An interventional study of Quetiapine fumarate and Sodium valproate in Bipolar Disorder, sponsored by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2008-08-28.
Sponsored by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This is an open label, randomised, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy and safety of quetiapine and valproate used as monotherapy in the treatment of mania in patients hospitalised for an acute manic episode. After given of informed consent and undergoing screening procedures, the patients will be randomised into quetiapine or valproate group on Day 1. The efficacy of study treatment on symptoms of mania will be assessed at Day 28. Patients will not permitted to use any psychoactive or antipsychotic medications throughout the study period other than those expressly permitted by the protocol.
At each centre, the same individual will administer a specific psychiatric assessment for a patient at all study visits in order to reduce variability in rating scale scoring. Before the initiation of the study, a consistency assessment will be done among the investigators who conduct the scale assessment in each centre.
The rationale for using the quetiapine to treat patients with acute mania is multifold. A potential major advantage for quetiapine is its demonstrated tolerability. Because of the low incidence of EPS, quetiapine should be better tolerated than other antipsychotic medications in this sensitive patient population. The limited potential for weight gain and prolactin elevation may promote long-term treatment compliance.
The effect of quetiapine alone or adjunctive with mood stabilizers in the treatment of acute mania in patients with bipolar disorder has been confirmed through 4 phase III clinical trials (8,9). Based on the results of these clinical trials, the use of Seroquel in the acute mania of bipolar disorder has been approved in US, UK and other major markets in Europe. Quetiapine is also been recommended as alternative therapy for acute mania treatment in the practice guideline (10). The present study is to assess the effectiveness of quetiapine and valproate in the treatment of Chinese patients with acute mania over a treatment period of 4 weeks. Primary objective The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of quetiapine fumarate used as monotherapy in the treatment of symptoms of acute mania in patients with bipolar disorder, by evaluation of the change from baseline in YMRS total score at Day 28 (LOCF).
Secondary objectives
The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the following:
1,601 studies on the registry are indexed under Bipolar Disorder; 254 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 70 is close to the median of 64 across 1,223 interventional studies indexed under Bipolar Disorder.
Browse Bipolar Disorder studies →Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 358 studies on the registry; 104 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
These conditions included:
Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) fulfilling one of the following criteria:
Quetiapine fumarate tablet:25mg and 200mg
Drug: Quetiapine fumarate
Sodium valproate tablet 200mg
Drug: Sodium valproate
Investigational product: quetiapine fumarate tablet 25 mg and 200 mg
Sodium valproate tablet 200 mg
The outcome measure is the change from baseline in YMRS total score at Day 28 (LOCF).
Time frame: Four weeks
These changes from baseline in PANSS,MADRS, CGI total score at Day 28.
Time frame: 28 days
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine