CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00830778Updated Sep 12, 2012

Reduced Pancreatic Fistula Rate Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Trial on Pancreaticogastrostomy Versus Pancreaticojejunostomy

A Phase 3 interventional study of Pancreaticojejunostomy and Pancreaticogastrostomy in Tumors, sponsored by Baki Topal. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-09-12.

Sponsored by Baki Topal · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
336
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The incidence of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is around 50 %. The postoperative course after PD is strongly dependent of the occurrence of pancreatic fistula (POPF), which determines postoperative mortality, length of hospital stay and costs. The incidence of POPF after PD is dependent of its definition, and is reported in up to 20% of patients.

There is disagreement on whether to perform a pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) or a pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) after PD. The aim of the current randomized controlled trial is to study whether PG significantly reduces the rate of POPF following PD for pancreatic or peri-ampullary tumours. Secondary endpoints are the reduction of overall postoperative complication rate and their severity.

Read the detailed description

Therapeutic intervention

  • Surgeons who have performed a minimum of five (5) PG and PJ procedures can include patients in this randomized trial.
  • Any dissection device or technique is allowed.
  • Pancreatic anastomosis (PG or PJ)

    • 1-layer or 2-layer anastomosis is allowed but has to be registered
    • mono-filament and/or poly-filament suture material is allowed but has to be registered
    • no pancreatic stent will be placed
  • Drainage: one (1) or more closed drain(s) with or without suction is allowed in the vicinity of the pancreatic anastomosis
  • Enteral tube feeding (tube positioned in the jejunum at the time of surgery, and distal to the pancreatic anastomosis) as well as total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is allowed
  • Gastrostomy tube (percutaneous) is allowed
  • Somatostatin: start intra-operatively and administered for seven (7) days after surgery at a dose of 6 mg/d
  • Prophylactic use of antibiotics during 24h post-operatively
  • Prophylactic use of Ranitidine as well as any PPI (proton pump inhibitor) is allowed to prevent peptic ulcer

Clinical evaluation and assessment criteria

  • The number and type of POPF will be recorded according to the ISGPF guidelines and based on findings on day 3 (three) after surgery
  • The number and type of postoperative complications will be recorded. The therapy-oriented severity grading system (TOSGS) of complications will be used and complications will be allocated to surgical (SSC) and non-surgical site (NSSC) complications
  • The adequacy of the surgical resection margins (pR0) and the magnitude of the tumour-free resection margin (millimetres) will be monitored
  • Postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) will be registered

Patient randomization and registration procedure (randomization lists attached)

  • This is a multicentric randomized controlled trial.
  • Patient randomization will be done intra-operatively since a substantial number of patients could be dropped out intra-operatively because of the presence of unexpected intra-abdominal metastases at the time of surgery.
  • Patient stratification will be performed for each centre and will be based on the diameter of the pancreatic duct. A pancreatic duct at the level of the surgical transsection margin measuring 3 millimetres or less in diameter is defined as being a "soft pancreas". A pancreatic duct measuring more than 3 millimetres is defined as a "hard pancreas".
  • A prospective registration of following parameters will be performed: intra-operative diameter of the pancreatic duct at the surgical transection margin, diameter of the pancreas at the surgical transection margin, pancreatic tissue consistency assessed by the surgeon: soft vs. hard, post-operative pathology parameters.

Statistical analysis and sample size calculation based on a stratified design

  • 40% of patients are expected to have a hard pancreas and 60% a soft pancreas.
  • It is assumed that the magnitude of the effect of the intervention (PJ vs. PG) on the POPF rate, expressed as an odds ratio (OR), is similar in both strata.
  • The needed sample size is calculated to have 80% power to detect a common odds ratio of 2.7. POPF rates of 12% and 20% are assumed after PJ within the hard and soft pancreas stratum respectively (yielding 4.8% and 8.4% after PG). Note that, given the unequal size strata, this leads to an expected POPF rate of 16.8% after PJ and 7% after PG (≈12% POPF overall).
  • A 2-sided (with alpha=5%) Mantel-Haenszel test of OR=1 for stratified 2x2 tables is planned
  • 168 patients are required per group (total patient population 336)
  • Expected duration of recruitment: 3-4 years
  • An interim analysis will be performed annually (i.e. after inclusion of 1/3 and 2/3 of the patients) to to allow early stop of the study (or accrual of patients in a specific treatment group) due to rejection of the null hypothesis. Using the O'Brien-Fleming method (O'Brien and Fleming 1979) results in respectively \|3.471\|, \|2.454\| and \|2.004\| as critical values for the Z-statistic at the three analysis moments. Otherwise stated, p-values are declared significant if \<.00052, \<0.0141 and \<0.0451 at respectively the first interim analysis, the second interim analysis and at the final analysis.
  • Exact 95% confidence intervals will be calculated for the POPF and post-operative complication rates within each stratum. A stratified Mann-Whitney U test will be used for the TOSGS grading.

Translational research: optional Prognostic relevance of gene expression profiling in pancreatic cancer: analyses will be performed at UZ.Leuven/KU.Leuven (project coordinator B.Topal)

  • Fresh tissue samples from pancreatic cancer and from non-tumoral pancreatic tissue will be stored in RNA-later (samples in 2 separate tubes; 5-10 volumes of RNA-later)
  • Sample tubes will be transported (or picked up by the coördinator's research team), within 3 days from sampling, to be stored in -80°C for further analyses
02

Conditions studied

  • Tumors

Keywords

  • pancreas
  • surgery
  • cancer
  • pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD)
  • peri-ampullary tumours (ampulla, duodenum, distal bile duct, and miscellaneous tumours)
  • pancreatic tumors
  • peri-ampullary tumors
03

In context

Pancreatic Fistula

125 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Fistula; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 336 is above the median of 110 across 75 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Fistula.

Browse Pancreatic Fistula studies →

Lead sponsor

Baki Topal is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients, male or female, who undergo PD for a pancreatic or peri-ampullary tumor
  • Age between 18 to 85 years
  • Patients with and without pre-operative biliary drainage (for obstructive jaundice)
  • Concomitant surgical procedures such as simultaneous colonic resection etc.
  • Reconstruction of the portal vein or superior mesenteric vein

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 18years
  • Pregnancy
  • Pre-operative radiotherapy
  • PD for IPMT
  • PD for chronic pancreatitis
  • PD for pancreatic trauma
  • PD for post-ERCP complications
  • Any arterial reconstruction at the time of surgery
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
336 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PG anastomosis

    Pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) reconstruction/anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD)

    Procedure: Pancreaticogastrostomy

  • Active comparator
    PJ anastomosis

    Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) reconstruction/anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD)

    Procedure: Pancreaticojejunostomy

Interventions

  • ProcedurePancreaticojejunostomy

    Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) reconstruction/anastomosis

  • ProcedurePancreaticogastrostomy

    Pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) reconstruction/anastomosis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction of clinical postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate

    Time frame: 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reduction of overall postoperative pancreatic fistula rate

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Reduction of the severity of postoperative complications

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Gasthuisberg
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Weerts J, Feryn T, Roeyen G, Bertrand C, Hubert C, Janssens M, Closset J; Belgian Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):655-62. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70126-8. Epub 2013 May 2. PubMed 23643139 ↗
  • Bertrand C, Squifflet JP, Gys T, Berrevoet F, Jehaes C, Lerut T, Malaise J, Topal B. The Society for Internet-based Scientific Studies: a new platform to promote multicentric studies in the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery. Acta Chir Belg. 2010 Jan-Feb;110(1):3-5. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2010.11680554. No abstract available. Erratum In: Acta Chir Belg. 2010 Mar-Apr;110(2):261. PubMed 20306901 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 12, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00830778
Lead sponsor
Baki Topal
Collaborators
Erasme ULB, Brussels, Jolimont, Brussels, St.Lucas, Brugge, General Hospital Groeninge, Université Catholique de Louvain, Clinique Saint Joseph, Liège, University Hospital, Antwerp, Jan Palfijn, Antwerp, St.Jan, Brugge, Monica, Deurne
Responsible party
Baki Topal (MD, PhD, University Hospital, Gasthuisberg) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 28, 2009
Start date
Jun 2009
Primary completion
Aug 2012
Completion
Sep 2012
Last update
Sep 12, 2012

Study contacts

Baki Topal, MD, PhD
study director · Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Claude Bertrand, MD
principal investigator · Hospital Jolimont, Brussels
Jean Closset, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Hospital Erasme (ULB), Brussels
Henk Thieren, MD
principal investigator · AZ. St.Lucas, Brugge
Franky Vansteenkiste, MD
principal investigator · General Hospital Groeninge
Jean-Francois Gigot, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Université Catholique de Louvain
Joseph Weerts, MD
principal investigator · St.Joseph Hospital, Liège
Geert Roeyen, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp
Marc Janssens, MD
principal investigator · J.Palfijn Hospital, Antwerp
Tom Feryn, MD
principal investigator · St.Jan Hospital, Brugge
Steven Pauli, MD
principal investigator · Monica Hospital, Deurne

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion