CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00682643Updated Jan 13, 2017Results posted

A Clinical Study With Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray And Vehicle Placebo For The Treatment Of Perennial (Year-round) Allergic Rhinitis

A Phase 4 interventional study of fluticasone furoate nasal spray and vehicle placebo nasal spray in Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 56 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-13.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
550
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess long-term ocular safety of fluticasone furoate nasal spray in adult and adolescent subjects diagnosed with perennial allergic rhinitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial

Keywords

  • Perennial Allergic Rhinitis
  • fluticasone furoate
  • ocular safety
03

In context

Rhinitis

1,105 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinitis; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 550 is above the median of 89 across 906 interventional studies indexed under Rhinitis.

Browse Rhinitis studies →

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline is the lead sponsor of 3,562 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Of its 258 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 232 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects eligible for enrollment in the study must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Informed consent
  • Subject has provided an appropriately signed and dated informed consent. An appropriately signed and dated assent must be obtained from the parents or guardian if the subject is a child under 18 years of age.

    • Outpatient
  • Subject is treatable on an outpatient basis.

    • Age
  • 12 years of age and older at Visit 2

    • Male or eligible female Female subjects should not be enrolled if they plan to become pregnant during the time of study participation.

To be eligible for entry into the study, females of childbearing potential must commit to the consistent and correct use of an acceptable method of birth control, as defined by the following:

  • Abstinence Females of childbearing potential who are not sexually active must commit to complete abstinence from intercourse for two weeks before exposure to the study drug, throughout the clinical trial, and for a period after the trial to account for elimination of the drug (minimum of six days).
  • Oral contraceptive (either combined estrogen/progestin or progestin only)
  • Injectable progestogen
  • Implants of levonorgestrel
  • Percutaneous contraceptive patches
  • Intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS) with a documented failure rate of less than 1% per year,
  • Male partner who is sterile (vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia) prior to the female subject's entry into the study and is the sole sexual partner for that female subject, or
  • Double barrier method-condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical /vault caps) plus Spermicide,
  • Estrogenic vaginal ring. A urine pregnancy test will be done at the screening visit to confirm females of childbearing potential are not pregnant upon entry into the study. In addition, urine pregnancy tests will be done for all females of childbearing potential at each clinic visit.

    • Diagnosis of PAR to include:

A positive skin test (by prick method) response to appropriate perennial allergen (house dust mites, animal dander, mold, or cockroach) within last 12 months prior to Visit 1 or at Visit 1.

A positive skin test is defined as a wheal ³3mm larger than the diluent control for prick testing.

•Two year medical history and past treatment of PAR (written or verbal confirmation) which includes perennial, i.e., year-round, symptoms. PAR symptoms could include nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching and sneezing.

In vitro tests for specific IgE (such as RAST, PRIST) will not be allowed for the diagnosis of PAR.

NOTE: Subjects who meet the above criteria and who also may have seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and/or perennial non-allergic rhinitis (PNAR) are eligible for randomization.

  • Environment

    •Subject must be symptomatic to appropriate perennial allergen (animal dander, house dust mites, cockroach, mold) and willing to maintain, as much as possible, the same environment throughout the study.

  • Ability to comply with study procedures Subject understands and is willing, able and likely to comply with study procedures and restrictions.
  • Literate Subject must be able to read, comprehend, and record information in English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects meeting any of the following criteria must not be enrolled in the study:

  • Significant concomitant medical conditions, defined as but not limited to:

    • A historical or current evidence of clinically significant uncontrolled disease of any body system (e.g., tuberculosis, psychological disorders, eczema). Significant is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through study participation or which would confound the interpretation of the study results if the disease/condition exacerbated during the study.
    • History or current diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
    • Uncontrolled hypertension (i.e., systolic blood pressure ³ 140mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ³ 90mm Hg)
    • A severe physical obstruction of the nose (e.g., deviated septum or nasal polyp) or nasal septal perforation that could affect the deposition of double blind intranasal study drug
    • Nasal (e.g., nasal septum) or ocular injury/surgery in the last 6 months (including LASIK eye surgery)
    • Asthma, with the exception of mild intermittent asthma [National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma - Expert Panel Report 3, National Institutes of Health, August 28, 2007.

NOTE: Subjects will be allowed to use short-acting inhaled beta2 agonists ONLY on an as needed basis.

  • Rhinitis medicamentosa
  • Bacterial or viral infection (e.g., common cold) of the eyes or upper respiratory tract within two weeks of Visit 1 or during the screening period
  • Documented evidence of acute or significant chronic sinusitis, as determined by the individual investigator
  • Current or history of glaucoma and/or ocular herpes simplex
  • Current cataract and/or previous history of cataract surgery
  • Physical impairment that would affect subject's ability to participate safely and fully in the study
  • Clinical evidence of a Candida infection of the nose
  • History of psychiatric disease, intellectual deficiency, poor motivation, substance abuse (including drug and alcohol) or other conditions that will limit the validity of informed consent or that would confound the interpretation of the study results
  • History of adrenal insufficiency
  • History of Hepatitis B or C

    • Use of corticosteroids, defined as:
  • Intranasal corticosteroid within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 (e.g., VERAMYST, FLONASE™, Nasonex, Rhinocort).
  • Inhaled, oral, intramuscular, intravenous, ocular, and/or topical corticosteroids (with the exception of topical hydrocortisone, 1% or less, or equivalent) within 8 weeks prior to Visit 1.

    • Use of other allergy medications within the timeframe indicated relative to Visit 1
  • Intranasal or ocular cromolyn within 14 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., Nasalcrom, Crolom)
  • Short-acting prescription and non-prescription antihistamines, including ocular preparations and antihistamines contained in insomnia and "night time" pain formulations, within 3 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., Benadryl, Chlortrimeton, Dimetane, Tavist)
  • Long-acting antihistamines within 10 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., Allegra, Claritin, Clarinex, Zyrtec).
  • Intranasal antihistamines (e.g., Astelin) within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1
  • Oral or intranasal decongestants within 3 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., Sudafed)
  • Long-acting beta-agonists within 3 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., SEREVENT™, Foradil)
  • Intranasal, oral, or inhaled anticholinergics within 3 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., Atrovent)
  • Oral antileukotrienes within 3 days of Visit 1 (e.g., Singulair)
  • Subcutaneous omalizumab (Xolair) within 5 months of Visit 1
  • Use of other medications that may affect allergic rhinitis or its symptoms
  • Chronic use of concomitant medications, such as tricyclic antidepressants, that would affect assessment of the effectiveness of the study drug
  • Use of other intranasally administered medications (e.g., Miacalcin)

    • Use of immunosuppressive medications 8 weeks prior to screening and during the study
    • Immunotherapy Immunotherapy patients may be enrolled in the study if the immunotherapy was not initiated within 30 days of Visit 1, if the dose has remained fixed over the 30 days prior to Visit 1, and the dose will remain fixed for the duration of the study.
    • Use of any medications that significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of fluticasone furoate (ritonavir and ketoconazole)
    • Use of chronic treatment with agents known to promote the development of cataracts (e.g., potassium-sparing diuretics and allopurinol)
    • Allergy/Intolerance
  • Known hypersensitivity to corticosteroids or any excipients

    • Clinical trial/experimental medication experience
  • Has recent exposure to an investigational study drug within 30 days of Visit 1
  • Participation in a previous or current FFNS (GW685698X) clinical study

    • Positive urine pregnancy test or female who is breastfeeding
  • Has a positive or inconclusive pregnancy test at Visit 1 or Visit 2

    • Affiliation with investigational site
  • Subject is a participating investigator, sub-investigator, study co-ordinator, or employee of a participating investigator, or is an immediate family member of the aforementioned.

    • Tobacco use
  • Subject currently uses smoking products including cigarettes, cigars, and pipe or chewing tobacco, or has used these products in the last 6 months

    • Chickenpox or measles A subject is not eligible if he/she currently has chickenpox or measles, or has been exposed to chickenpox or measles during the last three weeks and is non-immune. If a subject develops chickenpox or measles during the study, he/she will be withdrawn from the study. If a non-immune subject is exposed to chickenpox or measles during the study, his/her continuation in the study will be at the discretion of the investigator, taking into consideration the likelihood of developing active disease.
    • Findings of a clinically significant, abnormal ECG
    • Findings of a clinically significant laboratory abnormality
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
550 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    vehicle placebo nasal spray

    Drug: vehicle placebo nasal spray

  • Active comparator
    fluticasone furoate nasal spray

    Drug: fluticasone furoate nasal spray

Interventions

  • Drugfluticasone furoate nasal spray

    fluticasone furoate nasal spray

  • Drugvehicle placebo nasal spray

    placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P)

    An event for P (opacity in the lens positioned just anterior to the posterior lens capsule and characterized by the posterior migration of lens epithelial cells from the lens bow) is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in Lens Opacities Classification System, Version III (LOCS III; system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Data represent the Kaplan-Meier estimate for the CU of par. with an event of P based on a lifetest table.

    Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, 76, 88, and 104

  2. Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event

    An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT). GAT is a commonly used method of determining approximate intraocular pressure. The data below represent the Kaplan-Meier estimate for the cumulative proportion of participants with an IOP event based on a lifetest table.

    Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, 76, 88, and 104

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity at Week 52 and Week 104

    An event for P (opacity in the lens positioned just anterior to the posterior lens capsule and characterized by the posterior migration of lens epithelial cells from the lens bow) is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104

  2. Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104

    An event for P is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (classification system based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104

  3. Change From Baseline in LOCS III Cortical Opacity (C) at Week 52 and Week 104

    An event for C (an opacity starting at the outer edge of the lens and progressing toward the center) is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for C (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104

  4. Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104

    An event for C (an opacity starting at the outer edge of the lens and progressing toward the center) is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for C (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104

  5. Change From Baseline in LOCS III Nuclear Opacity (NO) at Week 52 and Week 104

    Nuclear opacity refers to the opacity in the central nucleus of the eye.The range for NO is 0.1 (no opacity) to 6.9 (maximum opacity). Change from baseline in NO was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104

  6. Change From Baseline in Nuclear Color (NC) at Week 52 and Week 104

    Nuclear color is associated with the force required to compress a lens to 75% of its original depth. The range for NC is 0.1 (no opacity) to 6.9 (maximum opacity). Change from baseline in NC was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104

  7. Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Weeks 52 and 104

    An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104

  8. Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52

    An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 value.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

  9. Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104

    An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline in IOP was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 104 value.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 104

  10. Change From Baseline in Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Visual Acuity (VA) Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Charts at Week 52 and Week 104

    ETDRS charts are used to measure VA (the ability to resolve fine image details). Participants must have had a best-corrected distance VA of =\< 0.18 on the LogMAR scale using ETDRS charts in both eyes measured separately. The LogMAR scale (expressed as the \[decadic\] logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution \[range from +1.00 to -0.30\]) converts the geometric sequence of a traditional chart to a linear scale. It measures VA loss; positive values indicate vision loss, whereas negative values denote normal or better VA. A lower LogMAR value indicates better VA.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104

  11. Percent Change From Baseline in the Funduscopic Horizontal Cup-to-disc Ratio at Week 104

    The funduscopic horizontal cup-to-risk ratio assesses the progression of glaucoma. Percent change from baseline in funduscopic horizontal cup-to-disc ratio at Week 104 was calculated by substracting the baseline value from the Week 104 value (both expressed as a percent). The cup-to-disc ratio compares the diameter of the "cup" portion of the optic disc with the total diameter of the optic disc. A large cup-to-disc ratio may imply glaucoma or other pathology.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 104

  12. Change From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods

    rTNSS was evaluated on a 4-point categorical scale (sum of the scores for rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing; range=0-12). The data collected were used as a measure for treatment compliance. The scores on the scale were based on the severity of each nasal symptom: 0=none (symptom is not present); 1=mild (sign/symptom is clearly present but minimal awareness; easily tolerated); 2=moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (sign/symptom is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping).

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 to 26, Weeks 27 to 52, Weeks 53 to 78, and Weeks 79 to 104

07

Results

Posted Mar 13, 2012

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
Started182368
Completed104199
Not completed78169
Withdrew: Adverse event1223
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy20
Withdrew: Protocol violation3876
Withdrew: Met protocol-defined stopping criteria34
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up16
Withdrew: Physician decision26
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1953
Withdrew: Did not receive study drug11

Outcome measures

PrimaryCumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P)

An event for P (opacity in the lens positioned just anterior to the posterior lens capsule and characterized by the posterior migration of lens epithelial cells from the lens bow) is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in Lens Opacities Classification System, Version III (LOCS III; system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Data represent the Kaplan-Meier estimate for the CU of par. with an event of P based on a lifetest table.

Time frame:
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, 76, 88, and 104
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P)
Percentage of participantsPlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
Week 120.600.88
Week 241.241.84
Week 361.932.56
Week 522.683.72
Week 642.683.72
Week 762.683.72
Week 882.684.59
Week 1042.685.09
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs FF 110 mcg QD · Wald Chi-square · p = 0.395 (Wald Chi-Square test based on a proportional hazards model adjusting for age and baseline value)
PrimaryCumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event

An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT). GAT is a commonly used method of determining approximate intraocular pressure. The data below represent the Kaplan-Meier estimate for the cumulative proportion of participants with an IOP event based on a lifetest table.

Time frame:
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, 76, 88, and 104
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event
percentage of participantsPlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
Week 120.000.00
Week 240.000.32
Week 360.000.32
Week 520.000.71
Week 640.001.12
Week 760.001.98
Week 880.841.98
Week 1040.842.96
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs FF 110 mcg QD · Wald Chi-square · p = 0.342 (Wald Chi-Square test based on a proportional hazards model adjusting for age and baseline value)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity at Week 52 and Week 104

An event for P (opacity in the lens positioned just anterior to the posterior lens capsule and characterized by the posterior migration of lens epithelial cells from the lens bow) is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity at Week 52 and Week 104
scores on a scalePlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 2510.00 ± 0.0420.00 ± 0.063
Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 1980.00 ± 0.0390.00 ± 0.083
Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 2510.00 ± 0.0570.00 ± 0.061
Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 1980.00 ± 0.042-0.01 ± 0.068
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104

An event for P is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (classification system based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104
participantsPlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
Left eye, Week 52, <-0.3; n=130, 25100
Left eye, Week 52, -0.3; n=130, 25100
Left eye, Week 52, -0.2; n=130, 25125
Left eye, Week 52, -0.1; n=130, 251313
Left eye, Week 52, 0; n=130, 251121218
Left eye, Week 52, 0.1; n=130, 251312
Left eye, Week 52, 0.2; n=130, 25100
Left eye, Week 52, 0.3; n=130, 25112
Left eye, Week 52, 0.4; n=130, 25100
Left eye, Week 52, 0.5; n=130, 25100
Left eye, Week 52, 0.6; n=130, 25101
Left eye, Week 52, 0.7; n=130, 25100
Left eye, Week 52, 0.8; n=130, 25100
Left eye, Week 52, >=0.9; n=130, 25100
Left eye, Week 52, >=0.3; n=130, 25113
Left eye, Week 52, >=0.5; n=130, 25101
Left eye, Week 52, >=1.0; n=130, 25100
Right eye, Week 52, <-0.3; n=130, 25100
Right eye, Week 52, -0.3; n=130, 25110
Right eye, Week 52, -0.2; n=130, 25115
Right eye, Week 52, -0.1; n=130, 251010
Right eye, Week 52, 0; n=130, 251122218
Right eye, Week 52, 0.1; n=130, 251413
Right eye, Week 52, 0.2; n=130, 25102
Right eye, Week 52, 0.3; n=130, 25111
Right eye, Week 52, 0.4; n=130, 25112
Right eye, Week 52, 0.5; n=130, 25100
Right eye, Week 52, 0.6; n=130, 25100
Right eye, Week 52, 0.7; n=130, 25100
Right eye, Week 52, 0.8; n=130, 25100
Right eye, Week 52, >=0.9; n=130, 25100
Right eye, Week 52, >=0.3; n=130, 25123
Right eye, Week 52, >=0.5; n=130, 25100
Right eye, Week 52, >=1.0; n=130, 25100
Left eye, Week 104, <-0.3; n=104, 19800
Left eye, Week 104, -0.3; n=104, 19800
Left eye, Week 104, -0.2; n=104, 19825
Left eye, Week 104, -0.1; n=104, 198311
Left eye, Week 104, 0; n=104, 19894175
Left eye, Week 104, 0.1; n=104, 19855
Left eye, Week 104, 0.2; n=104, 19800
Left eye, Week 104, 0.3; n=104, 19800
Left eye, Week 104, 0.4; n=104, 19800
Left eye, Week 104, 0.5; n=104, 19800
Left eye, Week 104, 0.6; n=104, 19801
Left eye, Week 104, 0.7; n=104, 19800
Left eye, Week 104, 0.8; n=104, 19801
Left eye, Week 104, >=0.9; n=104, 19800
Left eye, Week 104, >=0.3; n=104, 19802
Left eye, Week 104, >=0.5; n=104, 19802
Left eye, Week 104, >=1.0; n=104, 19800
Right eye, Week 104, <-0.3; n=104, 19800
Right eye, Week 104, -0.3; n=104, 19810
Right eye, Week 104, -0.2; n=104, 19815
Right eye, Week 104, -0.1; n=104, 198214
Right eye, Week 104, 0; n=104, 19897174
Right eye, Week 104, 0.1; n=104, 19832
Right eye, Week 104, 0.2; n=104, 19802
Right eye, Week 104, 0.3; n=104, 19800
Right eye, Week 104, 0.4; n=104, 19800
Right eye, Week 104, 0.5; n=104, 19800
Right eye, Week 104, 0.6; n=104, 19800
Right eye, Week 104, 0.7; n=104, 19801
Right eye, Week 104, 0.8; n=104, 19800
Right eye, Week 104, >=0.9; n=104, 19800
Right eye, Week 104, >=0.3; n=104, 19801
Right eye, Week 104, >=0.5; n=104, 19801
Right eye, Week 104, >=1.0; n=104, 19800
SecondaryChange From Baseline in LOCS III Cortical Opacity (C) at Week 52 and Week 104

An event for C (an opacity starting at the outer edge of the lens and progressing toward the center) is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for C (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in LOCS III Cortical Opacity (C) at Week 52 and Week 104
scores on a scalePlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 2510.01 ± 0.2100.00 ± 0.113
Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 1980.02 ± 0.2100.01 ± 0.186
Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 251-0.01 ± 0.2290.00 ± 0.154
Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 1980.02 ± 0.1870.01 ± 0.186
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104

An event for C (an opacity starting at the outer edge of the lens and progressing toward the center) is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for C (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104
participantsPlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
Left eye, Week 52, >=0.3; n=130, 25144
Left eye, Week 52, >=0.5; n=130, 25110
Left eye, Week 52, >=1.0; n=130, 25110
Right eye, Week 52, >=0.3; n=130, 25138
Right eye, Week 52, >=0.5; n=130, 25112
Right eye, Week 52, >=1.0; n=130, 25110
Left eye, Week 104, >=0.3; n=104, 198610
Left eye, Week 104, >=0.5; n=104, 19834
Left eye, Week 104, >=1.0; n=104, 19811
Right eye, Week 104, >=0.3; n=104, 198310
Right eye, Week 104, >=0.5; n=104, 19824
Right eye, Week 104, >=1.0; n=104, 19812
SecondaryChange From Baseline in LOCS III Nuclear Opacity (NO) at Week 52 and Week 104

Nuclear opacity refers to the opacity in the central nucleus of the eye.The range for NO is 0.1 (no opacity) to 6.9 (maximum opacity). Change from baseline in NO was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in LOCS III Nuclear Opacity (NO) at Week 52 and Week 104
scores on a scalePlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 2510.12 ± 0.4980.06 ± 0.495
Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 1980.21 ± 0.5380.10 ± 0.506
Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 2510.12 ± 0.5110.06 ± 0.492
Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 1980.21 ± 0.5500.09 ± 0.531
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Nuclear Color (NC) at Week 52 and Week 104

Nuclear color is associated with the force required to compress a lens to 75% of its original depth. The range for NC is 0.1 (no opacity) to 6.9 (maximum opacity). Change from baseline in NC was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Nuclear Color (NC) at Week 52 and Week 104
scores on a scalePlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 2510.14 ± 0.4320.09 ± 0.402
Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 1980.21 ± 0.4540.13 ± 0.465
Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 2510.16 ± 0.4220.09 ± 0.410
Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 1980.22 ± 0.4520.13 ± 0.469
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Weeks 52 and 104

An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104
Reported as:
Mean · mm Hg
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Weeks 52 and 104
mm HgPlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 251-0.5 ± 2.04-0.3 ± 2.26
Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 198-0.8 ± 1.98-0.6 ± 2.41
Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 251-0.7 ± 2.08-0.4 ± 2.33
Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 198-1.0 ± 2.17-0.7 ± 2.55
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52

An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 value.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 52
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52
participantsPlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
Left eye, IOP = <-10 to -910
Left eye, IOP = -800
Left eye, IOP = -702
Left eye, IOP = -600
Left eye, IOP = -533
Left eye, IOP = -4512
Left eye, IOP = -3919
Left eye, IOP = -21840
Left eye, IOP = -12240
Left eye, IOP = 03650
Left eye, IOP = 12030
Left eye, IOP = 2724
Left eye, IOP = 3519
Left eye, IOP = 447
Left eye, IOP = 503
Left eye, IOP = 602
Left eye, IOP = 700
Left eye, IOP = 800
Left eye, IOP = 900
Left eye, IOP >= 700
Left eye, IOP >= 1000
Left eye, IOP >= 1500
Right eye, IOP = <-10 to -900
Right eye, IOP = -801
Right eye, IOP = -720
Right eye, IOP = -601
Right eye, IOP = -524
Right eye, IOP = -4714
Right eye, IOP = -3923
Right eye, IOP = -22543
Right eye, IOP = -12234
Right eye, IOP = 02846
Right eye, IOP = 11631
Right eye, IOP = 21327
Right eye, IOP = 3314
Right eye, IOP = 428
Right eye, IOP = 512
Right eye, IOP = 603
Right eye, IOP = 700
Right eye, IOP = 800
Right eye, IOP = 900
Right eye, IOP >= 700
Right eye, IOP >= 1000
Right eye, IOP >= 1500
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104

An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline in IOP was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 104 value.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 104
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104
participantsPlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
Left eye, IOP = <-10 to -900
Left eye, IOP = -801
Left eye, IOP = -700
Left eye, IOP = -623
Left eye, IOP = -507
Left eye, IOP = -4610
Left eye, IOP = -31519
Left eye, IOP = -21731
Left eye, IOP = -11532
Left eye, IOP = 02132
Left eye, IOP = 11930
Left eye, IOP = 2516
Left eye, IOP = 337
Left eye, IOP = 406
Left eye, IOP = 512
Left eye, IOP = 601
Left eye, IOP = 701
Left eye, IOP = 800
Left eye, IOP = 900
Left eye, IOP >= 701
Left eye, IOP >= 1000
Left eye, IOP >= 1500
Right eye, IOP = <-10 to -900
Right eye, IOP = -801
Right eye, IOP = -702
Right eye, IOP = -621
Right eye, IOP = -557
Right eye, IOP = -4415
Right eye, IOP = -31017
Right eye, IOP = -22432
Right eye, IOP = -12122
Right eye, IOP = 01246
Right eye, IOP = 11623
Right eye, IOP = 2613
Right eye, IOP = 318
Right eye, IOP = 415
Right eye, IOP = 512
Right eye, IOP = 612
Right eye, IOP = 702
Right eye, IOP = 800
Right eye, IOP = 900
Right eye, IOP >= 702
Right eye, IOP >= 1000
Right eye, IOP >= 1500
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Visual Acuity (VA) Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Charts at Week 52 and Week 104

ETDRS charts are used to measure VA (the ability to resolve fine image details). Participants must have had a best-corrected distance VA of =\< 0.18 on the LogMAR scale using ETDRS charts in both eyes measured separately. The LogMAR scale (expressed as the \[decadic\] logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution \[range from +1.00 to -0.30\]) converts the geometric sequence of a traditional chart to a linear scale. It measures VA loss; positive values indicate vision loss, whereas negative values denote normal or better VA. A lower LogMAR value indicates better VA.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Visual Acuity (VA) Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Charts at Week 52 and Week 104
scores on a scalePlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 251-0.027 ± 0.0729-0.013 ± 0.0778
Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 198-0.035 ± 0.0740-0.023 ± 0.0858
Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 251-0.023 ± 0.0810-0.014 ± 0.0852
Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 198-0.025 ± 0.0992-0.024 ± 0.0899
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in the Funduscopic Horizontal Cup-to-disc Ratio at Week 104

The funduscopic horizontal cup-to-risk ratio assesses the progression of glaucoma. Percent change from baseline in funduscopic horizontal cup-to-disc ratio at Week 104 was calculated by substracting the baseline value from the Week 104 value (both expressed as a percent). The cup-to-disc ratio compares the diameter of the "cup" portion of the optic disc with the total diameter of the optic disc. A large cup-to-disc ratio may imply glaucoma or other pathology.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 104
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in the Funduscopic Horizontal Cup-to-disc Ratio at Week 104
percent changePlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
Left eye0.0 ± 7.230.7 ± 7.58
Right eye0.0 ± 7.310.0 ± 7.39
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods

rTNSS was evaluated on a 4-point categorical scale (sum of the scores for rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing; range=0-12). The data collected were used as a measure for treatment compliance. The scores on the scale were based on the severity of each nasal symptom: 0=none (symptom is not present); 1=mild (sign/symptom is clearly present but minimal awareness; easily tolerated); 2=moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (sign/symptom is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping).

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 1 to 26, Weeks 27 to 52, Weeks 53 to 78, and Weeks 79 to 104
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods
scores on a scalePlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
Week 1 to 26-2.12 ± 0.17-3.19 ± 0.12
Week 27 to 52-2.52 ± 0.21-3.86 ± 0.15
Week 53 to 78-2.56 ± 0.23-3.89 ± 0.16
Week 79 to 104-2.59 ± 0.25-4.10 ± 0.18
Week 1 to 104-2.30 ± 0.18-3.45 ± 0.13

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo—7/181 (3.9%)97/181 (53.6%)
FF 110 mcg QD—12/367 (3.3%)232/367 (63.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 23
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/1810/367
Intra-uterine deathPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions1/1810/367
Upper airway obstructionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/1810/367
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders1/1810/367
Suicide attemptPsychiatric disorders1/1810/367
NephrolithiasisRenal and urinary disorders1/1810/367
Abortion spontaneousPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions0/1812/367
ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1811/367
Rib fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1811/367
Tibia fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1811/367
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboFF 110 mcg QD
EpistaxisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders34/181123/367
SinusitisInfections and infestations31/18147/367
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations29/18152/367
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations17/18144/367
InfluenzaInfections and infestations16/18125/367
BronchitisInfections and infestations8/18131/367
Nasal ulcerRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/18130/367
HeadacheNervous system disorders13/18129/367
Viral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations12/18127/367
Nasal septum ulcerationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders6/18124/367

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)PlaceboFF 110 mcg QDTotal
Mean38.0 ± 13.3437.0 ± 13.4837.4 ± 13.43
Gender
Gender(Participants)PlaceboFF 110 mcg QDTotal
Female116255371
Male65112177
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)PlaceboFF 110 mcg QDTotal
African American/African Heritage295079
American Indian or Alaska Native145
Central/South Asian Heritage011
Japanese/East Asian/South East Asian Heritage268
Mixed Asian Heritage011
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander224
White146303449
African American/African Heritage & White101
08

Study locations

56 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Oxford, Alabama 36203, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Fresno, California 93720, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Huntington Beach, California 92647, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90025, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Mission Viejo, California 92691, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Rolling Hills Estates, California 90274, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Roseville, California 95678, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Sacramento, California 95823, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    San Diego, California 92120, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    San Jose, California 95117, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Stockton, California 95207, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Vista, California 92083, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Walnut Creek, California 94598, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Denver, Colorado 80230, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Englewood, Colorado 80112, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Tallahassee, Florida 32308, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Conyers, Georgia 30013, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Gainesville, Georgia 30501, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Lawrenceville, Georgia 30045, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Stockbridge, Georgia 30281, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46208, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    South Bend, Indiana 46617, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bethesda, Maryland 20814, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    North Dartmouth, Massachusetts 02747, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    St. Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bozeman, Montana 59718, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bellevue, Nebraska 68123-4303, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Omaha, Nebraska 68130, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Omaha, Nebraska 68131, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Ocean, New Jersey 07712, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Skillman, New Jersey 08558, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Asheville, North Carolina 28801, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Canton, Ohio 44718, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45231, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Sylvania, Ohio 43560, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73120, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Eugene, Oregon 97401, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Portland, Oregon 97213, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Summerville, South Carolina 29485, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Austin, Texas 78750, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75231-4307, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    El Paso, Texas 79903, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Kerrville, Texas 78028, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Waco, Texas 76712, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    South Burlington, Vermont 05403, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Spokane, Washington 99204, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Greenfield, Wisconsin 53228, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • LaForce C, Journeay GE, Miller SD, Silvey MJ, Wu W, Lee LA, Chylack LT Jr. Ocular safety of fluticasone furoate nasal spray in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a 2-year study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Jul;111(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 May 12. PubMed 23806459 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 13, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00682643
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 22, 2008
Start date
Jun 2008
Primary completion
Feb 2011
Completion
Feb 2011
Results posted
Mar 13, 2012
Last update
Jan 13, 2017

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion