CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00798096Updated Sep 19, 2016Results posted

Efficacy and Safety Study of Fostamatinib Disodium Tablets to Treat T-Cell Lymphoma

A Phase 2 interventional study of Fostamatinib Disodium in T Cell Lymphoma, sponsored by Rigel Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 10 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-19.

Sponsored by Rigel Pharmaceuticals · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients meeting specific inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled in two stages, 19 patients in Stage 1 and 36 patients in Stage 2. Stage 2 will enroll if 4 or more patients exhibit a response at Week 8 or later in the study. All enrolled patients will be treated with Fostamatinib Disodium until disease progression. Efficacy will be assessed by tumor measurements using CT and PET (when indicated) scans and physical exam at baseline, and scans and physical exam of all disease-involved areas every 8 weeks until progression. Safety will be assessed by periodic physical exams, clinical laboratory studies, and adverse events. All patients will have a follow-up visit 30 days following last study drug treatment. Blood samples for PK assessment will be obtained from all patients enrolled in Stage 1 at protocol defined intervals.

Read the detailed description

Up to 61 patients (male and female) meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled into this trial in two stages. All enrolled patients will be treated with R788 at 200 mg PO bid until disease progression. In the initial stage of the study, a total of 19 patients will be enrolled and treated with Fostamatinib Disodium. Should at least 4 patients exhibit a response at Week 8 or later of the study, the second stage of 36 patients will open to enrollment. Efficacy will be assessed by CT and PET scans (when indicated) and physical exam at baseline, and CT scans and physical exam of all disease-involved areas every 8 weeks until progression. Safety will be assessed by periodic physical exams, clinical laboratory studies, and adverse events. All patients will have a follow-up visit 30 days following last study drug treatment. Blood samples for PK assessment will be obtained from all patients enrolled in Stage 1 at protocol-defined intervals. Patients with accessible tumor tissue will be asked to undergo a biopsy for a fresh tissue sample for assessment of Syk activity in tumor tissue. Archived tissue samples from the initial diagnostic biopsy and the most recent biopsy for lymphoma will be obtained in the event a fresh tumor biopsy cannot be obtained. Patients who have accessible tumor tissue will be asked to consent to a second tumor biopsy at Week 8, to assess the impact of Fostamatinib Disodium treatment on the activity of Syk and its downstream markers. All baseline fresh or archived tumor tissue samples will undergo central pathology review to confirm the diagnosis of TCL.

02

Conditions studied

  • T Cell Lymphoma

Keywords

  • T Cell Lymphoma
  • Lymphoma
03

In context

Lymphoma

5,578 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphoma; 825 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 40 across 4,508 interventional studies indexed under Lymphoma.

Browse Lymphoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Rigel Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must give written informed consent to participate in this study by signing an IRB/EC-approved Informed Consent Form (ICF) prior to admission to this study.
  • Males and females, 18 years of age or older.
  • Patients must have histologically proven T-cell lymphoma (TCL).
  • Patients must have documented disease progression after receiving at least one prior therapeutic regimen and must be patients for whom no known curative therapy exists.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has a history of, or a concurrent, clinically significant illness, medical condition or laboratory abnormality that, in the investigator's opinion, could affect the conduct of the study.
  • Has a B-cell lymphoma, primary CNS lymphoma, or known lymphomatous involvement of the CNS, or any other NK/T-cell leukemia/lymphoma.
  • Has uncontrolled or poorly controlled hypertension.
  • Has had recent (within 1 month prior to Day 1) serious surgery or uncontrolled infectious disease.
  • Has any concurrent malignancy requiring treatment.
  • Has a known positive test for Hepatitis B surface Ag, Hepatitis C, or HIV.
  • Has laboratory abnormalities.
  • Has difficulty swallowing or malabsorption.
  • Has an ECOG performance status > 2.
  • Has not recovered from adverse effects related to last prior therapy for lymphoma.
  • Has had an allotransplantation within 90 days prior to Day 1 of treatment.
  • Has been treated with a CYP3A4 inducer/inhibitor within 3 days prior to Day 1 of treatment or is expected to require treatment with CYP3A4 inducer/inhibitor during the course of the study.
  • Has received systemic steroids at a dose greater than the equivalent of 10 mg/day of prednisone within 7 days prior to Day 1 of treatment.
  • Has received any other investigational therapy within 5 half-lives of the agent or 2 weeks of Day 1 of treatment, whichever is longer.
  • Is a female of childbearing potential unless menopausal, surgically sterile, or willing to use an effective method of birth control, (oral contraceptive, mechanical barrier, long-acting hormonal agent), during the study and for 30 days thereafter.
  • Is pregnant or lactating.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Drug: Fostamatinib Disodium

Interventions

  • DrugFostamatinib Disodium

    200 mg PO BID

    Also known as: Code Designation: R935788 Sodium Hexahydrate, USAN Name: Fostamatinib Disodium, CAS No.: 914295-16-2

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Primary Efficacy Endpoint for This Study is Overall Regressive Response Rate (ORRR): Proportion of Patients With a Best Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Regressive Stable Disease (RSD).

    Overall regressive response rate (ORRR) is the proportion of patients with a best response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) (per Cheson 2007), or Regressive Stable Disease (RSD) defined as regressive disease that does not meet the criteria for partial response.

    Time frame: Serial tumor assessments were taken at baseline (within 28 days of the start of treatment), and re-evaluated at Day 57, and every 8weeks therafter or to confirm response . (Maximum duration of treatment 182 days, Maximum duration of follow-up 217 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Benefit Rate is the Proportion of Patients With Best Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD).

    Clinical benefit rate is the proportion of patients with best response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD).

    Time frame: Serial tumor assessments were taken at baseline (within 28 days of the start of treatment), and re-evaluated at Day 57, and every 8weeks therafter or to confirm response . (Maximum duration of treatment 182 days, Maximum duration of follow-up 217 days)

  2. Overall Response Rate (ORR) is the Proportion of Patients With a Best Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR).

    Overall response rate (ORR) is the proportion of patients with a best response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR).

    Time frame: Serial tumor assessments were taken at baseline (within 28 days of the start of treatment), and re-evaluated at Day 57, and every 8weeks therafter or to confirm response . (Maximum duration of treatment 182 days, Maximum duration of follow-up 217 days)

  3. Duration of Overall Response is the Time From First Documentation of Complete or Partial Response, Whichever Occurs Earlier, to Discontinuation of Study Drug.

    Duration of Overall Response is the time from first documentation of Complete or Partial Response (Cheson 2007), whichever occurs earlier, to discontinuation of study drug.

    Time frame: Serial tumor assessments were taken at baseline (within 28 days of the start of treatment), and re-evaluated at Day 57, and every 8weeks therafter or to confirm response . (Maximum duration of treatment 182 days, Maximum duration of follow-up 217 days)

07

Results

Posted Jun 12, 2014
Limitations and caveats
This is a small, non-randomized study.

Participant flow

A total of 18 patients with T-Cell lymphoid malignancy were enrolled in this study from 05 March 2009 until 04 January 2010. As of 19 May 2010, no patients remain on study. All enrolled patients received at least one dose of fostamatinib. This study was conducted at 9 sites in the U.S. and Canada.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOverall Study
Started18
Completed16
Not completed2
Withdrew: Ongoing2

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Primary Efficacy Endpoint for This Study is Overall Regressive Response Rate (ORRR): Proportion of Patients With a Best Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Regressive Stable Disease (RSD).

Overall regressive response rate (ORRR) is the proportion of patients with a best response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) (per Cheson 2007), or Regressive Stable Disease (RSD) defined as regressive disease that does not meet the criteria for partial response.

Time frame:
Serial tumor assessments were taken at baseline (within 28 days of the start of treatment), and re-evaluated at Day 57, and every 8weeks therafter or to confirm response . (Maximum duration of treatment 182 days, Maximum duration of follow-up 217 days)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
The Primary Efficacy Endpoint for This Study is Overall Regressive Response Rate (ORRR): Proportion of Patients With a Best Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Regressive Stable Disease (RSD).
ParticipantsOverall Study
The Primary Efficacy Endpoint for This Study is Overall Regressive Response Rate (ORRR): Proportion of Patients With a Best Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Regressive Stable Disease (RSD).4
SecondaryClinical Benefit Rate is the Proportion of Patients With Best Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD).

Clinical benefit rate is the proportion of patients with best response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD).

Time frame:
Serial tumor assessments were taken at baseline (within 28 days of the start of treatment), and re-evaluated at Day 57, and every 8weeks therafter or to confirm response . (Maximum duration of treatment 182 days, Maximum duration of follow-up 217 days)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Clinical Benefit Rate is the Proportion of Patients With Best Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD).
ParticipantsOverall Study
Clinical Benefit Rate is the Proportion of Patients With Best Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD).5
SecondaryOverall Response Rate (ORR) is the Proportion of Patients With a Best Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR).

Overall response rate (ORR) is the proportion of patients with a best response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR).

Time frame:
Serial tumor assessments were taken at baseline (within 28 days of the start of treatment), and re-evaluated at Day 57, and every 8weeks therafter or to confirm response . (Maximum duration of treatment 182 days, Maximum duration of follow-up 217 days)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR) is the Proportion of Patients With a Best Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR).
ParticipantsOverall Study
Overall Response Rate (ORR) is the Proportion of Patients With a Best Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR).0
SecondaryDuration of Overall Response is the Time From First Documentation of Complete or Partial Response, Whichever Occurs Earlier, to Discontinuation of Study Drug.

Duration of Overall Response is the time from first documentation of Complete or Partial Response (Cheson 2007), whichever occurs earlier, to discontinuation of study drug.

Time frame:
Serial tumor assessments were taken at baseline (within 28 days of the start of treatment), and re-evaluated at Day 57, and every 8weeks therafter or to confirm response . (Maximum duration of treatment 182 days, Maximum duration of follow-up 217 days)
Reported as:
Median · Days
Duration of Overall Response is the Time From First Documentation of Complete or Partial Response, Whichever Occurs Earlier, to Discontinuation of Study Drug.
DaysOverall Study
Duration of Overall Response is the Time From First Documentation of Complete or Partial Response, Whichever Occurs Earlier, to Discontinuation of Study Drug.NA ± NA

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Overall Study—11/18 (61.1%)18/18 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent serious events
EventOverall Study
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders2/18
SepsisInfections and infestations2/18
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/18
Febrile NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/18
DysphagiaGastrointestinal disorders1/18
MelaenaGastrointestinal disorders1/18
PyrexiaGeneral disorders1/18
Hepatic FailureHepatobiliary disorders1/18
Lobar PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/18
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/18
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 133
Most frequent other events
EventOverall Study
FatigueGeneral disorders11/18
PyrexiaGeneral disorders8/18
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders7/18
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders7/18
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders7/18
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders7/18
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders7/18
ChillsGeneral disorders7/18
Aspartate Aminotransferase IncreasedInjury, poisoning and procedural complications6/18
White Blood Cell Count DecreasedInjury, poisoning and procedural complications5/18

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Overall Study
Mean68.5 ± 12
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Overall Study
Female8
Male10
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Overall Study
Asian2
White15
Other - Unknown1
08

Study locations

10 sites
  • Research Site
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
  • Research Site
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • Research Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Research Site
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Research Site
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Research Site
    Omaha, Nebraska 68198, United States
  • Research Site
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Research Site
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Research Site
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada
  • Research Site
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00798096
Lead sponsor
Rigel Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 25, 2008
Start date
Mar 2009
Primary completion
Apr 2010
Completion
Apr 2010
Results posted
Jun 12, 2014
Last update
Sep 19, 2016

Study contacts

Jeffrey Skolnik, MD
study director · AstraZeneca

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion