system disorders1/20
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 46
Most frequent other events
EventBevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab
FatigueGeneral disorders16/20
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders8/20
Joint, painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders8/20
HypomagnesemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders7/20
Head/headacheNervous system disorders6/20
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders5/20
Diarrhea w/o prior colostomyGastrointestinal disorders5/20
ProteinuriaRenal and urinary disorders4/20
Nose, hemorrhageRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/20
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders3/20

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Bevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab
Median64 (44 to 82)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Bevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab
Female20
Male0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Bevacizumab Then Cyclophosphamide With Bevacizumab
United States20
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Matulonis UA, Pereira L, Liu J, Lee H, Lee J, Whalen C, Campos S, Atkinson T, Hill M, Berlin S. Sequential bevacizumab and oral cyclophosphamide for recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jul;126(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Apr 6. PubMed 22487536 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00856180
Lead sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Collaborators
Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Genentech, Inc.
Responsible party
Ursula A. Matulonis, MD (Medical Oncologist, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 5, 2009
Start date
Feb 2009
Primary completion
Apr 2010
Completion
Jan 2014
Results posted
May 17, 2016
Last update
Sep 10, 2018

Study contacts

Ursula Matulonis, MD
principal investigator · Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion