CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00654368Updated Jul 23, 2014Results posted

CAMEO: Canadian Methotrexate and Etanercept Outcome Study

A Phase 4 interventional study of Etanercept and Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by Amgen. Completed at 28 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-07-23.

Sponsored by Amgen · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
258
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the use of etanercept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with or without methotrexate treatment over a 24 month period

Read the detailed description

This noninferiority study was a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients who did not have an adequate response to methotrexate (MTX) had etanercept (50 mg/week subcutaneously [SC]) added to existing MTX therapy of at least 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses of MTX) at baseline and were followed for 6 months. After 6 months of therapy, participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the 2 treatment arms: either discontinue MTX (tapered over 6 weeks) and continue etanercept alone or continue both etanercept plus MTX for an additional 18 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

  • Amgen
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 258 is above the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Amgen is the lead sponsor of 1,015 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Of its 245 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or older at the baseline visit
  • An American College of Rheumatology(ACR) diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis with onset of symptoms of at least 6 months
  • Active disease of at least 3 swollen joints from the Disease Activity Severity 28 at the baseline visit
  • A Disease Activity Severity 28 score of ≥ 3.2 at the baseline visit
  • Have not previously received etanercept therapy
  • Able to start etanercept therapy per the approved product monograph
  • Able to continue methotrexate therapy per the approved product monograph and have received a dose of at least 15 mg/wk (or 10 mg/wk in the case of documented intolerance to higher doses) for at least 12 weeks and this dose has been stable at least 4 weeks before the baseline visit
  • The patient or legally acceptable representative must provide written informed consent for participation in the study before any study specific procedures are performed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have a positive purified protein derivative (PPD) skin test and who do not have a documented course of anti-tuberculosis therapy. Patients with a positive PPD skin test (equal to or greater than 5 mm), a negative chest x-ray at screening which should be repeated if indicated during of the study, at low risk based on exposure and travel and have initiated a course of anti-tuberculosis therapy of which at least 8 weeks have been completed would be eligible for the study. The full course of anti-tuberculosis therapy must be completed
  • Patients who have previously received infliximab or adalimumab
  • Active infections within 2 weeks of the baseline visit or during the study period
  • Any history of human immunodeficiency (HIV) infection, untreated tuberculosis, multiple sclerosis, congestive heart failure, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, cytopenia, prior or current use of cyclophosphamide or malignancy (other than basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or in situ carcinoma of the cervix) in the past 5 years
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating or of childbearing potential who are not using adequate contraception
  • Receipt of any investigational therapy within 4 weeks of the initiation of study medication or during the study period
  • Presence of any significant and uncontrolled medical condition, which in the investigator's opinion precludes the use of etanercept, as outlined in the product monograph
  • Participants not available for follow-up assessment or unable to comply with study procedures
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
258 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Etanercept + Methotrexate

    After six months of treatment with 50 mg/week subcutaneous etanercept added to existing methotrexate therapy of at least 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses) participants were randomized to continue both etanercept plus methotrexate for an additional 18 months.

    Biological: Etanercept · Drug: Methotrexate

  • Experimental
    Etanercept Only

    After six months of treatment with 50 mg/week subcutaneous etanercept added to existing methotrexate therapy of at least 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses) participants were randomized to discontinue methotrexate (tapered over 6 weeks) and continue etanercept alone for an additional 18 months.

    Biological: Etanercept · Drug: Methotrexate

Interventions

  • BiologicalEtanercept

    Commercially available etanercept administered subcutaneously at 50 mg/week.

    Also known as: Enbrel®

  • DrugMethotrexate

    Commercially available methotrexate administed orally, subcutaneously or intramuscularly 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Month 6 to Month 12 in Disease Activity Sscore 28 (DAS28)

    The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. In this study, the mean change in DAS28 scores from Month 6 to Month 12 was multiplied by a factor of -1, such that a negative change in DAS28 indicates worsening in disease activity.

    Time frame: Month 6 (randomization) and Month 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response

    The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. Remission is defined by a DAS28 score less than 2.6. Low disease activity is defined by a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2. Moderate is defined as a DAS28 higher than 3.2 but lower than or equal to 5.1. DAS28 above 5.1 indicates high disease activity. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

    Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

  2. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)

    The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. In this study, the mean changes in DAS28 scores from Baseline were multiplied by a factor of -1, such that a negative change in DAS28 indicates worsening in disease activity. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

  3. Drug Persistence

    Drug persistence is defined as the percentage of participants receiving etanercept at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.

    Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

  4. Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)

    The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. X-rays of hands and feet were scored in a blinded manner by an independent reader. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 4 (bony ankylosis or complete luxation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the total mTSS score, ranging from 0 (normal) to 448 (maximal disease). An increase in mTSS from Baseline (represented by a positive change from Baseline score) indicates disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease (negative change from Baseline score) represents improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24

  5. Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score

    X-rays of hands and feet were read centrally and in a blinded manner. Sixteen joints on each hand/wrist and 6 joints on each foot were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 to 5 (or for the feet from 0 to 10, with each side of the joint independently scored from 0 to 5) according to the following: One point is scored if erosions are discrete, rising to 2, 3, 4, or 5 depending on the amount of surface area affected (complete collapse of the bone is scored as 5). Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 280 (worst). A large increase in erosion score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of joint erosion. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24

  6. Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing

    X-rays of hands and feet were read centrally and in a blinded manner. Joint space narrowing (JSN) scores were recorded for each hand/wrist (15 joints) and each foot (6 joints) on a 5-point scale scored as follows: 0 = normal; 1 = focal or doubtful; 2 = generalised, less than 50% of the original joint space; 3 = generalised, more than 50% of the original joint space or subluxation; 4 = bony ankylosis or complete luxation. The scores were summed to calculate the total JSN score ranging from 0 to 168 (worst). A large increase in joint narrowing score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of JSN. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24

  7. Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI)

    The HAQ disability index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that addresses health-related quality of life. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants choose from four response categories, ranging from 'without any difficulty' (score=0) to 'unable to do' (score=3). The overall score is the average of each of the 8 category scores and ranges from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change score indicates an improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

    Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

  8. Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The HAQ pain visual analog scale (VAS) is a measure of pain on a continuous 100 point scale. Participants were asked to indicate how much pain they had in the past week as a result of their illness on a horizontal line from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain). End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

    Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

  9. Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)

    The SF-36 assesses the general quality of life (QOL) of participants by evaluating the domains of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The questionnaire consists of 36 questions that are completed by the participant. The SF-36 is split into two major components: physical health and mental health. Under physical health are the following four domains: physical health, bodily pain, physical functioning and physical role limitations. Under the mental health domain there are four domains; mental health, vitality, social functioning, and emotional role limitation. The individual domain scores are aggregated to derive a physical-component summary score and a mental-component summary score which range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning. End of study is month 24 or early termination.

    Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

  10. Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)

    This 6-item assessment measures productivity losses during the past 7 days and includes measures on work time missed due to health, impairment while working due to health (the participant's assessment of the degree to which health affected their productivity while working), overall work impairment due to health (takes into account both hours missed due to health and the participant's assessment of the degree to which health affected their productivity while working) and activity impairment due to health (the degree in which health problems affected their ability to do regular daily activities). Scores for each measure are expressed from 0 to 100 with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. For each measure change from Month 6 is reported; a negative change score indicates improvement. End of study is month 24 or early termination.

    Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

  11. Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)

    The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication is a 14-item self-administered questionnaire which measures patients' experiences with their medication on four dimensions: effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction. Optional responses are: Extremely Dissatisfied (1), Very Dissatisfied (2), Dissatisfied (3), Somewhat Satisfied (4), Satisfied (5), Very Satisfied (6), and Extremely Satisfied (7). For each dimension, responses are added and transformed to a scale from 0 - 100, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. Change from Month 6 is reported for each dimension; a positive change score indicates improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

    Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

  12. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined by regulatory authorities as one that: • is fatal • is life threatening • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • other significant medical hazard.

    Time frame: 25 months

07

Results

Posted Jun 13, 2014

Participant flow

First patient was enrolled 28 June 2008 and last patient was enrolled 07 November 2010.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNon-randomizedEtanercept AloneEtanercept + Methotrexate
Started5398107
Completed05075
Not completed534832
Withdrew: Ineligibility determined600
Withdrew: Protocol deviation321
Withdrew: Non-compliance212
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject522
Withdrew: Disease progression213113
Withdrew: Requirement for alternative therapy111
Withdrew: Physician decision002
Withdrew: Death100
Withdrew: Pregnancy002
Withdrew: Other023
Withdrew: Adverse event1496

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Month 6 to Month 12 in Disease Activity Sscore 28 (DAS28)

The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. In this study, the mean change in DAS28 scores from Month 6 to Month 12 was multiplied by a factor of -1, such that a negative change in DAS28 indicates worsening in disease activity.

Time frame:
Month 6 (randomization) and Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Month 6 to Month 12 in Disease Activity Sscore 28 (DAS28)
scores on a scaleEtanercept AloneEtanercept + Methotrexate
Change From Month 6 to Month 12 in Disease Activity Sscore 28 (DAS28)-0.39 ± 0.110.02 ± 1.26
Statistical analysis
  • Etanercept Alone vs Etanercept + Methotrexate · Mean difference: -0.41 · 95% CI -0.75 to -0.06The 95% CI was calculated using the mean square error from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) fitted with effects for treatment and covariates of duration of disease, type of reimbursement, and 6 month DAS28.
SecondaryDisease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response

The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. Remission is defined by a DAS28 score less than 2.6. Low disease activity is defined by a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2. Moderate is defined as a DAS28 higher than 3.2 but lower than or equal to 5.1. DAS28 above 5.1 indicates high disease activity. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Time frame:
Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response
Percentage of participantsEtanercept AloneEtanercept + Methotrexate
Month 6: Remission30.5 (21.3 to 39.8)25.7 (17.4 to 34.1)
Month 6: Low16.8 (9.3 to 24.4)19.0 (11.5 to 26.6)
Month 6: Moderate41.1 (31.2 to 50.9)41.9 (32.5 to 51.3)
Month 6: High11.6 (5.1 to 18.0)13.3 (6.8 to 19.8)
Month 12: Remission19.4 (11.6 to 27.2)23.4 (15.3 to 31.4)
Month 12: Low10.2 (4.2 to 16.2)19.6 (12.1 to 27.2)
Month 12: Moderate49.0 (39.1 to 58.9)44.9 (35.4 to 54.3)
Month 12: High21.4 (13.3 to 29.6)12.1 (6.0 to 18.3)
Month 18: Remission21.4 (13.3 to 29.6)32.7 (23.8 to 41.6)
Month 18: Low12.2 (5.8 to 18.7)19.6 (12.1 to 27.2)
Month 18: Moderate41.8 (32.1 to 51.6)34.6 (25.6 to 43.6)
Month 18: High24.5 (16.0 to 33.0)13.1 (6.7 to 19.5)
End of Study: Remission21.4 (13.3 to 29.6)29.9 (21.2 to 38.6)
End of Study: Low8.2 (2.7 to 13.6)14.0 (7.4 to 20.6)
End of Study: Moderate45.9 (36.1 to 55.8)39.3 (30.0 to 48.5)
End of Study: High24.5 (16.0 to 33.0)16.8 (9.7 to 23.9)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)

The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. In this study, the mean changes in DAS28 scores from Baseline were multiplied by a factor of -1, such that a negative change in DAS28 indicates worsening in disease activity. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Time frame:
Baseline and Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)
scores on a scaleEtanercept AloneEtanercept + Methotrexate
Change from Baseline to Month 61.97 ± 1.231.97 ± 1.51
Change from Baseline to Month 121.43 ± 1.271.91 ± 1.61
Change from Baseline to Month 181.35 ± 1.302.01 ± 1.59
Change from Baseline to End of Study1.37 ± 1.321.86 ± 1.71
SecondaryDrug Persistence

Drug persistence is defined as the percentage of participants receiving etanercept at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.

Time frame:
Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Drug Persistence
percentage of participantsEtanercept AloneEtanercept + Methotrexate
Month 6100100
Month 1293.287.6
Month 1881.978.8
Month 2451.469.5
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)

The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. X-rays of hands and feet were scored in a blinded manner by an independent reader. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 4 (bony ankylosis or complete luxation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the total mTSS score, ranging from 0 (normal) to 448 (maximal disease). An increase in mTSS from Baseline (represented by a positive change from Baseline score) indicates disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease (negative change from Baseline score) represents improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)
scores on a scaleEtanercept AloneEtanercept + Methotrexate
Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=89, 102)0.3 ± 1.90.1 ± 1.2
Change from Baseline to End of Study (n=94, 104)0.4 ± 1.90.0 ± 1.4
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score

X-rays of hands and feet were read centrally and in a blinded manner. Sixteen joints on each hand/wrist and 6 joints on each foot were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 to 5 (or for the feet from 0 to 10, with each side of the joint independently scored from 0 to 5) according to the following: One point is scored if erosions are discrete, rising to 2, 3, 4, or 5 depending on the amount of surface area affected (complete collapse of the bone is scored as 5). Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 280 (worst). A large increase in erosion score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of joint erosion. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score
scores on a scaleEtanercept AloneEtanercept + Methotrexate
Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=89, 102)0.0 ± 0.60.0 ± 0.6
Change from Baseline to End of Study (n=94, 104)0.1 ± 0.60.0 ± 0.7
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing

X-rays of hands and feet were read centrally and in a blinded manner. Joint space narrowing (JSN) scores were recorded for each hand/wrist (15 joints) and each foot (6 joints) on a 5-point scale scored as follows: 0 = normal; 1 = focal or doubtful; 2 = generalised, less than 50% of the original joint space; 3 = generalised, more than 50% of the original joint space or subluxation; 4 = bony ankylosis or complete luxation. The scores were summed to calculate the total JSN score ranging from 0 to 168 (worst). A large increase in joint narrowing score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of JSN. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing
scores on a scaleEtanercept AloneEtanercept + Methotrexate
Change from Baseline to Month 12 (n=89, 102)0.2 ± 1.50.1 ± 0.9
Change from Baseline to End of Study (n=94, 104)0.3 ± 1.5-0.0 ± 1.0
SecondaryChange From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI)

The HAQ disability index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that addresses health-related quality of life. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants choose from four response categories, ranging from 'without any difficulty' (score=0) to 'unable to do' (score=3). The overall score is the average of each of the 8 category scores and ranges from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change score indicates an improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Time frame:
Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI)
scores on a scaleEtanercept AloneEtanercept + Methotrexate
Change from Month 6 to Month 120.148 ± 0.3540.026 ± 0.430
Change from Month 6 to Month 180.179 ± 0.452-0.004 ± 0.485
Change from Month 6 to End of Study0.198 ± 0.4480.016 ± 0.539
SecondaryChange From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The HAQ pain visual analog scale (VAS) is a measure of pain on a continuous 100 point scale. Participants were asked to indicate how much pain they had in the past week as a result of their illness on a horizontal line from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain). End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Time frame:
Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
scores on a scaleEtanercept AloneEtanercept + Methotrexate
Change from month 6 to month 127.3 ± 21.32.4 ± 23.8
Change from month 6 to month 188.0 ± 25.61.8 ± 24.4
Change from month 6 to end of study8.7 ± 26.15.1 ± 27.3
SecondaryChange From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)

The SF-36 assesses the general quality of life (QOL) of participants by evaluating the domains of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The questionnaire consists of 36 questions that are completed by the participant. The SF-36 is split into two major components: physical health and mental health. Under physical health are the following four domains: physical health, bodily pain, physical functioning and physical role limitations. Under the mental health domain there are four domains; mental health, vitality, social functioning, and emotional role limitation. The individual domain scores are aggregated to derive a physical-component summary score and a mental-component summary score which range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning. End of study is month 24 or early termination.

Time frame:
Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
scores on a scaleEtanercept AloneEtanercept + Methotrexate
Physical Component: Change at Month 12-1.74 ± 8.87-0.30 ± 7.40
Physical Component: Change at Month 18-3.28 ± 9.40-0.10 ± 8.61
Physical Component: Change at End of Study-3.08 ± 8.95-0.75 ± 9.42
Mental Health Component: Change at 12 Months-1.16 ± 10.29-1.27 ± 9.40
Mental Health Component: Change at 18 Months-0.30 ± 9.40-0.92 ± 10.34
Mental Health Component: Change at End of Study-1.30 ± 10.470.08 ± 10.70
SecondaryChange From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)

This 6-item assessment measures productivity losses during the past 7 days and includes measures on work time missed due to health, impairment while working due to health (the participant's assessment of the degree to which health affected their productivity while working), overall work impairment due to health (takes into account both hours missed due to health and the participant's assessment of the degree to which health affected their productivity while working) and activity impairment due to health (the degree in which health problems affected their ability to do regular daily activities). Scores for each measure are expressed from 0 to 100 with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. For each measure change from Month 6 is reported; a negative change score indicates improvement. End of study is month 24 or early termination.

Time frame:
Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)
scores on a scaleEtanercept AloneEtanercept + Methotrexate
Work Time Missed: Month 12 (n=45, 44)-4.2 ± 19.3-0.3 ± 15.0
Work Time Missed: Month 18 (n=42, 43)-5.5 ± 20.20.9 ± 17.5
Work Time Missed: End of Study (n=42, 44)-3.8 ± 23.3-0.1 ± 15.6
Work Impairment: Month 12 (n=43, 46)5.8 ± 15.0-1.3 ± 19.6
Work Impairment: Month 18 (n=40, 45)7.3 ± 24.2-1.3 ± 21.8
Work Impairment: End of Study (n=40, 46)10.5 ± 22.2-1.7 ± 24.1
Overall Work Impairment: Month 12 (n=43, 44)3.4 ± 16.8-0.7 ± 20.1
Overall Work Impairment: Month 18 (n=40, 43)4.3 ± 26.0-2.7 ± 24.2
Overall Work Impairment: End of Study (n=40, 44)8.2 ± 26.4-1.7 ± 25.0
Activity Impairment: Month 12 (n=98, 107)6.7 ± 21.24.3 ± 22.7
Activity Impairment: Month 18 (n=98, 107)7.4 ± 25.80.7 ± 25.3
Activity Impairment: End of Study (n=98, 107)9.1 ± 27.01.8 ± 27.4
SecondaryChange From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)

The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication is a 14-item self-administered questionnaire which measures patients' experiences with their medication on four dimensions: effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction. Optional responses are: Extremely Dissatisfied (1), Very Dissatisfied (2), Dissatisfied (3), Somewhat Satisfied (4), Satisfied (5), Very Satisfied (6), and Extremely Satisfied (7). For each dimension, responses are added and transformed to a scale from 0 - 100, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. Change from Month 6 is reported for each dimension; a positive change score indicates improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

Time frame:
Month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)
scores on a scaleEtanercept AloneEtanercept + Methotrexate
Effectiveness: Month 12 (n=98, 107)-5.0 ± 27.3-1.2 ± 30.0
Effectiveness: Month 18 (n=98, 107)-7.4 ± 25.2-1.1 ± 29.4
Effectiveness: End of Study (n=98, 107)-5.0 ± 25.6-1.5 ± 29.7
Side Effects: Month 12 (n= 97, 106)2.5 ± 21.40.6 ± 19.0
Side Effects: Month 18 (n=97, 106)-0.5 ± 24.80.9 ± 17.9
Side Effects: End of Study (n=97, 106)0.6 ± 24.71.2 ± 19.4
Convenience: Month 12 (n=97, 107)0.6 ± 16.50.9 ± 14.3
Convenience: Month 18 (n=97, 107)0.9 ± 15.6-0.8 ± 15.1
Convenience: End of Study (n=97, 107)2.0 ± 15.0-0.6 ± 15.3
Global Satisfaction: Month 12 (n=97, 107)-1.3 ± 19.41.2 ± 17.3
Global Satisfaction: Month 18 (n=97, 107)-6.3 ± 24.0-1.5 ± 20.0
Global Satisfaction: End of Study (n=97, 107)-5.4 ± 23.7-1.3 ± 20.9
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined by regulatory authorities as one that: • is fatal • is life threatening • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • other significant medical hazard.

Time frame:
25 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
participantsEtanercept AloneEtanercept + Methotrexate
Any adverse event8692
Serious adverse event1117
AEs leading to withdrawal from study drug96

Adverse events

Collected over 25 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Non-randomized—7/53 (13.2%)18/53 (34%)
Etanercept Alone—11/98 (11.2%)56/98 (57.1%)
Etanercept + Methotrexate—17/107 (15.9%)73/107 (68.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 45
Most frequent serious events
EventNon-randomizedEtanercept AloneEtanercept + Methotrexate
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/533/982/107
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders1/531/980/107
Cardiac failure chronicCardiac disorders1/530/980/107
Prinzmetal anginaCardiac disorders1/530/980/107
SepsisInfections and infestations1/530/980/107
Lung cancer metastaticNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/530/980/107
Lung squamous cell carcinoma stage unspecifiedNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/530/980/107
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders1/531/980/107
Demyelinating polyneuropathyNervous system disorders1/530/980/107
AlveolitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/530/980/107
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent other events
EventNon-randomizedEtanercept AloneEtanercept + Methotrexate
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations2/5313/9819/107
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations1/5310/9812/107
SinusitisInfections and infestations1/538/9811/107
HeadacheNervous system disorders5/539/989/107
Rheumatoid arthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/535/9810/107
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/531/989/107
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/534/989/107
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations4/533/988/107
InfluenzaInfections and infestations0/537/985/107
Injection site reactionGeneral disorders2/536/987/107

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Non-randomizedEtanercept AloneEtanercept + MethotrexateTotal
Mean56.2 ± 13.454.3 ± 11.954.4 ± 12.754.7 ± 12.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Non-randomizedEtanercept AloneEtanercept + MethotrexateTotal
Female417284197
Male12262361
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Non-randomizedEtanercept AloneEtanercept + MethotrexateTotal
White or Caucasian4796103246
Black or African American2103
Hispanic or Latino0011
Asian2002
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander0033
Aborigine1001
Other1102
Duration of rheumatoid arthritis
Duration of rheumatoid arthritis(participants)Non-randomizedEtanercept AloneEtanercept + MethotrexateTotal
< 2 years11232357
>= 2 years427584201
Reimbursement type
Reimbursement type(participants)Non-randomizedEtanercept AloneEtanercept + MethotrexateTotal
Private234855126
Public16333786
Combination/Other14171546
Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR)
Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR)(participants)Non-randomizedEtanercept AloneEtanercept + MethotrexateTotal
<= 5.1204341104
> 5.1335566154
08

Study locations

28 sites
  • Research Site
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 3Y1, Canada
  • Research Site
    Victoria, British Columbia V8P 5P6, Canada
  • Research Site
    Victoria, British Columbia V8V 3P9, Canada
  • Research Site
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3A 1M3, Canada
  • Research Site
    Quispamsis, New Brunswick E2E 4J8, Canada
  • Research Site
    St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador A1A 5E8, Canada
  • Research Site
    St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador A1C 5B8, Canada
  • Research Site
    Sydney, Nova Scotia B1S 3N1, Canada
  • Research Site
    Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 1P6, Canada
  • Research Site
    Brampton, Ontario L6T 3J1, Canada
  • Research Site
    Burlington, Ontario L7R 4B7, Canada
  • Research Site
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 1Y2, Canada
  • Research Site
    London, Ontario N6A 4V2, Canada
  • Research Site
    Mississauga, Ontario L5M 2V8, Canada
  • Research Site
    Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3R7, Canada
  • Research Site
    Ottawa, Ontario K1S 1C2, Canada
  • Research Site
    St Catharines, Ontario L2N 7E4, Canada
  • Research Site
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada
  • Research Site
    Toronto, Ontario M9B 6H8, Canada
  • Research Site
    Laval, Quebec H7T 2P5, Canada
  • Research Site
    Montreal, Quebec H2L 1S6, Canada
  • Research Site
    Montreal, Quebec H3T 1E2, Canada
  • Research Site
    Montreal, Quebec H3Z 2Z3, Canada
  • Research Site
    Rimouski, Quebec G5L 8W1, Canada
  • Research Site
    Saint Leonard, Quebec H1R 1X8, Canada
  • Research Site
    Saint-Eustache, Quebec J7P 4J2, Canada
  • Research Site
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 0H6, Canada
  • Research Site
    Quebec, G1V 3M7, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Pope JE, Haraoui B, Thorne JC, Vieira A, Poulin-Costello M, Keystone EC. The Canadian methotrexate and etanercept outcome study: a randomised trial of discontinuing versus continuing methotrexate after 6 months of etanercept and methotrexate therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Dec;73(12):2144-51. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203684. Epub 2013 Aug 26. PubMed 23979914 ↗
  • Keystone EC, Pope JE, Thorne JC, Poulin-Costello M, Phan-Chronis K, Vieira A, Haraoui B; CAMEO Investigators. Two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes from the Canadian Methotrexate and Etanercept Outcome study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Feb;55(2):327-34. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev338. Epub 2015 Sep 11. PubMed 26361879 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00654368
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Collaborators
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 8, 2008
Start date
Jun 2008
Primary completion
Dec 2012
Completion
Feb 2013
Results posted
Jun 13, 2014
Last update
Jul 23, 2014

Study contacts

MD
study director · Amgen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion