CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00832000Updated Aug 23, 2013Results posted

Effectiveness of Mexiletine for Treating People With Non-Dystrophic Myotonia

A Phase 2 interventional study of Mexiletine and Placebo in Myotonia and Non-Dystrophic Myotonia, sponsored by Richard Barohn, MD. Completed at 7 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-08-23.

Sponsored by Richard Barohn, MD · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
59
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Nondystrophic myotonias (NDM) are neuromuscular disorders caused by genetic abnormalities in certain muscle cell membrane proteins. The proteins affect muscle contraction. Individuals with NDM experience limited muscle relaxation, which then can cause pain, weakness, incoordination, and impaired physical activity and function. Because NDM is very rare, information on the best way to treat people with the disorders is lacking, and there are no FDA-approved therapies. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the medication mexiletine in treating people with NDM.

Read the detailed description

NDM are neuromuscular disorders that are caused by mutations in skeletal muscle ion channels, usually voltage-dependent sodium and chloride channels. The poorly functioning channels result in impaired muscle relaxation after contraction, which is also called myotonia. Mexiletine is an antiarrhythmic medication that has a high affinity for muscle sodium channels and may have the ability to correct delayed inactivation of sodium channels. In case reports and single-blind clinical trials, mexiletine was shown to reduce symptoms of myotonia. Currently, there is no standard strategy for treating people with NDM, and effective treatment options are needed. This study will determine the effectiveness of mexiletine in treating people with NDM.

Participation in this study will last 9 weeks and will involve two separate 4-week treatment periods, with a 1-week washout period between them. During the first treatment period, participants will be randomly assigned to receive either mexiletine or placebo, both of which will be taken three times a day. This will be followed by 1 week of no treatment. During the second treatment period, participants will receive whichever treatment they did not receive initially and will follow the same dosing schedule.

Participants will attend five study visits that will occur at screening and Weeks 0, 4, 5, and 9. Screening will include blood and urine sampling, electrocardiography (EKG), and a medical history. The remaining visits will include a physical examination, a grip test, exercise tests, nerve conduction tests, blood sampling, questionnaires, and electromyography (EMG). EKG will be repeated at Weeks 4, 5, and 9. Throughout the study, participants will phone in daily to report their symptoms. There will be no follow-up visits.

Funded by FDAOPD RO1 0003454.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myotonia
  • Non-Dystrophic Myotonia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Myotonia

25 studies on the registry are indexed under Myotonia; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 59 is above the median of 35 across 17 interventional studies indexed under Myotonia.

Browse Myotonia studies →

Lead sponsor

Richard Barohn, MD is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical symptoms or signs suggestive of myotonic disorders
  • Presence of myotonic potentials on electromyography (EMG)
  • Participant in the Non-Dystrophic Natural History study (RDCRN 5303) or a new patient with confirmed non-dystrophic myotonia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other neurological condition that might affect the assessment of the study measurements
  • Genetic confirmation of DM1 (more than 50 repeats of CTG) or DM2
  • Existing cardiac conduction defects, as evidenced on EKG, including but not limited to the following conditions: malignant arrhythmia or cardiac conduction disturbances (e.g., second degree AV block, third degree AV block, or prolonged QT interval)
  • Existing permanent pacemaker
  • Current use of any of the following antiarrhythmic medications for a cardiac disorder: flecainide acetate, encainide, disopyramide, procainamide, quinidine, propafenone, or mexiletine
  • Use of medications for myotonia, such as phenytoin and flecainide acetate, within 5 days of study entry; carbamazepine and mexiletine within 3 days of study entry; or propafenone, procainamide, disopyramide, quinidine, and encainide within 2 days of study entry
  • Use of medications that produce myotonia, which may include fibrate acid derivatives, hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitors, chloroquine, and colchicines
  • Kidney or liver disease
  • Heart failure
  • Seizure disorder
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
59 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Participants will receive mexiletine for 4 weeks, then no intervention for 1 week, and finally placebo for 4 weeks.

    Drug: Mexiletine · Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    2

    Participants will receive placebo for 4 weeks, then no intervention for 1 week, and finally mexiletine for 4 weeks.

    Drug: Mexiletine · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugMexiletine

    200 mg three times a day; in pill form

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo three times a day; in pill form

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient-reported Stiffness on the IVR

    Stiffness measured on a 1-9 scale, 1 being minimal, 9 the worst ever experienced. 0=no symptom reported. For analysis the average severity of stiffness for each participant was calculated from daily calls made in weeks 3-4 of each period.

    Time frame: Weeks 3-4 of each period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Reported Pain on the IVR

    Pain measured on a 1-9 scale, 1 being minimal, 9 the worst ever experienced. 0=no symptom reported. For analysis the average severity of pain for each participant was calculated from daily calls made in weeks 3-4 of each period.

    Time frame: Weeeks 3-4 of each period

  2. Patient Reported Weakness on the IVR

    Weakness measured on a 1-9 scale, 1 being minimal, 9 the worst ever experienced. 0=no symptom reported. For analysis the average severity of weakness for each participant was calculated from daily calls made in weeks 3-4 of each period.

    Time frame: Weeks 3-4 of each period

  3. Patient Reported Tiredness on the IVR

    Tiredness measured on a 1-9 scale, 1 being minimal, 9 the worst ever experienced. 0=no symptom reported. For analysis the average severity of tiredness for each participant was calculated from daily calls made in weeks 3-4 of each period.

    Time frame: Weeks 3-4 of each period

  4. Quantitative Measure of Hand Grip Myotonia (Seconds)

    Maximum voluntary contractions following forced right hand grip were recorded and the time to relax from 90% to 5% of average maximal force was determined using automated analysis software.

    Time frame: The end of period 1 (week 4) and period 2 (week 9)

  5. Compound Motor Action Potentials After Short Exercise Test

    The maximal post-exercise compound muscle action potential (CMAP) after short periods of exercise as a percent of the baseline measurement.

    Time frame: The end of period 1 (week 4) and period 2 (week 9)

  6. Graded Myotonia by Needle Electromyography - Right Abductor Digiti Minimi

    Measured the amount of myotonia present on needle exam by assigning a number 1-3, with 1 being minimal amount of myotonia on needle stick and 3 being maximal amount of myotonia present on needle stick.

    Time frame: The end of period 1 (week 4) and period 2 (week 9)

  7. Clinical Hand Grip Myotonia Evaluation (Seconds)

    The time to open the fist after a forced handgrip as measured on a stopwatch.

    Time frame: The end of period 1 (week 4) and the end of period 2 (week 9)

  8. Clinical Eye Closure Myotonia Evaluation (Seconds)

    Time to open the eyes after forced eye closure as measured on a stopwatch.

    Time frame: The end of period 1 (week 4) and the end of period 2 (week 9)

  9. Graded Myotonia by Needle Electromyography - Right Tibialis Anterior

    Measured the amount of myotonia present on needle exam by assigning a number 1-3, with 1 being minimal amount of myotonia on needle stick and 3 being maximal amount of myotonia present on needle stick.

    Time frame: The end of period 1 (week 4) and period 2 (week 9)

  10. Compound Motor Action Potentials After Long Exercise Test

    Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) after long periods of exercise as a percentage of baseline.

    Time frame: The end of period 1 (week 4) and period 2 (week 9)

  11. Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life Scale - Summary Score

    Quality of life scale for patinets with neuromuscular disorders. The INQoL summary score is a weighted average made up of 5 subdomains (activities, social relationships, independence, emotions, and body image) which document the impact of a disease on a patients' quality of life. Scores range from 0-100, and can be interpreted as the percent of maximal detrimental impact on quality of life. A higher score indicates more detrimental impact.

    Time frame: The end of period 1 (week 4) and period 2 (week 9)

  12. Short Form 36 - Physical Composite Score

    The SF-36 is a standard quality of life instrument. The physical composite score represents the the physical burden on quality of life and is a summary of questions related to physical impact of a disease or condition (physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and general health). The score is nomralized to the population and ranges from 0-100, with the US normal value of 50. A lower score represents a greater impact of quality of life.

    Time frame: Particiapnts who experienced weakness on mexiletine in either period 1 or period 2.

  13. Short Form 36 - Mental Composite Score

    The SF-36 is a standard quality of life instrument. The mental composite score represents the the mental burden on quality of life and is a summary of questions related to mental impact of a disease or condition (mental function, role emotional, vitality, and mental health). The score is nomralized to the population and ranges from 0-100, with the US normal value of 50. A lower score represents a greater impact of quality of life.

    Time frame: The end of period 1 (week 4) and period 2 (week 9)

07

Results

Posted Mar 11, 2013

Participant flow

Eligible participants were at least 16 years of age, had clinical symptoms or signs of NDM, and myotonic potentials on electromyography. Participants were either enrolled in the CINCH NDM Natural History Study, or a new patient with genetically confirmed NDM, or with clinical features of NDM but negative myotonic dystrophy DNA testing.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMexiletine Then PlaceboPlacebo Then Mexiletine
Started2930
Crossed over to opposite intervention2529
Completed2329
Not completed61
Withdrew: Adverse event20
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: No calls to ivr in either period11
Withdrew: No calls to ivr in period 220

Outcome measures

PrimaryPatient-reported Stiffness on the IVR

Stiffness measured on a 1-9 scale, 1 being minimal, 9 the worst ever experienced. 0=no symptom reported. For analysis the average severity of stiffness for each participant was calculated from daily calls made in weeks 3-4 of each period.

Time frame:
Weeks 3-4 of each period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient-reported Stiffness on the IVR
units on a scaleMexiletine - Period 1Placebo - Period 1Mexiletine - Period 2Placebo - Period 2
Patient-reported Stiffness on the IVR2.53 (1.80 to 3.17)4.21 (3.40 to 5.20)1.60 (1.04 to 2.20)5.27 (4.44 to 6.27)
Statistical analysis
  • Mexiletine - Period 1 vs Placebo - Period 1 · Wald · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (final values): -1.68 · 95% CI -2.66 to -0.706Residual standard deviation.
  • Mexiletine - Period 2 vs Placebo - Period 2 · Wald · p = 0.04 · Mean difference (final values): -3.68 · 95% CI -3.85 to -0.139Residual standard deviation.
SecondaryPatient Reported Pain on the IVR

Pain measured on a 1-9 scale, 1 being minimal, 9 the worst ever experienced. 0=no symptom reported. For analysis the average severity of pain for each participant was calculated from daily calls made in weeks 3-4 of each period.

Time frame:
Weeeks 3-4 of each period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient Reported Pain on the IVR
units on a scaleMexiletinePlacebo
Patient Reported Pain on the IVR1.54 (0.924 to 2.13)3.17 (2.43 to 3.93)
Statistical analysis
  • Mexiletine vs Placebo · Wald · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (final values): -1.63 · 95% CI -2.00 to -1.26Residual standard deviation.
SecondaryPatient Reported Weakness on the IVR

Weakness measured on a 1-9 scale, 1 being minimal, 9 the worst ever experienced. 0=no symptom reported. For analysis the average severity of weakness for each participant was calculated from daily calls made in weeks 3-4 of each period.

Time frame:
Weeks 3-4 of each period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient Reported Weakness on the IVR
units on a scaleMexiletinePlacebo
Patient Reported Weakness on the IVR1.96 (1.42 to 2.63)3.22 (2.52 to 3.98)
Statistical analysis
  • Mexiletine vs Placebo · Wald · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (final values): -1.26 · 95% CI -1.67 to -0.861Residual standard deviation.
SecondaryPatient Reported Tiredness on the IVR

Tiredness measured on a 1-9 scale, 1 being minimal, 9 the worst ever experienced. 0=no symptom reported. For analysis the average severity of tiredness for each participant was calculated from daily calls made in weeks 3-4 of each period.

Time frame:
Weeks 3-4 of each period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient Reported Tiredness on the IVR
units on a scaleMexiletinePlacebo
Patient Reported Tiredness on the IVR2.90 (2.12 to 3.68)3.82 (3.03 to 4.53)
Statistical analysis
  • Mexiletine vs Placebo · Wald · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (final values): -0.918 · 95% CI -1.30 to -0.532Residual standard deviation.
SecondaryQuantitative Measure of Hand Grip Myotonia (Seconds)

Maximum voluntary contractions following forced right hand grip were recorded and the time to relax from 90% to 5% of average maximal force was determined using automated analysis software.

Time frame:
The end of period 1 (week 4) and period 2 (week 9)
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Quantitative Measure of Hand Grip Myotonia (Seconds)
secondsMexiletinePlacebo
Quantitative Measure of Hand Grip Myotonia (Seconds)0.321 (0.274 to 0.370)0.429 (0.365 to 0.517)
Statistical analysis
  • Mexiletine vs Placebo · Wald · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (final values): -0.109 · 95% CI -0.177 to -0.056Residual standard deviation.
SecondaryCompound Motor Action Potentials After Short Exercise Test

The maximal post-exercise compound muscle action potential (CMAP) after short periods of exercise as a percent of the baseline measurement.

Time frame:
The end of period 1 (week 4) and period 2 (week 9)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of baseline CMAP amplitude
Compound Motor Action Potentials After Short Exercise Test
percentage of baseline CMAP amplitudeMexiletinePlacebo
Compound Motor Action Potentials After Short Exercise Test83.1 (77.5 to 88.4)78.6 (71.9 to 84.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Mexiletine vs Placebo · wald · p = 0.09 · Mean difference (final values): 4.54 · 95% CI -0.680 to 9.75Residual standard deviation.
SecondaryGraded Myotonia by Needle Electromyography - Right Abductor Digiti Minimi

Measured the amount of myotonia present on needle exam by assigning a number 1-3, with 1 being minimal amount of myotonia on needle stick and 3 being maximal amount of myotonia present on needle stick.

Time frame:
The end of period 1 (week 4) and period 2 (week 9)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Graded Myotonia by Needle Electromyography - Right Abductor Digiti Minimi
units on a scaleMexiletinePlacebo
Graded Myotonia by Needle Electromyography - Right Abductor Digiti Minimi2.05 (1.75 to 2.33)2.62 (2.39 to 2.86)
Statistical analysis
  • Mexiletine vs Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (final values): -0.568 · 95% CI -0.812 to -0.325Residual standard deviation.
SecondaryClinical Hand Grip Myotonia Evaluation (Seconds)

The time to open the fist after a forced handgrip as measured on a stopwatch.

Time frame:
The end of period 1 (week 4) and the end of period 2 (week 9)
Reported as:
Mean · Seconds
Clinical Hand Grip Myotonia Evaluation (Seconds)
SecondsMexiletinePlacebo
Clinical Hand Grip Myotonia Evaluation (Seconds)0.164 (0.0858 to .294)0.494 (0.281 to 0.872)
Statistical analysis
  • Mexiletine vs Placebo · Wald · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (final values): -0.330 · 95% CI -0.633 to -0.142Residual standard deviation.
SecondaryClinical Eye Closure Myotonia Evaluation (Seconds)

Time to open the eyes after forced eye closure as measured on a stopwatch.

Time frame:
The end of period 1 (week 4) and the end of period 2 (week 9)
Reported as:
Mean · Seconds
Clinical Eye Closure Myotonia Evaluation (Seconds)
SecondsMexiletinePlacebo
Clinical Eye Closure Myotonia Evaluation (Seconds)0.161 (0.0704 to 0.314)0.474 (0.261 to 0.871)
Statistical analysis
  • Mexiletine vs Placebo · Wald · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (final values): -0.313 · 95% CI -0.602 to -0.149Residual standard deviation.
SecondaryGraded Myotonia by Needle Electromyography - Right Tibialis Anterior

Measured the amount of myotonia present on needle exam by assigning a number 1-3, with 1 being minimal amount of myotonia on needle stick and 3 being maximal amount of myotonia present on needle stick.

Time frame:
The end of period 1 (week 4) and period 2 (week 9)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Graded Myotonia by Needle Electromyography - Right Tibialis Anterior
units on a scaleMexiletinePlacebo
Graded Myotonia by Needle Electromyography - Right Tibialis Anterior2.07 (1.73 to 2.37)2.54 (2.28 to 2.76)
Statistical analysis
  • Mexiletine vs Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (final values): -0.464 · 95% CI -0.675 to -0.254Residual standard deviation.
SecondaryCompound Motor Action Potentials After Long Exercise Test

Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) after long periods of exercise as a percentage of baseline.

Time frame:
The end of period 1 (week 4) and period 2 (week 9)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of baseline CMAP amplitude
Compound Motor Action Potentials After Long Exercise Test
percentage of baseline CMAP amplitudeMexiletinePlacebo
Compound Motor Action Potentials After Long Exercise Test81.8 (76.8 to 87.0)80.1 (74.7 to 86.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Mexiletine vs Placebo · wald · p = 0.50 · Mean difference (final values): 1.69 · 95% CI -3.34 to 6.73Residual standard deviation.
SecondaryIndividualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life Scale - Summary Score

Quality of life scale for patinets with neuromuscular disorders. The INQoL summary score is a weighted average made up of 5 subdomains (activities, social relationships, independence, emotions, and body image) which document the impact of a disease on a patients' quality of life. Scores range from 0-100, and can be interpreted as the percent of maximal detrimental impact on quality of life. A higher score indicates more detrimental impact.

Time frame:
The end of period 1 (week 4) and period 2 (week 9)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life Scale - Summary Score
units on a scaleMexiletinePlacebo
Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life Scale - Summary Score14.0 (11.6 to 16.5)16.7 (14.0 to 19.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Mexiletine vs Placebo · wald · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (final values): -2.69 · 95% CI -4.07 to -1.30Residual standard deviation.
SecondaryShort Form 36 - Physical Composite Score

The SF-36 is a standard quality of life instrument. The physical composite score represents the the physical burden on quality of life and is a summary of questions related to physical impact of a disease or condition (physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and general health). The score is nomralized to the population and ranges from 0-100, with the US normal value of 50. A lower score represents a greater impact of quality of life.

Time frame:
Particiapnts who experienced weakness on mexiletine in either period 1 or period 2.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Short Form 36 - Physical Composite Score
units on a scaleMexiletinePlacebo
Short Form 36 - Physical Composite Score44.8 (41.9 to 47.4)39.2 (35.9 to 41.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Mexiletine vs Placebo · wald · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (final values): 5.58 · 95% CI 3.44 to 7.72Residual standard deviation.
SecondaryShort Form 36 - Mental Composite Score

The SF-36 is a standard quality of life instrument. The mental composite score represents the the mental burden on quality of life and is a summary of questions related to mental impact of a disease or condition (mental function, role emotional, vitality, and mental health). The score is nomralized to the population and ranges from 0-100, with the US normal value of 50. A lower score represents a greater impact of quality of life.

Time frame:
The end of period 1 (week 4) and period 2 (week 9)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Short Form 36 - Mental Composite Score
units on a scaleMexiletine - Period 1Placebo - Period 1Mexiletine - Period 2Placebo - Period 2
Short Form 36 - Mental Composite Score47.4 (44.0 to 50.2)47.7 (44.2 to 51.3)53.1 (50.3 to 55.8)42.7 (36.8 to 48.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Mexiletine - Period 1 vs Placebo - Period 1 · Wald · p = 0.90 · Mean difference (final values): -0.351 · 95% CI -5.87 to 5.17Residual standard deviation.
  • Mexiletine - Period 2 vs Placebo - Period 2 · wald · p = 0.03 · Mean difference (final values): 10.4 · 95% CI 0.941 to 20.6Residual standard deviation.

Adverse events

Collected over Data was collected over a 3 year period. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Mexiletine Treatment—1/57 (1.8%)24/57 (42.1%)
Placebo Treatment—0/57 (0%)11/57 (19.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventMexiletine TreatmentPlacebo Treatment
Drug withdrawalPsychiatric disorders1/1—
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventMexiletine TreatmentPlacebo Treatment
GastrointestinalGastrointestinal disorders9/571/57
NeurologicNervous system disorders5/571/57
PainGeneral disorders4/570/57
ConstitutionalGeneral disorders3/570/57
InfectionInfections and infestations1/573/57
Dermatologic/skinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/572/57
Musculosketetal/soft tissueMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/572/57
LymphaticsBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/571/57
CardiacCardiac disorders1/571/57

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)All Study Participants
<=18 years1
Between 18 and 65 years56
>=65 years2
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)All Study Participants
Mean42.9 ± 25
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Study Participants
Female26
Male33
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)All Study Participants
United States31
Canada4
United Kingdom12
Italy12
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • Brigham & Women's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
  • London Health Sciences Center
    London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada
  • University of Milan
    Milan, Italy
  • Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology
    London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Statland JM, Bundy BN, Wang Y, Rayan DR, Trivedi JR, Sansone VA, Salajegheh MK, Venance SL, Ciafaloni E, Matthews E, Meola G, Herbelin L, Griggs RC, Barohn RJ, Hanna MG; Consortium for Clinical Investigation of Neurologic Channelopathies. Mexiletine for symptoms and signs of myotonia in nondystrophic myotonia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012 Oct 3;308(13):1357-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.12607. PubMed 23032552 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 23, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00832000
Lead sponsor
Richard Barohn, MD
Responsible party
Richard Barohn, MD (Gertrude and Dewey Zeigler Professor of Neurology and Chair, University of Kansas Medical Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 29, 2009
Start date
Dec 2008
Primary completion
Mar 2011
Completion
Mar 2011
Results posted
Mar 11, 2013
Last update
Aug 23, 2013

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion