CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00758485Updated Aug 21, 2015Results posted

Comparing 4.0 mg.Kg-1 Sugammadex With Placebo in the Reversal of Profound Neuromuscular Blockade (P05767)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Sugammadex and 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) in Anesthesia and Neuromuscular Blockade, sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-08-21.

Sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The current trial was designed to demonstrate faster recovery in participants undergoing elective surgeries requiring profound neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium to a fourth twitch/first twitch (T4/T1) ratio of 0.9, after reversal of a target depth of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) of 1-2 Post Tetanic Count (PTC) by 4.0 mg.kg-1 Sugammadex compared to Placebo, to evaluate the safety of 4.0 mg.kg-1 Sugammadex and to evaluate the Operating Room (OR) and Post Anesthetic Care Unit (PACU) length of stay for these participants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia
  • Neuromuscular Blockade
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC is the lead sponsor of 2,114 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 489 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 362 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female participants
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 1, 2 or 3
  • Age >=18 years
  • Scheduled to undergo a surgery requiring profound NMB such as cardiovascular, gynaecologic, neurologic and thoracic surgical procedures under general anesthesia requiring neuromuscular relaxation with rocuronium for endotracheal intubation and if applicable maintenance of NMB in a position allowing neuromuscular monitoring
  • Given written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants known or suspected to have neuromuscular disorders affecting NMB
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
140 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    sugammadex

    Participants receiving 4.0 mg.kg-1 Sugammadex at a target depth of NMB of 1-2 PTC after the last dose of rocuronium

    Drug: Sugammadex

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants receiving Placebo (0.9% NaCl) at a target depth of NMB of 1-2 PTC after the last dose of rocuronium

    Drug: 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl)

Interventions

  • DrugSugammadex

    At a target depth of NMB of 1-2 PTC after the last dose of rocuronium, a bolus dose of 4.0 mg.kg-1 sugammadex (volume based on the actual body weight of the participant) will be administered, within 10 seconds into a fast running venous infusion.

    Also known as: Org 25969, SCH 900616, MK-8616, Bridion®

  • Drug0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl)

    At a target depth of NMB of 1-2 PTC after the last dose of rocuronium, a bolus dose of placebo (0.9% NaCl, volume based on the actual body weight of the participant) will be administered, within 10 seconds into a fast running venous infusion.

    Also known as: Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time From Start of Administration of Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP, Sugammadex or Placebo) to Recovery of the Fourth Twitch/First Twitch (T4/T1) Ratio to 0.9

    Neuromuscular functioning was monitored by applying repetitive Train-Of-Four (TOF) electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds \& assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. T1 and T4 refer to the magnitudes (height) of the first and fourth twitches, respectively, after TOF nerve stimulation. The T4/T1 Ratio (a percentage that is expressed as a decimal of up to 1.0) indicates the extent of recovery from neuromuscular blockade (NMB), with a higher ratio indicating a greater recovery from NMB. In this study, twitch responses were recorded until the T4/T1 Ratio reached \>=0.9, the minimum acceptable ratio that indicated complete recovery from NMB. A shorter time to recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio \>=0.9 indicates a faster recovery from NMB.

    Time frame: From Start of IMP Administration to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.9 (estimated from ~2 minutes up to ~90 minutes)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time From Start of Administration of IMP to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.7

    Neuromuscular functioning was monitored by applying repetitive TOF electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds \& assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. T1 and T4 refer to the magnitudes (height) of the first and fourth twitches, respectively, after TOF nerve stimulation. The T4/T1 Ratio (a percentage that is expressed as a decimal of up to 1.0) indicates the extent of recovery from NMB, with a higher ratio indicating a greater recovery from NMB.

    Time frame: From Start of IMP Administration to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.7 (estimated from ~1 minute up to ~70 minutes)

  2. Time From Start of Administration of IMP to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.8

    Neuromuscular functioning was monitored by applying repetitive TOF electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds \& assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. T1 and T4 refer to the magnitudes (height) of the first and fourth twitches, respectively, after TOF nerve stimulation. The T4/T1 Ratio (a percentage that is expressed as a decimal of up to 1.0) indicates the extent of recovery from NMB, with a higher ratio indicating a greater recovery from NMB.

    Time frame: From Start of IMP Administration to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.8 (estimated from ~2 minutes up to ~80 minutes)

07

Results

Posted Apr 22, 2013

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from 10 sites in Germany from November 2008 to May 2009.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSugammadexPlacebo
Started7070
Treated6968
Completed6967
Not completed13
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Withdrew: Not treated12

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime From Start of Administration of Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP, Sugammadex or Placebo) to Recovery of the Fourth Twitch/First Twitch (T4/T1) Ratio to 0.9

Neuromuscular functioning was monitored by applying repetitive Train-Of-Four (TOF) electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds \& assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. T1 and T4 refer to the magnitudes (height) of the first and fourth twitches, respectively, after TOF nerve stimulation. The T4/T1 Ratio (a percentage that is expressed as a decimal of up to 1.0) indicates the extent of recovery from neuromuscular blockade (NMB), with a higher ratio indicating a greater recovery from NMB. In this study, twitch responses were recorded until the T4/T1 Ratio reached \>=0.9, the minimum acceptable ratio that indicated complete recovery from NMB. A shorter time to recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio \>=0.9 indicates a faster recovery from NMB.

Time frame:
From Start of IMP Administration to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.9 (estimated from ~2 minutes up to ~90 minutes)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · minutes
Time From Start of Administration of Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP, Sugammadex or Placebo) to Recovery of the Fourth Twitch/First Twitch (T4/T1) Ratio to 0.9
minutesSugammadexPlacebo
Time From Start of Administration of Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP, Sugammadex or Placebo) to Recovery of the Fourth Twitch/First Twitch (T4/T1) Ratio to 0.92.2 (1.9 to 2.5)89.8 (80.1 to 100.7)
SecondaryTime From Start of Administration of IMP to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.7

Neuromuscular functioning was monitored by applying repetitive TOF electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds \& assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. T1 and T4 refer to the magnitudes (height) of the first and fourth twitches, respectively, after TOF nerve stimulation. The T4/T1 Ratio (a percentage that is expressed as a decimal of up to 1.0) indicates the extent of recovery from NMB, with a higher ratio indicating a greater recovery from NMB.

Time frame:
From Start of IMP Administration to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.7 (estimated from ~1 minute up to ~70 minutes)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · minutes
Time From Start of Administration of IMP to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.7
minutesSugammadexPlacebo
Time From Start of Administration of IMP to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.71.6 (1.4 to 1.8)70.1 (62.7 to 78.4)
SecondaryTime From Start of Administration of IMP to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.8

Neuromuscular functioning was monitored by applying repetitive TOF electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds \& assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. T1 and T4 refer to the magnitudes (height) of the first and fourth twitches, respectively, after TOF nerve stimulation. The T4/T1 Ratio (a percentage that is expressed as a decimal of up to 1.0) indicates the extent of recovery from NMB, with a higher ratio indicating a greater recovery from NMB.

Time frame:
From Start of IMP Administration to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.8 (estimated from ~2 minutes up to ~80 minutes)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · minutes
Time From Start of Administration of IMP to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.8
minutesSugammadexPlacebo
Time From Start of Administration of IMP to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.81.8 (1.6 to 2.0)78.8 (70.2 to 88.5)

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 7 days after administration of IMP. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sugammadex—4/69 (5.8%)44/69 (63.8%)
Placebo—4/68 (5.9%)48/68 (70.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSugammadexPlacebo
Post Procedural ComplicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/691/68
Post Procedural HaemorrhageInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/691/68
Diverticular PerforationGastrointestinal disorders0/691/68
Skin LacerationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/691/68
Alcohol Withdrawal SyndromePsychiatric disorders1/690/68
LymphoceleVascular disorders1/690/68
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent other events
EventSugammadexPlacebo
Procedural PainInjury, poisoning and procedural complications29/6932/68
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders9/6911/68
Wound ComplicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications11/6910/68
FlatulenceGastrointestinal disorders4/697/68
HeadacheNervous system disorders7/695/68
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders6/694/68
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders5/695/68
DizzinessNervous system disorders1/695/68
PyrexiaGeneral disorders4/694/68
Procedural NauseaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/694/68

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)SugammadexPlaceboTotal
Mean57 ± 1757 ± 1457 ± 16
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)SugammadexPlaceboTotal
Female212546
Male484391
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Rahe-Meyer N, Berger C, Wittmann M, Solomon C, Abels EA, Rietbergen H, Reuter DA. Recovery from prolonged deep rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade: A randomized comparison of sugammadex reversal with spontaneous recovery. Anaesthesist. 2015 Jul;64(7):506-12. doi: 10.1007/s00101-015-0048-0. Epub 2015 Jul 1. PubMed 26126940 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00758485
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 25, 2008
Start date
Oct 2008
Primary completion
May 2009
Completion
Jun 2009
Results posted
Apr 22, 2013
Last update
Aug 21, 2015

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion