CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00849563TDEUpdated Apr 10, 2014

Effect of Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Risk Information on Health Behaviors and Outcomes

An interventional study of Standardized Risk Assessment in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, sponsored by Duke University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-04-10.

Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
450
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the study is to assess the clinical utility of a genetic test for Type 2 diabetes risk in combination with standardized risk assessment compared with standardized risk assessment alone, and to measure whether changes in perceived risk following genetic testing for Type 2 diabetes risk are correlated with behavior change and increased concern about risk for Type 2 diabetes.

Read the detailed description

One thousand outpatients will be enrolled over two years at two university-affiliated primary care clinics. Patients will be assigned to one of three study arms: those who want genetic testing for diabetes risk will be randomly assigned to either receive the testing in addition to the SRA (SRA+G) or to receive the SRA only (SRA-only). Those who do not wish to have genetic testing will receive the SRA only. All patients will be surveyed at baseline, immediately after going through the SRA (risk-counseling visit; 2-4 weeks after initial visit), at 3 months post risk counseling visit and at 12 months post risk counseling visit. BMI, waist circumference, fasting plasma glucose and insulin will be measured at baseline and 12 months. Surveys will allow us to track patients' emotional responses to diabetes risk information and changing perceptions of personal risk for Type 2 diabetes over time, and to see if these correlate with subsequent diet and exercise behaviors.

We will use a linear model to assess the effects of genetic testing among the three study groups, using HOmeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) and weight loss as the primary outcomes. We will use generalized linear ordinal regression models to fit the ordinal survey outcomes of risk perceptions to the continuous HOMA-IR and weight outcome variables.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

  • predictive genomics
  • personalized medicine
  • personal genomics
  • genetic knowledge
  • genetic attitudes
  • prevention
  • health outcomes
  • behavioral
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,923 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,318 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 450 is above the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,025 studies on the registry; 277 are open to participants now.

Of its 194 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 158 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Are male or female outpatients
  • No self-reported history of diabetes
  • No self-reported history of prior genetic testing for diabetes
  • Not pregnant (self report)
  • Are ≥18 and \<81 years of age
  • Scheduled to receive serum glucose test in participating clinic
  • Fasting at time of blood draw (no food or drink - except water - previous 8 hours: self report)
  • Able and willing to give legally effective consent
  • Able and willing to participate in patient questionnaires
  • Ambulatory

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously or currently taking medications for lowering glucose (i.e., exenatide, pramlintide, metformin, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, or future diabetes drugs) based on self-report and/or prescreening
  • Self-report of current or prior diabetes diagnosis
  • Self-reported prior history of genetic testing for diabetes
  • Baseline serum glucose test result >125
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
450 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    SRA+genetic test

    patients randomized to receive genetic test for type 2 diabetes risk will be followed and surveyed and will be counseled based on SAR and genetic risk for type 2 diabetes

    Other: Standardized Risk Assessment

  • No intervention
    SRA only

    Patients randomized to not get genetic testing will be followed and surveyed and will be counseled based on SRA only

  • No intervention
    no testing control

    Patients not interested in genetic testing will be followed and surveyed. Counseling will be based on SRA only

Interventions

  • OtherStandardized Risk Assessment

    patients interested in genetic testing will be randomly assigned to either get testing for type 2 diabetes or not. All arms with receive standardized risk asessements. This study is evaluating behavior after receipt of genetic risk information and different types of counseling.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of weight loss

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in perceptions of personal risk for Type 2 diabetes

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Change in HOmeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Duke Family Medicine at Pickens
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
  • Duke Health Center at Pickett Rd
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Waxler JL, O'Brien KE, Delahanty LM, Meigs JB, Florez JC, Park ER, Pober BR, Grant RW. Genetic counseling as a tool for type 2 diabetes prevention: a genetic counseling framework for common polygenetic disorders. J Genet Couns. 2012 Oct;21(5):684-91. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9486-x. PubMed 22302620 ↗
  • Cho AH, Killeya-Jones LA, O'Daniel JM, Kawamoto K, Gallagher P, Haga S, Lucas JE, Trujillo GM, Joy SV, Ginsburg GS. Effect of genetic testing for risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus on health behaviors and outcomes: study rationale, development and design. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jan 18;12:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-16. PubMed 22257365 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 10, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00849563
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
deCODE genetics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 24, 2009
Start date
Apr 2009
Primary completion
Sep 2011
Completion
Jun 2013
Last update
Apr 10, 2014

Study contacts

Geoffrey Ginsburg, Md, PhD
principal investigator · Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University
Alex Cho, MD
principal investigator · Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University
Scott Joy, MD
principal investigator · Duke University
Susanne Haga, PhD
principal investigator · Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University
Isaac Lipkus, PhD
principal investigator · Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University
Gloria Trujillo, MD
principal investigator · Duke University
Julianne O'Daniel, PhD
principal investigator · Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion