CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00761345Updated Mar 7, 2017Results posted

Study of Low-Dose Fractionated Radiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

A Phase 1 interventional study of gemcitabine and Erlotinib in Pancreatic Carcinoma Non-resectable and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer, sponsored by Fox Chase Cancer Center. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-07.

Sponsored by Fox Chase Cancer Center · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
27
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

People with pancreatic cancer usually have a large amount of the cancer in the area of the pancreas and around it when they are diagnosed with it. Or their cancer has spread (metastasized)outside that area of the abdomen and is not able to be surgically removed (resected). For patients with metastatic disease, one standard treatment is the combination of gemcitabine and erlotinib. This combination has shown slightly longer survival compared to getting gemcitabine alone. For patients with localized but unresectable disease, the standard treatment remains controversial. Early studies showed that chemotherapy and radiation together was better than either one used alone. The greatest benefit of external beam radiotherapy may be after a period of full-dose chemotherapy alone, to help the rapid spread. A problem of beginning treatment with standard radiotherapy is that the doses of chemotherapy usually have to be reduced sometimes by half.

Studies have already shown that low dose radiotherapy (LDRT)is safe. This study will evaluate the safety of LDRT instead of standard doses with full dosing of gemcitabine and erlotinib in patients with locally advanced or limited metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients will be enrolled in groups of 3 to 6 each with a slightly higher dose of LDRT and erlotinib.

For patients with locally advanced disease, this protocol also may help because most patients develop and die from spread to the liver and abdominal cavity.

Read the detailed description

Pancreatic cancer is nearly universally fatal, with approximately 38,000 new cases and 34,000 deaths expected in 2008.1 The majority of patients present with disease that is not amenable to curative resection. For patients with metastatic disease, one standard treatment is the combination of gemcitabine with the small molecule epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib. This combination results in a modest survival benefit compared to single agent gemcitabine.2

For patients presenting with localized but unresectable disease, the standard treatment remains controversial. Early studies demonstrated that chemotherapy and radiation was superior to either modality alone.3 However, recent studies of systemic therapy alone have typically included a small but real minority of patients with locally advanced disease, supporting that systemic therapy alone is a reasonable treatment option.2 Adding to the confusion are recent European reports that systemic therapy alone may be superior to combined modality therapy, at least when used initially.4 The greatest benefit of external beam radiotherapy may be after a period of full-dose chemotherapy alone, to ensure that rapid metastases do not develop.5 A limitation of beginning treatment with conventional external beam radiotherapy is a requirement to reduce dosing of gemcitabine by 40-50%. Given the safety and preclinical rationale for LDRT, we propose this phase I study to evaluate the safety of LDRT with standard dosing of gemcitabine and erlotinib in patients with locally advanced or limited metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients will be enrolled in cohorts with escalating doses of low dose radiotherapy. Radiation ports will be uniform between patients as described in Section 5.6 below. As LDRT is administered to sites of disease in liver and abdominal cavity to iliac crest, patients with metastatic disease confined to these areas will be eligible. For patients with locally advanced disease, this protocol also has high rationale, as the overwhelming majority of patients develop and succumb to recurrences in liver and abdominal cavity,10 areas which would be covered by the proposed radiation field. The dose of 2880 cGy is the limit because of kidney and other upper abdominal organ potential for toxicity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Carcinoma Non-resectable
  • Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Keywords

  • pancreatic cancer
  • locally advanced
  • unresectable
  • metastatic pancreatic cancer
03

In context

Pancreatic Neoplasms

3,235 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms; 899 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 27 is below the median of 46 across 2,424 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms.

Browse Pancreatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Fox Chase Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 211 studies on the registry; 30 are open to participants now.

Of its 15 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (53%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must have a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas that is not amenable to curative surgical resection. Patients with locally advanced unresectable disease and those patients with metastatic disease that can be encompassed in the radiation fields for this study (as assessed by treating radiation oncologist) are eligible.
  • Patients may not have received any prior chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Prior adjuvant chemotherapy completed >1 year previously is allowed.
  • Patients must be able to provide informed consent and HIPAA consent.
  • Patients must be ≥18 years of age
  • Adequate hematologic and organ function:

    • ANC ≥ 1,000/μL, platelets ≥ 100,000/μL, hemoglobin ≥ 9.0/dL
    • Bilirubin: ≤1.5X ULN
    • ALT/AST \< 3.0 X upper limit of normal
    • Serum Creatinine: WNL
    • Albumin > 2.5 g/dL
  • Measurable and non-measurable disease are permitted
  • ECOG performance status 0-1
  • Patients must be able to swallow oral medications
  • Patients must be able to comply with study and follow up procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No prior radiation therapy to the abdomen.
  • Patients must not have any other active illness (e.g. active/uncontrolled infection, uncontrolled cardiac disease, etc.) that would preclude safe therapy in the judgment of the treating physicians. Patients may be enrolled while still on antibiotics as long as clinical signs of active infection are absent.
  • Patients with concurrent active malignancy requiring therapy are not eligible. Patients with a history of malignancy within any timeframe not requiring ongoing therapy are eligible.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
27 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    radiotherapy and chemotherapy

    gemcitabine will be administered at 1000mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 of each 21 day cycle. erlotinib at either 100mg (cohort 1-3) or 150mg (cohort 4) PO daily. Low dose fractionated radiotherapy (LDRT) will be given BID on days 1 and 2 and 8 and 9 of each 21 day cycle

    Drug: gemcitabine · Drug: Erlotinib · Radiation: low dose fractionated radiotherapy

Interventions

  • Druggemcitabine

    gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 days 1 and 8 of each 21 day cycle.

    Also known as: Gemzar

  • DrugErlotinib

    Erlotinib 100mg or 150mg daily of each 21 day cycle

    Also known as: Tarceva

  • Radiationlow dose fractionated radiotherapy

    low dose fractionated radiotherapy day 1 and 2, day 8 and 9 of each 21 day cycle

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To Determine the Dose Limiting Toxicities

    Time frame: weekly physician and nurse assessment and in between as needed until 30 days after treatment termination

Secondary outcomes

  1. To Measure Progression Free Survival and Overall Survival

    Time frame: Evaluate CT scans after every 2 cycles of therapy (about every 6 weeks) and long term follow up every 3 months once off treatment for survival

07

Results

Posted Mar 31, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRadiotherapy and Chemotherapy
Started27
Completed24
Not completed3

Outcome measures

PrimaryTo Determine the Dose Limiting Toxicities
Time frame:
weekly physician and nurse assessment and in between as needed until 30 days after treatment termination
Reported as:
Number · participants
To Determine the Dose Limiting Toxicities
participantsRadiotherapy and Chemotherapy
To Determine the Dose Limiting Toxicities27
SecondaryTo Measure Progression Free Survival and Overall Survival
Time frame:
Evaluate CT scans after every 2 cycles of therapy (about every 6 weeks) and long term follow up every 3 months once off treatment for survival

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over 3.5 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy—15/27 (55.6%)27/27 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventRadiotherapy and Chemotherapy
PneumoniaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/27
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders4/27
IleusGastrointestinal disorders2/27
DVTVascular disorders2/27
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders2/27
GI bleedGastrointestinal disorders1/27
Biliary obstructionHepatobiliary disorders1/27
Perforated viscousGastrointestinal disorders1/27
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 70
Most frequent other events
EventRadiotherapy and Chemotherapy
FatigueGeneral disorders26/27
hemoglobinBlood and lymphatic system disorders25/27
HypoalbuminemiaInvestigations23/27
WBCBlood and lymphatic system disorders22/27
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders22/27
AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders21/27
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders20/27
PlateletsBlood and lymphatic system disorders19/27
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders18/27
HyperglycemiaInvestigations18/27

Baseline characteristics

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer confined to the abdomen and an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0-1 who had received 0-1 prior regimens (without Gemcitabine or Erlotinib) and no prior radiotherapy were eligible

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years16
>=65 years11
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy
Female12
Male15
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy
United States27
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Karmanos Cancer Institue
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, United States
  • Reading Medical Center
    West Reading, Pennsylvania 19611, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 7, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00761345
Lead sponsor
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 29, 2008
Start date
Sep 2008
Primary completion
Jul 2014
Completion
Feb 2015
Results posted
Mar 31, 2016
Last update
Mar 7, 2017

Study contacts

Steven Cohen, MD
principal investigator · Fox Chase Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion