CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00736853Updated Sep 26, 2013Results posted

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Acetaminophen Plus Tramadol Hydrochloride (JNS013) in Participants With Chronic Pain

A Phase 3 interventional study of Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (Open-Label) and Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (Double-Blind) in Pain, sponsored by Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.. Completed at 22 sites in Japan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-09-26.

Sponsored by Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
321
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tramadol hydrochloride plus acetaminophen (JNS013) in participants with chronic pain accompanied by osteoarthritis (a progressive and degenerative joint disease, in which the joints become painful and stiff) of the knee or low back pain (acute or chronic pain in the lumbar or sacral regions) which cannot be controlled sufficiently with non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

Read the detailed description

This is a multi-center (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study), double-blind (test or experiment in which neither the person giving the treatment nor the participant knows which treatment the participant is receiving), placebo-controlled (an inactive substance; a pretend treatment [with no drug in it] that is compared in a clinical trial with a drug to test if the drug has a real effect), parallel group comparison study. The total duration of the study will be 11 weeks and consists of 4 periods; a pre-observation period (4 weeks), open-label period (2 weeks), double-blind period (4 weeks) and follow-up period (1 week). Participants will receive tramadol hydrochloride plus acetaminophen tablets orally 4 times daily for 2 weeks with no less than 4-hour intervals (up to 8 tablets per day) during the open-label period and the dose will be fixed for each participant in the latter 1 week. During the double-period participants will receive tramadol hydrochloride plus acetaminophen tablets or placebo at the same dose as used for the latter 1 week of the open-label period for up to 4 weeks. Efficacy will be primarily evaluated by number of participants with insufficient pain relief after the start of double-blind period. Participant's safety will be monitored throughout the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • Acetoaminophen
  • Tramadol
  • Osteoarthritis of the knee
  • Low back pain
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,930 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 701 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 321 is above the median of 60 across 2,161 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. is the lead sponsor of 122 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants with sustention of chronic pain associated with OA or LBP for at least 3 months
  • Participants whose pain cannot be controlled sufficiently with at least 14-day continuous treatment with identical oral NSAIDs at a usual maximum dose during 3 months prior to this study
  • Outpatients
  • Ambulatory participants without need for any supportive device or assistance during daily life

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with conditions for which opioids are contraindicated
  • Participants with conditions for which acetaminophen is contraindicated
  • Participants with history of convulsion or the possibility of convulsive seizure
  • Participants with concurrent, previous, or possible alcohol dependence, drug dependence, or narcotic addiction
  • Pregnant participants or those who may be pregnant, lactating mothers, and participants who wish pregnancy during the study period
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
321 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (Open-Label)

    Drug: Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (Open-Label)

  • Experimental
    Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (Double Blind)

    Drug: Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo (Double-Blind)

    Drug: Placebo (Double-Blind)

Interventions

  • DrugTramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (Open-Label)

    Fixed dose combination of tramadol 37.5 milligram (mg)/acetaminophen 325 mg, 1 or 2 tablets 4 times daily will be given for one week; dose level will be fixed for each participant during the second week based on analgesic efficacy and tolerability (maximum daily dose will be 8 tablets).

  • DrugTramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)

    Fixed dose combination of tramadol 37.5 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg, 1 or 2 tablets (same dose \[number of tablets\] as that for the second week in the open-label period) will be given 4 times daily up to 4 weeks.

  • DrugPlacebo (Double-Blind)

    Matching placebo will be given up to 4 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Insufficient Pain Relief After the Start of Double-Blind Period

    The pain relief was regarded as insufficient, if either of the following was met, a) the value of average pain intensity felt in daily living during the past 24 hours (Visual analog scale 24 \[VAS24\] ) on 2 consecutive days in double-blind period worsened greater than 15 millimeter (mm) compared with the average VAS24 during 3 days before the end of open-label period, b) when the participant asked for discontinuation of treatment with the study drug because of insufficient pain relief.

    Time frame: Day 28 of double-blind period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in the Visual Analog Scale for the Last 24 Hours (VAS24) Value at the Start of the Double-Blind Period From the Baseline Value at the Start of the Open-Label Period

    Pain over the last 24 hours was assessed by using VAS score ranges from 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. An increase in score from Baseline represented disease progression and decrease represented improvement.

    Time frame: Day 1 of open-label period and Day 1 of double-blind period

  2. Change in the VAS24 Value From the Baseline at the Final Time Point of the Double-Blind Period

    Pain over the last 24 hours was assessed by using VAS score ranges from 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. An increase in score from Baseline represented disease progression and decrease represented improvement.

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 28 of double-blind period

  3. Mean Pain Intensity (PI) Score During Open-Label Period

    PI was evaluated on a 4-stage scale with a score ranging from 0 to 3, wherein 0=no pain and 3=severe pain.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and post-dose at 2 hours, 4 hours on Day 1, and Day 8 of open-label period

  4. Mean PI Score During Double-Blind Period

    The PI was evaluated on a 4-stage scale with a score ranging from 0 to 3, wherein 0=no pain and 3=severe pain.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and post-dose at 2 hours, 4 hours on Day 1, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of double-blind period

  5. Mean Pain Intensity Difference (PID) During the Open-Label Period

    The PID was calculated as PI at pre-dose on Day 1, 8 minus PI at post-dose time point (i.e., 2 hours and 4 hours) on Day 1, 8 respectively. Baseline PI score ranges from 1=minor to 3=severe, post-baseline PI score ranges from 0=none to 3=severe. Total possible score range for PID: -2=worst to 3=best.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, and post-dose at 2 hours, 4 hours on Day 1, and Day 8 of open-label period

  6. Mean PID During the Double-Blind Period

    The PID was calculated as PI at pre-dose on Day 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 minus PI at post-dose time point (i.e., 2 hours and 4 hours) on Day 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 respectively. Baseline PI score ranges from 1=minor to 3=severe, post-baseline PI score ranges from 0=none to 3=severe. Total possible score range for PID: -2=worst to 3=best.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, and post-dose at 2 hours, 4 hours on Day 1, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of double-blind period

  7. Mean Pain Relief (PAR) Score During the Open-Label Period

    PAR was evaluated based on 5-stage scale with a score ranging from 0 to 4, wherein, 0=no relief and 4=complete relief.

    Time frame: 2 hours, 4 hours post-dose on Day 1, and Day 8 of open-label period

  8. Mean PAR Score During the Double-Blind Period

    PAR was evaluated based on 5-stage scale with a score ranging from 0 to 4, wherein, 0=no relief and 4=complete relief.

    Time frame: 2 hours, 4 hours post-dose on Day 1, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of double-blind period

  9. Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) During the Open-Label Period

    The PRID is defined as sum of PID and PAR Scores for each participant at each evaluation time point (at 2 and 4 hours after the dosing). The overall possible score ranges for PRID is -2=worst to 7=best. The PID was calculated as PI at pre-dose on Day 1, 8 minus PI at post-dose time point (i.e., 2 hours and 4 hours) on Day 1, 8 respectively. Baseline PI score ranges from 1=minor to 3=severe, post-baseline PI score ranges from 0=none to 3=severe. Total possible score range for PID: -2=worst to 3=best and PAR was evaluated based on a 5-stage scale score ranges from 0=no relief and 4=complete relief.

    Time frame: 2 hours, 4 hours post-dose on Day 1, and Day 8 of open-label period

  10. Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) During the Double-Blind Period

    The PRID is defined as sum of PID and PAR Scores for each participant at each evaluation time point (at 2 and 4 hours after the dosing). The overall possible score range for PRID is -2=worst to 7=best. The PID was calculated as PI at pre-dose on Day 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 minus PI at post-dose time point (i.e., 2 hours and 4 hours) on Day 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 respectively. Baseline PI score ranges from 1=minor to 3=severe, post-baseline PI score ranges from 0=none to 3=severe. Total possible score range for PID: -2=worst to 3=best and PAR was evaluated based on a 5-stage scale score ranges from 0=no relief and 4=complete relief.

    Time frame: 2 hours, 4 hours post-dose on Day 1, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of double-blind period

  11. Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Score During the Open-Label Period

    The SPID is defined as sum of the PID at 2 and 4 hours after dosing on each evaluation day. The overall possible score ranges for SPID is -4=worst to 6=best. The PID was calculated as PI at pre-dose on Day 1, 8 minus PI at post-dose time point (i.e., 2 hours and 4 hours) on Day 1, 8 respectively. Baseline PI score ranges from 1=minor to 3=severe, post-baseline PI score ranges from 0=none to 3=severe. Total possible score range for PID: -2=worst to 3=best.

    Time frame: Day 1, and Day 8 of open-label period

  12. Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Score During the Double-Blind Period

    The SPID is defined as sum of the PID at 2 and 4 hours after dosing on each evaluation day. The overall possible score ranges for SPID is -4=worst to 6=best. The PID was calculated as PI at pre-dose on Day 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 minus PI at post-dose time point (i.e., 2 hours and 4 hours) on Day 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 respectively. Baseline PI score ranges from 1=minor to 3=severe, post-baseline PI score ranges from 0=none to 3=severe. Total possible score range for PID: -2=worst to 3=best.

    Time frame: Day 1, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of double-blind period

  13. Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Score During the Open-Label Period

    The TOTPAR is defined as sum of PAR at 2 hours after dosing and the PAR at 4 hours after dosing on each evaluation day. Pain relief as evaluated on 5-stage scale with a score ranging from 0=no relief and 4=complete relief. Total possible score range for TOTPAR is 0=no relief to 8=complete relief.

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 8 of open-label period

  14. Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Score During the Double-Blind Period

    The TOTPAR is defined as sum of PAR at 2 hours after dosing and the PAR at 4 hours after dosing on each evaluation day. Pain relief as evaluated on 5-stage scale with a score ranging from 0=no relief and 4=complete relief. Total possible score range for TOTPAR is 0=no relief to 8=complete relief.

    Time frame: Day 1, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of double-blind period

  15. Sum of Pain Relief Combined With Pain Intensity Difference (SPRID) Score During the Open-Label Period

    The SPRID is defined as sum of PID and PAR Scores at 2 hours and 4 hours after the dosing on each evaluation day. The overall possible score ranges for SPRID is -4=worst to 14=best. The PID was calculated as PI at pre-dose on Day 1, 8 minus PI at post-dose time point (i.e., 2 hours and 4 hours) on Day 1, 8 respectively. Baseline PI score ranges from 1=minor to 3=severe, post-baseline PI score ranges from 0=none to 3=severe. Total possible score range for PID: -2=worst to 3=best and PAR was evaluated based on 5-stage scale with a score ranging from 0=no relief to 4=complete relief.

    Time frame: Day 1, and Day 8 of open-label period

  16. Sum of Pain Relief Combined With Pain Intensity Difference (SPRID) Score During the Double-Blind Period

    The SPRID is defined as sum of PID and PAR Scores at 2 hours and 4 hours after the dosing on each evaluation day. The overall possible score ranges for SPRID is -4=worst to 14=best. The PID was calculated as PI at pre-dose on Day 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 minus PI at post-dose time point (i.e., 2 hours and 4 hours) on Day 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 respectively. Baseline PI score ranges from 1=minor to 3=severe, post-baseline PI score ranges from 0=none to 3=severe. Total possible score range for PID: -2=worst to 3=best and PAR was evaluated based on 5-stage scale with a score ranging from 0 to 4, wherein, 0=no relief and 4=complete relief.

    Time frame: Day 1, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of double-blind period

  17. Change From Baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) Total Score at Day 14 of Open-Label Period

    The RDQ is self-administered measure of disability caused by low back pain and consists of 24 statements. The total score ranges from 0=no disability to 24=severe disability. The higher scores indicate greater physical disability.

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of open-label period

  18. Change From Baseline in RDQ Total Score at Day 28 of Double-Blind Period

    The RDQ is self-administered measure of disability caused by low back pain and consists of 24 statements. The total score ranges from 0=no disability to 24=severe disability. The higher scores indicate greater physical disability.

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 28 of double-blind period

  19. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Questionnaire Score at Day 14 of Open-Label Period

    The WOMAC questionnaire is an activity of daily living (ADL) indicator for Knee Osteoarthritis and designed to capture the elements of pain, stiffness, extent of obstruction to daily activities (EODA) and general index. The score for each element ranges from 0=better ADL to 10=worse ADL.

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of open-label period

  20. Change From Baseline in WOMAC Questionnaire Score at Day 28 of Double-Blind Period

    The WOMAC questionnaire is an activity of daily living (ADL) indicator for knee osteoarthritis and designed to capture the elements of pain, stiffness, extent of obstruction to daily activities (EODA) and general index. The score for each element ranges from 0=better ADL to 10=worse ADL.

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 28 of double-blind period

  21. Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Score at Day 14 of Open-Label Period

    The SF-36 is a survey of participant health and quality of life. It consists of 8 sub-scales, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. The 8 sub-scales are: physical functioning, role-physical, role-emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health. Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 0-100. Higher score defines a more favorable health status or a better mental status.

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of open-label period

  22. Change From Baseline in SF-36 at Day 28 of Double-Blind Period

    The SF-36 is a survey of participant health and quality of life. It consists of 8 sub-scales, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. The 8 sub-scales are: physical functioning, role-physical, role-emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health. Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 0-100. Higher score defines a more favorable health status or a better mental status.

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 28 of double-blind period

07

Results

Posted Sep 26, 2013

Participant flow

Open-Label Period
Participant flow — Open-Label Period
MilestoneTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Open-Label)Tramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)Placebo (Double-Blind)
Started31900
Treated27700
Completed18700
Not completed13200
Withdrew: Physician decision200
Withdrew: Adverse event3100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1600
Withdrew: Started but not treated4200
Withdrew: Failed to meet the transfer criteria4000
Withdrew: Unable to attend hospital appointments100
Double-Blind Period
Participant flow — Double-Blind Period
MilestoneTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Open-Label)Tramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)Placebo (Double-Blind)
Started09493
Completed07045
Not completed02448
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy01942
Withdrew: Adverse event032
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject014
Withdrew: Ineligible to participate the study010

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Insufficient Pain Relief After the Start of Double-Blind Period

The pain relief was regarded as insufficient, if either of the following was met, a) the value of average pain intensity felt in daily living during the past 24 hours (Visual analog scale 24 \[VAS24\] ) on 2 consecutive days in double-blind period worsened greater than 15 millimeter (mm) compared with the average VAS24 during 3 days before the end of open-label period, b) when the participant asked for discontinuation of treatment with the study drug because of insufficient pain relief.

Time frame:
Day 28 of double-blind period
Reported as:
Number · number of participants
Number of Participants With Insufficient Pain Relief After the Start of Double-Blind Period
number of participantsTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)Placebo (Double-Blind)
Number of Participants With Insufficient Pain Relief After the Start of Double-Blind Period2043
Statistical analysis
  • Tramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind) vs Placebo (Double-Blind) · Log Rank · p = 0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.377 · 95% CI 0.221 to 0.641Stratified Log-rank test with the target disease as the stratification factor
SecondaryChange in the Visual Analog Scale for the Last 24 Hours (VAS24) Value at the Start of the Double-Blind Period From the Baseline Value at the Start of the Open-Label Period

Pain over the last 24 hours was assessed by using VAS score ranges from 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. An increase in score from Baseline represented disease progression and decrease represented improvement.

Time frame:
Day 1 of open-label period and Day 1 of double-blind period
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Change in the Visual Analog Scale for the Last 24 Hours (VAS24) Value at the Start of the Double-Blind Period From the Baseline Value at the Start of the Open-Label Period
mmTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Open-Label)
Day 1 of open-label period66.27 ± 13.69
Change at Day 1 of double-blind period-28.17 ± 21.16
SecondaryChange in the VAS24 Value From the Baseline at the Final Time Point of the Double-Blind Period

Pain over the last 24 hours was assessed by using VAS score ranges from 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. An increase in score from Baseline represented disease progression and decrease represented improvement.

Time frame:
Day 1 and Day 28 of double-blind period
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Change in the VAS24 Value From the Baseline at the Final Time Point of the Double-Blind Period
mmTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)Placebo (Double-Blind)
Day 130.33 ± 17.4731.18 ± 16.59
Change at Day 28-0.67 ± 18.146.21 ± 22.50
SecondaryMean Pain Intensity (PI) Score During Open-Label Period

PI was evaluated on a 4-stage scale with a score ranging from 0 to 3, wherein 0=no pain and 3=severe pain.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and post-dose at 2 hours, 4 hours on Day 1, and Day 8 of open-label period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Pain Intensity (PI) Score During Open-Label Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Open-Label)
Day 1; Pre-dose (n=275)1.7 ± 0.56
Day 1; 2 hours after dosing (n=274)1.2 ± 0.62
Day 1; 4 hours after dosing (n=274)1.1 ± 0.65
Day 8; Pre-dose (n=219)1.2 ± 0.43
Day 8; 2 hours after dosing (n=219)1.0 ± 0.49
Day 8; 4 hours after dosing (n=219)0.9 ± 0.55
SecondaryMean PI Score During Double-Blind Period

The PI was evaluated on a 4-stage scale with a score ranging from 0 to 3, wherein 0=no pain and 3=severe pain.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and post-dose at 2 hours, 4 hours on Day 1, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of double-blind period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean PI Score During Double-Blind Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)Placebo (Double-Blind)
Day 1; Pre-dose (n=84, 89)1.2 ± 0.371.2 ± 0.37
Day 1; 2 hours after dosing (n=84, 89)1.0 ± 0.441.1 ± 0.43
Day 1; 4 hours after dosing (n=84, 89)1.0 ± 0.491.1 ± 0.47
Day 8; Pre-dose (n=74, 48)1.2 ± 0.391.2 ± 0.42
Day 8; 2 hours after dosing (n=74, 48)1.0 ± 0.471.1 ± 0.58
Day 8; 4 hours after dosing (n=74, 48)0.9 ± 0.511.1 ± 0.43
Day 15; Pre-dose (n=67, 41)1.1 ± 0.331.1 ± 0.33
Day 15; 2 hours after dosing (n=67, 41)1.0 ± 0.461.0 ± 0.50
Day 15; 4 hours after dosing (n=67, 41)0.8 ± 0.510.9 ± 0.52
Day 22; Pre-dose (n=63, 40)1.1 ± 0.301.2 ± 0.38
Day 22, 2 hours after dosing (n=63, 40)1.0 ± 0.421.0 ± 0.50
Day 22; 4 hours after dosing (n=63, 40)0.9 ± 0.491.0 ± 0.50
Day 28; Pre-dose (n=72, 47)1.1 ± 0.331.2 ± 0.41
Day 28; 2 hours after dosing (n=72, 47)1.0 ± 0.441.0 ± 0.51
Day 28; 4 hours after dosing (n=72, 47)0.9 ± 0.501.0 ± 0.49
SecondaryMean Pain Intensity Difference (PID) During the Open-Label Period

The PID was calculated as PI at pre-dose on Day 1, 8 minus PI at post-dose time point (i.e., 2 hours and 4 hours) on Day 1, 8 respectively. Baseline PI score ranges from 1=minor to 3=severe, post-baseline PI score ranges from 0=none to 3=severe. Total possible score range for PID: -2=worst to 3=best.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, and post-dose at 2 hours, 4 hours on Day 1, and Day 8 of open-label period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Pain Intensity Difference (PID) During the Open-Label Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Open-Label)
Day 1; 2 hours after dosing (n=274)0.4 ± 0.59
Day 1; 4 hours after dosing (n=274)0.5 ± 0.66
Day 8; 2 hours after dosing (n=219)0.2 ± 0.50
Day 8; 4 hours after dosing (n=219)0.3 ± 0.52
SecondaryMean PID During the Double-Blind Period

The PID was calculated as PI at pre-dose on Day 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 minus PI at post-dose time point (i.e., 2 hours and 4 hours) on Day 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 respectively. Baseline PI score ranges from 1=minor to 3=severe, post-baseline PI score ranges from 0=none to 3=severe. Total possible score range for PID: -2=worst to 3=best.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, and post-dose at 2 hours, 4 hours on Day 1, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of double-blind period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean PID During the Double-Blind Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)Placebo (Double-Blind)
Day 1; 2 hours after dosing (n=84, 89)0.2 ± 0.400.1 ± 0.34
Day 1; 4 hours after dosing (n=84, 89)0.2 ± 0.490.1 ± 0.42
Day 8; 2 hours after dosing (n=74, 48)0.2 ± 0.390.1 ± 0.46
Day 8; 4 hours after dosing (n=74, 48)0.3 ± 0.500.2 ± 0.38
Day 15; 2 hours after dosing (n=67, 41)0.1 ± 0.360.2 ± 0.44
Day 15; 4 hours after dosing (n=67, 41)0.3 ± 0.490.2 ± 0.51
Day 22; 2 hours after dosing (n=63, 40)0.1 ± 0.350.2 ± 0.42
Day 22; 4 hours after dosing (n=63, 40)0.2 ± 0.420.2 ± 0.42
Day 28; 2 hours after dosing (n=72, 47)0.2 ± 0.360.2 ± 0.41
Day 28; 4 hours after dosing (n=72, 47)0.3 ± 0.440.2 ± 0.43
SecondaryMean Pain Relief (PAR) Score During the Open-Label Period

PAR was evaluated based on 5-stage scale with a score ranging from 0 to 4, wherein, 0=no relief and 4=complete relief.

Time frame:
2 hours, 4 hours post-dose on Day 1, and Day 8 of open-label period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Pain Relief (PAR) Score During the Open-Label Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Open-Label)
Day 1; 2 hours after dosing (n=274)1.2 ± 0.97
Day 1; 4 hours after dosing (n=274)1.4 ± 1.01
Day 8; 2 hours after dosing (n=219)1.7 ± 1.03
Day 8; 4 hours after dosing (n=219)1.8 ± 1.02
SecondaryMean PAR Score During the Double-Blind Period

PAR was evaluated based on 5-stage scale with a score ranging from 0 to 4, wherein, 0=no relief and 4=complete relief.

Time frame:
2 hours, 4 hours post-dose on Day 1, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of double-blind period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean PAR Score During the Double-Blind Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)Placebo (Double-Blind)
Day 1; 2 hours after dosing (n=84, 89)1.7 ± 1.021.1 ± 1.04
Day 1; 4 hours after dosing (n=84, 89)1.8 ± 1.011.2 ± 1.00
Day 8; 2 hours after dosing (n=74, 48)1.9 ± 1.061.2 ± 1.08
Day 8; 4 hours after dosing (n=74, 48)1.9 ± 1.011.4 ± 1.05
Day 15; 2 hours after dosing (n=67, 41)2.1 ± 1.091.7 ± 1.11
Day 15; 4 hours after dosing (n=67, 41)2.1 ± 1.001.7 ± 1.06
Day 22; 2 hours after dosing (n=63, 40)2.1 ± 0.961.8 ± 1.21
Day 22; 4 hours after dosing (n=63, 40)2.2 ± 1.001.8 ± 1.26
Day 28; 2 hours after dosing (n=72, 47)2.1 ± 1.001.6 ± 1.26
Day 28; 4 hours after dosing (n=72, 47)2.1 ± 1.041.7 ± 1.29
SecondaryPain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) During the Open-Label Period

The PRID is defined as sum of PID and PAR Scores for each participant at each evaluation time point (at 2 and 4 hours after the dosing). The overall possible score ranges for PRID is -2=worst to 7=best. The PID was calculated as PI at pre-dose on Day 1, 8 minus PI at post-dose time point (i.e., 2 hours and 4 hours) on Day 1, 8 respectively. Baseline PI score ranges from 1=minor to 3=severe, post-baseline PI score ranges from 0=none to 3=severe. Total possible score range for PID: -2=worst to 3=best and PAR was evaluated based on a 5-stage scale score ranges from 0=no relief and 4=complete relief.

Time frame:
2 hours, 4 hours post-dose on Day 1, and Day 8 of open-label period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) During the Open-Label Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Open-Label)
Day 1; 2 hours after dosing (n=274)1.6 ± 1.39
Day 1; 4 hours after dosing (n=274)1.9 ± 1.49
Day 8; 2 hours after dosing (n=219)1.9 ± 1.30
Day 8; 4 hours after dosing (n=219)2.2 ± 1.36
SecondaryPain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) During the Double-Blind Period

The PRID is defined as sum of PID and PAR Scores for each participant at each evaluation time point (at 2 and 4 hours after the dosing). The overall possible score range for PRID is -2=worst to 7=best. The PID was calculated as PI at pre-dose on Day 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 minus PI at post-dose time point (i.e., 2 hours and 4 hours) on Day 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 respectively. Baseline PI score ranges from 1=minor to 3=severe, post-baseline PI score ranges from 0=none to 3=severe. Total possible score range for PID: -2=worst to 3=best and PAR was evaluated based on a 5-stage scale score ranges from 0=no relief and 4=complete relief.

Time frame:
2 hours, 4 hours post-dose on Day 1, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of double-blind period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores (PRID) During the Double-Blind Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)Placebo (Double-Blind)
Day 1; 2 hours after dosing (n=84, 89)1.9 ± 1.201.2 ± 1.19
Day 1; 4 hours after dosing (n=84, 89)2.0 ± 1.281.2 ± 1.18
Day 8; 2 hours after dosing (n=74, 48)2.1 ± 1.231.4 ± 1.36
Day 8; 4 hours after dosing (n=74, 48)2.3 ± 1.221.6 ± 1.25
Day 15; 2 hours after dosing (n=67, 41)2.2 ± 1.291.8 ± 1.39
Day 15; 4 hours after dosing (n=67, 41)2.4 ± 1.271.9 ± 1.35
Day 22; 2 hours after dosing (n=63, 40)2.3 ± 1.102.0 ± 1.46
Day 22; 4 hours after dosing (n=63, 40)2.4 ± 1.242.1 ± 1.45
Day 28; 2 hours after dosing (n=72, 47)2.2 ± 1.141.8 ± 1.52
Day 28; 4 hours after dosing (n=72, 47)2.4 ± 1.281.9 ± 1.49
SecondarySum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Score During the Open-Label Period

The SPID is defined as sum of the PID at 2 and 4 hours after dosing on each evaluation day. The overall possible score ranges for SPID is -4=worst to 6=best. The PID was calculated as PI at pre-dose on Day 1, 8 minus PI at post-dose time point (i.e., 2 hours and 4 hours) on Day 1, 8 respectively. Baseline PI score ranges from 1=minor to 3=severe, post-baseline PI score ranges from 0=none to 3=severe. Total possible score range for PID: -2=worst to 3=best.

Time frame:
Day 1, and Day 8 of open-label period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Score During the Open-Label Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Open-Label)
Day 1 (n=274)0.9 ± 1.17
Day 8 (n=219)0.5 ± 0.93
SecondarySum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Score During the Double-Blind Period

The SPID is defined as sum of the PID at 2 and 4 hours after dosing on each evaluation day. The overall possible score ranges for SPID is -4=worst to 6=best. The PID was calculated as PI at pre-dose on Day 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 minus PI at post-dose time point (i.e., 2 hours and 4 hours) on Day 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 respectively. Baseline PI score ranges from 1=minor to 3=severe, post-baseline PI score ranges from 0=none to 3=severe. Total possible score range for PID: -2=worst to 3=best.

Time frame:
Day 1, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of double-blind period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Score During the Double-Blind Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)Placebo (Double-Blind)
Day 1 (n=84, 89)0.4 ± 0.790.1 ± 0.70
Day 8 (n=74, 48)0.5 ± 0.810.3 ± 0.78
Day 15 (n=67, 41)0.4 ± 0.760.4 ± 0.86
Day 22 (n=63, 40)0.4 ± 0.730.5 ± 0.78
Day 28 (n=72, 47)0.4 ± 0.740.4 ± 0.77
SecondaryTotal Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Score During the Open-Label Period

The TOTPAR is defined as sum of PAR at 2 hours after dosing and the PAR at 4 hours after dosing on each evaluation day. Pain relief as evaluated on 5-stage scale with a score ranging from 0=no relief and 4=complete relief. Total possible score range for TOTPAR is 0=no relief to 8=complete relief.

Time frame:
Day 1 and Day 8 of open-label period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Score During the Open-Label Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Open-Label)
Day 1 (n=274)2.6 ± 1.89
Day 8 (n=219)3.5 ± 1.95
SecondaryTotal Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Score During the Double-Blind Period

The TOTPAR is defined as sum of PAR at 2 hours after dosing and the PAR at 4 hours after dosing on each evaluation day. Pain relief as evaluated on 5-stage scale with a score ranging from 0=no relief and 4=complete relief. Total possible score range for TOTPAR is 0=no relief to 8=complete relief.

Time frame:
Day 1, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of double-blind period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Score During the Double-Blind Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)Placebo (Double-Blind)
Day 1 (n=84, 89)3.5 ± 1.972.3 ± 2.00
Day 8 (n=74, 48)3.8 ± 2.002.6 ± 2.05
Day 15 (n=67, 41)4.1 ± 2.043.3 ± 2.10
Day 22 (n=63, 40)4.3 ± 1.913.6 ± 2.42
Day 28 (n=72, 47)4.2 ± 1.993.3 ± 2.50
SecondarySum of Pain Relief Combined With Pain Intensity Difference (SPRID) Score During the Open-Label Period

The SPRID is defined as sum of PID and PAR Scores at 2 hours and 4 hours after the dosing on each evaluation day. The overall possible score ranges for SPRID is -4=worst to 14=best. The PID was calculated as PI at pre-dose on Day 1, 8 minus PI at post-dose time point (i.e., 2 hours and 4 hours) on Day 1, 8 respectively. Baseline PI score ranges from 1=minor to 3=severe, post-baseline PI score ranges from 0=none to 3=severe. Total possible score range for PID: -2=worst to 3=best and PAR was evaluated based on 5-stage scale with a score ranging from 0=no relief to 4=complete relief.

Time frame:
Day 1, and Day 8 of open-label period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Sum of Pain Relief Combined With Pain Intensity Difference (SPRID) Score During the Open-Label Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Open-Label)
Day 1 (n=274)3.5 ± 2.74
Day 8 (n=219)4.1 ± 2.50
SecondarySum of Pain Relief Combined With Pain Intensity Difference (SPRID) Score During the Double-Blind Period

The SPRID is defined as sum of PID and PAR Scores at 2 hours and 4 hours after the dosing on each evaluation day. The overall possible score ranges for SPRID is -4=worst to 14=best. The PID was calculated as PI at pre-dose on Day 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 minus PI at post-dose time point (i.e., 2 hours and 4 hours) on Day 1, 8, 15, 22, 28 respectively. Baseline PI score ranges from 1=minor to 3=severe, post-baseline PI score ranges from 0=none to 3=severe. Total possible score range for PID: -2=worst to 3=best and PAR was evaluated based on 5-stage scale with a score ranging from 0 to 4, wherein, 0=no relief and 4=complete relief.

Time frame:
Day 1, 8, 15, 22 and 28 of double-blind period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Sum of Pain Relief Combined With Pain Intensity Difference (SPRID) Score During the Double-Blind Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)Placebo (Double-Blind)
Day 1 (n=84, 89)3.9 ± 2.372.4 ± 2.30
Day 8 (n=74, 48)4.3 ± 2.323.0 ± 2.48
Day 15 (n=67, 41)4.6 ± 2.463.7 ± 2.61
Day 22 (n=63, 40)4.7 ± 2.274.0 ± 2.81
Day 28 (n=72, 47)4.6 ± 2.353.7 ± 2.90
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) Total Score at Day 14 of Open-Label Period

The RDQ is self-administered measure of disability caused by low back pain and consists of 24 statements. The total score ranges from 0=no disability to 24=severe disability. The higher scores indicate greater physical disability.

Time frame:
Day 1 and Day 14 of open-label period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) Total Score at Day 14 of Open-Label Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Open-Label)
Day 1 (n=160)9.1 ± 4.89
Change at Day 14 (n=126)-2.6 ± 3.28
SecondaryChange From Baseline in RDQ Total Score at Day 28 of Double-Blind Period

The RDQ is self-administered measure of disability caused by low back pain and consists of 24 statements. The total score ranges from 0=no disability to 24=severe disability. The higher scores indicate greater physical disability.

Time frame:
Day 1 and Day 28 of double-blind period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in RDQ Total Score at Day 28 of Double-Blind Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)Placebo (Double-Blind)
Day 1 (n=55, 57)6.5 ± 4.416.0 ± 4.57
Change at Day 28 (n=55, 57)-0.5 ± 3.080.8 ± 3.69
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Questionnaire Score at Day 14 of Open-Label Period

The WOMAC questionnaire is an activity of daily living (ADL) indicator for Knee Osteoarthritis and designed to capture the elements of pain, stiffness, extent of obstruction to daily activities (EODA) and general index. The score for each element ranges from 0=better ADL to 10=worse ADL.

Time frame:
Day 1 and Day 14 of open-label period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Questionnaire Score at Day 14 of Open-Label Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Open-Label)
Day 1; Pain (n=117)4.4 ± 1.96
Change at Day 14; Pain (n=90)-1.9 ± 1.66
Day 1; Stiffness (n=117)4.2 ± 2.31
Change at Day 14; Stiffness (n=90)-1.5 ± 2.09
Day 1; EODA (n=117)3.7 ± 1.89
Change at Day 14; EODA (n=90)-1.5 ± 1.38
Day 1; General index (n=117)4.1 ± 1.82
Change at Day 14; General index (n=90)-1.7 ± 1.39
SecondaryChange From Baseline in WOMAC Questionnaire Score at Day 28 of Double-Blind Period

The WOMAC questionnaire is an activity of daily living (ADL) indicator for knee osteoarthritis and designed to capture the elements of pain, stiffness, extent of obstruction to daily activities (EODA) and general index. The score for each element ranges from 0=better ADL to 10=worse ADL.

Time frame:
Day 1 and Day 28 of double-blind period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Questionnaire Score at Day 28 of Double-Blind Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)Placebo (Double-Blind)
Day 1; Pain (n=39, 36)2.6 ± 1.462.2 ± 1.20
Change at Day 28; Pain (n=39, 36)-0.3 ± 1.020.5 ± 1.49
Day 1; Stiffness (n=39, 36)2.7 ± 1.942.4 ± 1.72
Change at Day 28; Stiffness (n=39, 36)-0.2 ± 1.330.2 ± 1.99
Day 1; EODA (n=39, 36)2.3 ± 1.681.9 ± 1.45
Change at Day 28; EODA (n=39, 36)-0.5 ± 0.580.4 ± 1.30
Day 1; General index (n=39, 36)2.5 ± 1.482.2 ± 1.23
Change at Day 28; General index (n=39, 36)-0.4 ± 0.650.4 ± 1.29
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Score at Day 14 of Open-Label Period

The SF-36 is a survey of participant health and quality of life. It consists of 8 sub-scales, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. The 8 sub-scales are: physical functioning, role-physical, role-emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health. Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 0-100. Higher score defines a more favorable health status or a better mental status.

Time frame:
Day 1 and Day 14 of open-label period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Score at Day 14 of Open-Label Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Open-Label)
Day 1; Physical functioning (n=277)34.3 ± 15.23
Change at Day 14; Physical functioning (n=216)3.9 ± 10.39
Day 1; Role-physical (n=216)37.0 ± 13.62
Change at Day 14; Role-physical (n=216)4.3 ± 11.10
Day 1; Bodily pain (n=277)34.8 ± 6.59
Change at Day 14; Bodily pain (n=216)5.4 ± 7.04
Day 1; General health (n=277)45.4 ± 9.01
Change at Day 14; General health (n=216)2.7 ± 6.31
Day 1; Vitality (n=277)45.1 ± 9.43
Change at Day 14; Vitality (n=216)2.3 ± 8.10
Day 1; Social functioning (n=277)43.5 ± 12.48
Change at Day 14; Social functioning (n=277)2.0 ± 10.76
Day 1; Role-emotional (n=277)43.2 ± 12.95
Change at Day 14; Role-emotional (n=216)2.5 ± 11.36
Day 1; Mental health (n=277)46.8 ± 9.69
Change at Day 14; Mental health (n=216)2.8 ± 8.59
SecondaryChange From Baseline in SF-36 at Day 28 of Double-Blind Period

The SF-36 is a survey of participant health and quality of life. It consists of 8 sub-scales, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. The 8 sub-scales are: physical functioning, role-physical, role-emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health. Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 0-100. Higher score defines a more favorable health status or a better mental status.

Time frame:
Day 1 and Day 28 of double-blind period
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in SF-36 at Day 28 of Double-Blind Period
units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)Placebo (Double-Blind)
Day 1; Physical functioning (n=94,93)39.0 ± 12.2839.7 ± 13.36
Change at Day 28; Physical functioning (n=94,93)1.1 ± 8.49-1.6 ± 10.03
Day 1; Role-physical (n=94,93)40.5 ± 12.8441.8 ± 12.24
Change at Day 28; Role-physical (n=94,93)0.8 ± 11.87-0.6 ± 9.54
Day 1; Bodily pain (n=94,93)41.0 ± 7.6839.3 ± 7.27
Change at Day 28; Bodily pain (n=94,93)2.4 ± 7.240.3 ± 7.77
Day 1; General health (n=94,93)49.1 ± 9.2348.0 ± 9.33
Change at Day 28; General health (n=94,93)0.4 ± 7.11-1.2 ± 5.97
Day 1; Vitality (n=94,93)47.3 ± 9.5847.4 ± 8.49
Change at Day 28; Vitality (n=94,93)3.1 ± 7.400.1 ± 7.51
Day 1; Social functioning (n=94,93)46.4 ± 12.6845.7 ± 11.48
Change at Day 28; Social functioning (n=94,93)1.6 ± 11.320.4 ± 10.07
Day 1; Role-emotional (n=94,93)46.7 ± 11.4645.8 ± 11.72
Change at Day 28; Role-emotional (n=94,93)0.0 ± 9.49-1.0 ± 9.99
Day 1; Mental health (n=94,93)50.4 ± 9.1449.6 ± 8.80
Change at Day 28; Mental health (n=94,93)2.2 ± 7.29-0.7 ± 8.17

Adverse events

Collected over From the start of open-label period until 7 days after the last dose of study medication. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Tramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Open-Label)—0/277 (0%)222/277 (80.1%)
Tramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)—1/94 (1.1%)47/94 (50%)
Placebo (Double-Blind)—0/93 (0%)44/93 (47.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Open-Label)Tramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)Placebo (Double-Blind)
Rectal cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/2771/940/93
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 112
Most frequent other events
EventTramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Open-Label)Tramadol Hydrochloride and Acetaminophen (Double-Blind)Placebo (Double-Blind)
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders125/2775/943/93
SomnolenceNervous system disorders77/2771/942/93
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders76/2771/941/93
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders52/2773/940/93
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations6/2775/9417/93
DizzinessNervous system disorders45/2773/940/93
γ-glutamyl transferase increasedInvestigations3/27711/943/93
HeadacheNervous system disorders21/2771/942/93
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders18/2770/941/93
Abnormal sensationGeneral disorders15/2773/940/93

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Entire Study Population
Mean57.0 ± 17.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Entire Study Population
Female168
Male109
08

Study locations

22 sites
  • Aichi, Japan
  • Amagasaki, Japan
  • Chiba N/A, Japan
  • Chiba, Japan
  • Edogawa, Japan
  • Fukuoka, Japan
  • Fukushima, Japan
  • Iruma, Japan
  • Kagoshima, Japan
  • Kawasaki, Japan
  • Kumagaya, Japan
  • Kurume, Japan
  • Meguro, Japan
  • Minato, Japan
  • Niigata N/A, Japan
  • Niigata, Japan
  • Ohta-Ku, Japan
  • Okazaki, Japan
  • Sagamihara, Japan
  • Setagaya, Japan
  • Shibuya, Japan
  • Shinjuku-Ku, Japan
09

References and documents

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 26, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00736853
Lead sponsor
Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 18, 2008
Start date
Jun 2008
Primary completion
Jan 2009
Completion
Jan 2009
Results posted
Sep 26, 2013
Last update
Sep 26, 2013

Study contacts

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion