An interventional study of Stapling device during radical cystectomy and Ligasure tissue sealing device in Bladder Cancer and Hemostasis, sponsored by Vanderbilt University. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-02-11.
Sponsored by Vanderbilt University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Evaluate the utility/safety of an FDA-approved tissue sealing device during radical cystectomy as compared to an FDA-approved stapling device.
1,649 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; 427 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 80 is above the median of 60 across 1,183 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms.
Browse Urinary Bladder Neoplasms studies →Vanderbilt University is the lead sponsor of 520 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.
Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (63%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Efficacy of stapling device during radical cystectomy
Device: Stapling device during radical cystectomy
Efficacy of ligasure tissue sealing device during radical cystectomy
Device: Ligasure tissue sealing device
Hemostasis
Also known as: Ethicon articulating stapler
Efficacy of tissue sealing device during hemostasis
Also known as: Tissue sealing device
Estimated Blood Loss
Time frame: Perioperative
Operating Room Time in Minutes
Time frame: Intraoperative time
| Milestone | Stapling Device | Ligasure Device |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 40 | 40 |
| Completed | 40 | 40 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
| milliliters | Stapling Device | Ligasure Device |
|---|---|---|
| Estimated Blood Loss | 686.5 ± 406.1 | 707.5 ± 570.8 |
| minutes | Stapling Device | Ligasure Device |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Room Time in Minutes | 262.1 ± 74.9 | 272.9 ± 73.3 |
Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stapling Device | — | 0/40 (0%) | 0/40 (0%) |
| Ligasure Device | — | 0/40 (0%) | 0/40 (0%) |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Stapling Device | Ligasure Device | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 65.8 ± 9.6 | 68.5 ± 7.9 | 67.15 ± 8.75 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Stapling Device | Ligasure Device | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 3 | 7 | 10 |
| Male | 37 | 33 | 70 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Stapling Device | Ligasure Device | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 40 | 80 |
The record gives a start of Nov 2008, a primary completion of Dec 2011 and a completion of Jun 2012. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
Results were first posted in Feb 2014, 2 years 2 months after primary completion.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.