CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00809146RAMPARTUpdated Jun 17, 2016Results posted

Paramedic Treatment of Prolonged Seizures by Intramuscular Versus Intravenous Anticonvulsant Medications

A Phase 3 interventional study of Intramuscular route of active treatment and Intravenous route of active treatment in Status Epilepticus, sponsored by Robert Silbergleit. Completed at 17 sites in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-06-17.

Sponsored by Robert Silbergleit · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,023
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this non-inferiority trial is to determine which type of routine care is the best for paramedics to stop someone from seizing.

Read the detailed description

Seizures are a common medical problem. Although they can be frightening to watch, most seizures are brief and stop by themselves. Seizures that don't stop in seconds or minutes are a dangerous life-threatening medical emergency. Paramedics often have medications that can stop seizures, but the best way to give the medicines is not known. Paramedics often give medicine directly into a vein, which is called intravenous (IV) administration. This works well, but can be hard to do in a person who is seizing. It can also take some time and delay treatment. Another way to give the medicine is as a shot given into a muscle, which is called intramuscular (IM) administration. Giving the medicine this way is faster, but it may not stop the seizure as quickly.

This clinical trial, the Rapid Anti-convulsant Medication Prior to ARrival Trial (RAMPART), is designed to figure out whether giving anti-seizure medicine works similarly well and more quickly when given through an IV or when given as a shot in the muscle. Two similar medicines will be used. Both are already used by paramedics in the field and by doctors in the hospital to stop seizures. One is commonly given by IV, and the other is commonly given as a shot in the muscle. In this study, the shot will be given using a device similar to an EpiPen-which is an autoinjector used by people with severe allergies.

Approximately 1,024 persons whose seizures are continuing after emergency medical service (EMS) arrival and who meet all eligibility criteria will be enrolled in the trial. Every participant will be treated with anti-seizure medicine by the paramedics. At random, half the participants will be in one group and half in another. Half the participants will receive the study medicine through an IV and will be given a shot in the muscle without medicine (placebo). The other half will receive the medicine as a shot in the muscle plus an IV without medicine (placebo).

In September 2010, more rapid than expected enrollment made it feasible to increase the sample size of the study from 800 to 1,024 with the already available funding. The goals of the expansion were to enroll more pediatric subjects (since the trial was enrolling slightly fewer than anticipated) and to improve the power of the study to 90%, which was initially desired. It is important to understand that the extended enrollment was not a sample size re-estimation in any way. The opportunity to extend the trial is pragmatic, based solely on the early enrollment success of the trial. It is not informed by the planned interim analyses that have been performed, the results of which remain sequestered, and there have been no unscheduled interim analyses. The firewall that prevents the blinded leadership from any knowledge of the outcome data has been diligently maintained throughout the process of proposing and implementing this extension.

02

Conditions studied

  • Status Epilepticus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Status Epilepticus
  • Emergency Medical Services
  • Anticonvulsants
  • Drug Administration Routes
  • Seizures
03

In context

Status Epilepticus

126 studies on the registry are indexed under Status Epilepticus; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,023 is above the median of 70 across 74 interventional studies indexed under Status Epilepticus.

Browse Status Epilepticus studies →

Lead sponsor

Robert Silbergleit is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Paramedics or reliable witnesses verify 5 minutes of either continuous seizure activity or of repeated convulsive seizure activity where the patient does not regain consciousness (operationally defined as meaningful speech or obeying commands) between seizures.
  • Patient is still seizing at the time of paramedic treatment with study medications.
  • Estimated weight equal to or greater than 13 kg.
  • Subject to be transported to a RAMPART participating hospital.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major trauma as the precipitant of the seizure
  • Hypoglycemia (as defined by local EMS protocol or a glucose \< 60 mg/dL)
  • Known allergy to midazolam or lorazepam
  • Cardiac arrest or heart rate (HR) \<40 beats per minute
  • Sensitivity to benzodiazepines
  • Medical alert tag marked with "RAMPART declined"
  • Prior treatment of this seizure with diazepam autoinjector as part of another study
  • Known pregnancy
  • Prisoners
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,023 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intramuscular (IM) anticonvulsant

    This group gets active treatment with an anticonvulsant by the intramuscular route of administration.

    Drug: Intramuscular route of active treatment

  • Active comparator
    Intravenous (IV) anticonvulsant

    This group gets active treatment with an anticonvulsant by the intravenous route of administration.

    Drug: Intravenous route of active treatment

Interventions

  • DrugIntramuscular route of active treatment

    IM administration by autoinjector of midazolam 5 mg for subjects under estimated weight of 40 kg or midazolam 10 mg for subjects with estimated weight of 40 kg or above, IV administration of matching volume of IV flush.

    Also known as: Autoinjector

  • DrugIntravenous route of active treatment

    IV administration of lorazepam 2 mg for subjects under estimated weight of 40 kg or midazolam 4 mg for subjects with estimated weight of 40 kg or above, IM administration by autoinjector of matching volume of saline.

    Also known as: Ativan

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Subjects With Termination of Seizures at ED Arrival With no Rescue Therapy Given

    The primary outcome was termination of seizures before arrival in the emergency department (ED) without the need for the paramedics to provide rescue therapy. Subjects did not reach the primary outcome if they were having seizures on arrival in the emergency department or if they received rescue medication before arrival. Termination of seizures on arrival was determined according to the clinical judgment of the attending emergency physician and was based on examination of the subjects, their clinical course, and results of any routine diagnostic testing.

    Time frame: Duration of prehospital care, outcome is determined upon arrival at the ED on the day of enrollment (average 20 minutes).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Subjects With Endotracheal Intubation Within 30 Min After ED Arrival

    Endotracheal intubation performed or attempted by EMS or within 30 minutes after ED arrival is abstracted from the ED record physician and nursing records. Endotracheal intubation includes placement of a definitive tracheal airway (oro-, naso-, cricothyroidotomy, or tracheostomy) for support of respirations or protection of airway. Non-definitive and/or non-tracheal airways (oral or nasal airways, laryngeal mask airways, or esophageal obturator airways) are not included if the patient is not subsequently intubated unless specifically deemed to have been used in lieu of tracheal intubation.

    Time frame: anytime before 30 minutes after ED arrival

  2. Number of Subjects Hospitalized

    Hospital and ICU admission from the ED, and length of stay, is abstracted from the hospital admission record. ICU admission is recorded as occurring only if the ICU is the initial inpatient unit for the patient.

    Time frame: at ED disposition on day of enrollment

  3. Number of Subjects Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

    Hospital and ICU admission from the ED, and length of stay, is abstracted from the hospital admission record. ICU admission is recorded as occurring only if the ICU is the initial inpatient unit for the patient.

    Time frame: at time of disposition on day of enrollment

  4. Number of Subjects With Recurrent Seizure Within 12 Hours After ED Arrival

    Acute seizure recurrence is defined as any further convulsive or electrographic seizures occurring in the first 12 hours of hospitalization, if they require additional antiepileptic medications, in subjects that had been determined not to be having seizures on ED arrival.

    Time frame: within 12 hours after ED arrival

  5. Number of Subjects With Hypotension

    Acute hypotension is defined as a systolic blood pressure of \< 90 mmHg sustained for greater than 5 minutes and for which the patient was treated with a continuous IV infusion of a vasopressor.

    Time frame: participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 6 days

  6. Number of Subjects With IM Injection-site Complications

    IM injection site complications are defined as any symptoms or signs of injury or reaction at the site of the study IM injection requiring treatment. This includes extensive hematoma requiring treatment (decompression, pressure dressings, or discontinuation of anticoagulant or antithrombotic medications). Treatment does not include imaging without other interventions. This definition also includes wound infection requiring antibiotic therapy, retained foreign bodies requiring exploration and removal, or other similar wound problems.

    Time frame: participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 6 days

  7. Number of Subjects With IV Injection-site Complications

    IV insertion site complications are defined as any symptoms or signs of injury or reaction at the site of the study IV placed by paramedics and used for study medication. This includes thrombosis, phlebitis, or skin infection requiring specific treatment including compresses, antibiotics, or wound care.

    Time frame: participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 6 days

  8. Length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay in Days

    Continuous days of initial ICU stay from time of admission

    Time frame: participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 6 days

  9. Length of Hospital Stay in Days

    Continuous acute care inpatient hospital days from day of admission until discharge

    Time frame: participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 6 days

07

Results

Posted Apr 13, 2012

Participant flow

Subjects treated for status epilepticus in the prehospital setting by paramedics were enrolled at the scene between June 2009 and January 2011. A total of 1023 subject enrollments represented 893 unique subjects with a reenrollment rate of 13%. RAMPART involved 4314 paramedics, 33 EMS agencies, and 79 receiving hospitals across the United States.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntramuscular (IM) AnticonvulsantIntravenous (IV) Anticonvulsant
Started448445
Completed448445
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Subjects With Termination of Seizures at ED Arrival With no Rescue Therapy Given

The primary outcome was termination of seizures before arrival in the emergency department (ED) without the need for the paramedics to provide rescue therapy. Subjects did not reach the primary outcome if they were having seizures on arrival in the emergency department or if they received rescue medication before arrival. Termination of seizures on arrival was determined according to the clinical judgment of the attending emergency physician and was based on examination of the subjects, their clinical course, and results of any routine diagnostic testing.

Time frame:
Duration of prehospital care, outcome is determined upon arrival at the ED on the day of enrollment (average 20 minutes).
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects With Termination of Seizures at ED Arrival With no Rescue Therapy Given
participantsIM MidazolamIV Lorazepam
Number of Subjects With Termination of Seizures at ED Arrival With no Rescue Therapy Given329282
Statistical analysis
  • IM Midazolam vs IV Lorazepam · one-sided z statistic · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 0.10 · 95% CI 0.04 to 0.16
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Endotracheal Intubation Within 30 Min After ED Arrival

Endotracheal intubation performed or attempted by EMS or within 30 minutes after ED arrival is abstracted from the ED record physician and nursing records. Endotracheal intubation includes placement of a definitive tracheal airway (oro-, naso-, cricothyroidotomy, or tracheostomy) for support of respirations or protection of airway. Non-definitive and/or non-tracheal airways (oral or nasal airways, laryngeal mask airways, or esophageal obturator airways) are not included if the patient is not subsequently intubated unless specifically deemed to have been used in lieu of tracheal intubation.

Time frame:
anytime before 30 minutes after ED arrival
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects With Endotracheal Intubation Within 30 Min After ED Arrival
participantsIM MidazolamIV Lorazepam
Number of Subjects With Endotracheal Intubation Within 30 Min After ED Arrival6364
Statistical analysis
  • IM Midazolam vs IV Lorazepam · Risk ratio (rr): 0.98 · 95% CI 0.70 to 1.34
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Hospitalized

Hospital and ICU admission from the ED, and length of stay, is abstracted from the hospital admission record. ICU admission is recorded as occurring only if the ICU is the initial inpatient unit for the patient.

Time frame:
at ED disposition on day of enrollment
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects Hospitalized
participantsIM MidazolamIV Lorazepam
Number of Subjects Hospitalized258292
Statistical analysis
  • IM Midazolam vs IV Lorazepam · Risk ratio (rr): 0.88 · 95% CI 0.79 to 0.98
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

Hospital and ICU admission from the ED, and length of stay, is abstracted from the hospital admission record. ICU admission is recorded as occurring only if the ICU is the initial inpatient unit for the patient.

Time frame:
at time of disposition on day of enrollment
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
participantsIM MidazolamIV Lorazepam
Number of Subjects Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU)128161
Statistical analysis
  • IM Midazolam vs IV Lorazepam · Risk ratio (rr): 0.79 · 95% CI 0.65 to 0.95
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Recurrent Seizure Within 12 Hours After ED Arrival

Acute seizure recurrence is defined as any further convulsive or electrographic seizures occurring in the first 12 hours of hospitalization, if they require additional antiepileptic medications, in subjects that had been determined not to be having seizures on ED arrival.

Time frame:
within 12 hours after ED arrival
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects With Recurrent Seizure Within 12 Hours After ED Arrival
participantsIM MidazolamIV Lorazepam
Number of Subjects With Recurrent Seizure Within 12 Hours After ED Arrival5147
Statistical analysis
  • IM Midazolam vs IV Lorazepam · Risk ratio (rr): 1.08 · 95% CI 0.74 to 1.56
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Hypotension

Acute hypotension is defined as a systolic blood pressure of \< 90 mmHg sustained for greater than 5 minutes and for which the patient was treated with a continuous IV infusion of a vasopressor.

Time frame:
participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 6 days
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects With Hypotension
participantsIM MidazolamIV Lorazepam
Number of Subjects With Hypotension1213
Statistical analysis
  • IM Midazolam vs IV Lorazepam · Risk ratio (rr): 0.92 · 95% CI 0.42 to 1.98
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With IM Injection-site Complications

IM injection site complications are defined as any symptoms or signs of injury or reaction at the site of the study IM injection requiring treatment. This includes extensive hematoma requiring treatment (decompression, pressure dressings, or discontinuation of anticoagulant or antithrombotic medications). Treatment does not include imaging without other interventions. This definition also includes wound infection requiring antibiotic therapy, retained foreign bodies requiring exploration and removal, or other similar wound problems.

Time frame:
participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 6 days
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects With IM Injection-site Complications
participantsIM MidazolamIV Lorazepam
Number of Subjects With IM Injection-site Complications42
Statistical analysis
  • IM Midazolam vs IV Lorazepam · Risk ratio (rr): 1.99 · 95% CI 0.30 to 10.70
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With IV Injection-site Complications

IV insertion site complications are defined as any symptoms or signs of injury or reaction at the site of the study IV placed by paramedics and used for study medication. This includes thrombosis, phlebitis, or skin infection requiring specific treatment including compresses, antibiotics, or wound care.

Time frame:
participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 6 days
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects With IV Injection-site Complications
participantsIM MidazolamIV Lorazepam
Number of Subjects With IV Injection-site Complications03
SecondaryLength of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay in Days

Continuous days of initial ICU stay from time of admission

Time frame:
participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 6 days
Reported as:
Mean · days
Length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay in Days
daysIM MidazolamIV Lorazepam
Length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay in Days5.7 ± 9.54.1 ± 4.7
Statistical analysis
  • IM Midazolam vs IV Lorazepam · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.09
SecondaryLength of Hospital Stay in Days

Continuous acute care inpatient hospital days from day of admission until discharge

Time frame:
participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 6 days
Reported as:
Mean · days
Length of Hospital Stay in Days
daysIM MidazolamIV Lorazepam
Length of Hospital Stay in Days6.7 ± 10.05.5 ± 6.4
Statistical analysis
  • IM Midazolam vs IV Lorazepam · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.11

Adverse events

Collected over Serious adverse events were collected through subject end of study (emergency department or hospital discharge).. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
IM Midazolam—137/514 (26.7%)103/514 (20%)
IV Lorazepam—156/509 (30.6%)95/509 (18.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 49
Most frequent serious events
EventIM MidazolamIV Lorazepam
Respiratory depressionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders33/51451/509
Depressed level of consciousnessNervous system disorders49/51445/509
ConvulsionNervous system disorders33/51439/509
Pneumonia/ Aspiration pneumoniaInfections and infestations2/51411/509
Mental status changesNervous system disorders9/51410/509
Sepsis/SIRS/organ failureInfections and infestations8/5148/509
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders5/5147/509
HypotensionCardiac disorders5/5147/509
RhabdomyolysisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/5145/509
Alcohol/Drug withdrawal syndromeGeneral disorders5/5145/509
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventIM MidazolamIV Lorazepam
ConvulsionNervous system disorders45/51438/509
Vomiting/NauseaGastrointestinal disorders15/51423/509
PyrexiaGeneral disorders23/51414/509
Mental status changesNervous system disorders20/51420/509

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Intramuscular (IM) AnticonvulsantIntravenous (IV) AnticonvulsantTotal
Mean43 ± 2244 ± 2243 ± 22
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)Intramuscular (IM) AnticonvulsantIntravenous (IV) AnticonvulsantTotal
0-5 years322961
6-10 years152035
11-20 years282149
21-40 years114112226
41-60 years169169338
>61 years9094184
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Intramuscular (IM) AnticonvulsantIntravenous (IV) AnticonvulsantTotal
Female198207405
Male250238488
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Intramuscular (IM) AnticonvulsantIntravenous (IV) AnticonvulsantTotal
Hispanic or Latino4957106
Not Hispanic or Latino310290600
Unknown or Not Reported8998187
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Intramuscular (IM) AnticonvulsantIntravenous (IV) AnticonvulsantTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native358
Asian81422
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander213
Black or African American229224453
White165183348
More than one race9514
Unknown or Not Reported321345
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Intramuscular (IM) AnticonvulsantIntravenous (IV) AnticonvulsantTotal
United States448445893
Dose tier
Dose tier(participants)Intramuscular (IM) AnticonvulsantIntravenous (IV) AnticonvulsantTotal
children with an estimated weight of 13 to 40 kg6259121
Children estimated >40kg and All Adults386386772
History of epilepsy
History of epilepsy(participants)Intramuscular (IM) AnticonvulsantIntravenous (IV) AnticonvulsantTotal
Yes293295588
No111103214
Not documented444791

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

17 sites
  • University of Arizona
    Tucson, Arizona 85742, United States
  • Stanford University
    Palo Alto, California 94304-5777, United States
  • University of California-San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94110, United States
  • Emory University
    Atlanta, Georgia 30303, United States
  • University of Kentucky
    Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0298, United States
  • University of Maryland
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • Henry Ford Health System
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Wayne State University
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414, United States
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • University of Cincinnati Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45267, United States
  • Oregon Health and Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97239-3098, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania/York
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Temple University-Main Line
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, United States
  • University of Texas-Houston
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
    Richmond, Virginia 23298, United States
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Sherman NA, Silbergleit R, Bengelink EM, Durkalski V, Wolter KD. The Midazolam RAMPART Study Medical Records Project: A Unique Use of Real-World Data in a Complex Collaborative Partnership to Support a New Drug Application. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jan;57(1):132-141. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00447-4. Epub 2022 Aug 20. PubMed 35987977 ↗
  • Silbergleit R, Lowenstein D, Durkalski V, Conwit R; NETT Investigators. Lessons from the RAMPART study--and which is the best route of administration of benzodiazepines in status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2013 Sep;54 Suppl 6(0 6):74-7. doi: 10.1111/epi.12284. PubMed 24001080 ↗
  • Silbergleit R, Biros MH, Harney D, Dickert N, Baren J; NETT Investigators. Implementation of the exception from informed consent regulations in a large multicenter emergency clinical trials network: the RAMPART experience. Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;19(4):448-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01328.x. PubMed 22506949 ↗
  • Silbergleit R, Durkalski V, Lowenstein D, Conwit R, Pancioli A, Palesch Y, Barsan W; NETT Investigators. Intramuscular versus intravenous therapy for prehospital status epilepticus. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 16;366(7):591-600. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1107494. PubMed 22335736 ↗
  • Silbergleit R, Lowenstein D, Durkalski V, Conwit R; Neurological Emergency Treatment Trials (NETT) Investigators. RAMPART (Rapid Anticonvulsant Medication Prior to Arrival Trial): a double-blind randomized clinical trial of the efficacy of intramuscular midazolam versus intravenous lorazepam in the prehospital treatment of status epilepticus by paramedics. Epilepsia. 2011 Oct;52 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):45-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03235.x. PubMed 21967361 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 17, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00809146
Lead sponsor
Robert Silbergleit
Collaborators
Medical University of South Carolina, University of California, San Francisco, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Responsible party
Robert Silbergleit (Principal Investigator, Professor, University of Michigan) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 17, 2008
Start date
Jun 2009
Primary completion
Jan 2011
Completion
Jan 2011
Results posted
Apr 13, 2012
Last update
Jun 17, 2016

Study contacts

Robert Silbergleit, MD
principal investigator · University of Michigan
Daniel H Lowenstein, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco
Valerie L Durkalski, PhD
principal investigator · Medical University of South Carolina

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion