CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00655811Updated Sep 10, 2018Results posted

Ethnic Differences in Response to Topical Capsaicin: A Psychophysical Study on Healthy Subjects

A Phase 4 interventional study of Capsaicin and Placebo moisturizing cream in Healthy, sponsored by Wake Forest University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-10.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research is to study how people respond differently to capsaicin in different racial groups and the effect it has on your pain levels. Capsaicin is a natural product made from hot chili peppers that is useful for treating the itch symptoms of skin disease.

Read the detailed description

To comprehensively evaluate the ethnic differences in response to topical capsaicin and its effect on thermal sensory thresholds.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy

Keywords

  • Healthy volunteers
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University is the lead sponsor of 116 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Of its 31 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 27 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult men and women who are between 18 and 50 years of age.
  • Subjects must be in general good health with no skin disease, disease state or physical condition which would impair evaluation of pain perception or which would increase their health risk by study participation as determined by the investigators.
  • Women of childbearing potential will be required to have a negative pregnancy test in order to enroll in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adults over age 50.
  • Children less than 18 years of age.
  • Unable to complete the required measures.
  • Diagnosis of diseases that would affect the measurement of pain perception.
  • Currently enrolled in any investigational study in which the subject is receiving any type of drug, biologic, or non-drug therapy and subjects undergoing treatment with another investigational drug or approved therapy for investigational use within 30 days prior to study participation.
  • Use of oral analgesic or other medications known to interfere with pain perception in the week prior to the study.
  • Use of emollient on the forearms on the day of the study visit.
  • Use of medicated topical preparations on the forearms for the week prior to the study.
  • Known history of neuropathy causing diseases such as uremia.
  • Known history of uncontrolled thyroid disease.
  • Known history of diabetes mellitus.
  • Allergy to capsaicin.
  • Pregnant women.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Capsaicin

    Capsaicin 0.1% cream application to the volar side of forearm.

    Drug: Capsaicin

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo moisturizing cream

    Placebo moisturizing cream with no active ingredient (Cetaphil; Galderma Laboratories LP, Fort Worth, TX, U.S.A.) to the opposite forearm.

    Drug: Placebo moisturizing cream

Interventions

  • DrugCapsaicin

    Topical application, 0.1%, Capzasin HP; Chattem Inc., Chattanooga, TN, U.S.A

    Also known as: Topical capsaicin, 0.1%, Capzasin HP

  • DrugPlacebo moisturizing cream

    Placebo moisturizing cream with no active ingredient (Cetaphil; Galderma Laboratories LP, Fort Worth, TX, U.S.A.)

    Also known as: Cetaphil

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ethnic Differences in Burning Pain Induced by Topical Capsaicin

    The primary endpoint is to test the burning pain effect of topical capsaicin by using an continuous visual analog scale (CoVAS) intensity scale as an outcome measure. Participants will rate burning pain intensity after topical capsaicin application. The burning or pain sensation intensity was recorded continuously on a 100-mm COVAS (0, no sensation to 100, maximum, strongest imaginable pain sensation). The subjects were also asked to indicate whether they experienced any nonpainful sensation.

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ethnic Differences on the Effects of Topical Capsaicin on Thermal Sensory Thermal Thresholds

    A secondary endpoint is to see if topical capsaicin has an effect on warm and heat pain thresholds. Quantitative thermosensory testing was carried out using the Medoc TSA 2001 (Medoc Ltd). The probe baseline temperature was 32 °C and the contact area was 12 cm2. The probe warmed the skin surface at a linear rate of 0·4 °C per second, up to a cut-off of 50 °C. Thermal thresholds were measured in the following order: warmth sensation threshold was measured followed by heat pain detection threshold; each of them was determined four times by the ascending method of limits.

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. The Difference in Burning/Pain Sensation Ratings Between the Capsaicin or Placebo Application.

    This secondary outcome is to see if subjects rated burning/pain differently between the topical capsaicin or placebo application. Participants will rate burning/pain intensity after topical capsaicin and placebo application. The burning/pain sensation intensity was recorded continuously on a 100-mm COVAS (0, no sensation to 100, maximum, strongest imaginable burning/pain sensation). The subjects were also asked to indicate whether they experienced any non-burning/-painful sensation.

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Results

Posted Aug 14, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCapsaicin and Placebo
Started40
Completed40
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryEthnic Differences in Burning Pain Induced by Topical Capsaicin

The primary endpoint is to test the burning pain effect of topical capsaicin by using an continuous visual analog scale (CoVAS) intensity scale as an outcome measure. Participants will rate burning pain intensity after topical capsaicin application. The burning or pain sensation intensity was recorded continuously on a 100-mm COVAS (0, no sensation to 100, maximum, strongest imaginable pain sensation). The subjects were also asked to indicate whether they experienced any nonpainful sensation.

Time frame:
1 day
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Ethnic Differences in Burning Pain Induced by Topical Capsaicin
units on a scaleAfrican AmericansCaucasiansEast AsiansHispanics
Capsaicin0.81 ± 0.684.07 ± 1.6117.05 ± 5.8013.3 ± 4.67
Placebo0 ± 00 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
Statistical analysis
  • African Americans vs Caucasians vs East Asians vs Hispanics · ANOVA · p = <0.05
  • African Americans vs Caucasians · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.550
  • African Americans vs East Asians · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.005
  • African Americans vs Hispanics · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.027
SecondaryEthnic Differences on the Effects of Topical Capsaicin on Thermal Sensory Thermal Thresholds

A secondary endpoint is to see if topical capsaicin has an effect on warm and heat pain thresholds. Quantitative thermosensory testing was carried out using the Medoc TSA 2001 (Medoc Ltd). The probe baseline temperature was 32 °C and the contact area was 12 cm2. The probe warmed the skin surface at a linear rate of 0·4 °C per second, up to a cut-off of 50 °C. Thermal thresholds were measured in the following order: warmth sensation threshold was measured followed by heat pain detection threshold; each of them was determined four times by the ascending method of limits.

Time frame:
1 day
Reported as:
Mean · Change in degrees Celsius
Ethnic Differences on the Effects of Topical Capsaicin on Thermal Sensory Thermal Thresholds
Change in degrees CelsiusAfrican AmericansCaucasiansEast AsiansHispanics
Heat pain detection threshold change-2.11 ± 1.12-6.10 ± 1.36-5.01 ± 1.09-7.24 ± 0.57
Warmth sensation threshold change2.36 ± 0.93-0.68 ± 0.680.56 ± .059-3.15 ± 0.93
Statistical analysis
  • African Americans vs Caucasians · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.012
  • African Americans vs East Asians · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.06
  • African Americans vs Hispanics · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.002
SecondaryThe Difference in Burning/Pain Sensation Ratings Between the Capsaicin or Placebo Application.

This secondary outcome is to see if subjects rated burning/pain differently between the topical capsaicin or placebo application. Participants will rate burning/pain intensity after topical capsaicin and placebo application. The burning/pain sensation intensity was recorded continuously on a 100-mm COVAS (0, no sensation to 100, maximum, strongest imaginable burning/pain sensation). The subjects were also asked to indicate whether they experienced any non-burning/-painful sensation.

Time frame:
1 day
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
The Difference in Burning/Pain Sensation Ratings Between the Capsaicin or Placebo Application.
units on a scaleCapsaicinPlacebo
The Difference in Burning/Pain Sensation Ratings Between the Capsaicin or Placebo Application.8.81 ± 7.630 ± 0
Statistical analysis
  • Capsaicin vs Placebo · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.06

Adverse events

Collected over 1 day. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Capsaicin—0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)
Placebo—0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Capsaicin and Placebo
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years40
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Capsaicin and Placebo
Female20
Male20
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Capsaicin and Placebo
African Americans10
Caucasians10
East Asians10
Hispanic10
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Capsaicin and Placebo
United States40
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences Dermatology
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00655811
Lead sponsor
Wake Forest University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 10, 2008
Start date
Feb 2008
Primary completion
Aug 2008
Completion
Oct 2009
Results posted
Aug 14, 2017
Last update
Sep 10, 2018

Study contacts

Gil Yosipovitch, MD
principal investigator · Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion