CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00713310Updated Apr 5, 2012Results posted

Assessing the Safety/Efficacy of Asacol® Given Every 12 Hours to Children and Adolescents With Active Ulcerative Colitis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Asacol 400 mg and Asacol 400 mg in Ulcerative Colitis, sponsored by Warner Chilcott. Completed at 42 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-04-05.

Sponsored by Warner Chilcott · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
83
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overall objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of high dose and low dose Asacol administered as 400 mg delayed-release tablets given every 12 hours for 6 weeks to children and adolescents with mildly-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ulcerative Colitis
03

In context

Colitis

1,073 studies on the registry are indexed under Colitis; 131 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 83 is above the median of 60 across 771 interventional studies indexed under Colitis.

Browse Colitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Warner Chilcott is the lead sponsor of 57 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • are male or female between the ages of 5 and 17 years, inclusive, at the time of the first dose of study medication, with a history of biopsy and endoscopy confirmed UC;
  • have mildly-to-moderately active UC (either newly diagnosed or that has relapsed) as defined clinically by a Pediatric UC Activity Index (PUCAI) score 10 and 55, and, in the opinion of the Investigator, the patient does not require steroids;
  • have baseline scores of at least 1 for both rectal bleeding (Streaks of blood with stool less than half of the time) and stool frequency (1-2 stools greater than normal per day) as defined by the TM-Mayo Score

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have UC known to be confined to the rectum (isolated rectal proctitis);
  • have a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to salicylates, aminosalicylates, or any component of the Asacol tablet;
  • have a significant co-existing illness or other condition(s), including but not limited to cancer or significant organic or psychiatric disease on medical history or physical examination, that, in the judgment of the Investigator, contraindicate(s) administration of the study drug and/or any study procedures
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
83 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Low-Dose

    1.2 - 2.4 g/day Asacol dependent on body weight

    Drug: Asacol 400 mg

  • Experimental
    High-Dose

    2.0 - 4.8 g/day Asacol dependent on body weight

    Drug: Asacol 400 mg

Interventions

  • DrugAsacol 400 mg

    High dose: 17-\<33 kg = 3 Asacol 400mg in morning and 2 Asacol 400 in PM, 33-\<54 kg = 5 Asacol 400mg in morning and 4 Asacol 400 in PM, 54-\<90 kg = 6 Asacol 400mg in morning and 6 Asacol 400 in PM

  • DrugAsacol 400 mg

    Low dose: 17-\<33 kg = 2 Asacol 400mg + 1 placebo in morning and 1 Asacol 400 +1 placebo in PM, 33-\<54 kg = 3 Asacol 400mg +2 placebo in morning and 2 Asacol 400 + 2 placebo in PM, 54-\<90 kg = 3 Asacol 400mg + 3 placebo in morning and 3 Asacol 400mg + 3 placebo in PM

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment Success PUCAI (Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index), mITT/Modified Intent to Treat Population

    PUCAI 0-85, abdominal pain (no pain/0, pain ignored/5, pain not ignored/10), rectal bleeding (none/0, small \<50% stool/10, small with most stools/20, large \>50% stool/30), stool consistency (formed/0, partially/5, unformed/10), # per 24 hrs (0-2/0, 3-5/5, 6-8/10, \>8/15), nocturnal bowel movements (no/0, yes/10), activity level (no limitation/0, occasional limitation/5, severely restricted/10) Remission \<10, Mild 10-34, Moderate 35-64, Severe 65-85, Success score\<10 at Wk 6 (complete) or reduction of \>=20 points baseline to Wk 6 with Wk 6 score\>=10 (partial)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Treatment Success PUCAI Amended Endpoint (5 Point Scale Abdominal Pain), mITT

    PUCAI 0-85, abdominal pain amended (no pain/0, very mild/2.5, mild/5, moderate/7.5, severe/10), rectal bleeding (none/0, small \<50% stool/10, small with most stools/20, large \>50% stool/30), stool consistency (formed/0, partially/5, unformed/10), # per 24 hrs (0-2/0, 3-5/5, 6-8/10, \>8/15), nocturnal bowel movements (no/0, yes/10), activity level (no limitation/0, occasional limitation/5, severely restricted/10) Remission \<10, Mild 10-34, Moderate 35-64, Severe 65-85, Success score\<10 at Wk 6 (complete) or reduction of \>=20 points baseline to Wk 6 with Wk 6 score\>=10 (partial)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

07

Results

Posted Apr 4, 2012

Participant flow

Recruitment began 16 Dec 2008

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLow-DoseHigh-Dose
Started4142
Mitt population4141
Completed3636
Not completed56
Withdrew: Adverse event52
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy02
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject02

Outcome measures

PrimaryTreatment Success PUCAI (Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index), mITT/Modified Intent to Treat Population

PUCAI 0-85, abdominal pain (no pain/0, pain ignored/5, pain not ignored/10), rectal bleeding (none/0, small \<50% stool/10, small with most stools/20, large \>50% stool/30), stool consistency (formed/0, partially/5, unformed/10), # per 24 hrs (0-2/0, 3-5/5, 6-8/10, \>8/15), nocturnal bowel movements (no/0, yes/10), activity level (no limitation/0, occasional limitation/5, severely restricted/10) Remission \<10, Mild 10-34, Moderate 35-64, Severe 65-85, Success score\<10 at Wk 6 (complete) or reduction of \>=20 points baseline to Wk 6 with Wk 6 score\>=10 (partial)

Time frame:
Baseline and 6 weeks
Reported as:
Number · % participants with treatment success
Treatment Success PUCAI (Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index), mITT/Modified Intent to Treat Population
% participants with treatment successLow DoseHigh Dose
Treatment Success PUCAI (Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index), mITT/Modified Intent to Treat Population56.155.0
Statistical analysis
  • Low Dose vs High Dose · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9240 · High-low dose difference success rates: -1.1 · 95% CI -22.7 to 20.5
SecondaryTreatment Success PUCAI Amended Endpoint (5 Point Scale Abdominal Pain), mITT

PUCAI 0-85, abdominal pain amended (no pain/0, very mild/2.5, mild/5, moderate/7.5, severe/10), rectal bleeding (none/0, small \<50% stool/10, small with most stools/20, large \>50% stool/30), stool consistency (formed/0, partially/5, unformed/10), # per 24 hrs (0-2/0, 3-5/5, 6-8/10, \>8/15), nocturnal bowel movements (no/0, yes/10), activity level (no limitation/0, occasional limitation/5, severely restricted/10) Remission \<10, Mild 10-34, Moderate 35-64, Severe 65-85, Success score\<10 at Wk 6 (complete) or reduction of \>=20 points baseline to Wk 6 with Wk 6 score\>=10 (partial)

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 6
Reported as:
Number · % participants with treatment success
Treatment Success PUCAI Amended Endpoint (5 Point Scale Abdominal Pain), mITT
% participants with treatment successLow DoseHigh Dose
Treatment Success PUCAI Amended Endpoint (5 Point Scale Abdominal Pain), mITT56.157.5
Statistical analysis
  • Low Dose vs High Dose · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8193 · High-low dose difference success rates: 1.4 · 95% CI -20.2 to 23.0

Adverse events

Collected over Day -7 thru Week 6 of trial (7 weeks). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Low Dose—5/41 (12.2%)20/50 (40%)
High Dose—2/41 (4.9%)15/41 (36.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLow DoseHigh Dose
SinusitisInfections and infestations1/410/41
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders1/410/41
Body Mass Index DecreasedInvestigations1/410/41
Colitis UlcerativeGastrointestinal disorders1/411/41
Adenovirus InfectionInfections and infestations1/410/41
Diarrhoea HaemorrhagicGastrointestinal disorders1/410/41
Cholangitis SclerosingHepatobiliary disorders1/410/41
PancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders1/410/41
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/411/41
SyncopeNervous system disorders0/411/41
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLow DoseHigh Dose
Colitis UlcerativeGastrointestinal disorders5/502/41
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations4/504/41
HeadacheNervous system disorders4/502/41
FatigueGeneral disorders1/503/41
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/503/41
SinusitisInfections and infestations3/500/41
DizzinessNervous system disorders3/501/41

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Low-DoseHigh-DoseTotal
Mean13.0 ± 3.212.8 ± 3.012.9 ± 3.1
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)Low-DoseHigh-DoseTotal
5-8 years448
9-17 years373875
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Low-DoseHigh-DoseTotal
Female222345
Male191938
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Low-DoseHigh-DoseTotal
United States262349
Canada044
Poland91019
Romania235
Croatia426
08

Study locations

42 sites
  • Research Facility
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • Research Facility
    Phoenix, Arizona 85016, United States
  • Research Facility
    Loma Linda, California 92354, United States
  • Research Facility
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Research Facility
    San Francisco, California 94118, United States
  • Research Facility
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
  • Research Facility
    Washington, District of Columbia 20010, United States
  • Research Facility
    Gainesville, Florida 32610, United States
  • Research Facility
    Park Ridge, Illinois 60068, United States
  • Research Facility
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Research Facility
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Research Facility
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, United States
  • Research Facility
    Kansas City, Missouri 64108, United States
  • Research Facility
    Omaha, Nebraska 68015, United States
  • Research Facility
    Mays Landing, New Jersey 08330, United States
  • Research Facility
    Buffalo, New York 14222, United States
  • Research Facility
    New Hyde Park, New York 11040, United States
  • Research Facility
    Youngstown, Ohio 44514, United States
  • Research Facility
    Portland, Oregon 97239-3098, United States
  • Research Facility
    Chattanooga, Tennessee 37404, United States
  • Research Facility
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37916, United States
  • Research Facility
    Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • Research Facility
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Research Facility
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Research Facility
    Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
  • Research Facility
    Huntington, West Virginia 25701, United States
  • Research Facility
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3K 6R8, Canada
  • Research Facility
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada
  • Research Facility
    London, Ontario N6A 5W9, Canada
  • Research Facility
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L1, Canada
  • Research Facility
    Montreal, Quebec H3T 1C5, Canada
  • Research Site
    Rijeka, 51000, Croatia
  • Research Site
    Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
  • Research Site
    Bialystok, 15-274, Poland
  • Research Site
    Bydgoszcz, 85-094, Poland
  • Research Site
    Krakow, 30-663, Poland
  • Research Site
    Lodz, 91-738, Poland
  • Research Site
    Warsazawa, 04-730, Poland
  • Research Site
    Wroclaw, 50-369, Poland
  • Research Site
    Bucharest, 011743, Romania
  • Research Site
    Bucharest, 041451, Romania
  • Research Site
    Iasi, 700309, Romania
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Winter HS, Krzeski P, Heyman MB, Ibarguen-Secchia E, Iwanczak B, Kaczmarski M, Kierkus J, Kolacek S, Osuntokun B, Quiros JA, Shah M, Yacyshyn B, Dunnmon PM. High- and low-dose oral delayed-release mesalamine in children with mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Dec;59(6):767-72. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000530. PubMed 25419597 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 5, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00713310
Lead sponsor
Warner Chilcott
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 11, 2008
Start date
Dec 2008
Primary completion
Mar 2011
Completion
Mar 2011
Results posted
Apr 4, 2012
Last update
Apr 5, 2012

Study contacts

Preston M Dunnmon, MD
study director · Procter and Gamble

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion