CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00825812Updated Nov 1, 2015Results posted

Comparison of 2.0 mg/kg Sugammadex and Neostigmine at Reappearance of T2 in Chinese and European Subjects (Study 19.4.324)(P05768AM1)(COMPLETED)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Sugammadex and neostigmine in Anesthesia, General and Neuromuscular Blockade, sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-11-01.

Sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
308
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The present trial was set up to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2.0 mg.kg-1 sugammadex compared to neostigmine administered at reappearance of T2 in Chinese and Caucasian subjects for registration purposes in China.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia, General
  • Neuromuscular Blockade
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC is the lead sponsor of 2,114 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 489 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 362 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-Subjects who are willing to provide informed consent; be between 18 and 64 years old; are American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) class 1-3 (extremes included); scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia, allowing stable neuromuscular monitoring, which requires neuromuscular blockade using rocuronium; be compliant with the dose/visit schedules, and use an accepted method of contraception (if applicable).

For China only: Subjects of Chinese descent born in China, never emigrated out of China and have a Chinese home address. For Europe only: Subjects of Caucasian descent born in Europe, never emigrated out of Europe and have a European home address.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-Subjects with expected difficult intubation, neuromuscular disorders affecting neuromuscular blockade, significant renal/hepatic dysfunction, use of a tourniquet, (family) history of malignant hyperthermia, allergy to general anesthesia medications, contraindication to study drugs, breast feeding, pregnant, participation in previous or new trials, a clinically significant condition that may interfere with the trial, or membership in the (family of) study/sponsor staff.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
308 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sugammadex in Caucasian Subjects

    At reappearance of T2 after the last dose of rocuronium, 2.0 mg.kg-1 sugammadex was administered.

    Drug: Sugammadex

  • Active comparator
    Neostigmine in Caucasian Subjects

    At reappearance of T2 after the last dose of rocuronium, 50 μg.kg-1 neostigmine (combined with 10-20 μg.kg-1 atropine, in a ratio ranging from 2.5:1 to 5:1) was administered.

    Drug: neostigmine

  • Experimental
    Sugammadex in Chinese Subjects

    At reappearance of T2 after the last dose of rocuronium, 2.0 mg.kg-1 sugammadex was administered.

    Drug: Sugammadex

  • Active comparator
    Neostigmine in Chinese Subjects

    At reappearance of T2 after the last dose of rocuronium, 50 μg.kg-1 neostigmine (combined with 10-20 μg.kg-1 atropine, in a ratio ranging from 2.5:1 to 5:1) was administered.

    Drug: neostigmine

Interventions

  • DrugSugammadex

    After induction of anesthesia an intubation dose of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium was administered. Maintenance doses of 0.1-0.2 mg/kg rocuronium intravenous (IV) could be administered if necessary. At reappearance of T2 after the last administration of rocuronium, an IV single bolus dose of 2.0 mg/kg sugammadex was administered.

    Also known as: Org 25969, Bridion®

  • Drugneostigmine

    After induction of anesthesia an intubation dose of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium was administered. Maintenance doses of 0.1-0.2 mg/kg rocuronium IV could be administered if necessary. At reappearance of T2 after the last administration of rocuronium, an IV single bolus dose of 50 µg/kg neostigmine (combined with 10-20 μg.kg-1 atropine, in a ratio ranging from 2.5:1 to 5:1) was administered.

    Also known as: Neostigmine with atropine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time From Start of Administration of Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.9.

    Neuromuscular functioning was monitored by applying repetitive train of four (TOF) electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds and assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. Nerve stimulation was to continue until the ratio of the magnitude of the fourth twitch (T4) to first twitch (T1) reached \>= 0.9. The greater the T4/T1 ratio the greater the recovery from neuromuscular blockade, with a value of 1.0 representing full recovery. The primary analysis was the comparison between sugammadex \& neostigmine among Chinese subjects; other comparisons were secondary.

    Time frame: start of administration of sugammadex/neostigmine to recovery from neuromuscular blockade

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time From Start of Administration of IMP to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.7 and 0.8.

    Neuromuscular functioning was monitored by applying repetitive TOF electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds and assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. The greater the T4/T1 ratio the greater the recovery from neuromuscular blockade.

    Time frame: start of administration of sugammadex/neostigmine to recovery from neuromuscular blockade

07

Results

Posted Aug 18, 2011

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSugammadex in Caucasian SubjectsNeostigmine in Caucasian SubjectsSugammadex in Chinese SubjectsNeostigmine in Chinese Subjects
Started2932126121
Treated2931120111
Completed2931120111
Not completed01610
Withdrew: Never entered follow up0001
Withdrew: Adverse event0001
Withdrew: Subject withdrew consent0032
Withdrew: Non-compliance with protocol0001
Withdrew: Administrative0135

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime From Start of Administration of Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.9.

Neuromuscular functioning was monitored by applying repetitive train of four (TOF) electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds and assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. Nerve stimulation was to continue until the ratio of the magnitude of the fourth twitch (T4) to first twitch (T1) reached \>= 0.9. The greater the T4/T1 ratio the greater the recovery from neuromuscular blockade, with a value of 1.0 representing full recovery. The primary analysis was the comparison between sugammadex \& neostigmine among Chinese subjects; other comparisons were secondary.

Time frame:
start of administration of sugammadex/neostigmine to recovery from neuromuscular blockade
Reported as:
Geometric mean · minutes
Time From Start of Administration of Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.9.
minutesSugammadex in Caucasian SubjectsNeostigmine in Caucasian SubjectsSugammadex in Chinese SubjectsNeostigmine in Chinese Subjects
Time From Start of Administration of Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.9.1.4 (1.3 to 1.5)6.7 (5.5 to 8.0)1.6 (1.5 to 1.7)9.1 (8.0 to 10.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Sugammadex in Chinese Subjects vs Neostigmine in Chinese Subjects · ANOVA · Ratio of geometric mean time to recovery: 5.7 · 95% CI 4.9 to 6.6Ratio of time to recovery of 0.9 T4/T1 ratio (neostigmine time / sugammadex time).
  • Sugammadex in Caucasian Subjects vs Neostigmine in Caucasian Subjects · ANOVA · Ratio of geometric mean time to recovery: 4.8 · 97.5% CI 3.7 to 6.0Ratio of time to recovery of 0.9 T4/T1 ratio (neostigmine time / sugammadex time).
  • Sugammadex in Caucasian Subjects vs Sugammadex in Chinese Subjects · Median difference (seconds): 7 · 97.5% CI -5 to 21Estimated median difference (Chinese - Caucasian) in seconds for the time to recovery of the T4/T1 ratio to 0.9 (after sugammadex).
SecondaryTime From Start of Administration of IMP to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.7 and 0.8.

Neuromuscular functioning was monitored by applying repetitive TOF electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds and assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. The greater the T4/T1 ratio the greater the recovery from neuromuscular blockade.

Time frame:
start of administration of sugammadex/neostigmine to recovery from neuromuscular blockade
Reported as:
Geometric mean · minutes
Time From Start of Administration of IMP to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.7 and 0.8.
minutesSugammadex in Caucasian SubjectsNeostigmine in Caucasian SubjectsSugammadex in Chinese SubjectsNeostigmine in Chinese Subjects
Recovery of T4/T1 ratio to 0.71.0 (0.9 to 1.1)3.4 (3.0 to 3.8)1.1 (1.1 to 1.2)4.4 (4.0 to 4.9)
Recovery of T4/T1 ratio to 0.81.2 (1.1 to 1.3)4.6 (4.0 to 5.4)1.3 (1.2 to 1.4)6.0 (5.4 to 6.7)

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sugammadex in Caucasian Subjects—0/29 (0%)18/29 (62.1%)
Neostigmine in Caucasian Subjects—2/31 (6.5%)26/31 (83.9%)
Sugammadex in Chinese Subjects—0/120 (0%)73/120 (60.8%)
Neostigmine in Chinese Subjects—1/111 (0.9%)84/111 (75.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSugammadex in Caucasian SubjectsNeostigmine in Caucasian SubjectsSugammadex in Chinese SubjectsNeostigmine in Chinese Subjects
Enterococcal bacteraemiaInfections and infestations0/291/310/1200/111
Anastomotic leakInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/291/310/1200/111
Incision site haemorrhageInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/290/310/1201/111
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 20
Most frequent other events
EventSugammadex in Caucasian SubjectsNeostigmine in Caucasian SubjectsSugammadex in Chinese SubjectsNeostigmine in Chinese Subjects
Procedural hypotensionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications6/2914/311/1200/111
Procedural painInjury, poisoning and procedural complications13/2912/3110/12010/111
Incision site painInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/290/3128/12026/111
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders4/297/3110/12013/111
DizzinessNervous system disorders2/290/3111/12022/111
Anaesthetic complication cardiacInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/295/311/1207/111
PyrexiaGeneral disorders2/291/3116/12016/111
Wound complicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/293/313/1202/111
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/290/3111/12011/111
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders2/293/312/1201/111

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Sugammadex in Caucasian SubjectsNeostigmine in Caucasian SubjectsSugammadex in Chinese SubjectsNeostigmine in Chinese SubjectsTotal
Mean52.0 ± 10.351.9 ± 7.339.9 ± 10.839.4 ± 10.842.2 (18 to 64)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sugammadex in Caucasian SubjectsNeostigmine in Caucasian SubjectsSugammadex in Chinese SubjectsNeostigmine in Chinese SubjectsTotal
Female25287886217
Male43422574
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Wu X, Oerding H, Liu J, Vanacker B, Yao S, Dahl V, Xiong L, Claudius C, Yue Y, Huang Y, Abels E, Rietbergen H, Woo T. Rocuronium blockade reversal with sugammadex vs. neostigmine: randomized study in Chinese and Caucasian subjects. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul 12;14:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-53. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25187755 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 1, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00825812
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 21, 2009
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Sep 2010
Completion
Sep 2010
Results posted
Aug 18, 2011
Last update
Nov 1, 2015

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion