A Phase 1/2 interventional study of panobinostat in Acute Myeloblastic Leukaemia, sponsored by PETHEMA Foundation. Completed at 9 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-12-11.
Sponsored by PETHEMA Foundation · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment
This protocol is a multicenter, national, open-label, single-arm, non-controlled study designed to establish the efficacy (in terms of response and survival) and safety of panobinostat in combination with idarubicin and cytarabine and in monotherapy in patients with newly-diagnosed AML aged 65 years or older.
A phase Ib will be initially performed to establish the MTD of panobinostat that can be administered in combination with the classic regimen of idarubicin and cytarabine in patients aged 65 years or older. This MTD will be established in the induction cycle. For this purpose, the first patients enrolled in the trial will be successively distributed into three cohorts of patients for each dose level of panobinostat (20 mg, 30 mg, 40 mg) in combination with idarubicin and cytarabine, according to the classical 3+3 schedule (vid section 5.2). In case of an unacceptable toxicity in the first dose step (20 mg), a dose reduction to a -1 step will be considered (10 mg). Patients included in the phase Ib part of the study will continue throughout the treatment with the starting dose of panobinostat corresponding to the step to which they were initially assigned (except for those patients receiving a dose higher than the MTD which will be deescalated to the MTD). 9 additional patients will be included at the MTD dose level to confirm the safety of this dose.
Once the MTD of panobinostat is determined, during the phase II of the study, up to a total of 46 patients will be recruited (40 of them at the MTD dose) and the scheduled assessments and visits will be carried out in three periods: Pre-treatment, Treatment, and Follow-up.
The pre-treatment period includes the screening visit where the written informed consent for participating in the study is obtained. Then, during the screening visit that is completed 14 days before the baseline visit (Days -14 to -1), patients are assessed for eligibility. The patients eligible for inclusion in the study will start the treatment period where they will receive two or three cycles of cytarabine and idarubicin in combination with panobinostat (induction and consolidation, or induction, re-induction and consolidation) followed by treatment with panobinostat as monotherapy (vid. schema in appendix 4). The induction cycle will comprise of cytarabine 100 mg/m2 (Day 1 to 7) and idarubicin 8 mg/m2 (Days 1 to 3) followed by panobinostat administered three times a week for three weeks (Days 8, 10, 12, 15, 17, 19, 22, 24, 26) (Table 4 ). The patients will be assessed by bone marrow aspiration on day +14 and at the moment of the recovery from aplasia.
If the patient experiences an unsatisfactory response, i.e. partial remission or resistant disease after the first cycle, a second induction cycle, identical to the first one (re-induction cycle), will be administered not sooner than seven days after receiving the last dose of panobinostat (in the induction cycle).
If the patient reaches a complete morphological remission (or CRi) after the induction or the re-induction cycles, then, in the absence of unacceptable toxicity, a consolidation cycle, identical to the induction cycle, will be administered once recovered from aplasia and always leaving the seven days of Panobinostat treatment free interval. If a patient does not reach a CR or CRi after the re-induction, she/he will be removed from the protocol.
Then, after the recovery from the aplasia caused by the last consolidation, all patients will be assessed for efficacy and safety, and, in the absence of relapse (i.e. patients in CR or CRi) or unacceptable toxicity will turn to the maintenance phase, during which they will receive single agent panobinostat at a dose of 40 mg with the following treatment regimen: three times a week for a total duration of three weeks (Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17 and 19), followed by a rest period of 9 days (Table 5). This cycle will be repeated every 28 days and a total of six cycles will be administered in the absence of relapse or unacceptable toxicity. During this period, patients will be assessed monthly for efficacy based on the hematimetric values (bone marrow aspirate will be performed every three months and when relapse is suspected) and toxicity/vital signs until the end of treatment.
Finally, during the follow-up period that starts once the patient completes the treatment, patients will be assessed for efficacy based on the hematimetric values (bone marrow aspirate will be performed every six months and when relapse is suspected) and toxicity every 3 months for one additional year.
Safety will be assessed by monitoring all adverse events, physical examination, vital signs, cardiological examinations, and blood and biochemical tests. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) will be assessed by echocardiography. The response to treatment will be assessed according to the standard Cheson response criteria. Furthermore, the impact of MRD in the prognosis of these patients will be assessed. For this purpose, MRD changes at different treatment time points will be tested by multiparametric flow cytometry: at Day +14 post-induction, before starting the first consolidation cycle (this is to say at the moment of achieving CR), at the start of maintenance therapy, every three months during this phase and every six months during the follow-up period.
5,441 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia; 636 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 46 is above the median of 38 across 4,247 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia.
Browse Leukemia studies →PETHEMA Foundation is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The patient should have the following laboratory values prior to the start of the treatment:
Exclusion Criteria:
Presence of heart disorders or clinically significant heart diseases, including any of the following:
The first patients enrolled in the trial will be successively distributed into three cohorts of patients for each dose level of panobinostat (20 mg, 30 mg, 40 mg) in combination with idarubicin and cytarabine, according to the classical 3+3 schedule
Drug: panobinostat
20 mg, 30 mg, 40 mg in combination with idarubicin and cytarabine, according to the classical 3+3 schedule.
To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of panobinostat in combination with idarubicin and cytarabine after an induction cycle in patients aged 65 years or older with newly diagnosed AML
Time frame: 1 year
To analyse efficacy in terms of response to an induction (+/- reinduction) and consolidation regimens with idarubicin and cytarabine in combination with panobinostat
Time frame: 2 years
To explore efficacy in terms of TTR during a maintenance period with panobinostat as monotherapy in patients aged 65 years or older with newly diagnosed AML
Time frame: 2 years
Investigation of the overall safety and tolerability of panobinostat when given in combination with idarubicin and cytarabine, with special focus on cardiac safety determined by echocardiography and ECG monitoring
Time frame: 1 year
Survival: Overall survival, disease-free survival, and duration of response
Time frame: 4 years
Impact of Panobinostat in the reduction of the minimum residual disease (MRD) monitored by multiparametric flow cytometry at different time points of the study: During the induction and consolidation treatments and during the maintenance treatment
Time frame: 4 years
To investigate the safety and tolerability of panobinostat in combination with idarubicin and cytarabine and of panobinostat as monotherapy measured in terms of incidence of clinical and biological toxicity
Time frame: 2 years
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
PETHEMA Foundation