CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00814658Updated Aug 26, 2013Results posted

The Use of Galantamine (Reminyl ER) in Patients With MIXed Dementia: Effects on Cognition and Quality of Life

A Phase 4 interventional study of Galantamine and Nimodipine in Dementia, sponsored by Janssen-Cilag Farmaceutica Ltda.. Completed. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-08-26.

Sponsored by Janssen-Cilag Farmaceutica Ltda. · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the combination of galantamine with nimodipine in patients with mixed dementia on cognition and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

A double-blind (neither the patient nor the physician know the name of the study drug), 6-month, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the combination of galantamine with nimodipine in patients with mixed dementia on cognition and quality of life. The target dose of galantamine is 24 mg/day and nimodipine will be taken in fixed doses of 90 mg/day. Primary outcomes will be measured by a computerized battery of neuropsychological tests and Quality of Life (QoL) scores. Secondary outcomes will be measured by ADAS-cog, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Mixed dementia (Alzheimer's Disease (AD) associated with cerebrovascular disease) is one of the most common causes of dementia, which remain largely underdiagnosed. Little is known about specific treatments for this condition. Ischemic lesions by themselves seem to play an important role in cognitive impairment, even in the presence of AD pathology. Hypotheses: - Galantamine 16-24 mg/day in combination with nimodipine 90 mg/day is superior to galantamine monotherapy (16-24 mg/day) in improving or stabilizing cognition in patients with AD associated with cerebrovascular disease (mixed dementia), as measured by the CNTB at 6 months. - Galantamine 16-24 mg/day in combination with nimodipine 90 mg/day is superior to galantamine monotherapy (16-24 mg/day) on QoL measures in this population as measured by QoL - AD at 6 months. Group 1: galantamine oral 8mg/day for a month, 16mg/day for 4 weeks and after 24mg/day until end of study plus nimodipine oral 30mg tid during all study. Group 2: Group 1: galantamine oral 8mg/day for a month, 16mg/day for 4 weeks and after 24mg/day until end of study plus placebo oral 30mg tid during all study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dementia

Keywords

  • Dementia
  • Mixed Dementia
  • Galantamine
  • Reminyl ER
  • Nimodipine
03

In context

Dementia

2,172 studies on the registry are indexed under Dementia; 540 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 22 is below the median of 83 across 1,629 interventional studies indexed under Dementia.

Browse Dementia studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen-Cilag Farmaceutica Ltda. is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients should fulfill DSM-IV criteria for dementia (APA, 1994)
  • Patients should fulfill criteria for AD with cerebrovascular disease according to NINDS-AIREN criteria (Román et al., 1993)
  • The severity of dementia should be mild to moderate, as defined by MMSE score between 10 and 26 (inclusive)
  • Patients (and their legally acceptable representatives) must have signed an informed consent document indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease, Pick's disease or Huntington's chorea, Down's syndrome, Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease. Patients who have mild extrapyramidal signs, for which no treatment is required, are not excluded from the trial
  • History of liver or renal insufficiency
  • significant cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurological, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances in the past 6 months
  • Patients who have previously received M1 agonists or cholinesterase inhibitors (tacrine, donepezil, metrifonate, rivastigmine) for treatment of Alzheimer's disease, no matter if approved or experimental can be included in this trial provided there was at least a washout period of 60 days prior to the screening assessments
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse within the last year or prior prolonged history
  • History of severe drug allergy or hypersensitivity
  • including recorded hypersensitivity to cholinesterase inhibitors, choline agonists or similar agents, or bromide
  • Subjects who have previously been enrolled in other galantamine trials.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Galantamine + Nimodipine

    Drug: Galantamine · Drug: Nimodipine

  • Experimental
    Galantamine + Placebo

    Drug: Galantamine · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugGalantamine

    Galantamine 8 mg/day for one month, followed by 4 weeks of galantamine 16 mg/day. If necessary and well tolerated, dosage of galantamine will be increased to 24 mg/day.

  • DrugNimodipine

    Nimodipine 30 mg 3 times a day (tid).

  • DrugPlacebo

    Matching placebo three times a day (tid).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reaction Time for Simple Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

    The Simple Reaction Time is a computerized attention test that evaluates the patient's reaction time. The number one was presented in the center of the computer screen and the patient had to press this number in the response box as quickly as possible. The reaction time, assessed 100 times per patient, was averaged at each time point for each patient e.g., at baseline, Week 8 and Week 24. The patient's finger was put over button one before the test begun. This test is part of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

  2. Reaction Time for Two-choice Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

    The Two-choice reaction time test is a computerized attention test in which the numbers one or five were presented in the center of the computer screen in a random order. The patient had to press the correspondent button in the response box as quickly as possible. The patient's right finger was put over the button five and the left finger over button one before the test begun. The reaction time, assessed 100 times per patient, was averaged at each time point for each patient e.g., at baseline, Week 8 and Week 24.This test is part of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

  3. Reaction Time for Face Recognition Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

    The face recognition test is a computerized attention test in which ten unfamiliar faces were presented simultaneously on the computer screen for ten seconds to be remembered. After that, a single face was shown and the patient had to press the button one if he/she remembered or, otherwise, button five. It consisted of a random presentation of ten pre-exposed faces and ten new faces as distracters. The reaction time, assessed per patient, was averaged at each time point for each patient e.g., at baseline, Weeks 8 and 24. This test is part of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

  4. Reaction Time for Word Recognition and Learning Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

    The reaction time for word recognition and learning test is a computerized attention test that evaluates the patient's reaction time. This test is similar to the Face Recognition test procedure using Words. The recognition procedure was repeated three times to evaluate a learning effect. The reaction time, assessed per patient, was averaged at each time point for each patient e.g., at baseline, Week 8 and Week 24. This test is part of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

  5. The Quality of Life Assessment for Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

    The Quality of Life assessment scale for caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease (QoL-AD) is a 13-item scale with four possible scores for each question (score 1: poor and score 4: excellent). It evaluates the caregivers own perceived quality of life. Total score ranges from 13 to 52. Higher scores represent a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

  6. The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

    The Quality of Life assessment scale for patients with Alzheimer's disease (QoL-AD) is a 13-item scale with four possible scores for each question (score 1: poor and score 4: excellent). Total score ranges from 13 to 52. Higher scores represent a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

  7. The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores, Based on the Caregiver's Opinion, at Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

    The Quality of Life assessment scale for patients with Alzheimer's disease (QoL-AD), according to the opinion of the caregiver is a 13-item scale with four possible scores for each question (score 1: poor and score 4: excellent). It evaluates the opinion of the caregiver about the patient's quality of life. Total score ranges from 13 to 52. Higher scores represent a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

    The ADAS-Cog is a psychometric instrument that evaluates memory, attention, reasoning, language, orientation and praxis using an 11-point Assessment Scale. It has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum severity score of 70, and a higher score indicates more impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

  2. The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24

    The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) is a scale to assess treatment response in patients with mental disorders. The Clinical Global Impression Improvement scale (CGI-I) requires the clinician to rate how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state. A patient's illness is compared to change over time and rated as: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, or very much worse.

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24

  3. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

    The NPI evaluates 12 neuropsychiatric domains: delusions, hallucinations, dysphoria, anxiety, aggression, euphoria, dis-inhibition, irritability/lability, apathy, aberrant motor activity, eating disorders, and night-time behavior disturbances. For present domains, the severity and frequency of the behavior are determined. Frequency is rated 1 (rarely) to 4 (very often) and Severity is scored 1 (mild) to 3 (severe). The product scores vary from 1 (mild and rarely) to 12 (very often and severe). Total scores vary from 0 (no present domain) to 144 (all domains are present, are often and severe).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

07

Results

Posted Aug 26, 2013
Limitations and caveats
The major limitation of this study was the small sample size. This was probably due to the short enrollment period and to the rigorous inclusion criteria that were adopted.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGalantamine + NimodipineGalantamine + Placebo
Started912
Completed58
Not completed44
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Withdrew: Physician decision10
Withdrew: Adverse event33

Outcome measures

PrimaryReaction Time for Simple Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

The Simple Reaction Time is a computerized attention test that evaluates the patient's reaction time. The number one was presented in the center of the computer screen and the patient had to press this number in the response box as quickly as possible. The reaction time, assessed 100 times per patient, was averaged at each time point for each patient e.g., at baseline, Week 8 and Week 24. The patient's finger was put over button one before the test begun. This test is part of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds
Reaction Time for Simple Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24
millisecondsGalantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)
Reaction Time for Simple Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 241024.06 ± 1307.97729.18 ± 394.88466.60 ± 297.53671.33 ± 298.38467.60 ± 336.69584.44 ± 320.37
PrimaryReaction Time for Two-choice Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

The Two-choice reaction time test is a computerized attention test in which the numbers one or five were presented in the center of the computer screen in a random order. The patient had to press the correspondent button in the response box as quickly as possible. The patient's right finger was put over the button five and the left finger over button one before the test begun. The reaction time, assessed 100 times per patient, was averaged at each time point for each patient e.g., at baseline, Week 8 and Week 24.This test is part of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds
Reaction Time for Two-choice Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24
millisecondsGalantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)
Reaction Time for Two-choice Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 241919.72 ± 1801.131096.75 ± 617.45852.70 ± 480.791187.78 ± 637.60727.60 ± 375.031116.25 ± 540.91
PrimaryReaction Time for Face Recognition Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

The face recognition test is a computerized attention test in which ten unfamiliar faces were presented simultaneously on the computer screen for ten seconds to be remembered. After that, a single face was shown and the patient had to press the button one if he/she remembered or, otherwise, button five. It consisted of a random presentation of ten pre-exposed faces and ten new faces as distracters. The reaction time, assessed per patient, was averaged at each time point for each patient e.g., at baseline, Weeks 8 and 24. This test is part of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds
Reaction Time for Face Recognition Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24
millisecondsGalantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)
Reaction Time for Face Recognition Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 243124.00 ± 1461.462684.45 ± 1315.442262.50 ± 803.302734.25 ± 1252.622357.80 ± 1919.723099.38 ± 1823.80
PrimaryReaction Time for Word Recognition and Learning Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

The reaction time for word recognition and learning test is a computerized attention test that evaluates the patient's reaction time. This test is similar to the Face Recognition test procedure using Words. The recognition procedure was repeated three times to evaluate a learning effect. The reaction time, assessed per patient, was averaged at each time point for each patient e.g., at baseline, Week 8 and Week 24. This test is part of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds
Reaction Time for Word Recognition and Learning Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24
millisecondsGalantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)
Reaction Time for Word Recognition and Learning Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 242022.17 ± 672.082978.77 ± 1867.621966.40 ± 1252.102379.83 ± 984.521722.00 ± 1174.223038.81 ± 1243.79
PrimaryThe Quality of Life Assessment for Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

The Quality of Life assessment scale for caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease (QoL-AD) is a 13-item scale with four possible scores for each question (score 1: poor and score 4: excellent). It evaluates the caregivers own perceived quality of life. Total score ranges from 13 to 52. Higher scores represent a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
The Quality of Life Assessment for Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 24
scores on a scaleGalantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)
The Quality of Life Assessment for Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2434.00 ± 6.9836.50 ± 7.4032.00 ± 9.0333.56 ± 6.8436.60 ± 4.5634.88 ± 6.83
PrimaryThe Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

The Quality of Life assessment scale for patients with Alzheimer's disease (QoL-AD) is a 13-item scale with four possible scores for each question (score 1: poor and score 4: excellent). Total score ranges from 13 to 52. Higher scores represent a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 24
scores on a scaleGalantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)
The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2433.56 ± 5.5932.67 ± 7.0235.60 ± 3.7133.11 ± 4.6836.60 ± 6.2333.86 ± 5.27
PrimaryThe Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores, Based on the Caregiver's Opinion, at Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

The Quality of Life assessment scale for patients with Alzheimer's disease (QoL-AD), according to the opinion of the caregiver is a 13-item scale with four possible scores for each question (score 1: poor and score 4: excellent). It evaluates the opinion of the caregiver about the patient's quality of life. Total score ranges from 13 to 52. Higher scores represent a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores, Based on the Caregiver's Opinion, at Baseline, Week 8, Week 24
scores on a scaleGalantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)
The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores, Based on the Caregiver's Opinion, at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2428.33 ± 8.6229.33 ± 8.0827.80 ± 5.3629.78 ± 6.6929.80 ± 5.7629.13 ± 7.00
SecondaryThe Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

The ADAS-Cog is a psychometric instrument that evaluates memory, attention, reasoning, language, orientation and praxis using an 11-point Assessment Scale. It has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum severity score of 70, and a higher score indicates more impairment.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24
scores on a scaleGalantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 2430.40 ± 13.8128.20 ± 11.0625.10 ± 9.2131.03 ± 11.4525.02 ± 9.7527.70 ± 12.16
SecondaryThe Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) is a scale to assess treatment response in patients with mental disorders. The Clinical Global Impression Improvement scale (CGI-I) requires the clinician to rate how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state. A patient's illness is compared to change over time and rated as: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, or very much worse.

Time frame:
Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24
Reported as:
Number · participants
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24
participantsGalantamine + Nimodipine (Week 4)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 4)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 16)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 16)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)
Very much improved00000000
Much improved11011012
Minimally improved15262334
No change44221511
Minimally worse10101001
Much worse00000000
Very much worse00000000
SecondaryThe Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

The NPI evaluates 12 neuropsychiatric domains: delusions, hallucinations, dysphoria, anxiety, aggression, euphoria, dis-inhibition, irritability/lability, apathy, aberrant motor activity, eating disorders, and night-time behavior disturbances. For present domains, the severity and frequency of the behavior are determined. Frequency is rated 1 (rarely) to 4 (very often) and Severity is scored 1 (mild) to 3 (severe). The product scores vary from 1 (mild and rarely) to 12 (very often and severe). Total scores vary from 0 (no present domain) to 144 (all domains are present, are often and severe).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 8, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24
scores on a scaleGalantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)
The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 2424.0 ± 14.7226.92 ± 20.6620.20 ± 8.6722.11 ± 17.9315.00 ± 11.5519.75 ± 16.58

Adverse events

Collected over 24 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Galantamine + Nimodipine—1/9 (11.1%)8/9 (88.9%)
Galantamine + Placebo—1/12 (8.3%)10/12 (83.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventGalantamine + NimodipineGalantamine + Placebo
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/90/12
Respiratory distressRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/91/12
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 36
Most frequent other events
EventGalantamine + NimodipineGalantamine + Placebo
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/94/12
AggressivenessPsychiatric disorders3/90/12
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders1/93/12
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/93/12
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders2/93/12
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/92/12
DizzinessNervous system disorders0/92/12
CachexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/90/12
Gastrointestinal anomalyGastrointestinal disorders1/90/12
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders1/90/12

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Galantamine + NimodipineGalantamine + PlaceboTotal
Mean78.1 ± 5.374.3 ± 6.576.0 ± 6.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Galantamine + NimodipineGalantamine + PlaceboTotal
Female51015
Male426
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Caramelli P, Laks J, Palmini AL, Nitrini R, Chaves ML, Forlenza OV, Vale Fde A, Barbosa MT, Bottino CM, Machado JC, Charchat-Fichman H, Lawson FL. Effects of galantamine and galantamine combined with nimodipine on cognitive speed and quality of life in mixed dementia: a 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled exploratory trial (the REMIX study). Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2014 Jun;72(6):411-7. doi: 10.1590/0004-282x20140055. PubMed 24964105 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00814658
Lead sponsor
Janssen-Cilag Farmaceutica Ltda.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 25, 2008
Start date
Jun 2008
Primary completion
Oct 2009
Completion
Oct 2009
Results posted
Aug 26, 2013
Last update
Aug 26, 2013

Study contacts

Janssen-Cilag Farmaceutica Ltda. Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen-Cilag Farmaceutica Ltda.
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion