ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT00758888Updated Jul 24, 2009

Effect of Orthopedic Blocking on Cervical Spine Flexion and Extension Strength

An interventional study of Orthopedic Blocking and Trochanter Belt in Sacroiliac Function, sponsored by Logan College of Chiropractic. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-07-24.

Sponsored by Logan College of Chiropractic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2008), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A few studies concerning the effects of joint manipulation have shown muscle responses distal to the site of manipulation. The purpose of this study is to determine if pelvic orthopedic blocking, a low force method of manipulating the sacroiliac joint, can have produce changes to cervical spine function.

Read the detailed description

All mechanoreceptor types are found in diarthrodial joints. Mechanoreceptor afferents have reflexive connections to motor neurons. Stimulation of muscle and joint afferents are known to produce reflexive muscle changes. Orthopedic blocking applies a gentle compression to the sacroiliac joints. The current study seeks to determine if orthopedic blocking of the sacroiliac joint can affect cervical spine function thereby serving as a useful adjunctive procedure in the treatment of cervical spine joint dysfunction. The current study will compare pre \& post treatment cervical isometric strength readings from an orthopedic blocking group, a trochanter belt group (another type of compression), and a sham group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sacroiliac Function
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Logan College of Chiropractic is the lead sponsor of 50 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Logan faculty, students, or staff 18-30 years of age with a leg-length inequality of 5mm or more.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fractures
  • Tumors
  • Myopathies
  • Consumption of prescription drugs that affect nervous system function
  • Recent cervical spine injuries or surgeries
  • Cervical pain
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment

    Place the blocks under the pelvis for 2 minutes

    Procedure: Orthopedic Blocking

  • Active comparator
    Trochanter Belt

    Participant is fitted with trochanter belt on the adjusting table and wear it while Investigator checks their flexion and extension strength.

    Procedure: Trochanter Belt

  • Sham comparator
    Sham

    Participant lies on adjusting table, blocks are placed in a similar configuration but distant to actual points of leverage.

    Other: Blocking Sham

Interventions

  • ProcedureOrthopedic Blocking

    Place the blocks under the pelvis for 2 minutes

  • ProcedureTrochanter Belt

    Participant is fitted with trochanter belt on the adjusting table and wear it while Investigator checks their flexion and extension strength.

  • OtherBlocking Sham

    Participant lies on adjusting table, blocks are placed in a similar configuration but distant to actual points of leverage.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cervical Isometric Strength

    Time frame: Pre and post treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Logan College of Chiropractic
    Chesterfield, Missouri 63006, United States
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Sep 2008, a primary completion of Oct 2008 and a completion of Oct 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 23, 2008
First posted
Sep 25, 2008
Start
Sep 2008
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2008
CompletionEst.
Oct 2008
Last update
Jul 24, 2009
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00758888
Lead sponsor
Logan College of Chiropractic
First posted
Sep 25, 2008
Start date
Sep 2008
Primary completion
Oct 2008 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2008 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 24, 2009

Study contacts

Kristan Giggey, DC
Contact
Kristan.Giggey@logan.edu
636-230-1942 ext. 1942

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion