A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Boceprevir and Narlaprevir in Hepatitis C, Chronic and Hepacivirus, sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Terminated. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-11.
Sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Other
Study P05063 is a 3-year long-term follow-up (LTFU) study in participants previously treated with boceprevir (BOC) or narlaprevir (NAR) in a Phase 1, 2, or 3 clinical study. Participants will be followed for up to 3.5 years after the end of their participation in the treatment protocol to document maintenance of the antiviral response (for sustained responders) and to characterize the long-term safety after use of this therapeutic regimen. LTFU procedures include collection of plasma samples for measuring Hepatitis C Virus ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and HCV sequence analysis. No drug therapy will be administered as part of this study.
In Part 1, participants who previously participated in one of nine boceprevir studies (P03523 [NCT00423670], P03659 [NCT00160251], P04487 [No NCT], P05101 [NCT00708500], P05216 [NCT00705432], P05411 [NCT00959699], P05514 [NCT00910624], P05685 [NCT00845065], and P06086 [NCT01023035]) were followed for response. In Part 2, participants who previously participated in one narlaprevir study (P05104 [NCT00797745]) were followed for response.
2,709 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis A; 142 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 1,954 is above the median of 100 across 1,886 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis A.
Browse Hepatitis A studies →Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC is the lead sponsor of 2,114 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.
Of its 489 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 362 (74%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants who previously participated in treatment studies in which boceprevir was administered were subsequently enrolled in Part 1 of the current follow-up study P05063 (NCT00689390). Participants may have received boceprevir or control peginterferon plus ribavirin (PR) in the previous treatment study. No treatment was administered in the current follow-up study.
Biological: Boceprevir · Biological: Peginterferon alfa-2b · Drug: Ribavirin · Other: Blood/Plasma Collection
Participants who previously participated in treatment studies in which narlaprevir was administered were subsequently enrolled in Part 2 of the current follow-up study P05063 (NCT00689390). Participants may have received narlaprevir or control PR in the previous treatment study. No treatment was administered in the current follow-up study.
Biological: Narlaprevir · Biological: Peginterferon alfa-2b · Drug: Ribavirin · Other: Blood/Plasma Collection
In previous treatment studies, boceprevir was administered as specified by the protocol. No treatment was administered on the current follow-up study (P05063, NCT00689390).
Also known as: SCH 503034
In previous treatment studies, narlaprevir was administered as specified by the protocol. No treatment was administered on the current follow-up study (P05063, NCT00689390).
Also known as: SCH 900518
In previous treatment studies, peginterferon alfa-2b was administered as specified by the protocol. No treatment was administered on the current follow-up study (P05063, NCT00689390).
Also known as: PEG-Intron®, SCH 054031
In previous treatment studies, ribavirin was administered as specified by the protocol. No treatment was administered on the current follow-up study (P05063, NCT00689390).
Also known as: Rebetol®
Blood samples were collected at all visits during the LTFU for blood chemistry and hematology. Plasma samples were collected at all visits as appropriate from participants who were sustained responders at the end of FU in the previous treatment protocol for HCV-RNA PCR and HCV sequence analysis.
Number of Participants With Relapse During the LTFU Among Sustained Responders From Previous Treatment Studies With Boceprevir or Narlaprevir (Durability of Virologic Response)
Durability of response was assessed by the number of participants who relapsed during the LTFU among those that had achieved sustained virologic response (SVR) by 24 weeks after treatment with boceprevir or narlaprevir in a previous Phase 1, 2, or 3 treatment study. In the current LTFU, participants were classified based on the last Hepatitis C Virus ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) result available at the time of the data cut-off date as follows: A participant was classified as a sustained virologic responder at a given time point if serum HCV-RNA was undetectable at that time point and there had not been a positive HCV-RNA since the participant was determined to have achieved SVR in the previous study. A participant was classified as a relapser if they were a sustained virologic responder in the previous treatment study and became serum HCV-RNA positive with no subsequent negative results during LTFU.
Time frame: From End Of Treatment (EOT) date in the previous treatment study to the first date of a positive HCV RNA result for relapsers or the last contact date for non-relapsers in the LTFU (up to 3.5 years)
Kaplan-Meier Exposure-adjusted Relapse Rate
The distribution of time to relapse was summarized using Kaplan-Meier estimates for all participants who were sustained responders at 24 weeks post-treatment in the previous study. Exposure Adjusted Relapse Rate = 1000 × (number of relapses) / (Total exposure time in years). Total exposure time in years = \[(total number of days from last day of treatment to the last follow-up day for all subjects who did not relapse) + (total number of days from last day of treatment to the day of relapse for those who relapsed)\] / 365.25 days \[for 1 year\].
Time frame: From EOT date in the previous treatment study to the first date of a positive HCV RNA result for relapsers or the last contact date for non-relapsers in the LTFU (up to 3.5 years)
Number of Participants With HCV Treatment-Emergent Resistance Associated Variants (TE-RAVs) of NS3/4A Protease Loci
Plasma samples of all participants receiving at least one dose of study medication in a previous treatment protocol were evaluated by population sequencing and analyzed to detect amino acid variants in the NS3/4A protease known to be associated with reduced susceptibility to boceprevir and narlaprevir. RAVs in the NS3/4A protease gene were evaluated at 12 loci (V36, Q41, F43, T54, V55, V107, R155, A156, V158, D168, I/V170 and M175) on the basis of in vitro studies. A TE-RAV was defined as a RAV not present at baseline and that had not returned to wild type (WT) while the participant was still on treatment. The number of participants with TE-RAVS detected at the EOT in the previous treatment study are reported below, followed by those participants with TE-RAVS that returned to WT during the LTFU (among those with detected TE-RAVS).
Time frame: From EOT in the previous treatment study to the last available date in the LTFU (up to 3.5 years)
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Reported During the LTFU
Long-term safety was assessed based on the SAEs reported during the LTFU period. An SAE was any adverse drug or biologic or device experience occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening AE, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongs hospitalization, congenital anomaly or birth defect. Important medical events that did not result in any of these outcomes could still be considered SAEs if they jeopardized the participant and/or required medical/surgical intervention, based on appropriate medical judgment. Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities and out of normal range liver function tests that were not accompanied by clinical manifestations were NOT considered SAEs.
Time frame: From enrollment in the LTFU study to the last available date in the LTFU study (up to 3 years)
Number of Participants That Discontinued the LTFU Due to SAEs
An SAE was any adverse drug or biologic or device experience occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening AE, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongs hospitalization, congenital anomaly or birth defect. Important medical events that did not result in any of these outcomes could still be considered SAEs if they jeopardized the participant and/or required medical/surgical intervention, based on appropriate medical judgment. Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities and out of normal range liver function tests that were not accompanied by clinical manifestations were NOT considered SAEs.
Time frame: From enrollment in the LTFU study to the last available date in the LTFU study (up to 3 years)
Participants were recruited from 9 boceprevir studies (P03523 \[NCT00423670\], P03659 \[NCT00160251\], P04487 \[No NCT\], P05101 \[NCT00708500\], P05216 \[NCT00705432\], P05411 \[NCT00959699\], P05514 \[NCT00910624\], P05685 \[NCT00845065\], and P06086 \[NCT01023035\]) and 1 narlaprevir study (P05104 \[NCT00797745\]).
| Milestone | Participants From Boceprevir Studies | Participants From Narlaprevir Studies |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 1907 | 47 |
| Completed | 1481 | 37 |
| Not completed | 426 | 10 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 19 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 179 | 7 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 117 | 3 |
| Withdrew: Withdrew consent-retreatment opportunity | 52 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Non-compliance with protocol | 21 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Did not meet protocol eligibility | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Administrative | 37 | 0 |
Durability of response was assessed by the number of participants who relapsed during the LTFU among those that had achieved sustained virologic response (SVR) by 24 weeks after treatment with boceprevir or narlaprevir in a previous Phase 1, 2, or 3 treatment study. In the current LTFU, participants were classified based on the last Hepatitis C Virus ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) result available at the time of the data cut-off date as follows: A participant was classified as a sustained virologic responder at a given time point if serum HCV-RNA was undetectable at that time point and there had not been a positive HCV-RNA since the participant was determined to have achieved SVR in the previous study. A participant was classified as a relapser if they were a sustained virologic responder in the previous treatment study and became serum HCV-RNA positive with no subsequent negative results during LTFU.
| participants | Previous SVR on Boceprevir + PR | Previous SVR on Narlaprevir + PR | Previous SVR on PR Only |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Relapse During the LTFU Among Sustained Responders From Previous Treatment Studies With Boceprevir or Narlaprevir (Durability of Virologic Response) | 8 | 0 | 1 |
The distribution of time to relapse was summarized using Kaplan-Meier estimates for all participants who were sustained responders at 24 weeks post-treatment in the previous study. Exposure Adjusted Relapse Rate = 1000 × (number of relapses) / (Total exposure time in years). Total exposure time in years = \[(total number of days from last day of treatment to the last follow-up day for all subjects who did not relapse) + (total number of days from last day of treatment to the day of relapse for those who relapsed)\] / 365.25 days \[for 1 year\].
| relapses per 1,000 person-years | Previous SVR on Boceprevir + PR | Previous SVR on Narlaprevir + PR | Previous SVR on PR Only |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kaplan-Meier Exposure-adjusted Relapse Rate | 2.3 | 0 | 2.2 |
Plasma samples of all participants receiving at least one dose of study medication in a previous treatment protocol were evaluated by population sequencing and analyzed to detect amino acid variants in the NS3/4A protease known to be associated with reduced susceptibility to boceprevir and narlaprevir. RAVs in the NS3/4A protease gene were evaluated at 12 loci (V36, Q41, F43, T54, V55, V107, R155, A156, V158, D168, I/V170 and M175) on the basis of in vitro studies. A TE-RAV was defined as a RAV not present at baseline and that had not returned to wild type (WT) while the participant was still on treatment. The number of participants with TE-RAVS detected at the EOT in the previous treatment study are reported below, followed by those participants with TE-RAVS that returned to WT during the LTFU (among those with detected TE-RAVS).
| participants | Participants From Boceprevir Studies With TE-RAVs | Participants From Narlaprevir Studies With TE-RAVs |
|---|---|---|
| V36A TE-RAVs detected | 6 | — |
| __V36A TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 6) | 6 | — |
| V36G TE-RAVs detected | 1 | — |
| __V36G TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 1) | 1 | — |
| V36L TE-RAVs detected | 9 | — |
| __V36L TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 9) | 8 | — |
| V36M TE-RAVs detected | 142 | — |
| __V36M TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 142) | 135 | — |
| F43C TE-RAVs detected | 3 | — |
| __F43C TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 3) | 3 | — |
| T54A TE-RAVs detected | 40 | — |
| __T54A TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 40) | 40 | — |
| T54C TE-RAVs detected | 2 | — |
| __T54C TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 2) | 2 | — |
| T54S TE-RAVs detected | 143 | — |
| __T54S TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 143) | 104 | — |
| V55A TE-RAVs detected | 5 | — |
| __V55A TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 5) | 3 | — |
| V107I TE-RAVs detected | 3 | — |
| __V107I TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 3) | 2 | — |
| R155K TE-RAVs detected | 183 | — |
| __R155K TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 183) | 154 | — |
| R155T TE-RAVs detected | 22 | — |
| __R155T TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 22) | 20 | — |
| A156S TE-RAVs detected | 37 | — |
| __A156S TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 37) | 35 | — |
| A156T TE-RAVs detected | 4 | — |
| __A156T TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 4) | 4 | — |
| V158I TE-RAVs detected | 18 | — |
| __V158I TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 16) | 16 | — |
| V158M TE-RAVs detected | 1 | — |
| __V158M TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 1) | 1 | — |
| D168N TE-RAVs detected | 12 | — |
| __D168N TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 12) | 11 | — |
| I170T TE-RAVs detected | 3 | — |
| __I170T TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 3) | 3 | — |
| V170A TE-RAVs detected | 27 | — |
| __V170A TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 27) | 24 | — |
| M175L TE-RAVs detected | 5 | — |
| __M175L TE-RAVs returned to WT (out of 5) | 2 | — |
Long-term safety was assessed based on the SAEs reported during the LTFU period. An SAE was any adverse drug or biologic or device experience occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening AE, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongs hospitalization, congenital anomaly or birth defect. Important medical events that did not result in any of these outcomes could still be considered SAEs if they jeopardized the participant and/or required medical/surgical intervention, based on appropriate medical judgment. Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities and out of normal range liver function tests that were not accompanied by clinical manifestations were NOT considered SAEs.
| participants | Participants From Boceprevir Studies | Participants From Narlaprevir Studies |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Reported During the LTFU | 136 | 2 |
An SAE was any adverse drug or biologic or device experience occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening AE, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongs hospitalization, congenital anomaly or birth defect. Important medical events that did not result in any of these outcomes could still be considered SAEs if they jeopardized the participant and/or required medical/surgical intervention, based on appropriate medical judgment. Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities and out of normal range liver function tests that were not accompanied by clinical manifestations were NOT considered SAEs.
| participants | Participants From Boceprevir Studies | Participants From Narlaprevir Studies |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants That Discontinued the LTFU Due to SAEs | 19 | 0 |
Collected over From enrollment in the LTFU study to the last available date in the LTFU study (up to 3 years). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants From Boceprevir Studies | — | 136/1,907 (7.1%) | — |
| Participants From Narlaprevir Studies | — | 2/47 (4.3%) | — |
| Event | Participants From Boceprevir Studies | Participants From Narlaprevir Studies |
|---|---|---|
| COLITIS ISCHAEMICGastrointestinal disorders | 0/1907 | 1/47 |
| DIVERTICULAR PERFORATIONGastrointestinal disorders | 0/1907 | 1/47 |
| MYOCARDIAL INFARCTIONCardiac disorders | 9/1907 | 0/47 |
| HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMANeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | 9/1907 | 0/47 |
| CHOLELITHIASISHepatobiliary disorders | 5/1907 | 0/47 |
| PNEUMONIAInfections and infestations | 5/1907 | 0/47 |
| OSTEOARTHRITISMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 5/1907 | 0/47 |
| CHEST PAINGeneral disorders | 4/1907 | 0/47 |
| ATRIAL FIBRILLATIONCardiac disorders | 3/1907 | 0/47 |
| CORONARY ARTERY DISEASECardiac disorders | 3/1907 | 0/47 |
All Enrolled Participants
| Age, Customized(participants) | Participants From Boceprevir Studies | Participants From Narlaprevir Studies | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <40 years | 173 | 5 | 178 |
| 40 to <65 years | 1651 | 42 | 1693 |
| ≥65 years | 83 | 0 | 83 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Participants From Boceprevir Studies | Participants From Narlaprevir Studies | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 785 | 19 | 804 |
| Male | 1122 | 28 | 1150 |
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Yes — https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC