CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00786188Updated Oct 15, 2015Results posted

Eight-Week Efficacy & Safety Study of Brisdelle™ (Formerly Known as Mesafem) in the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms Associated With Menopause

A Phase 2 interventional study of Brisdelle (paroxetine mesylate) and Sugar pill in Hot Flashes, sponsored by Noven Therapeutics. Completed at 10 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 41 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-10-15.

Sponsored by Noven Therapeutics · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
102
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
41 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is an exploratory 8-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of Brisdelle (paroxetine mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mgin subjects with moderate to severe postmenopausal vasomotor symptoms (VMS), defined as follows:

  • Moderate VMS: Sensation of heat with sweating, able to continue activity
  • Severe VMS: Sensation of heat with sweating, causing cessation of activity
Read the detailed description

Eligible subjects will be entered into a 1-week observation period followed by a 1-week run-in period. Following completion of the run-in period, eligible subjects will be randomized to receive either Brisdelle (paroxetine mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Study drug will be administered once daily at bedtime. Symptom assessment questionnaires will be administered at baseline and at Day 28 and Day 57 visits.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hot Flashes

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Menopause
  • Vasomotor Symptoms
  • Hot flash
  • Perimenopause
  • Nonhormonal therapies
  • Climacteric symptoms
  • Mesafem
  • Low-Dose Mesylate salt of Paroxetine (LDMP)
03

In context

Hot Flashes

285 studies on the registry are indexed under Hot Flashes; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 102 is above the median of 90 across 255 interventional studies indexed under Hot Flashes.

Browse Hot Flashes studies →

Lead sponsor

Noven Therapeutics is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
41 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Female, >40 years of age
  2. Reported more than 7-8 moderate to severe hot flashes per day (average) or 50-60 moderate to severe hot flashes per week for at least 30 days prior
  3. Spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 12 consecutive months
  4. Amenorrhea for at least 6 months and meet the biochemical criteria for menopause
  5. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy >6 weeks with or without hysterectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of hypersensitivity or adverse reaction to paroxetine mesylate
  2. Use of an investigational study medication within 30 days prior to screening or during the study
  3. Concurrent participation in another clinical trial or previous participation in this trial
  4. Family of investigational-site staff
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
102 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Brisdelle (paroxetine mesylate)

    Eligible subjects will be randomized to receive Brisdelle (paroxetine mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg.

    Drug: Brisdelle (paroxetine mesylate)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo - Sugar Pill

    Eligible subjects will be randomized to receive a sugar pill.

    Drug: Sugar pill

Interventions

  • DrugBrisdelle (paroxetine mesylate)

    Eligible subjects will be randomized to receive Brisdelle™ (paroxetine mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg.

    Also known as: Former Names: Mesafem capsules 7.5 mg or, LDMP (Low-Dose Mesylate salt of Paroxetine)

  • DrugSugar pill

    Subjects will receive a sugar pill.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Frequency at Week 4 and Week 8

    The number of hot flashes reported in the result table are: * Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe VMS from baseline to Week 4 * Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe VMS from baseline to Week 8. They are both measured as hot flashes per week.

    Time frame: Week 4 and Week 8

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Severity at Week 4 and Week 8

    A scale was not used to measure severity scores. Severity scores of hot flashes were calculated for each subject. The following formula was used to calculate severity. SS = (2•Fm + 3•Fs) ÷ (Fm + Fs) Where: SS = severity score Fm = frequency of moderate hot flashes Fs = frequency of severe hot flashes The mean number of moderate and severe hot flashes that was recorded in the Run-In Period was used to calculate the baseline severity score.

    Time frame: Week 4 and Week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Climacteric Symptoms at Week 8

    The Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) was used for this measurement. The scale has 21 questions and measures symptoms in 4 areas; these are psychological (anxiety and depression), physical, vasomotor, and libido. The severity of the symptom was scored as: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Anxiety was determined by using the sum of scores 1 to 6, and depression was determined by using the sum of scores 7 to 11. Physical aspects were determined by using the sum of scores 12 to 18; vasomotor aspects were determined by using the sum of scores 19 to 20; and libido was determined by using the score for question 21. The total GCS score ranges from "0" to "63" which is the sum of all the scores for the 21-symptom assessment questions in this scale. Each subject's total GCS score at baseline and at Week 8 were used to calculate change from baseline in these symptoms. The change from baseline is reported below.

    Time frame: Week 8

  2. Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Composite Score at Week 4 and Week 8

    A scale was not used for this measurement. Composite scores of hot flashes were calculated by using the following formula: CS = (2 • Fm + 3 • Fs) Where: CS = composite score Fm = frequency of moderate hot flashes Fs = frequency of severe hot flashes The mean number of moderate and severe hot flashes recorded in the Run-In Period was used to calculate the baseline composite score.

    Time frame: Week 4 and Week 8

  3. Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Depression and Anxiety at Week 8

    Depression \& anxiety were measured using the Hospital Anxiety \& Depression Scale (HADS). The HADS is a scale developed to assess anxiety \& depression. The HADS Scale consists of 14 Questions (7 relating to anxiety; 7 relating to depression) with possible scores ranging from 0 to 21. The results presented below are the number of participants with abnormal HADS Scores for both Abnormal Anxiety \& Abnormal Depression combined at Week 8.

    Time frame: Week 8

  4. Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Mood at Week 4

    Mood was measured using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) Questionnaire. The Profile of Moods States (POMS) is a 65-item multi-dimensional measure that provides a method of assessing transient, fluctuating active mood states. Key areas that are measured include: tension-anxiety, anger-hostility, fatigue-inertia, depression-dejection, vigor-activity, confusion-bewilderment. Responses to questions are scored with the following numerical values: Not at all = 1, A little = 2, Moderate = 3, Quite a bit = 4, Extremely = 5. A total score for a domain was obtained by summing the responses of individual items in the domain. The total POMS score can range from "65" to "335." The percentage of participants who had a change from baseline in the total score at Week 4 is reported below.

    Time frame: Week 4

  5. Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Improvement of Hot Flash Interference at Week 4

    Interference of hot flashes was measured by using the Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS). The HFRDIS is a 10-item scale that measures the degree to which hot flashes interfere with 9 daily activities and the tenth item measures the degree to which hot flashes interfere with each of the other items. Subjects can score for each item on a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 = Do not interfere and a score of 10 = Completely interferes. The measure being reported below is percentage of responders who had an improvement in HFRDIS score at Week 4 compared to baseline. A responder is defined as a subject who had an improvement in the HFRDIS score. An improvement is define as a score ≤3 on each question.

    Time frame: Week 4

  6. Proportion of Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Responders at Week 4 and Week 8

    The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGIS) was completed by the investigator and was used to measure the severity of the VMS at any given time and the improvement from baseline. Responders were defined as subjects who achieved a score of 1 to 3 where 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, and 3 = minimally improved. Non-responders were defined as subjects who achieved a score of 4 to 7 where 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.

    Time frame: Week 4 and Week 8

  7. Asses the Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on the Interference on Sexual Functioning at Week 8

    The Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX) is a 5-item rating scale that quantifies sex drive, arousal, vaginal lubrication/penile erection, ability to reach orgasm, and satisfaction from orgasm. Possible total scores range from 5 to 30, with the higher scores indicating more sexual dysfunction. The sum of the scores for all 5 items was calculated.

    Time frame: Week 8

  8. Proportion of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) True Responders at Week 4 and Week 8

    The Subject Impression Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is an 11-point scale was used to measure how bothered a subject was by hot flashes both during the day and the night. The measure being reported below is percentage of responders who had an improvement in NRS score at Week 4 compared to baseline. A responder is defined as a subject who had an improvement in the NRS score. An improvement is define as a score ≤3 on each question.

    Time frame: Week 4 and Week 8

  9. Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on BMI at Week 4 and Week 8

    Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated by using height in centimeters and weight in kilograms.

    Time frame: Week 4 and Week 8

07

Results

Posted Mar 12, 2014

Participant flow

Recruitment Period = 29 October 2008 to 26 May 2009 Types of Locations = Research clinics

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBrisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mgPlacebo - Sugar Pill
Started5052
Completed4551
Not completed51
Withdrew: Adverse event31
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Frequency at Week 4 and Week 8

The number of hot flashes reported in the result table are: * Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe VMS from baseline to Week 4 * Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe VMS from baseline to Week 8. They are both measured as hot flashes per week.

Time frame:
Week 4 and Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · Hot flashes
Mean Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Frequency at Week 4 and Week 8
Hot flashesBrisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) CapsulesPlacebo - Sugar Pill
Baseline82.44 ± 3.1483.18 ± 3.67
Week 437.3 ± 3.1128.5 ± 3.30
Week 842.2 ± 3.2435.5 ± 3.13
Statistical analysis
  • Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules vs Placebo - Sugar Pill · Repeated measures analysis · p = 0.0177 (Week 4 frequency)
  • Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules vs Placebo - Sugar Pill · Reapeated measures analysis · p = 0.0541 (Week 8 frequency)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Severity at Week 4 and Week 8

A scale was not used to measure severity scores. Severity scores of hot flashes were calculated for each subject. The following formula was used to calculate severity. SS = (2•Fm + 3•Fs) ÷ (Fm + Fs) Where: SS = severity score Fm = frequency of moderate hot flashes Fs = frequency of severe hot flashes The mean number of moderate and severe hot flashes that was recorded in the Run-In Period was used to calculate the baseline severity score.

Time frame:
Week 4 and Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · Severity score
Mean Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Severity at Week 4 and Week 8
Severity scoreBrisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) CapsulesPlacebo - Sugar Pill
Baseline2.570 ± 0.0442.539 ± 0.035
Week 40.128 ± 0.0310.072 ± 0.024
Week 80.133 ± 0.0320.066 ± 0.026
Statistical analysis
  • Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules vs Placebo - Sugar Pill · Reapeated measures analysis · p = 0.0644 (Week 4 severity)
  • Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules vs Placebo - Sugar Pill · Reapeated measures analysis · p = 0.0364 (Week 8 severity)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Climacteric Symptoms at Week 8

The Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) was used for this measurement. The scale has 21 questions and measures symptoms in 4 areas; these are psychological (anxiety and depression), physical, vasomotor, and libido. The severity of the symptom was scored as: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Anxiety was determined by using the sum of scores 1 to 6, and depression was determined by using the sum of scores 7 to 11. Physical aspects were determined by using the sum of scores 12 to 18; vasomotor aspects were determined by using the sum of scores 19 to 20; and libido was determined by using the score for question 21. The total GCS score ranges from "0" to "63" which is the sum of all the scores for the 21-symptom assessment questions in this scale. Each subject's total GCS score at baseline and at Week 8 were used to calculate change from baseline in these symptoms. The change from baseline is reported below.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Climacteric Symptoms at Week 8
units on a scaleBrisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) CapsulesPlacebo - Sugar Pill
Baseline16.63 ± 1.5517.33 ± 1.32
Week 812.31 ± 9.2412.67 ± 6.90
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hot Flash Composite Score at Week 4 and Week 8

A scale was not used for this measurement. Composite scores of hot flashes were calculated by using the following formula: CS = (2 • Fm + 3 • Fs) Where: CS = composite score Fm = frequency of moderate hot flashes Fs = frequency of severe hot flashes The mean number of moderate and severe hot flashes recorded in the Run-In Period was used to calculate the baseline composite score.

Time frame:
Week 4 and Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · Composite score
Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Composite Score at Week 4 and Week 8
Composite scoreBrisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) CapsulesPlacebo - Sugar Pill
Baseline211.9 ± 8.85213.0 ± 11.34
Week 4114.7 ± 8.43136.4 ± 9.01
Week 8102.6 ± 8.82119.2 ± 8.47
SecondaryEffect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Depression and Anxiety at Week 8

Depression \& anxiety were measured using the Hospital Anxiety \& Depression Scale (HADS). The HADS is a scale developed to assess anxiety \& depression. The HADS Scale consists of 14 Questions (7 relating to anxiety; 7 relating to depression) with possible scores ranging from 0 to 21. The results presented below are the number of participants with abnormal HADS Scores for both Abnormal Anxiety \& Abnormal Depression combined at Week 8.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Number · participants
Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Depression and Anxiety at Week 8
participantsBrisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) CapsulesPlacebo - Sugar Pill
Baseline21
Week 401
Week 801
SecondaryEffect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Mood at Week 4

Mood was measured using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) Questionnaire. The Profile of Moods States (POMS) is a 65-item multi-dimensional measure that provides a method of assessing transient, fluctuating active mood states. Key areas that are measured include: tension-anxiety, anger-hostility, fatigue-inertia, depression-dejection, vigor-activity, confusion-bewilderment. Responses to questions are scored with the following numerical values: Not at all = 1, A little = 2, Moderate = 3, Quite a bit = 4, Extremely = 5. A total score for a domain was obtained by summing the responses of individual items in the domain. The total POMS score can range from "65" to "335." The percentage of participants who had a change from baseline in the total score at Week 4 is reported below.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Mood at Week 4
percentage of participantsBrisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) CapsulesPlacebo - Sugar Pill
Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Mood at Week 42118
SecondaryEffect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Improvement of Hot Flash Interference at Week 4

Interference of hot flashes was measured by using the Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS). The HFRDIS is a 10-item scale that measures the degree to which hot flashes interfere with 9 daily activities and the tenth item measures the degree to which hot flashes interfere with each of the other items. Subjects can score for each item on a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 = Do not interfere and a score of 10 = Completely interferes. The measure being reported below is percentage of responders who had an improvement in HFRDIS score at Week 4 compared to baseline. A responder is defined as a subject who had an improvement in the HFRDIS score. An improvement is define as a score ≤3 on each question.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of responders
Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Improvement of Hot Flash Interference at Week 4
percentage of respondersBrisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) CapsulesPlacebo - Sugar Pill
Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Improvement of Hot Flash Interference at Week 41211
SecondaryProportion of Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Responders at Week 4 and Week 8

The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGIS) was completed by the investigator and was used to measure the severity of the VMS at any given time and the improvement from baseline. Responders were defined as subjects who achieved a score of 1 to 3 where 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, and 3 = minimally improved. Non-responders were defined as subjects who achieved a score of 4 to 7 where 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.

Time frame:
Week 4 and Week 8
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Proportion of Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Responders at Week 4 and Week 8
Percentage of participantsBrisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) CapsulesPlacebo - Sugar Pill
Week 473.9160.00
Week 864.5854.90
SecondaryAsses the Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on the Interference on Sexual Functioning at Week 8

The Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX) is a 5-item rating scale that quantifies sex drive, arousal, vaginal lubrication/penile erection, ability to reach orgasm, and satisfaction from orgasm. Possible total scores range from 5 to 30, with the higher scores indicating more sexual dysfunction. The sum of the scores for all 5 items was calculated.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Asses the Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on the Interference on Sexual Functioning at Week 8
units on a scaleBrisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) CapsulesPlacebo - Sugar Pill
Baseline17.98 ± 0.6717.33 ± 0.72
Week 818.00 ± 0.9018.15 ± 1.44
SecondaryProportion of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) True Responders at Week 4 and Week 8

The Subject Impression Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is an 11-point scale was used to measure how bothered a subject was by hot flashes both during the day and the night. The measure being reported below is percentage of responders who had an improvement in NRS score at Week 4 compared to baseline. A responder is defined as a subject who had an improvement in the NRS score. An improvement is define as a score ≤3 on each question.

Time frame:
Week 4 and Week 8
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of true responders
Proportion of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) True Responders at Week 4 and Week 8
Percentage of true respondersBrisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) CapsulesPlacebo - Sugar Pill
Week 433.3316.67
Week 837.1421.95
SecondaryEffect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on BMI at Week 4 and Week 8

Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated by using height in centimeters and weight in kilograms.

Time frame:
Week 4 and Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · BMI Kg/m2
Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on BMI at Week 4 and Week 8
BMI Kg/m2Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) CapsulesPlacebo - Sugar Pill
Baseline27.85 ± 1.027.69 ± 0.081
Week 428.14 ± 1.0127.91 ± 0.84
Week 827.73 ± 0.9928.04 ± 0.82

Adverse events

Collected over 56 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg—0/49 (0%)26/49 (53.1%)
Placebo - Sugar Pill—1/52 (1.9%)26/52 (50%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventBrisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mgPlacebo - Sugar Pill
ColitisGastrointestinal disorders0/491/52
Clostridium difficile colitisInfections and infestations0/491/52
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventBrisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mgPlacebo - Sugar Pill
HeadacheNervous system disorders6/495/52
FatigueGeneral disorders4/492/52
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations4/494/52
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations3/494/52
AnxietyPsychiatric disorders3/490/52
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/491/52
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/491/52
DepressionPsychiatric disorders2/491/52
SinusitisInfections and infestations0/492/52
MyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/492/52

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mgPlacebo - Sugar PillTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years464995
>=65 years437
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mgPlacebo - Sugar PillTotal
Mean56 ± 55.855.0 ± 54.655.0 ± 55.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mgPlacebo - Sugar PillTotal
Female5052102
Male000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mgPlacebo - Sugar PillTotal
United States5052102
08

Study locations

10 sites
  • Altus Research
    Lake Worth, Florida 33461, United States
  • Anchor Research Center
    Naples, Florida 34102, United States
  • Hawthorne Research
    Greensboro, North Carolina 27408, United States
  • Hawthorne Medical Research, Inc.
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • Philadelphia Clinical Research
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19114, United States
  • Chattanooga Medical Research, LLC
    Chattanooga, Tennessee 37404, United States
  • Virginia Women's Center
    Richmond, Virginia 23233, United States
  • National Clinical Research, Inc.
    Richmond, Virginia 23294, United States
  • Women's Clinical Research Center
    Seattle, Washington 98105, United States
  • North Spokane Women's Clinic Research
    Spokane, Washington 99207, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Fugate SE, Church CO. Nonestrogen treatment modalities for vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Sep;38(9):1482-99. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D610. Epub 2004 Aug 3. PubMed 15292498 ↗
  • Kritz-Silverstein D, Goldani Von Muhlen D, Barrett-Connor E. Prevalence and clustering of menopausal symptoms in older women by hysterectomy and oophorectomy status. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000 Sep;9(7):747-55. doi: 10.1089/15246090050147727. PubMed 11025867 ↗
  • Nelson HD, Vesco KK, Haney E, Fu R, Nedrow A, Miller J, Nicolaidis C, Walker M, Humphrey L. Nonhormonal therapies for menopausal hot flashes: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006 May 3;295(17):2057-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.17.2057. PubMed 16670414 ↗
  • Greene JG. A factor analytic study of climacteric symptoms. J Psychosom Res. 1976;20(5):425-30. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(76)90005-2. No abstract available. PubMed 1003364 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 15, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00786188
Lead sponsor
Noven Therapeutics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 6, 2008
Start date
Nov 2008
Primary completion
Jun 2009
Completion
Jun 2009
Results posted
Mar 12, 2014
Last update
Oct 15, 2015

Study contacts

Patrick F. Freuen, MD
principal investigator · North Spokane Women's Clinic, Spokane, WA 99207
Richard E. Hedrick, MD
principal investigator · Hawthorne Medical Research, Inc., Winston-Salem, NC 27103
Samuel N. Lederman, MD
principal investigator · Altus Research, Lake Worth, FL 33461
Larry S. Seidman, DO
principal investigator · Philadelphia Clinical Research, LLC, Philadelphia, PA 19114
James E. Tomblin, MD
principal investigator · Hawthorne Medical Research, Inc., Greensboro, NC 27408
Peter A. Zedler, MD
principal investigator · Virginia Women's Center, Richmond, VA 23233
D. S. Harnsberger, MD
principal investigator · Chattanooga Medical Research, LLC, Chattanooga, TN 37404
John A. Hoekstra, MD
principal investigator · National Clinical Research, Inc., Richmond, VA 23294
Robin Kroll, MD
principal investigator · Women's Clinical Research Center, Seattle, WA 98105
Ashley Tunkle, MD
principal investigator · Anchor Research Center, Naples, FL 34102

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion