CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00754247Updated Jul 10, 2019Results posted

A Randomized Comparative Study Evaluating the Tolerability and Efficacy of Two Topical Therapies for the Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars

A Phase 4 interventional study of 0.5% hydrocortisone, silicone, vitamin E lotion and Onion extract gel in Keloid, Hypertrophic Scar and Cicatrix, Hypertrophic, sponsored by University of Miami. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-10.

Sponsored by University of Miami · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Keloids are thought to result from derailments in the typical wound healing process following cutaneous injury. Current treatment options for keloids include intralesional corticosteroids, silicone gel sheeting, compression, surgery and adjuvants to surgery, including radiation and cryotherapy.

0.5% hydrocortisone, silicone, vitamin E lotion (HSE) and onion extract gel (OE) are widely used over-the-counter medications for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. However, their efficacy and safety have not been compared in a blinded, placebo-controlled, prospective fashion. This study is being undertaken to determine the efficacy and safety of HSE versus OE versus placebo (Cetearyl alcohol; CEA) in subjects with hypertrophic scars and keloids.

This is an investigator-blinded study, which means that the doctor evaluating you will not know if you are receiving the study medication or not. Another doctor will be supplying you with the medication and discussing any problems that you may have with the medication.

You will be assigned to one of the three treatment groups: HSE, OE, or CEA. The group will be assigned by chance and you will have two in three chances of receiving treatment with a study medication, HSE or OE. The no treatment group will receive CEA, a bland lotion, containing no active ingredients such as steroids, silicone, vitamin E, or onion extract.

Read the detailed description

This study will last up to 16 weeks, with a total of 5 visits to the clinic (Baseline visit, Week 4, 8, 12, and 16 ), excluding the Screening Visit.

Screening Visit/Baseline Visit:

Patients will read and be explained the informed consent. Patients who agree to participate will sign the informed consent and a copy will be given to them. Medical history and exclusion/inclusion criteria will be reviewed; if a patient qualifies he/she will be assigned a randomization number for the treatment.

At the baseline visit, medical history and exclusion/inclusion criteria since the screening visit will be reviewed. Patients randomized to the HSE group will receive one tube and apply the first application to the keloid/hypertrophic scar during the baseline visit. Patients randomized to the OE group will be given a tube of OE gel and will apply the first application to the keloid/hypertrophic scar. Patients in the placebo group will be given a bottle of CEA lotion, the placebo medication, and will apply the first application to the keloid/hypertrophic scar. The medications will be given by the unblinded investigator and the blinded investigator will be evaluating the patients. Photographs of the patient's keloid/hypertrophic scar will be taken, and the keloid/hypertrophic scar will be measured/assessed according to Methods of Study Lesion Assessment (below). A urine pregnancy test will be obtained for all women of child-bearing potential.

Week 4, 8, 12, and 16 Visit:

Patients will be asked about side effects since last visit. Photographs of the patient's keloid/hypertrophic scar will be taken and the keloid/hypertrophic scar will be measured/assessed according to Methods of Study Lesion Assessment (below). A urine pregnancy test will be obtained at for all women of child-bearing potential.

Methods of Study Lesion Assessment

A. Volume B. Linear dimensions

Investigator's Assessments w/ Visual Analog Scale (VAS):

C. Cosmetic assessment D. Induration (hardness) [compared to standardized hard discs with numerical ranking of increased induration] E. Erythema (redness) F. Pigmentary alteration

Patient's Assessments w/ VAS:

G. Cosmetic assessment H. Pain I. Tenderness J. Pruritus (itching) K. Patient satisfaction

L. Digital photographs

02

Conditions studied

  • Keloid
  • Hypertrophic Scar
  • Cicatrix, Hypertrophic

Keywords

  • Keloid
  • Hypertrophic scar
  • Hydrocortisone, silicone, vitamin E lotion
  • HSE
  • Onion extract gel
  • OE
  • Cetearyl alcohol lotion
  • CEA
03

In context

Keloid

123 studies on the registry are indexed under Keloid; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is close to the median of 30 across 97 interventional studies indexed under Keloid.

Browse Keloid studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Miami is the lead sponsor of 821 studies on the registry; 162 are open to participants now.

Of its 111 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 93 (84%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for enrollment into the study:

  1. Male or female, at least 18 years old in good general health, that have a hypertrophic and keloid scar. The length of the scar should be between 1-4 cm. Individuals who are willing and able to follow the requirements for study participation
  2. The investigator believes that the scar could benefit from the study medication.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria should be excluded from the study:

  1. Individuals with target scar that is not amenable to the randomized treatment
  2. Individuals who are planning pregnancy, or pregnant as determined by urine pregnancy test during the duration of the study, or breast-feeding an infant
  3. Individuals with uncontrolled diabetes or autoimmune disorders
  4. Individuals who have received scar treatment within one month of the first day of study treatment
  5. Individuals who plan to receive scar treatment(s) other than study treatment during the trial
  6. Individuals with a known sensitivity to any ingredients in the test products
  7. Individuals with any skin conditions or taking any medications that may interfere with the study medication.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Regimen A

    0.5% hydrocortisone, silicone, vitamin E lotion

    Drug: 0.5% hydrocortisone, silicone, vitamin E lotion

  • Experimental
    Regimen B

    Onion extract gel

    Drug: Onion extract gel

  • Placebo comparator
    Regimen C

    Cetearyl alcohol lotion

    Drug: Cetearyl alcohol lotion

Interventions

  • Drug0.5% hydrocortisone, silicone, vitamin E lotion

    0.5% hydrocortisone, silicone, vitamin E lotion will be applied topically to cover the selected scar twice daily for 16 weeks. The lesion will be cleansed with soap and water and dried thoroughly. The medication will be applied with a brush and allow it to dry for one minute before contact with clothing.

    Also known as: Scarguard

  • DrugOnion extract gel

    Onion extract gel is applied and massaged into the selected scar 3 to 4 times daily according to product instructions for 16 weeks.

    Also known as: Mederma

  • DrugCetearyl alcohol lotion

    Placebo is cetearyl alcohol lotion with no steroids, silicone, vitamin E, or onion extract and will be applied 2 times a day to the lesion.

    Also known as: Cetaphil lotion

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Lesion Volume

    Blinded investigator assessed the scar volume by using an alginate impression.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Lesion Length

    Blinded investigator assessed the scar length. Measured with ruler, from scar tip to tip.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16

  2. Change in Lesion Width

    Blinded investigator assessed the scar width. Measured with a ruler at the visually largest width.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16

  3. Change in Lesion Induration

    Blinded investigator assessed the scar induration. Measured with a ruler at deepest point.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16

  4. Change in Lesion Erythema

    Blinded investigator assessed the scar erythema. Measured with a visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0-100 (0=best and 100=worst).

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16

  5. Change in Lesion Pigmentary Alteration

    Blinded investigator assessed the scar pigmentation alteration using a visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0-100 (0=best and 100=worst).

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16

  6. Change in Lesion Cosmetic Appearance

    Blinded investigator assessed the scar cosmetic appearance using a visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0-100 (0=best and 100=worst).

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16

  7. Change in Lesion Cosmetic Appearance

    Subjects assessed the scar cosmetic appearance with a visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0-100 (0=best and 100=worst).

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16

07

Results

Posted Jul 10, 2019

Participant flow

Detailed enrollment data for participants is not available for week 4, 8, and 12. Reason participants did not complete study are not available for reporting.

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone0.5% Hydrocortisone, Silicone, Vitamin E Lotion (HSE )Onion Extract Gel (OE)Cetearyl Alcohol Lotion (Placebo)
Started101010
Completed555
Not completed555

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Lesion Volume

Blinded investigator assessed the scar volume by using an alginate impression.

Time frame:
Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Percent Change
Change in Lesion Volume
Percent Change0.5% Hydrocortisone, Silicone, Vitamin E Lotion (HSE )Onion Extract Gel (OE)Cetearyl Alcohol Lotion (Placebo)
Change in Lesion Volume40 ± NA42 ± NA32 ± NA
SecondaryChange in Lesion Length

Blinded investigator assessed the scar length. Measured with ruler, from scar tip to tip.

Time frame:
Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Percent change
Change in Lesion Length
Percent change0.5% Hydrocortisone, Silicone, Vitamin E Lotion (HSE )Onion Extract Gel (OE)Cetearyl Alcohol Lotion (Placebo)
Change in Lesion Length12 ± NA13 ± NA3 ± NA
SecondaryChange in Lesion Width

Blinded investigator assessed the scar width. Measured with a ruler at the visually largest width.

Time frame:
Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Percent change
Change in Lesion Width
Percent change0.5% Hydrocortisone, Silicone, Vitamin E Lotion (HSE )Onion Extract Gel (OE)Cetearyl Alcohol Lotion (Placebo)
Change in Lesion Width0 ± NA16 ± NA5 ± NA
SecondaryChange in Lesion Induration

Blinded investigator assessed the scar induration. Measured with a ruler at deepest point.

Time frame:
Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Percent change
Change in Lesion Induration
Percent change0.5% Hydrocortisone, Silicone, Vitamin E Lotion (HSE )Onion Extract Gel (OE)Cetearyl Alcohol Lotion (Placebo)
Change in Lesion Induration68 ± NA50 ± NA2 ± NA
SecondaryChange in Lesion Erythema

Blinded investigator assessed the scar erythema. Measured with a visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0-100 (0=best and 100=worst).

Time frame:
Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Percent change
Change in Lesion Erythema
Percent change0.5% Hydrocortisone, Silicone, Vitamin E Lotion (HSE )Onion Extract Gel (OE)Cetearyl Alcohol Lotion (Placebo)
Change in Lesion Erythema72 ± NA8 ± NA1 ± NA
SecondaryChange in Lesion Pigmentary Alteration

Blinded investigator assessed the scar pigmentation alteration using a visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0-100 (0=best and 100=worst).

Time frame:
Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Percent change
Change in Lesion Pigmentary Alteration
Percent change0.5% Hydrocortisone, Silicone, Vitamin E Lotion (HSE )Onion Extract Gel (OE)Cetearyl Alcohol Lotion (Placebo)
Change in Lesion Pigmentary Alteration61 ± NA30 ± NA0 ± NA
SecondaryChange in Lesion Cosmetic Appearance

Blinded investigator assessed the scar cosmetic appearance using a visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0-100 (0=best and 100=worst).

Time frame:
Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Percent change
Change in Lesion Cosmetic Appearance
Percent change0.5% Hydrocortisone, Silicone, Vitamin E Lotion (HSE )Onion Extract Gel (OE)Cetearyl Alcohol Lotion (Placebo)
Change in Lesion Cosmetic Appearance68 ± NA25 ± NA15 ± NA
SecondaryChange in Lesion Cosmetic Appearance

Subjects assessed the scar cosmetic appearance with a visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0-100 (0=best and 100=worst).

Time frame:
Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Percent change
Change in Lesion Cosmetic Appearance
Percent change0.5% Hydrocortisone, Silicone, Vitamin E Lotion (HSE )Onion Extract Gel (OE)Cetearyl Alcohol Lotion (Placebo)
Change in Lesion Cosmetic Appearance48 ± NA20 ± NA58 ± NA

Adverse events

Collected over Week 16. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
0.5% Hydrocortisone, Silicone, Vitamin E Lotion (HSE )0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)
Onion Extract Gel (OE)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)1/10 (10%)
Cetearyl Alcohol Lotion (Placebo)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
Event0.5% Hydrocortisone, Silicone, Vitamin E Lotion (HSE )Onion Extract Gel (OE)Cetearyl Alcohol Lotion (Placebo)
Acneiform-like eruptionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/101/100/10

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics are available for the 15 participants that completed the week 16 visit.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)0.5% Hydrocortisone, Silicone, Vitamin E Lotion (HSE )Onion Extract Gel (OE)Cetearyl Alcohol Lotion (Placebo)Total
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years55515
>=65 years0000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)0.5% Hydrocortisone, Silicone, Vitamin E Lotion (HSE )Onion Extract Gel (OE)Cetearyl Alcohol Lotion (Placebo)Total
Female43310
Male1225
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Miami Skin Research Group Office
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Augusti KT. Therapeutic values of onion (Allium cepa L.) and garlic (Allium sativum L.). Indian J Exp Biol. 1996 Jul;34(7):634-40. PubMed 8979497 ↗
  • Saulis AS, Mogford JH, Mustoe TA. Effect of Mederma on hypertrophic scarring in the rabbit ear model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jul;110(1):177-83; discussion 184-6. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200207000-00029. PubMed 12087249 ↗
  • Musgrave MA, Umraw N, Fish JS, Gomez M, Cartotto RC. The effect of silicone gel sheets on perfusion of hypertrophic burn scars. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2002 May-Jun;23(3):208-14. doi: 10.1097/00004630-200205000-00010. PubMed 12032371 ↗
  • Phillips TJ, Gerstein AD, Lordan V. A randomized controlled trial of hydrocolloid dressing in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Dermatol Surg. 1996 Sep;22(9):775-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1996.tb00728.x. PubMed 8874525 ↗
  • Eisen D. A pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of scarguard in the prevention of scars. Internet J Dermatol. 2004;5.
  • Gilman TH. Silicone sheet for treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scar: a new proposal for the mechanism of efficacy. Wound Repair Regen. 2003 May-Jun;11(3):235-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2003.11313.x. No abstract available. PubMed 12753606 ↗
  • Jackson BA, Shelton AJ. Pilot study evaluating topical onion extract as treatment for postsurgical scars. Dermatol Surg. 1999 Apr;25(4):267-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.08240.x. PubMed 10417579 ↗
  • Chung VQ, Kelley L, Marra D, Jiang SB. Onion extract gel versus petrolatum emollient on new surgical scars: prospective double-blinded study. Dermatol Surg. 2006 Feb;32(2):193-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32045.x. PubMed 16442038 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00754247
Lead sponsor
University of Miami
Responsible party
Robert S. Kirsner (Professor, University of Miami) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 17, 2008
Start date
Mar 2006
Primary completion
Feb 2008
Completion
Feb 2008
Results posted
Jul 10, 2019
Last update
Jul 10, 2019

Study contacts

Brian Berman, M.D., Ph.D
principal investigator · University of Miami, Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion