CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00816166VISSITUpdated Feb 20, 2015Results posted

VISSIT Intracranial Stent Study for Ischemic Therapy

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System (Stent implantation) + Medical therapy (Aspirin and Clopidogrel) and Aspirin and Clopidogrel (Medical therapy) in Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack, sponsored by Codman & Shurtleff. Terminated. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-02-20.

Sponsored by Codman & Shurtleff · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
125
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of this study is to prospectively evaluate the safety, probable benefit, and effectiveness of the PHAROS Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System in a multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

A secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of stenting in the neurovasculature to treat cerebral ischemia on other outcomes such as hospital length of stay, charges, and costs.

Read the detailed description

1.1 Study Hypothesis Treatment of cerebral or retinal ischemia due to plaque in the neurovasculature using the PHAROS Vitesse Stent System plus medical therapy will provide additional clinical benefit over medical therapy alone.

1.2 Primary Effectiveness Endpoint

The primary effectiveness endpoint consists of a composite of the two following outcomes:

  • Stroke in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event within 12 months of randomization
  • Hard TIA in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event from day 2 through month 12 post-randomization

1.3 Safety Outcomes

Safety outcomes to be collected and reported as part of the overall risk-to-benefit profile for this device are:

  • Stroke in any territory within 30 days of randomization
  • Death from any cause within 30 days of randomization
  • Hard TIA in any territory occurring after a 24 hour post-procedure stabilization period (days 2-30) since the recovery from anesthesia can mask accurate assessment of possible TIA symptoms.
  • Intracranial hemorrhage within 30 days of randomization

1.4 Other Outcomes

  • Stent Success - PHAROS Vitesse stent deployed across target lesion with residual stenosis 0-20%
  • Percentage of Stent Group Subjects with any (symptomatic or asymptomatic) in-stent restenosis ≥ 70% confirmed by angiogram at 12 months
  • Percentage of Stent Group Subjects with symptomatic in-stent restenosis ≥ 70% confirmed by angiogram at 12 months
  • Percentage of Medical Therapy Group Subjects with interventional procedure (e.g., angioplasty or stent) at 12 months
  • Comparison of NIHSS scores between treatment arms
  • Comparison of mRS scores between treatment arms
02

Conditions studied

  • Ischemic Stroke
  • Transient Ischemic Attack

Keywords

  • Ischemic stroke
  • Transient Ischemic Attack
  • Intracranial Stenting
03

In context

Ischemic Stroke

2,593 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 930 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 125 is close to the median of 120 across 1,752 interventional studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Codman & Shurtleff is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subject has at least one neurovascular lesion (70-99%) stenosis [internal carotid, middle cerebral, vertebral artery (C4-BA), and/or basilar artery] symptomatic with a hard TIA or stroke attributable to the territory of the lesion within the past 30 days. An intracranial tandem lesion (50-99%) stenosis may be treated if normal artery segment is sufficient length to avoid overlapping stents.
  2. Target vessel diameter / lesion length measurements are within one of the below per angiogram:

    • Vessel diameter is ≥ 2.0 mm and \< 2.5 mm / lesion length is ≤ 16 mm, or
    • Vessel diameter is ≥ 2.5 mm and \< 3.0 mm / lesion length is ≤ 18 mm, or
    • Vessel diameter is ≥ 3.0 mm and \< 4.5 mm / lesion length is ≤ 26 mm, or
    • Vessel diameter is ≥ 4.5 mm and ≤ 5.0 mm / lesion length is ≤ 31 mm
  3. Subject has normal artery adjacent to each stenosis; diameter 2.0 mm - 5.0 mm
  4. Subject age is 18-85 years
  5. Life expectancy is at least 2 years
  6. Subject 's mRS score is ≤ 3
  7. Subject is available for study follow-up visits (e.g., lives within 3 hours of research center)
  8. Subject is willing and cognitively able to provide Informed Consent (consent may be indicated verbally and signed by neutral witness if stroke has impaired hand or visual function)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has contraindications for balloon expandable stent, e.g.

    • Extreme tortuosity at, or proximal to, target lesion,
    • More than 2 lesions with > 50% stenosis (including vertebral ostia and common carotid disease),
    • Carotid or vertebral dissection
  2. CT scan or MRI evidence of any of the following:

    • Intracranial hemorrhage of type PH1 or PH2
    • Subdural or epidural hemorrhage
    • Mass effect, or
    • Intracranial tumor (except small meningioma)
  3. Subject has a previous stent in the territory of the target lesion(s)
  4. Subject has a previous coil or clip placed in the territory of the target lesion within 6 months
  5. Subject has a potential source of cardiac embolism requiring anticoagulation therapy (e.g., atrial fibrillation, intracardiac thrombus or vegetation, significant mitral stenosis, mechanical heart valve, congestive heart failure with EF \<30%, or endocarditis)
  6. Subject has concurrent intracranial pathology, e.g.

    • Moyamoya
    • Vasculitis documented by biopsy results
    • Ruptured Aneurysm
    • Unruptured aneurysm > 7mm
  7. Subject has uncontrolled hypertension (systolic >185 mmHg or diastolic >110 mmHg)
  8. Hemoglobin \< 10 g/dL; platelet count \< 100,000; or INR > 1.5 (e.g., use of warfarin)
  9. Subject has an uncorrectable bleeding diathesis
  10. Subject's neurological status is unstable and rapidly declining (NIHSS score increased > 4 points within 48 hours prior to randomization)
  11. Subject has a contraindication for combination antithrombotic treatment (e.g., clopidogrel and aspirin) such as peptic ulcer disease
  12. Subject history indicates high risk of non-compliance (e.g., substance abuse, psychosocial issues, etc.)
  13. Subject has a known history contraindicating contrast dye or iodine (vs. sensitivity which can be safely controlled by antihistamine, steroid, etc.)
  14. Subject is pregnant or plans to become pregnant in the next 12 months
  15. Myocardial infarction within past 3 months
  16. Treatment with tPA or other thrombolytic agent within 48 hours prior to randomization
  17. Major surgery or trauma within 2 weeks prior to randomization
  18. Enrollment in another investigational device or drug study that may confound the results
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
125 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Stent Group

    Medical therapy + PHAROS Vitesse neurovascular stent ("Stent Group")

    Device: Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System (Stent implantation) + Medical therapy (Aspirin and Clopidogrel)

  • Active comparator
    Medical Therapy Group

    Medical therapy alone ("Medical Therapy Group")

    Drug: Aspirin and Clopidogrel (Medical therapy)

Interventions

  • DevicePharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System (Stent implantation) + Medical therapy (Aspirin and Clopidogrel)

    Implantation of one or more balloon-expandable Pharos Vitesse stents to treat neurovascular ischemic lesions + Medical therapy \[Treatment with aspirin (81-325 mg daily for the duration of the study) and Clopidogrel (75 mg daily for first 3 months)\]

    Also known as: Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System, Asprin, Clopidogrel, Plavix(r)

  • DrugAspirin and Clopidogrel (Medical therapy)

    Medical therapy alone \[Treatment with aspirin (81-325 mg daily for the duration of the study) and Clopidogrel (75 mg daily for first 3 months)\]

    Also known as: Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Plavix(r)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Successful Outcome: No Stroke or Hard TIA in the Same Territory Within 12 Months

    The primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of the two following outcomes: * Stroke in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event within 12 months of randomization * Hard Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event from day 2 through month 12 post-randomization A subject was deemed to be a primary endpoint success if neither of these outcomes occurred. The Kaplan-Meier success rate at 12-months post-operatively was calculated with Kaplan-Meier time-to-event methodology, where the time variable for patients who were successful (no stroke within 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months) was censored at the time of last follow-up, and the time variable for patients who were not successful (had a stroke within 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months) was censored at the time of the first event (stroke with 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months).

    Time frame: One Year

07

Results

Posted Jun 16, 2014
Limitations and caveats
Early termination of enrollment led to small numbers of subjects analyzed (less than 50% of the prospectively planned sample size). Various endpoints, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were not conducted because the study was not fully enrolled.

Participant flow

Subjects were screened and enrolled at 27 sites worldwide (23 sites in the US and 4 sites outside of the US).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStent GroupMedical Therapy Group
Started5953
Itt population (met eligibility)5853
Completed4941
Not completed1012
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up610
Withdrew: Death42

Outcome measures

PrimarySuccessful Outcome: No Stroke or Hard TIA in the Same Territory Within 12 Months

The primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of the two following outcomes: * Stroke in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event within 12 months of randomization * Hard Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event from day 2 through month 12 post-randomization A subject was deemed to be a primary endpoint success if neither of these outcomes occurred. The Kaplan-Meier success rate at 12-months post-operatively was calculated with Kaplan-Meier time-to-event methodology, where the time variable for patients who were successful (no stroke within 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months) was censored at the time of last follow-up, and the time variable for patients who were not successful (had a stroke within 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months) was censored at the time of the first event (stroke with 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months).

Time frame:
One Year
Reported as:
Number · percent probability
Successful Outcome: No Stroke or Hard TIA in the Same Territory Within 12 Months
percent probabilityStent GroupMedical Therapy Group
Successful Outcome: No Stroke or Hard TIA in the Same Territory Within 12 Months62.24 (48.15 to 73.15)83.68 (69.94 to 91.50)

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collect from time of baseline angiogram/stent procedure through subject end of study (either early termination or 12 month post procedure follow up visit). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Stent Group—30/58 (51.7%)37/58 (63.8%)
Medical Therapy Group—20/53 (37.7%)34/53 (64.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 77
Most frequent serious events
EventStent GroupMedical Therapy Group
Ischaemic strokeNervous system disorders7/584/53
Transient ischaemic attackVascular disorders2/584/53
Urinary tract infectionRenal and urinary disorders3/581/53
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/582/53
Chest painCardiac disorders0/582/53
Clostridium difficile colitisInfections and infestations0/582/53
Transient ischaemic attackNervous system disorders0/582/53
Arterial restenosisInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/581/53
Cerebral infarctionNervous system disorders2/580/53
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders2/581/53
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 147
Most frequent other events
EventStent GroupMedical Therapy Group
Transient ischaemic attackVascular disorders2/588/53
HypertensionVascular disorders7/587/53
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications6/584/53
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders5/581/53
Urinary tract infectionRenal and urinary disorders5/581/53
HeadacheNervous system disorders4/583/53
VasospasmVascular disorders4/580/53
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/582/53
HyperglycaemiaEndocrine disorders3/580/53
HypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/581/53

Baseline characteristics

Analyses were based on an Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, defined ad enrolled subjects who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and who were randomized post angiogram. Stent and medical Therapy Group subjects were analyzed to their ITT randomized group regardless of treatment received.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Stent GroupMedical Therapy GroupTotal
Mean61.8 ± 12.361.8 ± 12.861.8 ± 12.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Stent GroupMedical Therapy GroupTotal
Female172138
Male413273
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Stent GroupMedical Therapy GroupTotal
Hispanic or Latino527
Not Hispanic or Latino5351104
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Stent GroupMedical Therapy GroupTotal
Asian7714
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander000
Black or African American459
White423880
Unknown or Not Reported538
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Stent GroupMedical Therapy GroupTotal
United States474289
China7714
Austria448
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Berkefeld J, Hamann GF, du Mesnil R, Kurre W, Steinmetz H, Zanella FE, Sitzer M. [Endovascular treatment for intracranial stenoses. A common statement by neurologists and neuroradiologists]. Nervenarzt. 2006 Dec;77(12):1444-55. doi: 10.1007/s00115-006-2182-z. German. PubMed 17119891 ↗
  • Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, Stern BJ, Hertzberg VS, Frankel MR, Levine SR, Chaturvedi S, Kasner SE, Benesch CG, Sila CA, Jovin TG, Romano JG; Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Trial Investigators. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 31;352(13):1305-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043033. PubMed 15800226 ↗
  • Cruz-Flores S, Diamond AL. Angioplasty for intracranial artery stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD004133. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004133.pub2. PubMed 16856032 ↗
  • Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI. Angioplasty and stenting for atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis: rationale for a randomized clinical trial. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2007 Aug;17(3):355-63, viii-ix. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2007.05.001. PubMed 17826637 ↗
  • Fiorella D, Chow MM, Anderson M, Woo H, Rasmussen PA, Masaryk TJ. A 7-year experience with balloon-mounted coronary stents for the treatment of symptomatic vertebrobasilar intracranial atheromatous disease. Neurosurgery. 2007 Aug;61(2):236-42; discussion 242-3. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000255521.42579.31. PubMed 17762735 ↗
  • Fiorella D, Woo HH. Emerging endovascular therapies for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Stroke. 2007 Aug;38(8):2391-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.482752. Epub 2007 Jun 21. No abstract available. PubMed 17585085 ↗
  • Zaidat OO, Fitzsimmons BF, Woodward BK, Wang Z, Killer-Oberpfalzer M, Wakhloo A, Gupta R, Kirshner H, Megerian JT, Lesko J, Pitzer P, Ramos J, Castonguay AC, Barnwell S, Smith WS, Gress DR; VISSIT Trial Investigators. Effect of a balloon-expandable intracranial stent vs medical therapy on risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis: the VISSIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015 Mar 24-31;313(12):1240-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1693. PubMed 25803346 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 20, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00816166
Lead sponsor
Codman & Shurtleff
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 31, 2008
Start date
Oct 2008
Primary completion
Apr 2013
Completion
Jun 2014
Results posted
Jun 16, 2014
Last update
Feb 20, 2015

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion