CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00654706Updated May 28, 2014

Efficacy Study Exploring the Effects on Cognition of Sertindole Versus Comparator in Patients With Schizophrenia

A Phase 3 interventional study of Sertindole and Quetiapine in Schizophrenia and Cognition, sponsored by H. Lundbeck A/S. Completed at 26 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-05-28.

Sponsored by H. Lundbeck A/S · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
264
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to explore the neurocognitive efficacy of Sertindole versus comparator in patients with schizophrenia using the MCCB.

Read the detailed description

Sertindole is an atypical antipsychotic approved in the European Union (EU) for use in patients with schizophrenia who are intolerant to at least one other antipsychotic agent. During clinical development sertindole was found to be as effective in the treatment of schizophrenia as the first-generation antipsychotic haloperidol and as the second-generation antipsychotic risperidone.

Sertindole is generally well tolerated and has a benign side-effect profile, including an absence of sedation, no effect on plasma prolactin levels, moderate weight gain, no anticholinergic-mediated cognitive impairment and a low rate of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Sertindole has been shown to prolong the QT interval and is contraindicated in patients with prolonged QT interval and in patients receiving drugs known to significantly prolong the QT interval.

The study is designed to provide data on the neurocognitive properties of sertindole versus quetiapine in patients with schizophrenia. Efficacy for cognitive impairment is assessed in patients who are in a stable phase of their illness, with a predefined maximum level of symptoms that will allow them to be included in the study. Prior antipsychotic medication will be withdrawn (down-tapered) and patients will be randomly assigned to one of the study drugs.

Cognitive deficiencies are an important feature of schizophrenia and correlate strongly with functional impairment. Improving functional outcomes in schizophrenia has a high priority and has resulted in the initiation of a program called Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) leading to the development of a neuropsychological test battery, the MCCB which is used in this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia
  • Cognition

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Schizophrenia
  • Cognition
  • MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,471 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 472 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 264 is above the median of 70 across 2,872 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

H. Lundbeck A/S is the lead sponsor of 218 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Of its 33 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 10 (30%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Primary diagnosis of schizophrenia
  • Man or woman, aged between 18 and 55 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current Axis I primary psychiatric diagnosis other than schizophrenia
  • Not previously received antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia
  • Acute exacerbation requiring hospitalisation within the last 3 months
  • Clinically significant extrapyramidal symptoms
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease, congestive heart failure, cardiac hypertrophy, arrhythmia or bradycardia
  • Congenital long QT syndrome or a family history of this disease, or known acquired QT interval prolongation
  • Significant ECG abnormalities
  • Hypokalaemia or hypomagnesaemia
  • In concurrent treatment with drugs inhibiting the P450 enzymes system CYP3A
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
264 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sertindole

    Drug: Sertindole

  • Active comparator
    Quetiapine

    Drug: Quetiapine

Interventions

  • DrugSertindole

    Once daily oral dose. Day 1-20: 4-16 mg/day (titration period). Day 21-84: 12, 16 or 20 mg/day (flexible treatment period).

  • DrugQuetiapine

    Twice daily oral dose. Day 1-20: 50-500 mg/day (titration period). Day 21-84: 400, 500 or 600 mg/day (flexible treatment period).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neurocognitive effect of treatment based on the overall composite score on the MCCB

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Domain specific scores on MCCB; PANSS total score, PANSS positive symptom subscale score, PANSS negative symptom subscale score, and PANSS general psychopathology subscale score; CGI-S, CDSS and GAF scores; QLS and UPSA total and subscale scores; ECGs

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

26 sites
  • US017
    Garden Grove, California 92845, United States
  • US008
    National City, California 91950, United States
  • US001
    Pasadena, California 91107, United States
  • US006
    Pico Rivera, California 90660, United States
  • US011
    San Diego, California 92126, United States
  • US014
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • US026
    Torrance, California 90502, United States
  • US016
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • US015
    Orange City, Florida 32763, United States
  • US010
    Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • US007
    Atlanta, Georgia 30308, United States
  • US024
    Chicago, Illinois 60640, United States
  • US002
    Joliet, Illinois 60435, United States
  • US012
    Baltimore, Maryland 21204, United States
  • US027
    Glen Burnie, Maryland 21061, United States
  • US019
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
  • US021
    Clementon, New Jersey 08021, United States
  • US013
    Brooklyn, New York 11203, United States
  • US025
    Staten Island, New York 10305, United States
  • US005
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28211, United States
  • US018
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
  • US022
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19139, United States
  • US023
    Austin, Texas 78754, United States
  • US020
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • US004
    Desoto, Texas 75115, United States
  • US028
    Houston, Texas 77008, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nielsen J, Matz J, Mittoux A, Polcwiartek C, Struijk JJ, Toft E, Kanters JK, Graff C. Cardiac effects of sertindole and quetiapine: analysis of ECGs from a randomized double-blind study in patients with schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Mar;25(3):303-11. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.12.005. Epub 2015 Jan 3. PubMed 25583364 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 28, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00654706
Lead sponsor
H. Lundbeck A/S
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 9, 2008
Start date
Mar 2008
Primary completion
Jan 2010
Completion
Mar 2010
Last update
May 28, 2014

Study contacts

Email contact via H. Lundbeck A/S
study director · LundbeckClinicalTrials@lundbeck.com

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion