CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00802373STARUpdated Sep 18, 2014

Solifenacin Succinate Versus Tolterodine 4mg Once Daily

A Phase 3 interventional study of Solifenacin succinate and Tolterodine in Urinary Bladder, Overactive, sponsored by Astellas Pharma Inc. Completed at 95 sites in 17 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-09-18.

Sponsored by Astellas Pharma Inc · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,355
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, 2-arm, parallel-group, design. Flexible dose regimen for solifenacin succinate, fixed dose treatment regimen for tolterodine. Assessment of OAB symptoms by patient diaries.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Bladder, Overactive

Keywords

  • Overactive Bladder
03

In context

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

855 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive; 125 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,355 is above the median of 72 across 652 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive.

Browse Urinary Bladder, Overactive studies →

Lead sponsor

Astellas Pharma Inc is the lead sponsor of 512 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Of its 27 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

At study entry:

  • Patient is willing and able to complete the micturition diary correctly
  • Symptoms of overactive bladder (including urinary frequency, urgency or urge incontinence) for >= 3 months

At randomization:

  • Patient must experience frequency of micturition on average >= 8 times per 24 hour period during the 3 day micturition diary period
  • Patient must experience at least one of the following symptoms during the 3 day micturition diary period:

    • At least 3 episodes of urinary incontinence or,
    • Patients must exhibit urgency at least 3 times

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

At study entry:

  • Pregnant women or women who intend to become pregnant during the study or women of childbearing potential who are sexually active and practising an unreliable method of birth control or will be lactating during the study. Reliable contraceptive methods are intra-uterine devices, contraceptive pills of combination type, hormonal implants and injectable contraceptives
  • Clinically significant outflow obstruction (at the discretion of the investigator)
  • Significant post void residual volume (PVR>200ml)
  • Significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor as determined by the investigator
  • Patient with a neurological cause for abnormal detrusor activity
  • Evidence of a symptomatic urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs
  • Uncontrolled narrow angle glaucoma, urinary or gastric retention or any other medical condition which in the opinion of the investigator makes the use of anticholinergics contra-indicated
  • Non drug treatment including electrostimulation therapy or start of a bladder training program during the 2 weeks prior to entry into, or during the study
  • Use of drugs intended to treat urinary incontinence
  • Diabetic neuropathy
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to solifenacin, tolterodine, other anticholinergics or lactose
  • Any clinically significant condition, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the patient unsuitable for the trial
  • Participation in any clinical trial within 30 (90 in the UK) days prior to randomisation
  • Employees of the Yamanouchi Group, third parties associated with the study, or the study site

At randomization:

  • Patient who did not complete the micturition diary according to the instructions
  • Total daily urine volume > 3000 ml as verified in the micturition diary
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
1,355 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    I

    Solifenacin succinate 5/10mg

    Drug: Solifenacin succinate

  • Experimental
    II

    Tolterodine 4mg

    Drug: Tolterodine

Interventions

  • DrugSolifenacin succinate

    oral

    Also known as: YM905, Vesicare

  • DrugTolterodine

    Oral

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in mean number of micturitions per 24 hours

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in mean urgency frequency per 24 hours

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  2. Change from baseline in mean number of incontinence and urge incontinence episodes per 24 hours

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  3. Change from baseline in mean volume voided per micturition

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  4. Change from baseline in number of pads used

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  5. Change from baseline in mean nocturia episodes per 24 hours

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  6. Percentage of patients requiring an increase in the dose of the study medication

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  7. Change from baseline in patient perception of bladder condition

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  8. Patient assessment of treatment benefit

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  9. Physician assessment of treatment benefit

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

07

Study locations

95 sites
  • Minsk, Belarus
  • Antwerp, Belgium
  • Brussels, Belgium
  • Gent, Belgium
  • Middleheim, Belgium
  • Brno, Czech Republic
  • Budejovice, Czech Republic
  • Bulovce, Czech Republic
  • Melnik, Czech Republic
  • Prague, Czech Republic
  • Aalborg, Denmark
  • Aarhus, Denmark
  • Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Glostrup, Denmark
  • Herlev, Denmark
  • Kolding, Denmark
  • Odense, Denmark
  • Angers, France
  • Bordeaux, France
  • Clermont-Ferrand, France
  • Lille, France
  • Nantes, France
  • Paris, France
  • Reims, France
  • Rouen, France
  • Saint Priest en Jarez, France
  • Toulouse, France
  • Bad Ems, Germany
  • Emmendingen, Germany
  • Frankfurt, Germany
  • Freiburg, Germany
  • Hagenow, Germany
  • Hamburg, Germany
  • Koblenz, Germany
  • Rheinfelden, Germany
  • Trier, Germany
  • Uetersen, Germany
  • Athens, Greece
  • Larisa, Greece
  • Patras, Greece
  • Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Budapest, Hungary
  • Nyiregyhaza, Hungary
  • Szolnok, Hungary
  • Tatabanya, Hungary
  • Montecchio Emilia, Italy
  • Novara, Italy
  • Orbassano, Italy
  • Rome, Italy
  • Sassari, Italy
  • Sesto San Giovanni, Italy
  • Varese, Italy
  • Verona, Italy
  • Apeldoorn, Netherlands
  • Ede, Netherlands
  • Eindhoven, Netherlands
  • Groningen, Netherlands
  • Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • Roermond, Netherlands
  • Tilburg, Netherlands
  • Zeist, Netherlands
  • Bodo, Norway
  • Haugesund, Norway
  • Rud, Norway
  • Tonsberg, Norway
  • Moscow, Russian Federation
  • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • Bratislava, Slovakia
  • Kosice, Slovakia
  • Martin, Slovakia
  • Presov, Slovakia
  • Skalica, Slovakia
  • Alicante, Spain
  • Bilbao, Spain
  • Burgos, Spain
  • Llobregat, Spain
  • Madrid, Spain
  • Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  • Sevilla, Spain
  • Valencia, Spain
  • Valladolid, Spain
  • Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Malmo, Sweden
  • Nykoping, Sweden
  • Stockholm, Sweden
  • Kiev, Ukraine
  • Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Harrow, United Kingdom
  • Leicester, United Kingdom
  • Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • London, United Kingdom
  • Plymouth, United Kingdom
  • Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • Stevenage, United Kingdom
  • Swansea, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chapple CR, Martinez-Garcia R, Selvaggi L, Toozs-Hobson P, Warnack W, Drogendijk T, Wright DM, Bolodeoku J; STAR study group. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of solifenacin succinate and extended release tolterodine at treating overactive bladder syndrome: results of the STAR trial. Eur Urol. 2005 Sep;48(3):464-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.05.015. PubMed 15990220 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00802373
Lead sponsor
Astellas Pharma Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 4, 2008
Start date
Jul 2003
Primary completion
Oct 2004
Completion
Oct 2004
Last update
Sep 18, 2014

Study contacts

Central Contact
study chair · Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion