CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00678340Updated Mar 6, 2013

Randomized Trial of Two Ablation Catheters in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

A Phase 4 interventional study of WACA and PVI and PVAC in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Pier Lambiase. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-03-06.

Sponsored by Pier Lambiase · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
178
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a chaotic heart rhythm of the top chambers of the heart. AF occurs in up to 10% of the population over the age of 60. It is associated with tiredness, impaired functional capacity and is the cause of up to 10% of strokes.

Ablation is a procedure performed with small tubes (catheters) that are introduced through the top of the leg. Burns are made inside of the heart to treat AF. This procedure has been shown to cure 90% of patients with intermittent (paroxysmal) AF.

The investigators currently use either one of two different catheters to create these burns inside the heart. The investigators do not know which is the best catheter to use in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

The investigators study will randomly allocate patients to have their ablation performed by either one of the catheters to give a fair comparison between the two. The investigators objective is to study the differences between these two catheters.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Single-Blind Study
  • Catheter Ablation
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 178 is above the median of 144 across 2,380 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Pier Lambiase as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with paroxysmal AF with a planned ablation procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior AF ablation
  • LA size greater than 60mm
  • Mechanical prosthetic MVR
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
178 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    WACA and PVI

    Device: WACA and PVI

  • Active comparator
    2

    PVAC

    Device: PVAC

Interventions

  • DeviceWACA and PVI

    Wide area circumferential ablation (WACA) in the pulmonary vein antrum with subsequent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with a single tip irrigated catheter.

  • DevicePVAC

    Circumferential ablation with a circular ablation catheter (Ablation Frontiers) to electrical silence.

    Also known as: Pulmonary vein ablation catheter, Ablation Frontiers

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Freedom of AF at 1 year following AF ablation procedure measured by 7 day holter recording

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Procedural time for pulmonary vein isolation

    Time frame: Index procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. All procedural complications

    Time frame: Index

  2. Incidence of pulmonary vein stenosis measure by MRI at 6 months post procedure

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Quality of life questionnaire

    Time frame: 6 months and 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University College Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust
    London, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • McCready J, Chow AW, Lowe MD, Segal OR, Ahsan S, de Bono J, Dhaliwal M, Mfuko C, Ng A, Rowland ER, Bradley RJ, Paisey J, Roberts P, Morgan JM, Sandilands A, Yue A, Lambiase PD. Safety and efficacy of multipolar pulmonary vein ablation catheter vs. irrigated radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized multicentre trial. Europace. 2014 Aug;16(8):1145-53. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu064. Epub 2014 May 19. PubMed 24843051 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00678340
Lead sponsor
Pier Lambiase
Collaborators
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, The Royal Bournemouth Hospital
Responsible party
Pier Lambiase (Chief Investigator, University College London Hospitals) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 15, 2008
Start date
Sep 2007
Primary completion
Mar 2013
Completion
Mar 2013
Last update
Mar 6, 2013

Study contacts

Pier D Lambiase, PhD
principal investigator · University College Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion