ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00805740Updated Aug 1, 2013Results posted

An Evaluation Of The Effectiveness And Safety Of Anidulafungin Compared To Caspofungin For The Treatment Of Deep Tissue Infection Due To Candida

A Phase 3 interventional study of Active anidulafungin and Active Caspofungin in Candidiasis and Fungemia, sponsored by Pfizer. Terminated at 18 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-08-01.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
The study was terminated prematurely on May 18, 2012 due to slow enrollment. The study was not terminated due to any safety issues or concerns.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
41
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to gather information on the use of anidulafungin for the treatment of serious Candida infection. It is expected that anidulafungin will be at least as safe and as effective as the comparator drug, caspofungin.

02

Conditions studied

  • Candidiasis
  • Fungemia

Keywords

  • Candidiasis; Invasive Candidiasis; Deep Tissue Candidiasis; Candida; Candidemia; Fungal Infection
03

In context

Candidiasis

132 studies on the registry are indexed under Candidiasis; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 41 is below the median of 91 across 86 interventional studies indexed under Candidiasis.

Browse Candidiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,334 studies on the registry; 149 are open to participants now.

Of its 601 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 391 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of deep tissue Candida infection, defined as growth of Candida sp. from a culture specimen obtained from a normally sterile site accompanied by signs and symptoms of infection.
  • Male or female ≥ 16 years of age.
  • Expected hospitalization for at least fourteen (14) days.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breast feeding or planning to become pregnant during the study.
  • Recent treatment with one of the study drugs over the last 30 days.
  • Allergy to either study drug or to this class of drugs.
  • Significant liver dysfunction.
  • Suspected Candida osteomyelitis, endocarditis, meningitis or any other infections of the central nervous system.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
41 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Anidulafungin arm

    Drug: Active anidulafungin

  • Experimental
    Caspofungin arm

    Drug: Active Caspofungin

Interventions

  • DrugActive anidulafungin

    Subjects in this arm will receive active anidulafungin and placebo caspofungin

  • DrugActive Caspofungin

    Subjects in this arm will receive active caspofungin and placebo anidulafungin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (Day 14 To Day 42)

    Participants had successful global response if there was clinical response of cure/improvement,microbiological eradication/presumed eradication.Clinical cure:resolution of signs/symptoms (s/s) of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Clinical improvement:significant,but incomplete resolution of s/s of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Microbiological eradication/presumed eradication:baseline pathogen not isolated from original site culture,or culture data not available for participant with successful clinical outcome.

    Time frame: End of Treatment (Day 14 to Day 42)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Global Response at 2-week and 6-week Follow-up Visit

    Participants had successful global response if there was clinical response of cure/improvement,microbiological eradication/presumed eradication.Clinical cure:resolution of signs/symptoms (s/s) of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Clinical improvement:significant,but incomplete resolution of s/s of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Microbiological eradication/presumed eradication:baseline pathogen not isolated from original site culture,or culture data not available for participant with successful clinical outcome.

    Time frame: 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after end of treatment [EOT]), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success

    A participant had a successful response if there was clinical response of cure and microbiological success (eradication or presumed eradication). Clinical response of cure: resolution of signs and symptoms attributed to Candida infection; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required to complete the course of therapy. Microbiological eradication or presumed eradication: baseline pathogen not isolated from original site culture, or culture data not available for a participant with successful clinical outcome.

    Time frame: EOT (Day 14 to 42), 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

  3. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response

    A participant had a successful clinical response if there was clinical response of cure or improvement. Clinical response of cure: resolution of signs and symptoms attributed to Candida infection; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required to complete the course of therapy. Clinical response of improvement: significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required.

    Time frame: Day 10

  4. Percentage of Participants With Relapse

    Relapse was defined as any baseline Candida sp. isolated following eradication (documented or presumed) or culture data not available for participants with a clinical response of failure after a previous response of success. Prophylactic treatment with oral antifungal agents was not sufficient to document a relapse.

    Time frame: 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

  5. Percentage of Participants With New Infection

    New Infection: participant presenting with clinical failure with the emergence of new Candida sp. at the original site of infection or at a distant site of infection. Clinical failure: no significant improvement in signs and symptoms, or death due to Candida infection. Participants must have had received at least 3 doses of study drug to be classified as a failure.

    Time frame: 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

  6. Time to Negative Blood Culture

    Negative blood culture referred to absence of Candida sp. in the blood sample of participants who had a positive blood culture at baseline. Time to negative blood culture (days) was calculated as date of first negative blood culture minus first treatment date plus 1.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

  7. Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality

    All-cause mortality during study therapy and at follow-up visits reported as unique death at EOT, 2 week follow-up and 6 week follow-up.

    Time frame: Baseline to EOT (Day 14 to 42), After EOT to 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), After 2-week follow-up to 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

  8. Time to Death

    Time to death (days) was assessed as date of death minus first treatment date plus 1.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

07

Results

Posted Aug 1, 2013
Limitations and caveats
The study was prematurely terminated due to slow enrollment. The study was not terminated due to any safety issues or concerns.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAnidulafunginCaspofungin
Started2813
Treated2613
Completed179
Not completed114
Withdrew: Death74
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Randomized, but not treated20

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (Day 14 To Day 42)

Participants had successful global response if there was clinical response of cure/improvement,microbiological eradication/presumed eradication.Clinical cure:resolution of signs/symptoms (s/s) of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Clinical improvement:significant,but incomplete resolution of s/s of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Microbiological eradication/presumed eradication:baseline pathogen not isolated from original site culture,or culture data not available for participant with successful clinical outcome.

Time frame:
End of Treatment (Day 14 to Day 42)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (Day 14 To Day 42)
percentage of participantsAnidulafunginCaspofungin
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (Day 14 To Day 42)83.3 (62.6 to 95.3)61.5 (31.6 to 86.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Anidulafungin vs Caspofungin · Risk difference (rd): 21.8 · 95% CI -12.3 to 53.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Global Response at 2-week and 6-week Follow-up Visit

Participants had successful global response if there was clinical response of cure/improvement,microbiological eradication/presumed eradication.Clinical cure:resolution of signs/symptoms (s/s) of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Clinical improvement:significant,but incomplete resolution of s/s of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Microbiological eradication/presumed eradication:baseline pathogen not isolated from original site culture,or culture data not available for participant with successful clinical outcome.

Time frame:
2-week follow-up (2 weeks after end of treatment [EOT]), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at 2-week and 6-week Follow-up Visit
percentage of participantsAnidulafunginCaspofungin
2-week follow-up76.2 (52.8 to 91.8)54.5 (23.4 to 83.3)
6-week follow-up66.7 (43.0 to 85.4)54.5 (23.4 to 83.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Anidulafungin vs Caspofungin · Risk difference (rd): 21.6 · 95% CI -13.6 to 55.6
  • Anidulafungin vs Caspofungin · Risk difference (rd): 12.1 · 95% CI -23.3 to 47.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success

A participant had a successful response if there was clinical response of cure and microbiological success (eradication or presumed eradication). Clinical response of cure: resolution of signs and symptoms attributed to Candida infection; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required to complete the course of therapy. Microbiological eradication or presumed eradication: baseline pathogen not isolated from original site culture, or culture data not available for a participant with successful clinical outcome.

Time frame:
EOT (Day 14 to 42), 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success
percentage of participantsAnidulafunginCaspofungin
EOT (n=21,8)81.062.5
2-week follow-up (n=16,6)87.5100.0
6-week follow-up (n=15,6)93.3100.0
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response

A participant had a successful clinical response if there was clinical response of cure or improvement. Clinical response of cure: resolution of signs and symptoms attributed to Candida infection; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required to complete the course of therapy. Clinical response of improvement: significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required.

Time frame:
Day 10
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response
percentage of participantsAnidulafunginCaspofungin
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response70.8 (48.9 to 87.4)76.9 (46.2 to 95.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Anidulafungin vs Caspofungin · Risk difference (rd): -6.1 · 95% CI -39.0 to 27.9
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Relapse

Relapse was defined as any baseline Candida sp. isolated following eradication (documented or presumed) or culture data not available for participants with a clinical response of failure after a previous response of success. Prophylactic treatment with oral antifungal agents was not sufficient to document a relapse.

Time frame:
2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Relapse
percentage of participantsAnidulafunginCaspofungin
2-week follow-up00
6-week follow-up00
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With New Infection

New Infection: participant presenting with clinical failure with the emergence of new Candida sp. at the original site of infection or at a distant site of infection. Clinical failure: no significant improvement in signs and symptoms, or death due to Candida infection. Participants must have had received at least 3 doses of study drug to be classified as a failure.

Time frame:
2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With New Infection
percentage of participantsAnidulafunginCaspofungin
2-week follow-up00
6-week follow-up00
SecondaryTime to Negative Blood Culture

Negative blood culture referred to absence of Candida sp. in the blood sample of participants who had a positive blood culture at baseline. Time to negative blood culture (days) was calculated as date of first negative blood culture minus first treatment date plus 1.

Time frame:
Baseline up to 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Negative Blood Culture
daysAnidulafunginCaspofungin
Time to Negative Blood Culture2.0 (2 to 7)3.5 (2 to 10)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality

All-cause mortality during study therapy and at follow-up visits reported as unique death at EOT, 2 week follow-up and 6 week follow-up.

Time frame:
Baseline to EOT (Day 14 to 42), After EOT to 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), After 2-week follow-up to 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality
percentage of participantsAnidulafunginCaspofungin
Baseline to EOT3.815.4
After EOT to 2-week follow-up15.415.4
After 2-week follow-up to 6-week follow-up7.70.0
SecondaryTime to Death

Time to death (days) was assessed as date of death minus first treatment date plus 1.

Time frame:
Baseline up to 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Death
daysAnidulafunginCaspofungin
Time to Death23.0 (6 to 67)11.5 (9 to 51)

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Anidulafungin—12/26 (46.2%)23/26 (88.5%)
Caspofungin—7/13 (53.8%)11/13 (84.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 28
Most frequent serious events
EventAnidulafunginCaspofungin
Cardiac arrestCardiac disorders0/262/13
BradycardiaCardiac disorders0/261/13
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders2/260/13
Abdominal sepsisInfections and infestations0/261/13
PeritonitisInfections and infestations0/261/13
Splenic haematomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/261/13
HypoglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/261/13
Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathyNervous system disorders0/261/13
Renal failure acuteRenal and urinary disorders0/261/13
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/261/13
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 151
Most frequent other events
EventAnidulafunginCaspofungin
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/264/13
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/263/13
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/263/13
Staphylococcus test positiveInvestigations1/263/13
Streptococcus test positiveInvestigations1/263/13
HypotensionVascular disorders3/263/13
CoagulopathyBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/262/13
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders1/262/13
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders0/262/13
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/262/13

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)AnidulafunginCaspofunginTotal
Mean56.3 ± 16.263.4 ± 16.358.6 ± 16.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AnidulafunginCaspofunginTotal
Female9514
Male17825
08

Study locations

18 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Newark, Delaware 19713, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Newark, Delaware 19718, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Wilmington, Delaware 19801, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Antwerpen, 2060, Belgium
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Bruxelles, 1000, Belgium
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Bruxelles, 1070, Belgium
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Bruxelles, 1200, Belgium
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, Netherlands
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Amsterdam, 1091 AC, Netherlands
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Nijmegen, 6532 SZ, Netherlands
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Coimbra, 3040-853, Portugal
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Lisboa, 1150-199, Portugal
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Bucuresti, 014461, Romania
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    P/o Stepanovskoe, Krasnogorskiy District, Moscow Region, 143423, Russian Federation
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Geneve 14, CH-1211, Switzerland
09

References and documents

Publications

  • De Rosa FG, Busca A, Capparella MR, Yan JL, Aram JA. Invasive Candidiasis in Patients with Solid Tumors Treated with Anidulafungin: A Post Hoc Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Six Pooled Studies. Clin Drug Investig. 2021 Jun;41(6):539-548. doi: 10.1007/s40261-021-01024-7. Epub 2021 Apr 23. PubMed 33891293 ↗
  • Sganga G, Wang M, Capparella MR, Tawadrous M, Yan JL, Aram JA, Montravers P. Evaluation of anidulafungin in the treatment of intra-abdominal candidiasis: a pooled analysis of patient-level data from 5 prospective studies. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Oct;38(10):1849-1856. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03617-9. Epub 2019 Jul 6. PubMed 31280481 ↗
  • Kontoyiannis DP, Bassetti M, Nucci M, Capparella MR, Yan JL, Aram J, Hogan PA. Anidulafungin for the treatment of candidaemia caused by Candida parapsilosis: Analysis of pooled data from six prospective clinical studies. Mycoses. 2017 Oct;60(10):663-667. doi: 10.1111/myc.12641. Epub 2017 Jun 9. PubMed 28597967 ↗
  • Kullberg BJ, Vasquez J, Mootsikapun P, Nucci M, Paiva JA, Garbino J, Yan JL, Aram J, Capparella MR, Conte U, Schlamm H, Swanson R, Herbrecht R. Efficacy of anidulafungin in 539 patients with invasive candidiasis: a patient-level pooled analysis of six clinical trials. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Aug 1;72(8):2368-2377. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx116. PubMed 28459966 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 2009, a primary completion of Jun 2012 and a completion of Jun 2012. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Aug 2013, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 26, 2008
First posted
Dec 10, 2008
Start
Apr 2009
Primary completionActual
Jun 2012
CompletionActual
Jun 2012
Results first posted
Aug 1, 2013
Last update
Aug 1, 2013
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 1, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00805740
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 10, 2008
Start date
Apr 2009
Primary completion
Jun 2012
Completion
Jun 2012
Results posted
Aug 1, 2013
Last update
Aug 1, 2013

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion