ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00659204Updated Jan 23, 2026Results posted

Efficacy of Silver Nanoparticle Gel Versus a Common Antibacterial Hand Gel

A Phase 3 interventional study of Silver Nanoparticle Gel and alcohol-based hand gel in Healthy, sponsored by Madigan Army Medical Center. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-23.

Sponsored by Madigan Army Medical Center · Phase 3, Interventional, and Screening

Why this study was terminated
Researcher left the institution

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2008, registered Apr 2008).
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of silver nanoparticle gel to a commercialized alcohol-based hand gel on bacterial counts isolated from the hands of 40 volunteers seeded with Serratia marcescens, a surrogate microbial marker. Specific aims of this study are: Aim #1: Compare the immediate antimicrobial efficacy of a one-time application of silver nanoparticle gel (SilvaSorb , AcryMed, Inc., Portland, OR) versus an alcohol-based hand gel (Purell, GoJo Industries, Akron, OH) in reducing transient bacterial counts isolated from hands seeded with S. marcescens.

Aim # 2: Compare the persistent antimicrobial efficacy of a one-time application of silver nanoparticle gel (SilvaSorb) versus an alcohol-based hand gel (Purell) over a 10 minute time frame in producing a persistent reduction on transient bacterial counts isolated from hands seeded with S. marcescens.

Aim # 3: Compare user acceptability of silver nanoparticle gel (SilvaSorb) versus an alcohol-based hand gel (Purell) using a self-assessment questionnaire.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this randomized controlled, double blinded, 2x3 experimental study is to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of silver nanoparticle gel compared to an alcohol-based hand gel on bacterial counts isolated from the hands of 40 healthy, adult, military student volunteers. The study will be conducted in two phases: the first phase will consist of a methods development period and the second phase will consist of the formal pilot study. For phase I, the first four participants from the sample pool will be assigned into one of two groups (nano-silver gel or alcohol-based gel) whereas in Phase II, the participants will be randomized into one of two groups. Participants in both phases will follow a 7 day washout period where subjects will refrain from using antimicrobial products for a week prior to testing. Testing of participants in both phases will start with a baseline bacterial hand count. This will be accomplished by using a surrogate biomarker (S. Marcescens). This microorganism was selected because it is considered the standard surrogate marker to be used in hand hygiene evaluations and because it produces a characteristic red colony that is easily distinguishable from normal microbial populations of the hands making colony counting more accurate. Sampling of bacterial flora will be accomplished utilizing an established "modified glove juice" technique in which the participant's dominant hand is placed into a large sterile bag containing a sampling solution, which removes the surrogate bacteria. Once baseline samples have been collected, all participants will then complete two additional random ordered timed conditions involving the surrogate biomarker and one of the two test gels. For each test condition, five mL of solution will be withdrawn from the collection bag, diluted, plated, and incubated for 36 hours. For the immediate efficacy testing, a glove juice sampling will be obtained after a 1 minute application of the gel. For the persistent efficacy testing, a glove juice sampling will be obtained after a 10 minute application of the gel. To ensure the biomarker has been removed, all subjects will wash hands with a 70% ethanol surgical handwash. The use of an UV-C light will also be implemented for 20 seconds as an additional precaution. Participants in phase I will have an additional glove juice sampling at the end of degerming to validate the protocol. All participants will end the study by completing a 4 question visual analog questionnaire to determine user acceptability of the gels. The percent difference of total bacterial counts from baseline will be used as the outcome variable. An unpaired Student's t-test (or an appropriate non-parametric test) will be used for data analysis for each of the study aims.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Madigan Army Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 26 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years old
  • Ability to read and understand English (for consent purposes)
  • Free of clinically evident dermatitis, open wounds, sores, or breaks in hand skin determined by a Visual Skin Scale (VSS).
  • Free of hand jewelry or artificial nail enhancements
  • Have fingernails that are clean and extend no longer than approximately one (1) mm past the nail bed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anyone directly working in a healthcare, public health, or long term residence setting.
  • Currently receiving any antibiotics, or on any other in as drug, or therapy.
  • Reports cuts, scratches, or skin disorders, or Dermatitis visualized by the PI/AI using the Visual Skin Scale (VSS).
  • Reports any form of current immune disorders such as AIDS, lupus, any cancers (solid or hematopoietic), or other medical conditions such as diabetes, hepatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, or an organ transplant recipient.
  • Known sensitivities or allergies to silver, alcohol, latex, soap, detergent, antibiotics.
  • Any use of artificial nail enhancements or any non-removable rings
  • Primary care provider or resident in a setting where someone has known impaired immunocompetence (currently receiving chemotherapy, positive), requires wound care or intravenous management.
  • Currently pregnant/lactating or taking care of children under the age of 3 or anyone that requires diaper changing.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Silver Nanoparticle Gel

    Silver Nanoparticle Gel (SilvaSorb, AcryMed, Inc., Portland, OR)

    Drug: Silver Nanoparticle Gel

  • Active comparator
    alcohol-based gel

    Alcohol-based hand gel (Purell, GoJo Industries, Akron, OH)

    Drug: alcohol-based hand gel

Interventions

  • DrugSilver Nanoparticle Gel

    SilvaSorb® gel applied topically to the hands with a limited exposure time of 10 minutes

    Also known as: SilvaSorb® gel

  • Drugalcohol-based hand gel

    Purell gel applied topically to the hands with a limited exposure time of 10 minutes

    Also known as: Purell

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Microbial Count at Baseline

    Subjects' hands are contaminated with 1.5 milliliters (mL) aliquot of S. marcescens which is then distributed evenly over both hands. A 30 second massage with bacteria followed by one minute of timed air drying takes place prior to the modified glove juice sampling procedure. Subject's dominant hand is placed into a sterile 1 liter polyethylene bag with 75 mL of sampling solution. Hand is removed after 60 seconds of massage and 5 mL of juice is retrieved, diluted 1:10 within 5 minutes, and plated in duplicate on trypticase soy agar. Samples are transported in bio-transport container to the lab where they are incubated aerobically at 36 degrees Centigrade for 36 hours.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Microbial Count - Persistent Effect

    Microbial count of hands seeded with S. marcescens after ten minutes of exposure and treatment with an antimicrobial gel. Same modified glove juice sampling technique was used and 1.5 milliliters of juice was removed, diluted, and plated for incubation.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  3. Microbial Count - Immediate Effect

    Subjects underwent the modified glove juice technique after seeding of hands with S. marcescens bacteria for 1 minute followed by application of one of the two antimicrobial gels; a 1.5 milliliter sample of the juice was collected after 1 minute. The procedure was repeated for each of the two gels, random order assigned.

    Time frame: 1 minute

Secondary outcomes

  1. User Acceptability

    User Acceptability Questionnaire - Self-assessment. Investigator-developed instrument that included 4 questions regarding the specific hand gel product applied to the participant's hands: 1) I would rate my acceptance of this product as?; 2) I would consider using this product again?; 3) I would rate my confidence in this product as?; and 4) I would recommend using this product to my co-workers?. Scale had anchors of 1 (least acceptable) to 10 (most acceptable). Total score was the sum of scores for each of the 4 questions; range was 4 to 40. there were no subscales. A score of 4 demonstrated least acceptance and score of 40 demonstrated highest acceptance.

    Time frame: 2 hours

07

Results

Posted Jan 23, 2026
Limitations and caveats
Further investigation is warranted to test silver nanoparticle gel as a persistent antibacterial therapeutic.

Participant flow

We assessed 24 subjects for eligibility. 2 did not meet inclusion criteria which left us with 22 subjects who were randomized into two groups; 11 in each group.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNano-silver GelAlcohol-based Gel
Started1111
Completed1111
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryMicrobial Count at Baseline

Subjects' hands are contaminated with 1.5 milliliters (mL) aliquot of S. marcescens which is then distributed evenly over both hands. A 30 second massage with bacteria followed by one minute of timed air drying takes place prior to the modified glove juice sampling procedure. Subject's dominant hand is placed into a sterile 1 liter polyethylene bag with 75 mL of sampling solution. Hand is removed after 60 seconds of massage and 5 mL of juice is retrieved, diluted 1:10 within 5 minutes, and plated in duplicate on trypticase soy agar. Samples are transported in bio-transport container to the lab where they are incubated aerobically at 36 degrees Centigrade for 36 hours.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · CFU/mL
Microbial Count at Baseline
CFU/mLNano-silver GelAlcohol-based Gel
Microbial Count at Baseline105 ± 7.1107 ± 8.1
SecondaryUser Acceptability

User Acceptability Questionnaire - Self-assessment. Investigator-developed instrument that included 4 questions regarding the specific hand gel product applied to the participant's hands: 1) I would rate my acceptance of this product as?; 2) I would consider using this product again?; 3) I would rate my confidence in this product as?; and 4) I would recommend using this product to my co-workers?. Scale had anchors of 1 (least acceptable) to 10 (most acceptable). Total score was the sum of scores for each of the 4 questions; range was 4 to 40. there were no subscales. A score of 4 demonstrated least acceptance and score of 40 demonstrated highest acceptance.

Time frame:
2 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
User Acceptability
score on a scaleNano-silver GelAlcohol-based Gel
User Acceptability27 ± 5.733 ± 5.6
PrimaryMicrobial Count - Persistent Effect

Microbial count of hands seeded with S. marcescens after ten minutes of exposure and treatment with an antimicrobial gel. Same modified glove juice sampling technique was used and 1.5 milliliters of juice was removed, diluted, and plated for incubation.

Time frame:
10 minutes
Reported as:
Mean · CFU/mL
Microbial Count - Persistent Effect
CFU/mLNano-silver GelAlcohol-based Gel
Microbial Count - Persistent Effect65 ± 9.4103 ± 8.7
PrimaryMicrobial Count - Immediate Effect

Subjects underwent the modified glove juice technique after seeding of hands with S. marcescens bacteria for 1 minute followed by application of one of the two antimicrobial gels; a 1.5 milliliter sample of the juice was collected after 1 minute. The procedure was repeated for each of the two gels, random order assigned.

Time frame:
1 minute
Reported as:
Mean · CFU/mL
Microbial Count - Immediate Effect
CFU/mLNano-silver GelAlcohol-based Gel
Microbial Count - Immediate Effect101 ± 6.649 ± 10.2

Adverse events

Collected over 48 hours. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Nano-silver Gel—0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)
Alcohol-based Gel—0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Nano-silver GelAlcohol-based GelTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years111122
>=65 years000
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(particpants)Nano-silver GelAlcohol-based GelTotal
Female000
Male111122
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Nano-silver GelAlcohol-based GelTotal
United States111122
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Madigan Army Medical Center
    Tacoma, Washington 98431, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2008 to primary completion in Aug 2008, 7 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2026, 17 years 5 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 11, 2008
First posted
Apr 16, 2008
StartActual
Jan 2008
Primary completionActual
Aug 2008
CompletionActual
Aug 2008
Results first posted
Jan 23, 2026
Last update
Jan 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00659204
Lead sponsor
Madigan Army Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 16, 2008
Start date
Jan 2008
Primary completion
Aug 2008
Completion
Aug 2008
Results posted
Jan 23, 2026
Last update
Jan 23, 2026

Study contacts

Mary S McCarthy, PhD, MN
principal investigator · Nurse Scientist, Madigan Army Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion